breasts are sexual because they are organs that nourish.So why shouldn’t men have to cover their different looking chests? At one time it was illegal for men to go topless in public on many places.
Upvote
0
breasts are sexual because they are organs that nourish.So why shouldn’t men have to cover their different looking chests? At one time it was illegal for men to go topless in public on many places.
I can go to the local Dairy Mart and see lots of milk in the coolers.because mens chests dont have milk.
So why were men once required to cover their chests?breasts are sexual because they are organs that nourish.
The function and appearence fits the definition of sexual. Cows milk is not sexual.I can go to the local Dairy Mart and see lots of milk in the coolers.
Sometimes they do.
Can Men Lactate? | Live Science
So why were men once required to cover their chests?
adam and eve felt shame because their reproductive organs would be used to create sinners.What does food have to with with modesty? Sounds like maybe we shouldn't order milk at a restaurant because that would be immodest!
Or if its the milk, then a woman would only have to cover up with she has a baby to fed. I don't get that one!
I can go to the local Dairy Mart and see lots of milk in the coolers.
Sometimes they do.
Can Men Lactate? | Live Science
Producing milk doesn’t make something sexual. As was noted earlier men can also produce milk.They exist for milk, though
They exist for milk, though
Producing milk doesn’t make something sexual. As was noted earlier men can also produce milk.
You have to explain that one. Using your reasoning chef Emeril Lagasse would be very sexual.breasts are sexual because they are organs that nourish.
Your argument is self defeating, not mine.then what makes something sexual? This is a self defeating arguement.
Indeed they do. And men have ALL the same milk-making equipment. They just don't have the hormones to make the equipment work.
But it's not the hormones we see; it's the equipment.