There's plenty of evidence right there in the article to merit concern, particularly given that it fits the pattern of the current WH - people willing to scratch backs and do favours get ahead, people with integrity get shown the door. Over and over again. If the allegations are false, then the NYT can/could be made to retract in, as on the few occasions when something that actually is false is printed and there is an instant hullabaloo that lasts for weeks, however minor the issue is. Anything that is actually true gets nothing more than flat denials without any attempt to counter what is said.
