"Abolish police brutality", not "Defund the police".

I advocate to abolish police brutality as infinitely superior to defund the police. If the police are not paid and can't work, that means the most dangerous people can walk out of prison. The most dangerous criminally insane also can walk out. And thieves and muggers are uninhibited. It is only the police brutality that must change. Racial and other old fashioned and unscientific typology can go replaced by something police chiefs find to be good quality psychology.

Defund Hamas, was the cry of the ACLJ some years ago. To defund a terrorist organization that was attacking Israelis with money in part from Obama's admin, if I am not mistaken. To quote "defund" before police, is a way of comparing the US police with terrorists. It divides the US. I have seen footage of a Muslim lady in the US advocating for BLM with references of hate for Israel.

Israel is a nation of people, citizens coming from Europe, Africa, India, China... and they tolerate various religions living in their midst. They are the only country like this, free, and democratic in their region.

Abolish police brutality aims to sound more like "abolish slavery" quoting William Wilberforce.

If we can can have more coloured police, like African American and Sikh, and new protocol, that it what people need, to help unite the USA.

childeye 2 said:

Defund the police doesn't mean get rid of police. But I think your point about getting rid of police brutality is valid. The problem is how to do it. The frontline law enforcement people see all the worst in society, and it's understandable that they gradually lose patience, particularly with those who would goad them with a disrespect for how much they personally sacrifice in the course of their duty to serve the public.

Click to expand...

What would defunding the police actually be?

I having heard more about this added another poll choice.