Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,469
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I've already posted it.

As I've already stated, the Lord's day encompasses or includes the rapture. Else why would they be so bent out of shape when someone said that the Lord's day had already begun?

Whatever aspect of what Paul wrote to them of the rapture, they thought that they'd somehow missed what Paul had assured them would involve them.

The particular scripture that speaks of a pre-Trib rapture is "He who restrains shall be taken out of the way and then the lawless one shall be revealed."

It's said twice because repeating it was warranted so it'd sink in deep.
The idea that the last trumpet will be blown at the non Biblically supported post-Trib rapture is erroneous. The last trump phrase is not used in the Revelation text that uses the phrase 7th trumpet. The post-Trib uses private interpretative guessing to assume that the last trump and the 7th trumpet is the same event.
But John doesn't refer to the last trump nor does Paul refer to the 7th Trumpet. Nor does either mention the distinctive events that happen in either case. They both keep it topical and not exhaustive.
But where does it say that the pre-Trib rapture will be in secret? Nowhere.
Well, I anticipated that one.

You use strawmen then knock it down.
The battle that Michael is involved in is Revelation 12. The actual Second Coming is Revelation 19. The two don't give any connection that they are connected to each other.
Whatever I said that this is a response to.. I don't see any connection when it's read like this alone.

The restraint is not the holy spirit, the holy spirit is not taken away even in the event of a pretrib rapture, because there will be the 2 witnesses, and the 144,000, and anyone saved after any supposed rapture.

So it's a bad interpretation of the one who restrains.
The traditional one is Michael, because Michael is the Archangel who is charged with protecting Israel (Daniel 12:1)
But I have also thought it could be Satan who restrains himself, because Satan has the most to lose. The only time he will decide to go for doing the most harm he can is when he gets tossed out of heaven permanently, because at that point, he knows his time is short anyway. But for as long as he thinks he can defer judgement on himself he would restrain himself. That is pure speculation though, it just makes sense that Satan wouldn't want to accelerate towards his own eternal destruction.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Romans 4 and Hebrews 11 show that salvation has always been through grace by faith. There is no separate dispensation.
The law used animal sacrifices. Grace uses Jesus crucifixion. Dispensational differences.
These are writings of Paul and show that it has been consistent. The law was not given for anyone to be saved, the law was given to show that we need to be saved because we're incapable of following it.
You are only using portions of what Paul taught to make it seem like that was all that he taught on the subject.

However, the law required animal sacrifices to cleanse and make the comers thereunto perfect. So not all Jews saw it the way Paul did. He saw it as they all did before he accepted Jesus as Savior.

The temple was still standing. The animal sacrifices were still being done. And they're going to resume the animal sacrifices at the start of the Tribulation until the end of the first 3.5 years of it.

Now, if all Israel believed what you say the law was only for.. then wouldn't the Jews be more like Paul in their theology?

Your argument fails.
The great tribulation is not fire falling from the sky, or 60 pound hailstones, or or demon locusts from hell stinging for 5 months or the seas turning to blood. or asteroid strikes.
That's not the great tribulation.
The great tribulation is the mark of the beast (implemented by wicked people in the world), and martyrdom (caused by wicked people in the world).
I didn't ever mention the Great Tribulation because the pre-Trib rapture doctrine that Paul taught of the wrath, states that the church is not destined to go through it.
Where is any scriptural evidence that God will snatch you away before that?
It's amazing to me how you and all like you that I can only assume read through my posts of similar repeated answers to the similar repeated questions and not see any of it.

You must of read what another said to me concerning the post-Trib rapture, and saw that their efforts failed to do whatever they thought it would do.

Yet you also ask similar questions. Do you think that maybe I'll give different answers?

I'm not interested in perpetuating this activity.

Have your dejavu sessions with someone else on this thread.

That includes any other post-Tribbers or anyone with different questions or comments that have posted already somewhere in earlier post-slots. I won't be replying to them at all.
 
Upvote 0

JulieB67

Well-Known Member
Apr 21, 2020
1,585
731
56
Ohio US
✟150,017.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I've already stated, the Lord's day encompasses or includes the rapture. Else why would they be so bent out of shape when someone said that the Lord's day had already begun?

They were confused and thought Christ could come back at any time. Paul writes them a second letter to nail down the timing.

Whatever aspect of what Paul wrote to them of the rapture, they thought that they'd somehow missed what Paul had assured them would involve them.

Again, Paul writes them this second letter and tells them specifically "do not be deceived by any means", that day shall not happen...If they were going to be raptured, Paul would not be so earnest in this warning. The subject hasn't changed and is still "our gathering back to Christ". If there were a pretrib rapture possible, than Paul wouldn't have given out the warning to not be deceived.

Your earlier translation of "the falling away" as "departure is a false hope. Departure from one's faith is more like it. It's apostasy pure and simple. That's the correct translation. And those waiting on Christ to come first are setting themselves up. That's why he says he comes at an hour most are not expecting.

Do you not believe Christ when he also gives out the warning to not be deceived and when someone says here is Christ or there is Christ? He's warning us as is Paul. It's very serious. Paul says we must have the complete armour on to fight the "fiery darts of Satan in that "evil day". Paul certainly isn't teaching that some are whisked away, he's teaching the opposite. Paul says above all else, we must "stand". And Christ says those that endure to the end, the same shall be saved.


The idea that the last trumpet will be blown at the non Biblically supported post-Trib rapture is erroneous. The last
trump phrase is not used in the Revelation text that uses the phrase 7th trumpet. The post-Trib uses private interpretative guessing to assume that the last trump and the 7th trumpet is the same event.

No, we read the entire bible chapter by chapter and verse by verse, rightly dividing the word of God as to not lose context. If you think Paul is teaching about the end times and these aren't the same trumpets as seen in Revelation, than you're beliefs are truly all over the place. Christ teaches in the gospels in such a simplicity that the other authors are only witnesses to his teachings. The last trump when taken back to the Greek is the farthest out. There are no more after that. And we see in Revelation the 7th is indeed the last. And why wouldn't it be knowing God's preference for the number. Of course it's the 7th, the last and indeed the trump of God.

You talk about non biblical support but I have yet to see you post one verse that even suggests that Christ returns before the 7th trump.

But where does it say that the pre-Trib rapture will be in secret?
Nowhere, just going by the traditional belief that many think Christ will come back and masses of Christians will just disappear.

The battle that Michael is involved in is Revelation 12. The actual Second Coming is Revelation 19. The two don't give any connection that they are connected to each other.

Satan and his getting kicked out jumpstarts the tribulation.

Whatever I said that this is a response to.. I don't see any connection when it's read like this alone.

You stated,

You smoothed your way over that text without even noticing what it said.

The Holy Spirit will speak through the believers because He dwells inside us. That means that the Holy Spirit DOES have the restraining power

Meaning you seem to be one of the ones that think the Holy Spirit is the restraining power and will be removed. I might be mistaken if that's not your belief. But I was pointing out that's impossible for the Holy Spirit to be removed seeing how Christ said some will be delivered up at that time and people are not to premeditate what they will say because it will be the Holy Spirit speaking through them.

Mark 13:9 "But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for My sake, for a testimony against them."

Mark 13:10 "And the gospel must first be published among all nations."


Mark 13:11 "But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Spirit.

This is the very same testimony that is written in Revelation 12,

Revelation 12:17 "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."

And another witness is as early as Revelation 2,


Revelation 2:10 "Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.."

As I've said many times in other threads, I used to believe in a pretrib rapture as well. But it's not biblical. The entire bible, old and new focus on the Lord's Day. And that will start when Christ returns at the 7th.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,469
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
The law used animal sacrifices. Grace uses Jesus crucifixion. Dispensational differences.
You are only using portions of what Paul taught to make it seem like that was all that he taught on the subject.

However, the law required animal sacrifices to cleanse and make the comers thereunto perfect. So not all Jews saw it the way Paul did. He saw it as they all did before he accepted Jesus as Savior.

The temple was still standing. The animal sacrifices were still being done. And they're going to resume the animal sacrifices at the start of the Tribulation until the end of the first 3.5 years of it.

Now, if all Israel believed what you say the law was only for.. then wouldn't the Jews be more like Paul in their theology?

Your argument fails.

You're in error, the animal sacrifices NEVER atoned for sin. They were symbolic, they were gestures of obedience, but they did not forgive sin. They never did.
Hebrews 10:1-4
It's like baptism and communion, we're commanded to do them but they do not forgive sin.
There are no different dispensations, the church is not granted special exemptions to never suffer at the hands of wicked people, we are no different from the "tribulation saints" and some of us may be tribulation saints if we live into those times.
there is no pretrib rapture.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: keras
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟797,954.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Whatever Jesus says is eternal because what He speaks comes directly from the Father who tells Him what to say.

So there can be no terminus to the things Jesus says??
Everything He says never gets FULL-filled because it is forever, eternally put off to a never ending future??
Interesting, though demonstrably un-biblical, theory.

Jesus has obviously not returned yet and it's been roughly 2000 years since Jesus ascended up into heaven after His resurrection from the dead.

Jesus has obviously returned multiple times since the Ascension.
Christ undeniably "Came" to Saul/Paul on the road to Damascus (Acts 22:6-11), and also obviously "Came" to Stephen at His stoning (Acts 7:54-60), both events happening after, and in obvious fulfillment of Acts 1:11. Christ also Obviously Came in Judgment at the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem, and was the stone that crushed those wicked men to powder, as Matthew 21:33-45 infallibly teaches.

I also affirm Christ "Comes" to earth every day, and is Bodily present with us in the Eucharist, and we, the Church, are Christ's actual physical Body manifest here on earth.

And of course, scripture obviously teaches that Christ "comes" wherever two or three are gathered in His name and He personally resides in their midst. (Matthew 18:20)

Those are some examples of the multiple, personal, Bodily comings of Christ that have happened and continue to happen since the ascension.

So what of the "at any moment"? You probably don't know else you wouldn't have put forth your response.

The fact is, the same event can not be "imminent" at different points in History separated by thousands of years... such a belief renders the immanency scriptures totally meaningless.
Plus, we have the infallible testimony that THAT day was FIXED in time since the foundation of the world... It's not a moving target based on the whim of God or the Actions (or Inactions) of Men. (Acts 17:31)
Neither Human Beings or Even God can change, hasten or delay it.


The apostle Peter said that one day is as a thousand years (that's one prophetic day), and a thousand years is as a day (that's two prophetic days).

Peter was quoting the Psalmist, who also said 1000 earth years = 3-6 Hours to God (a watch in the night -Psalm 90:4) Which infallibly teaches that 4000-8000 years = 1 Prophetic Day to God.
Peter aslo Said a day to God = 1000 earth years, AND 1 earth day = 1000 years to God.
Both are true, because the reality is that God is timeless.
God does not have Shortly, Near, At hand, about to take place... these are Human time statements, given to be understood by How time relates to Men, not how time relates to God.

Contrary to your assertions, God is quite capable of telling time correctly and correctly communicating it's passing to human beings in Human terms.

God can tell us when things are far away
Daniel 8:26 The vision of the evenings and the mornings that has been spoken is true. Now you must seal up the vision, for it concerns the distant future.”

God can tell us when they are near.

Revelation 22:10 Then he told me, “Do not seal up the words of prophecy in this book, because the time is near.

If things are not actually, TRUTHFULLY near, God can, does and will TRUTHFULLY tell us they are for a distant future, like He did in Daniel.

God CAN be Trusted to tell time Correctly.


Did I say that? No. But I will say that the belief in a lie is entirely by anyone's choice, God 'sending a lie' is to be understood as God's permissive will. Because God actually sending a lie would violate all scriptures known of that state that God is trustworthy to always speak truth.
Therefore God doesn't literally send lies nor tell lies. The Bible states that Jesus said that satan is the liar and the father of lies.

Which renders your interpretation impossible. Thanks for proving my point.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,674
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,157.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
God can tell us when they are near.
Revelation 22:10 Then he told me, “Do not seal up the words of prophecy in this book, because the time is near.

If things are not actually, TRUTHFULLY near, God can, does and will TRUTHFULLY tell us they are for a distant future, like He did in Daniel.

God CAN be Trusted to tell time Correctly.
Revelation 22:11 Meanwhile; let the evildoers persist in doing evil and the low minded continue in their filth, but let the good persevere in their goodness and the holy in their holiness.
How it is now and has been for a long time for mankind, but not for God.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: parousia70
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
However, the apostle Paul did not teach that to the Church Body of Christ. What he taught us is that we will not experience any wrath as those on the earth will. "God has not destined us for wrath."

Rev 15 and 16 are clear that those who experience wrath are killed. Rev 19 makes that point at well.

We will depart in the pre-Trib rapture.

It is pre-Trib because the cyrus type can only "be revealed after He who restrains lawlessness is taken out of the way." In Revelation he is first mentioned to arrive or is revealed to the world in the first verse of Chapter 6.

The point of this thread is to show that none of the scenarios you are mentioning matter to the one who is at the very basic first step Christianity 101 or any level beyond that in their understanding of the Bible.

Where is the "beef"?? in the models that you select from?? They all do not matter once we get to "I have accepted Christ as my Savior"
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Revelation 22:11 Meanwhile; let the evildoers persist in doing evil and the low minded continue in their filth, but let the good persevere in their goodness and the holy in their holiness.
How it is now and has been for a long time for mankind, but not for God.

Ahh - the difference between someone who accepts Christ and one who does not again. That message never changes. We can get that one just by reading the Gospel and accept the Gospel. Check. Got it.

So then why all the fuss about the scenario you select since you admit it makes no difference.. those who go through it do not control it and are not lost if they failed to guess it.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,469
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Rev 15 and 16 are clear that those who experience wrath are killed. Rev 19 makes that point at well.



The point of this thread is to show that none of the scenarios you are mentioning matter to the one who is at the very basic first step Christianity 101 or any level beyond that in their understanding of the Bible.

Where is the "beef"?? in the models that you select from?? They all do not matter once we get to "I have accepted Christ as my Savior"

Really the only thing that matters and the only concern is losing faith if it doesn't happen as they expect.
You do understand my concern with this right?

16 These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended.

That's really all prophecy boils down to, is knowing so that we can keep faith in a trying time.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Really the only thing that matters and the only concern is losing faith if it doesn't happen as they expect.
You do understand my concern with this right?

I don't agree with pre-trib rapture - but let's agree that there had to be tons and tons of pre-trib rapture folks that got into a lot of tribulation in the 1900's and are seeing some of it now. What they tell themselves (no matter how many tens of millions of Christians are slain during the 1260 years of the dark ages) is "this is not the big one", no matter that they die in what they call "not the big one".

Have you ever heard of a true Christian saying "I accepted Christ as my savior 5 years ago but now it looks like Christians do suffer persecution from what I read in the news... so I am now an atheist"??

"Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution." 2 Tim 3:12

Is not knowing about 2 Tim 3:12 really the problem we face in Christianity-- it looks to me like "we adjust to changing circumstances" all the time. so that whatever we suffer today is "not the big one" of tomorrow.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,674
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,157.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
So then why all the fuss about the scenario you select since you admit it makes no difference.. those who go through it do not control it and are not lost if they failed to guess it.
Guessing is not required. God HAS given us all the information needed to know what He plans for our future.
He has done it so as His people can be prepared for what must come.

He has not promised that everyone who is a faithful Christian will survive His terrible Day of wrath and the persecution of the Anti-Christ. Revelation 13:9-10, Revelation 12:17, Daniel 11:35
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So there can be no terminus to the things Jesus says??
Everything He says never gets FULL-filled because it is forever, eternally put off to a never ending future??
Interesting, though demonstrably un-biblical, theory.
You are assuming that because it's forever, that it doesn't get fulfilled. That is your own unbiblical interpretation.

Nothing is eternally put off. God's word does not return void but accomplish all God's purpose where unto it is sent.
Jesus said that all things of God's word will be fulfilled in the due time that God appointed for it. Not a jot nor tittle will pass away unfulfilled.
Jesus has obviously returned multiple times since the Ascension.
Christ undeniably "Came" to Saul/Paul on the road to Damascus (Acts 22:6-11), and also obviously "Came" to Stephen at His stoning (Acts 7:54-60), both events happening after, and in obvious fulfillment of Acts 1:11.
Read every testimonial account that Paul gave..

In Acts 9 Paul heard a voice. He didn't know who it was. Jesus had to tell him. "I'm Jesus whom you persecute."
In Acts 22:3-21 [same thing] Paul heard a voice. He asked "Who are you?" The answer "I'm Jesus of Nazareth whom you persecute."
In Acts 26:1-18 [same thing] Virtually identical to the Acts 9 account.

How can it be that Jesus is there when only His voice is heard? No one present saw Him. Because he was not literally there.
Christ also Obviously Came in Judgment at the 70AD destruction of Jerusalem, and was the stone that crushed those wicked men to powder, as Matthew 21:33-45 infallibly teaches.
It's a parable that Jesus told the people. He was comparing His being there at that moment to the heir of the parable and identifying the one's who would kill him by crucifixion to be the Pharisees.

Jesus did not personally physically arrive from heaven in a Second Coming capacity at the 70 AD destruction of Jerusalem. Because those who destroyed Jerusalem walked away with whatever they wanted to.

If Jesus had personally been there, then the Second Coming at the end of the Tribulation would be forfeit. Because He can only Come back once. And then immediately the Millennium will commence.
I also affirm Christ "Comes" to earth every day, and is Bodily present with us in the Eucharist, and we, the Church, are Christ's actual physical Body manifest here on earth.
When we are His Body on the earth then how can He be bodily present in the Communion Bread?

It's only the Holy Spirit who can be everywhere all the time. Not Jesus.
And of course, scripture obviously teaches that Christ "comes" wherever two or three are gathered in His name and He personally resides in their midst. (Matthew 18:20)
You are taking the text too literally. Jesus personally resides in each believer via the Holy Spirit. That is how Jesus is in the midst. No one can literally see Jesus physically there with those who gather together in His name.
Those are some examples of the multiple, personal, Bodily comings of Christ that have happened and continue to happen since the ascension.
Based on what you've already said I'd call what you claim to be more exaggerations.
The fact is, the same event can not be "imminent" at different points in History separated by thousands of years... such a belief renders the immanency scriptures totally meaningless.
You have just debunked and proved wrong your own claims above. Jesus coming at the times that you claim (at the first century, as well as our twenty first century) would be a series of imminencies. That would contradict the only valid imminency.. The only possible Coming for Jesus to Biblically return.
Plus, we have the infallible testimony that THAT day was FIXED in time since the foundation of the world... It's not a moving target based on the whim of God or the Actions (or Inactions) of Men. (Acts 17:31)
Neither Human Beings or Even God can change, hasten or delay it.
Yes, so I suggest that you think while your writing what you do. Because you're continuing to debunk your unbiblical claims above.
Peter was quoting the Psalmist, who also said 1000 earth years = 3-6 Hours to God (a watch in the night -Psalm 90:4)
The verse clearly says "A thousand years in Your sight, is like a day that has gone by like a watch in the night."

Peter didn't say that a thousand years is like a watch in the night. He was making comparison of human ability to experience time versus God's greater ability to experience a greater amount of time. So be it a thousand years (as God views it) or be it a day or a watch in the night (as man views it).. both (to God, and to man) are gone that quickly.

Any of us can be spending 2 or 3 hours on the CF but not realize it. To us the hours go quickly. So it is for God concerning a thousand years gone by.
Which infallibly teaches that 4000-8000 years = 1 Prophetic Day to God.
There are only seven thousand years of Bible time from Genesis-Creation to the Revelation-Millennium.

Your math goes beyond what the Bible tells us of. Therefore your calculations are based on incorrectly interpreting what you read.

When what Peter said is read correctly.. One day equals a thousand years. And a thousand years equals a day.
Peter aslo Said a day to God = 1000 earth years, AND 1 earth day = 1000 years to God.
When a day to God equals a thousand years why bother with AND only to say again "a day to God equals a thousand years"? That is not what Peter said.
Both are true, because the reality is that God is timeless.
Which would mean that His word is timeless. In that God does not annul His promises. Because God doesn't change. What He says will always be available.
God does not have Shortly, Near, At hand, about to take place... these are Human time statements, given to be understood by How time relates to Men, not how time relates to God.
As long as God is watching over the events that happen on earth in relation to His word coming to pass at the right time, He uses time based words in order to inform us when something is upcoming.

Jesus said that the Holy Spirit of truth leads and guides us, and shows us things to come.

Those words indicate the times that God's promises are due to be fulfilled. So again, you have debunked your previous statements. Because God then does not put anything off to a never ending future.

You have been building strawmen in order to knock them down.
Contrary to your assertions, God is quite capable of telling time correctly and correctly communicating it's passing to human beings in Human terms.
However, you've demonstrated that you don't correctly read the text. And therefore come up with incorrect statements.
God can tell us when things are far away
Daniel 8:26 The vision of the evenings and the mornings that has been spoken is true. Now you must seal up the vision, for it concerns the distant future.”
God can tell us when they are near.
Revelation 22:10 Then he told me, “Do not seal up the words of prophecy in this book, because the time is near.
How can it be near when roughly 2000 years have gone by and it still hasn't happened yet?

That is where the thousand years equals a day comes in. According to what Peter said according to prophetic terms, it's only been 2 days since Jesus showed the apostle John what will happen during the 7 year Tribulation.
If things are not actually, TRUTHFULLY near, God can, does and will TRUTHFULLY tell us they are for a distant future, like He did in Daniel.
Then why did God have the prophet to speak prophetically concerning time in saying "After two days He will revive us. And after the third day He will restore us."..?
God CAN be Trusted to tell time Correctly.
Yes God can, but that is exactly why you get things wrong. Because you don't understand that God at different times speaks both of prophetic time, and literal time.

Which renders your interpretation impossible. Thanks for proving my point.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Rev 15 and 16 are clear that those who experience wrath are killed. Rev 19 makes that point at well.
Getting killed is different than getting martyred. Many wicked people get killed. Christians get martyred.
The point of this thread is to show that none of the scenarios you are mentioning matter to the one who is at the very basic first step Christianity 101 or any level beyond that in their understanding of the Bible.
Those just born again don't understand anything of the Bible accept the gospel of salvation that they hear.

Eschatology comes after salvation. It could be anytime after getting saved that a Christian hears about a rapture.

Depending on the view of the teacher, they hear it. However, the scripture teaches pre-trib rapture.
Where is the "beef"?? in the models that you select from??
You are the one with the beef concerning the pre-trib rapture.
They all do not matter
You see?, there's your beef. But the pre-trib matters to me when I'm the one posting my response to your post(s)

In any discussion the person reading makes their own choice of what they will believe. I wasn't telling anyone that they must believe the pre-trib rapture. I said that I believe it and therefore I used it in responding to you. And you took up the opposing view because you had a beef with even seeing the p.t.r. on the thread.

There is nothing to keep me from saying that your rapture view doesn't matter. Because once you say it concerning my views then I'm at liberty to say it concerning your views.
once we get to "I have accepted Christ as my Savior"
What is your point here? That once anyone has accepted Jesus that all the other teachings of the Bible don't matter?

Or are you saying.. "Only what I tell you matters, not what anyone else says." That would mean that you want to control what anyone believes.

I'm certainly not doing that with my posts. I am defending what I believe against you wanting to control the discussion.

Put me on ignore then you will at least not see when I again post on any thread that you will be posting on.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The restraint is not the holy spirit, the holy spirit is not taken away even in the event of a pretrib rapture, because there will be the 2 witnesses, and the 144,000, and anyone saved after any supposed rapture.
Are you telling me personally?, or are you using my post to inform others? of what I already believe as you do.
So it's a bad interpretation of the one who restrains.
The traditional one is Michael, because Michael is the Archangel who is charged with protecting Israel (Daniel 12:1)
But I have also thought it could be Satan who restrains himself, because Satan has the most to lose.
Satan has proved that he is not one to restrain himself. For instance, if he'd known that crucifying Jesus would result in the redemption offered to people to get free from his bondage.. then he never would have crucified Jesus.
The only time he will decide to go for doing the most harm he can is when he gets tossed out of heaven permanently, because at that point, he knows his time is short anyway.
He's already been cast out of the heaven where God and all dead saints reside. I say dead because their bodies are buried, but they are alive with Christ in heaven.

The heaven that Michael casts him out of is the atmospheric heavens, the first heavens (the second is the stellar heavens). The "wicked spirits in high places" is the first heavens.. satan is "the prince of the power of the air."
But for as long as he thinks he can defer judgement on himself he would restrain himself.
No he wouldn't. Cain, ruled by the devil, killed his brother Abel because he did what pleased God in making animal sacrifice. Cain hadn't restrained himself at all.
Neither did Ham ruled by the devil, he didn't restrain himself when he uncovered Noah's robe while he was sleeping from drunkeness.
Nimrod ruled by the devil, tyrannically ruled over the people. He forced them to build the tower. Nimrod was not restraining himself at all. It was only when God confused their language that Nimrod's plans ended.
Look at the pagan rulers that came after Nimrod, influenced by devils called themselves gods. And sought to have God's throne. The antichrist will call himself God and seek to have God's throne.
That is pure speculation though, it just makes sense that Satan wouldn't want to accelerate towards his own eternal destruction.
He lies to himself that he'll win against God.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,469
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Are you telling me personally?, or are you using my post to inform others? of what I already believe as you do.
It's a common pretrib rapture position argument that I thought you were also advocating that "the one who restrains" is the Holy Spirit, so "obviously" Christians being raptured is what kicks things off. But it's a very flawed interpretation because as I said, the Holy Spirit is still there even in the event of a pre trib rapture.
Satan has proved that he is not one to restrain himself. For instance, if he'd known that crucifying Jesus would result in the redemption offered to people to get free from his bondage.. then he never would have crucified Jesus.
Satan is not all knowing, Satan is finite, and Satan knows the scriptures very well. Likely Satan thought Jesus would bring about his end within his lifetime so he had multiple attempts to try and thwart Jesus, such as getting Herod to try and kill all the male children born in Bethlehem, and trying to tempt Jesus, etc.
He's already been cast out of the heaven where God and all dead saints reside. I say dead because their bodies are buried, but they are alive with Christ in heaven.

The heaven that Michael casts him out of is the atmospheric heavens, the first heavens (the second is the stellar heavens). The "wicked spirits in high places" is the first heavens.. satan is "the prince of the power of the air."
Satan still has access to the throne of God to accuse us, that's the role he played in the book of Job, and the role he's described as having in Revelation 12.
No he wouldn't. Cain, ruled by the devil, killed his brother Abel because he did what pleased God in making animal sacrifice. Cain hadn't restrained himself at all.
Neither did Ham ruled by the devil, he didn't restrain himself when he uncovered Noah's robe while he was sleeping from drunkeness.
Nimrod ruled by the devil, tyrannically ruled over the people. He forced them to build the tower. Nimrod was not restraining himself at all. It was only when God confused their language that Nimrod's plans ended.
Look at the pagan rulers that came after Nimrod, influenced by devils called themselves gods. And sought to have God's throne. The antichrist will call himself God and seek to have God's throne.
He lies to himself that he'll win against God.

Satan still wants to steer men (and even Jesus) into Rebellion, but there's limits as to what he does. What he's doing now, theoretically isn't enough to bring back Jesus to crush his head. But once he gets tossed out for good and no longer has access to the throne to accuse us, that's when he knows no matter what he does, Jesus is going to crush him soon.

So if he's self restraining (and mind you there's been a lot of evil on the earth even the holocaust and communist purges) he's holding back how much damage he does to not have Jesus come back to kill him. But unrestrained, he does so much worse.

But I admit that's speculation and the more traditional restrainer is Michael, which also makes sense in that Michael is the one who defeats him and throws him down, and at that point Michael is no longer guarding Israel on earth.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's a common pretrib rapture position argument that I thought you were also advocating that "the one who restrains" is the Holy Spirit, so "obviously" Christians being raptured is what kicks things off. But it's a very flawed interpretation because as I said, the Holy Spirit is still there even in the event of a pre trib rapture.
Yes, after the body of Christ is raptured the H.S. remains to save those who have heard the gospel unto salvation. Through recordings, through Bibles etc.
Satan is not all knowing, Satan is finite, and Satan knows the scriptures very well. Likely Satan thought Jesus would bring about his end within his lifetime so he had multiple attempts to try and thwart Jesus, such as getting Herod to try and kill all the male children born in Bethlehem, and trying to tempt Jesus, etc.

Satan still has access to the throne of God to accuse us, that's the role he played in the book of Job, and the role he's described as having in Revelation 12.
It was my understanding that satan's accusations against the saints is by getting people to make accusation against us. It's completely a waste of time for satan to make accusation of us to God. For Jesus in heaven is everliving to intercede for us. In heaven and also regarding those on the earth who accuse us as well.

Remember the king who paid Balaam to curse Israel?
Satan still wants to steer men (and even Jesus) into Rebellion, but there's limits as to what he does. What he's doing now, theoretically isn't enough to bring back Jesus to crush his head. But once he gets tossed out for good and no longer has access to the throne to accuse us, that's when he knows no matter what he does, Jesus is going to crush him soon.
Notice that he's falling farther and farther by degrees? Then he's stuck on the earth. Earth bound. He can't go up high and look down on us with disdain anymore.

Then when Jesus returns in His Second Coming, Satan will be going farther down still, to the deepest abyss.
So if he's self restraining (and mind you there's been a lot of evil on the earth even the holocaust and communist purges) he's holding back how much damage he does to not have Jesus come back to kill him. But unrestrained, he does so much worse.
Satan can't ever be killed. Even evil spirits can't die. That's why they get sent to a horrible hell. If they could be killed then people's evil unsaved spirit would die so then there wouldn't be need of a hell at all.

He's not restraining himself, he doesn't have a slow down or off switch anywhere. It's the Body of Christ that is restraining him.

If he could do more deviltry, he would.
But I admit that's speculation and the more traditional restrainer is Michael, which also makes sense in that Michael is the one who defeats him and throws him down, and at that point Michael is no longer guarding Israel on earth.
The angel Michael also defeated the demonic army of the demonic Prince of Persia and after him came the demonic Prince of Grecia operating through Alexander the great and those of that empire who were influenced by him to do all sorts of sins.

The angel Michael personally battles with the devil because mankind made of flesh and blood cannot grab a spirit being like Michael and other battle angels can.

Talking about the Persia & Grecia demonic princes is not to say that demon princes of the power of the air aren't everywhere, but the Bible is only directed at events and people that make contact with God's covenant people. Specifically the Jews from the old testament and the events of the Tribulation.

The Body of Christ and all people alive today are sandwiched between those timeframes in the age of grace.
 
Upvote 0

fwGod

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2005
1,404
532
✟65,262.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Again, Paul writes them this second letter and tells them specifically "do not be deceived by any means", that day shall not happen...If they were going to be raptured, Paul would not be so earnest in this warning. The subject hasn't changed and is still "our gathering back to Christ". If there were a pretrib rapture possible, than Paul wouldn't have given out the warning to not be deceived.
You cut off what Paul said.

"That day".. the Day of the Lord.. "shall not take place UNTIL the departure comes first."

The teaching of the apostle Paul is about the timing of the rapture. He didn't tell them that it wouldn't happen at all. The deception was that people were saying that the Day of the Lord had already begun.

That's like saying that the Tribulation has already begun. But it can't until the pre-trib rapture happens first.
Your earlier translation of "the falling away" as "departure is a false hope. Departure from one's faith is more like it. It's apostasy pure and simple. That's the correct translation.
Not so. The apostle Paul did not tell them in either epistle about falling away from faith. However, he did in some other epistles.

The falling away from faith was required by King James that the translators use that phrase instead of what all of the other printed Bibles before it translated as "Departure". Most honest Bible scholars and commentaries will confirm that the word should be translated "Departure."
And those waiting on Christ to come first are setting themselves up. That's why he says he comes at an hour most are not expecting.
Are you using the Revelation text of the church at Sardis?

The church that gets raptured is the Philadelphian church. The word Philadelphia means brotherly love. So all a Christian has to do is walk in love toward the brethran and there's no missing the rapture. The pre-trib rapture.

It's not a set up when like the five wise virgins the Christian keeps plenty oil in their lamp, so that whether they sleep or are awake, they won't miss His Coming in the rapture. The apostle Paul says as much.
Do you not believe Christ when he also gives out the warning to not be deceived and when someone says here is Christ or there is Christ?
No pre-trib rapture Christian will have to rely on someone else to tell the ready Christian when the rapture is happening. The trump of God shall sound. The shout of the angel shall be heard. Loud enough to literally wake the dead.
He's warning us as is Paul. It's very serious. Paul says we must have the complete armour on to fight the "fiery darts of Satan in that "evil day". Paul certainly isn't teaching that some are whisked away, he's teaching the opposite. Paul says above all else, we must "stand". And Christ says those that endure to the end, the same shall be saved.
Salvation doesn't come by enduring. Salvation comes by believing in the anointed words of the gospel, and not from anyone who speaks differently than what is written in the Bible.

Besides, enduring to the end to be saved is inaccurate. The word that is translated saved should have been translated preserved. How does one endure? By not letting one's love grow cold. So this confirms what I earlier said.
No, we read the entire bible chapter by chapter and verse by verse, rightly dividing the word of God as to not lose context.
If a post-trib rapture believer really did that, then they wouldn't be a post-trib rapture believer., they'd be a pre-trib rapture believer.
If you think Paul is teaching about the end times and these aren't the same trumpets as seen in Revelation, than you're beliefs are truly all over the place.
On the contrary. You make "Last Trump" and "the seventh trump" into the same thing. But neither surrounding text is regarding the other. But contextually different. For different occasions and timeframes.
Christ teaches in the gospels in such a simplicity that the other authors are only witnesses to his teachings. The last trump when taken back to the Greek is the farthest out. There are no more after that. And we see in Revelation the 7th is indeed the last. And why wouldn't it be knowing God's preference for the number. Of course it's the 7th, the last and indeed the trump of God.
If you were acquainted with Hebrew culture and acquainted with the Moeds, then you'd know that the Last Trump is referring to the blowing of the Shofar at Rosh HaShanah. The notes are distinct. And the last notes are as long as the person has breath in their lungs. They are a call for the dead to rise, but only if the time of the rapture has come. Until then each Rosh HaShanah, is a rehearsal of the coming fulfillment of that Moed.
You talk about non biblical support but I have yet to see you post one verse that even suggests that Christ returns before the 7th trump.
That's because you've trained yourself to dismiss the verses that teach of pre-trib rapture. To you, they don't exist or they mean something else.

But that is private interpretation or eisegesis.
Nowhere, just going by the traditional belief that many think Christ will come back and masses of Christians will just disappear.
It's a biblical belief. Starting with Enoch. A few other prophets, with Jesus who disappeared out of their sight. The church will be speedily taken out at the pre-trib rapture. The two witnesses of the Revelation 11 as well. And also the 144,000 Jews of Revelation 12.
Satan and his getting kicked out jumpstarts the tribulation.
You didn't say of what satan gets kicked out of.
If you refer to Revelation 12, that is the start of the Great Tribulation, the remaining 3.5yrs of the seven year Tribulation.

But, according to Revelation 6:1 the opening of the first seal, that is when the lawless one of 2 Thes. shows up and that starts the Tribulation.
You stated,

Meaning you seem to be one of the ones that think the Holy Spirit is the restraining power and will be removed.
You saying that tells me that you didn't read my entire post. I didn't say the H.S. is taken out. I clearly said that He who restrains is the Body of Christ. As Jesus gave authority over all the power of the enemy.
I might be mistaken if that's not your belief.
It's to your credit that you allow such a possibility of being mistaken.
But I was pointing out that's impossible for the Holy Spirit to be removed seeing how Christ said some will be delivered up at that time and people are not to premeditate what they will say because it will be the Holy Spirit speaking through them.
The word "premeditate" is not the original Greek word, it's translated "beforehand".

Mark 13:11 "But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what ye shall speak, neither do ye premeditate: but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye: for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Spirit. [/quote] "Take no anxious thought" .. "Do not worry beforehand"..

It is possible to think, and pray without worry or anxiety of what to say. Jesus implies that it is. His words are to be used to make confession of faith to that effect.
This is the very same testimony that is written in Revelation 12,

Revelation 12:17 "And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ."
The seed of the woman is/are the Jews. So unless you would convert, it doesn't mean you.

The apostle John, a Messianic Jew, had that testimony, which is why he was put on the Isle of Patmos. Because all attempts to martyr him failed. Because He had developed the belief so highly that Jesus loved him.
And another witness is as early as Revelation 2,

Revelation 2:10 "Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer: behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that ye may be tried; and ye shall have tribulation ten days: be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.."
The tribulation of ten days is different than the Tribulation lasting seven years. The apostle Paul knew he would be martyred and looked to have a crown of life.

Revelation 2 is only for those who will be thrown into prison and sentenced to be martyred. So unless you fly to the middle east and present yourself to any Arab to make you a martyr, Revelation 2 doesn't apply to you.

There's no Biblical certainty, especially since you don't rightly divide God's word, that you of this church age, that God would skip over you at the pre-trib rapture and allow you to go through the Tribulation. Just because you don't think that it's right to escape the wrath.

But then again, Jesus said that the believers are to be found worthy of escape.. so.. are you going to be found worthy?

Revelation 3 says that it's those who keep His word of perseverance that he will keep such from the hour or timeframe of testing or Tribulation.

Now if the perseverance means to endure against doctrine that says that there is no pre-trib rapture..

Then perhaps you won't be raptured after all. Time will tell.
As I've said many times in other threads, I used to believe in a pretrib rapture as well. But it's not biblical. The entire bible, old and new focus on the Lord's Day. And that will start when Christ returns at the 7th.
Just because you got talked out of a pre-trib rapture belief doesn't mean all ought to switch theirs.

I won't be because to this day nothing that a post-tribber has said has been Biblically sound enough to persuade me to cease my perseverance against it.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
fwGod said:
However, the apostle Paul did not teach that to the Church Body of Christ. What he taught us is that we will not experience any wrath as those on the earth will. "God has not destined us for wrath."

BobRyan said:
Rev 15 and 16 are clear that those who experience wrath are killed. Rev 19 makes that point at well.

Getting killed is different than getting martyred. Many wicked people get killed.

Agreed - the wrath of God kills the wicked - it does not martyr the saints.


Rev 15 - the wrath of God that kills the wicked - vs the saints of God victorious over the wicked:

Rev 15
Then I saw another sign in heaven, great and marvelous, seven angels who had seven plagues, which are the last, because in them the wrath of God is finished.

2 And I saw something like a sea of glass mixed with fire, and those who had been victorious over the beast and his image and the number of his name, standing on the sea of glass, holding harps of God.

Rev 16
Then I heard a loud voice from the temple, saying to the seven angels, “Go and pour out on the earth the seven bowls of the wrath of God.”
...
4 Then the third angel poured out his bowl into the rivers and the springs of waters; and they became blood. 5 And I heard the angel of the waters saying, “Righteous are You, who are and who were, O Holy One, because You judged these things; 6 for they poured out the blood of saints and prophets, and You have given them blood to drink. They deserve it.” 7 And I heard the altar saying, “Yes, O Lord God, the Almighty, true and righteous are Your judgments.”

Rev 19
I heard something like a loud voice of a great multitude in heaven, saying,
“Hallelujah! Salvation and glory and power belong to our God; 2 because His judgments are true and righteous; for He has judged the great harlot who was corrupting the earth with her immorality, and He has avenged the blood of His bond-servants on her.”

14 And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses. 15 From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty. 16 And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, “KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

17 Then I saw an angel standing in the sun, and he cried out with a loud voice, saying to all the birds which fly in midheaven, “Come, assemble for the great supper of God, 18 so that you may eat the flesh of kings and the flesh of commanders and the flesh of mighty men and the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them and the flesh of all men, both free men and slaves, and small and great.”

19 And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army.
20 And the beast was seized, and with him the false prophet who performed the signs in his presence, by which he deceived those who had received the mark of the beast and those who worshiped his image; these two were thrown alive into the lake of fire which burns with brimstone. 21 And the rest were killed with the sword which came from the mouth of Him who sat on the horse, and all the birds were filled with their flesh.

"And the rest were killed" - all the wicked slain at the 2nd coming.
And the saints resurrected and raptured 1 Thess 4:13-18..
Rev 20:5 called "the first resurrection" where "the dead in Christ rise first" 1 Thess 4.

This is what starts the 1000 years of Rev 20.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Satan can't ever be killed. Even evil spirits can't die.

Ezek 28
You had the seal of perfection,
Full of wisdom and perfect in beauty.
13 “You were in Eden, the garden of God;
Every precious stone was your covering:
The ruby, the topaz and the diamond;
The beryl, the onyx and the jasper;
The lapis lazuli, the turquoise and the emerald;
And the gold, the workmanship of your settings and sockets,
Was in you.
On the day that you were created
They were prepared.
14 “You were the anointed cherub who covers,
And I placed you there.
You were on the holy mountain of God;
You walked in the midst of the stones of fire.
15 “You were blameless in your ways
From the day you were created
Until unrighteousness was found in you.
16 “By the abundance of your trade
You were internally filled with violence,
And you sinned;
Therefore I have cast you as profane
From the mountain of God.
And I have destroyed you, O covering cherub,
From the midst of the stones of fire.
17 “Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty;
You corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor.
I cast you to the ground;
I put you before kings,
That they may see you.
18 “By the multitude of your iniquities,
In the unrighteousness of your trade
You profaned your sanctuaries.
Therefore I have brought fire from the midst of you;
It has consumed you,
And I have turned you to ashes on the earth
In the eyes of all who see you.
19 “All who know you among the peoples
Are appalled at you;
You have become terrified
And you will cease to be forever.”’”
 
Upvote 0