What texts prove that Mary was a sinner?

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Matthew 1:20
But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

Luke 2:21
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Colossians 2:9
For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Another way to put it.

Jesus had the fulness of the Godhead in his body.
Jesus was in Mary's body.
Jesus being fully God and fully Man.
Therefore, Mary was in fact on earth and in time,
The Mother of Jesus who is God.
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Mother of God" is a silly, but understandable "Spin" the the Catholic Denominations tie on Mary for their own agenda (making her into something that she's NOT). WE all agree that Mary was Jesus' mom, and that the Circumstances of Jesus' birth were miraculous. WE also agree that since Jesus was the incarnation of "THE WORD" (who was with God, and who WAS God) that the "title" has an understandable "Religious rationalization" associated with it.

However GOd doesn't HAVE a "mother" Mary is The Mother of JESUS. ANd that's the end of the story. SHe gave birth, raised Him, and when Jesus entered His ministry, she thought he'd lost his mind, and went out with her family to drag Him out of the public view. None of them had a CLUE what Jesus was all about. His OWN half brothers didn't think HE was anything special!!!

Jesus is fully God and fully Man. You can not divide his being until James 2:26.
Jesus also rose physically from the dead.
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes. Exactly.

I know that verse well. It's part of Vespers, the evening prayer of the Liturgy of the Hours. I am not at all a stranger to that verse. I accept it as absolutely true.

I agree that she spoke of 'my' savior, and that she needed a savior. I fully agree. I consider the application of that salvation to have been at the beginning of her life, before she fell and sinned, and not after she fell and sinned. Still saved, but saved from falling or ever sinning. It's as if you are required to detour around a sinkhole that other motorists have driven into. They need to be rescued from the sinkhole to be saved. You were saved from ever falling into the sinkhole. It may be less dramatic, but you too were saved from that sinkhole and you were saved by the same emergency services that pulled those others out of the hole. Mary was a sinless person who would have ended up just like the rest of us sinners but for her savior working in her life.

I think for that you have to look to the same Song of Mary for some hints. There it says "all generations shall call me blessed" and "He that is mighty hath done great things to me". This isn't proof, but it is an indicator that there is something very special about Mary. She is not a run of the mill mother of a Jewish boy. But those are just hints. I look several verses earlier, to the annunciation, starting in verse 26.

It is the 'full of grace' that indicates to me a fullness of grace that has no room at all for the emptiness of sin. The angel Gabriel comes to her as a messenger, but here a mighty archangel refers to her as graced. Ordinarily it would be the other way around. But Mary isn't ordinary. It wasn't an ordinary greeting either. The angel said she was completely, perfectly, enduringly endowed with grace. One can downplay the meaning of the word 'kecharitōmenē' but I think it should be read otherwise than as a mere favor. It's the import of this one word that tells me Mary was sinless. It was so interpreted by St. Thomas Aquinas, who held that Mary never sinned, but was saved at least from right after the moment of her conception.

Here is an article that explains that interesting word 'kecharitōmenē': What Do We Mean By Full of Grace?.

Matt Slick, on the contrary, does a clever contrarian view by back translating 'full of grace' = 'gratia plena' to 'plaras karitos' and then equating Mary with Stephen. And then never translating 'kecharitōmenē', which is the real word in question. See that one here: Mary, Full of Grace, and Luke 1:28 | CARM.org

Anyhow, that is the Biblical source for my thinking that Mary was sinless. And to no surprise it is hotly contested by many modern Protestants, who need to figure out how to make the Bible say what they want it to say, and in doing so minimize Mary, who they seldom would affirm as blessed although all generations will do so.

Good to hear from you.


Luke 1:43
And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
 
Upvote 0

Bob Carabbio

Old guy -
Dec 22, 2010
2,271
568
81
Glenn Hts. TX
✟35,309.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Jesus is fully God and fully Man. You can not divide his being until James 2:26.

But you also from the Biblical text also can't claim that Jesus WALKED AS GOD hiding in a man suit pretending to be human. God can't be tempted - But Jesus COULD BE AND WAS just like us.

Jesus also rose physically from the dead.

Sure He did, but his POST Ressurection body was able to play neat tricks that his PRE-Ressuraction body couldn't. Aparently we'll be LIKE HIM in that respect on the other side -
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,308
16,144
Flyoverland
✟1,237,333.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Luke 1:43
And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
Exactly. If Mary is the mother of the Lord, which is totally Biblical, then it's not any mental gymnastics for her to be the mother of God. Elizabeth knew the score. The baby in Mary's womb was Elizabeth's Lord and her God.

Luther knew the score. Some, not all, but some Protestants no longer know the score. They're so interested in proving that Mary was a sinner they forget that all generations will be calling her blessed.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,591
12,122
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,181,092.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Sure He did, but his POST Ressurection body was able to play neat tricks that his PRE-Ressuraction body couldn't.
You don't actually know that. Just because He didn't suddenly appear in locked rooms before His resurrection, doesn't mean He couldn't. Have you walked on water lately? Not the frozen kind either.
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,541
707
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟125,343.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Yes. Exactly.
I think for that you have to look to the same Song of Mary for some hints. There it says "all generations shall call me blessed" and "He that is mighty hath done great things to me". This isn't proof, but it is an indicator that there is something very special about Mary. She is not a run of the mill mother of a Jewish boy. But those are just hints. I look several verses earlier, to the annunciation, starting in verse 26.

chevy,

Yes, Mary was 'blessed' because she carried the Son of Man in her womb. All generations will confirm she was blessed.

As for 'hints' she was special and not a Jewish run-of-the-mill mother, I don't find anything in the text that confirms this.

Oz
 
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,005
2,817
Australia
✟157,841.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Exactly. If Mary is the mother of the Lord, which is totally Biblical, then it's not any mental gymnastics for her to be the mother of God. Elizabeth knew the score. The baby in Mary's womb was Elizabeth's Lord and her God.

Luther knew the score. Some, not all, but some Protestants no longer know the score. They're so interested in proving that Mary was a sinner they forget that all generations will be calling her blessed.

Mary was a human being -all human beings sin.
Being called blessed does not make her or any other person sinless because only God is sinless.
Many people did God's will, Abraham went to sacrifice hsi son, Noah built an ark, Daniel prayed, David killed Goliath. Doing God's will in a particular circumstance does not make a person sinless from birth to death.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,591
12,122
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,181,092.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
As for 'hints' she was special and not a Jewish run-of-the-mill mother, I don't find anything in the text that confirms this.
You've never pondered how every time an angel appears to someone in the Scriptures, that person falls flat on their face in fear, but when an angel appeared to Mary, she was merely "troubled" by the angel's greeting? Almost like angelic visits were a regular occurrence for her.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Pavel Mosko
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,541
707
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟125,343.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
You don't actually know that. Just because He didn't suddenly appear in locked rooms before His resurrection, doesn't mean He couldn't. Have you walked on water lately? Not the frozen kind either.

Yes we do. It was 'transphysical' (N T Wright's language). He explains that this is not how the early Christians thought about Jesus' body. It's a label to demonstrate that 'early Christians envisaged a body which was still robustly physical but also significantly different from the present one (Wright 2003:477-478).

Wright gives an example of the 'transphysical' Jesus after the resurrection. Jesus' risen body did things ordinary bodies don't do. We could call this continuity and discontinuity between the present body and the risen body. This is demonstrated by Jesus' who comes and goes through locked doors but he was 'solidly physical', so physical that one could see his visible wounds (Wright 2003:609).

If Mary only bore the flesh of Jesus, then where was the Divinity? When did Jesus become both fully human and fully Divine?
Have a Blessed Day!

Jesus became fully human when he was conceived by the virgin Mary. He didn't need to 'become ... fully Divine' because he already was that. Read John 1:1 (ESV) very carefully where this is confirmed, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God'.

Oz

Works consulted
Wright, N T 2003. The resurrection of the Son of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
But you also from the Biblical text also can't claim that Jesus WALKED AS GOD hiding in a man suit pretending to be human. God can't be tempted - But Jesus COULD BE AND WAS just like us.



Sure He did, but his POST Ressurection body was able to play neat tricks that his PRE-Ressuraction body couldn't. Aparently we'll be LIKE HIM in that respect on the other side -


Jesus was tested, not tempted by his flesh.

What Does the Bible Mean by Temptation?

Copyright 1990 by Bob and Gretchen Passantino.

  1. God cannot be tempted (James 1:13)
.

  1. God can be tempted (or there would be no reason for us to be warned against tempting God -- Deuteronomy 6:16).

  2. If God cannot be tempted (see 1 above), and Jesus is God, then does that mean he cannot be tempted? (James 1:13)

  3. But Jesus was tempted (Hebrews 4:15).

  4. God tempts no one (James 1:13).

  5. God tempted someone (David, to number Israel -- 2 Samuel 24:1).
How are these biblical statements reconciled, both within scripture and consistent with God's character?

The answers to these statements can be categorized in two major ways: vocabulary (what words were used in the original, and what meanings those words have), and context (how the words were used in each passage).

Vocabulary

Temptation has many synonyms (equivalent words) in English. It can mean (among other things) test, proof, experiment, trial, and enticement. The main Greek (New Testament language) words for temptation are formed from peiraz and dokimaz , both words of which also occur in the Greek translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint. The main Hebrew words are n s�h, s rap, and b han, and one word which relates primarily to the genuineness of coins, sig. Comparing the Septuagint equivalents to the original Hebrew helps us understand the overall biblical use of the terms.

[Those who wish more information on the Greek or Hebrew should see The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology (Vol. 3), Colin Brown, ed., Zondervan, 1978, pp. 798-810; or The Expository Dictionary of Bible Words, Lawrence O. Richards, Zondervan, 1985, pp. 593-594.]

Both peiraz and dokimaz can mean test or proof. In addition, peiraz includes the ideas of temptation or enticement (to sin) and of a trial. Dokimaz also carries the connotation of approval or genuineness.

From this vocabulary study, we see that "temptation" can mean test, proof, or to establish genuineness; not only "enticement to sin."

Context

Armed with our vocabulary study, we can look at the context of each of our six statements.

God Cannot Be Tempted

James 1:13 says, "Let no one say when he is tempted, 'I am being tempted by God'; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone." Looking at the context, we see that the statement is not merely "God cannot be tempted," but "God cannot be tempted by evil." In other words, God cannot be enticed to sin (Greek apeir st s). James 1:13 affirms that God cannot sin, but is completely holy and good.

God Can Be Tempted

When Deuteronomy 6:16 warns us against "tempting God," the context refers on the one hand to testing the Israelites' faithfulness and, on the other hand, to testing God's righteous judgment. Paraphrased, the passage means, "Don't test God's righteous judgment by worship-ping idols unless you are willing to be wiped off the face of the earth" (v. 15).

The reconciliation of the two statements? God cannot be enticed to sin; he is holy and good. God's consistent, holy, good reaction to idolatry is righteous judgment. One should not "test" God's character by sinning, since God will "pass the test" of righteousness and punish the sinner (see also Jeremiah 18:7-10).

Can Jesus Be God and Be Tempted?

Jesus is God and so he cannot be tempted in the sense that he cannot be enticed to sin, but he can be tempted in the sense that he can be tested, even with the evil lures of Satan (Matthew 4), and found to be true to his character. This is the context of Hebrews 4:15, which says, "For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been tempted (peiraz ) in all things as we are, yet without sin."/

Jesus was tested by Satan's enticements concerning his obedience to the Father and his commitment to his messianic mission, yet he did not succumb to the temptation. (A related issue concerns the dynamics between Christ's human and divine natures, under the subjection of his one divine person. See The Impeccable Christ by W. E. Best, Zondervan, 1971).

Does God Tempt People?

Look again at James 1:13. Just as God cannot be enticed into sinning, so God does not entice anyone else into sinning. That is what is meant by "and He Himself does not tempt anyone." James warns us not to blame our own fall into sin on God. God does not persuade us to sin, we willingly fall to the lure of our own sinful nature (Romans 3:23), the sinfulness in the world (Titus 2:12), and/or the false promises of Satan (Genesis 3:1-5).

When 2 Samuel 24:1 says God provoked or tempted David to number Israel, it means God made use of David's action to manifest David's disobedience to God. The parallel passage in 1 Chronicles 27:23-24 credits Satan with provoking David to take the census. Putting the two passages together shows that, while Satan may have enticed David into sin, it was God who tested David and used that occasion to show both David and the Israelites the consequences of David's sin.

God tests us to reveal to ourselves and the world our true characters.

God has always tested each order of rational beings that He has created. This test has consisted of proof of perfect trust and obedience. A test in itself is not a cause of sin. Only the action of the one tested can turn it into an occasion to sin. . . . Adam and Eve faced a test of obedience, and disobeyed and fell. Christ, in order to redeem men, faced testing, and came out victorious (Hebrews 5:7-9) (Wycliffe Bible Encyclopedia, Vol. 2, Charles Pfeiffer, Howard Vos, and John Rea, eds., Moody, 1975, p. 1680).

Summary

There are various meanings for the word temptation. Usually it means either an enticement to sin or a test or trial. God never entices anyone to sin, but uses testing to reveal his justice and challenge believers to faithfulness (2 Corinthians 13:5-8).

What Does the Bible Mean by Temptation? - Answers.org
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You don't actually know that. Just because He didn't suddenly appear in locked rooms before His resurrection, doesn't mean He couldn't. Have you walked on water lately? Not the frozen kind either.

There is a funny story about Joseph Smith of the the mormons. He had planks set up just under dirty water to fake walking on the water. One night some children removed the middle plank at the deepest part. So, the next day when Smith was trying to his miracle, he sunk to the bottom.
 
Upvote 0

Daniel Marsh

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
9,750
2,615
Livingston County, MI, US
✟199,779.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
chevy,

Yes, Mary was 'blessed' because she carried the Son of Man in her womb. All generations will confirm she was blessed.

As for 'hints' she was special and not a Jewish run-of-the-mill mother, I don't find anything in the text that confirms this.

Oz
Luke 2:19
But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart.

Luke 2:51
And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,308
16,144
Flyoverland
✟1,237,333.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
As for 'hints' she was special and not a Jewish run-of-the-mill mother, I don't find anything in the text that confirms this.

Oz
Of course you don't. It would upset a large apple cart in your theology if you interpreted Luke 1:28 as something beyond 'favored'. I think the word 'kecharitōmenē' demands a more expansive meaning. That is not a 'hint' but to me it is clear and Biblical. She was so graced that there was no room for sin in her life. And it was fitting to have that sort of mother to raise the Son of Man. She was not blessed merely for being a biological mother. She was blessed before she became a biological mother according to the text.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,308
16,144
Flyoverland
✟1,237,333.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
You've never pondered how every time an angel appears to someone in the Scriptures, that person falls flat on their face in fear, but when an angel appeared to Mary, she was merely "troubled" by the angel's greeting? Almost like angelic visits were a regular occurrence for her.
And that the angel Gabriel called her blessed BEFORE she consented to be the mother of the Lord. She was not blessed because she became a mother. She was blessed BEFORE that.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Daniel Marsh
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,308
16,144
Flyoverland
✟1,237,333.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Mary was a human being -all human beings sin.
Jesus was a human being. -all human beings sin. I don't think you want to say that.

Adam was created sinless and was sinless for a while. God knows how to make sinless humans. Being a sinner is not actually the essence of humanity. It is only the common lot of almost all of humanity.
Being called blessed does not make her or any other person sinless because only God is sinless.
Adam, for a short time, was sinless. He was made that way. And he was not God. But if one is called blessed in the way Mary was in Luke 1:28, there is no room for sin.
Many people did God's will, Abraham went to sacrifice hsi son, Noah built an ark, Daniel prayed, David killed Goliath. Doing God's will in a particular circumstance does not make a person sinless from birth to death.
Of course not. But when the angel Gabriel comes up to you and tells you that you are kecharitōmenē, which was not said of Abraham, or Noah, or Daniel, or David, I think it does. The Bible has meaning. Including Luke 1.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
19,308
16,144
Flyoverland
✟1,237,333.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Jesus became fully human when he was conceived by the virgin Mary. He didn't need to 'become ... fully Divine' because he already was that. Read John 1:1 (ESV) very carefully where this is confirmed, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God'.
We Catholics, of course would agree with you totally. But there are folks out there who say that Jesus only became God later, or maybe hold to some more Arian interpretation. People for whom Mary bore a human son but did not bear God incarnate, people who deny that Mary was the mother of God, the theotokos. There are a jumble of different beliefs out there.

For those of us who are traditional Christians we understand that Mary is theotokos because Jesus was God from the moment of conception, that Jesus didn't pick up divinity later. You are preaching to the choir on that one. At least with the Catholics and the Orthodox in this discussion.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

thecolorsblend

If God is your Father, who is your Mother?
Site Supporter
Jul 1, 2013
9,199
8,425
Gotham City, New Jersey
✟308,231.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Jesus was a human being. -all human beings sin. I don't think you want to say that.

Adam was created sinless and was sinless for a while. God knows how to make sinless humans. Being a sinner is not actually the essence of humanity. It is only the common lot of almost all of humanity.

Adam, for a short time, was sinless. He was made that way. And he was not God. But if one is called blessed in the way Mary was in Luke 1:28, there is no room for sin.
You're right.

Luke 1:28 is one of the passages I had a lot of trouble understanding back in my evangelical days. I already thought the "reformers" had thrown the baby out with the bathwater when it comes to Our Lady. But passages like that one were especially challenging. "Hail, full of grace", what an odd greeting for an angel to give to a regular human.

But, of course, if the Catholic viewpoint of Our Lady is true, then the angel was recognizing how different she is from everyone else by addressing her as "full of grace". Protestants either can't explain that passage or else they come up with all sorts of goofy formulations that totally sidestep it. But there's never a direct explanation of it from them.

Of all Catholic doctrines I thought I'd struggle with when joining the Church, the Marian dogmas ended up being the easiest to believe because they're so flawlessly logical.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Daniel Marsh
Upvote 0