Failed Prophecies of Ellen G. White

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Another member asked me to prove EGW was a false prophet by posting some of her failed prophecies from her own words, So, here we go:

"This nation will yet be humbled into the dust. . . When England does declare war, all nations will have an interest of their own to serve, and there will be general war"
(Testimonies, Vol.1,p. 259).

"Had our nation remained united, it would have had strength; but divided, it must fall"
(p. 260) Again, written during our Civil War.

After predicting the world would end in 1843, 1844, & 1845, & flopping, she wrote,
"Now time is almost finished, (1851) and what we have been 6 years in learning they will have to learn in months."
(Early Writings, p.57)

More to come-these are all I have time for right now.
 

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
After predicting the world would end in 1843, 1844, & 1845, & flopping, she wrote, (Early Writings, p.57)

hmm she was 15 years old in 1842 when you suppose she was claiming God gave her a vision or dream about the 2nd coming being in 1843? seriously??? but have no quote for it?

and then you say that as a 15 year old in 1843 (turned 16 that November) she claimed God gave her a vision or dream that the second coming would be in 1844?? really?? but have no quote for it?

and then you say that as a 17 year old in 1844 she claimed that God gave her a vision or dream that the second coming would be in 1845?? -- but have no quote for it?

(Seems to be a pattern)

All that based on a quote from her from 1851 where she said the second coming would be soon?

seriously??

Did you mean to post that "as a teenager Ellen Harmon believed that the second coming would be in 1843, and then later thought it would be in 1844 based on the Bible presentations of a Baptist minister named William Miller"??

If so - it is very "instructive" for the reader to see the way you chose to convey that idea because it looks from the OP like you are claiming she is the one who authored Miller's Bible studies and that she claimed some prophetic inspiration for her non-existent message in those years.

If this is just a way to establish a pattern for false accusations it is as good as any I suppose

The OP to this thread lets me know the kind of thing you would like to be doing here. So thanks for that heads up and clarity on your intent.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,634
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,319.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Another member asked me to prove EGW was a false prophet by posting some of her failed prophecies from her own words, So, here we go:

"This nation will yet be humbled into the dust. . . When England does declare war, all nations will have an interest of their own to serve, and there will be general war"
(Testimonies, Vol.1,p. 259).

"Had our nation remained united, it would have had strength; but divided, it must fall"
(p. 260) Again, written during our Civil War.

Unfulfilled Predictions?

England to Declare War During the U.S. Civil War? Did Ellen G. White predict that England would declare war against the United States?

Here is the context of her comment and it is not what you are claiming:

"England is studying whether it is best to take advantage of the present weak condition of our nation, and venture to make war upon her. She is weighing the matter, and trying to sound other nations. She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home, and that other nations would take advantage of her weakness. Other nations are making quiet yet active preparations for war, and are hoping that England will make war with our nation, for then they would improve the opportunity to be revenged on her for the advantage she has taken of them in the past, and the injustice done them. A portion of the Queen's subjects are waiting a favorable opportunity to break their yoke; but if England thinks it will pay, she will not hesitate a moment to improve her opportunities to exercise her power, and humble our nation. When England does declare war, all nations will have an interest of their own to serve, and there will be general war, general confusion" (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, p. 259).

Note the conditional character of these statements: "She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home." "But if England thinks it will pay." Then follows the sentence: "When England does declare war. . . ." It is evident that Mrs. White is here using the word "when" as a synonym for "if," which is good English. In fact, if we do not thus understand the word "when" in this connection, we have an unusual situation--a series of problematical "ifs" is followed by a simple statement that England is going to declare war. Thus Mrs. White's last sentence would make pointless her preceding sentences.

A similar use of the word "when" is found on the preceding page in her work: "When our nation observes the fast which God has chosen, then will He accept their prayers as far as the war is concerned." No one will argue that the word "when" in this connection introduces a simple statement concerning a future fact that will undebatably happen.

An inspired parallel to this "if" and "when" construction is found in Jeremiah 42:10-19. The prophet speaks to Israel about abiding in Palestine rather than going down into Egypt:

"If ye will still abide in this land. . . ." Verse 10.
"But if ye say, We will not dwell in this land. . . ." Verse 13.
"If ye wholly set your faces to enter into Egypt. . . ." Verse 15.
"When ye shall enter into Egypt . . . ." Verse 18.

It is evident that the phrase "when ye shall enter into Egypt" is synonymous with "if ye shall enter into Egypt."

With the clause "when England does declare war," understood as synonymous with "if England does declare war," the statement changes from a prediction to a statement of mere possibility, but a possibility, however, whose full potentialities many might not realize.

So as you can see with the context added back in it does not say what your trying to claims it says.

After predicting the world would end in 1843, 1844, & 1845, & flopping, she wrote, (Early Writings, p.57) "Now time is almost finished, (1851) and what we have been 6 years in learning they will have to learn in months." More to come-these are all I have time for right now.

You got your facts wrong again, EGW did not have her first vision until after 1844 after the great disappointment from the predictions of William Miller (Baptist). She was not even a part of the SDA church which did not start until 21st May 1863. I think what your referring to is the Millerite movement. Started by William Miller who was a Baptist. The Millerite movement was a world wide movement that was made up of many Christian denominations. At this time EGW was a Methodist. These were the first group after studying the scriptures alone from the book of Daniel which showed a timeline to what they believed was the second coming *1843-1844. After the great disappointment it was revealed that the scripture timeline was correct but the event was wrong. By a careful study of the scriptures the event outlined in 1844 was that of the investigative judgement and the great day of atonement and Jesus work on our behalf in the heavenly Sanctuary. From this understanding of the scriptures some time latter (1863) people from all different denominations from the Millerite movement after careful study of the scriptures moved to develop the new SDA Church in 1863.

...........

So nothing personal but all you are providing is other peoples rehash of EGW quotes pulled from context to try and make them say things they do not say like many do with the scriptures.

Wouldn't your time be better spent discussing scripture if you believe that there is something wrong with the teachings of the SDA Church? Let me know if you want to discuss the scriptures with me. Until then this one for me is a waste of time.

Hope this is helpful
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: mmksparbud
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Note the conditional character of these statements: "She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home." "But if England thinks it will pay." Then follows the sentence: "When England does declare war. . . ." It is evident that Mrs. White is here using the word "when" as a synonym for "if," which is good English. In fact, if we do not thus understand the word "when" in this connection, we have an unusual situation--a series of problematical "ifs" is followed by a simple statement that England is going to declare war. Thus Mrs. White's last sentence would make pointless her preceding sentences.

A good point - but I view the "when" as "in the context of that scenario prefixed by IF" -- in other words "If you decide to drink alcohol then when you have consumed x-amount you will no longer be able to drive safely" -- it does not mean "you will not be able to drive safely" no matter what -- it means that only IF you choose that path the result will be as stated.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Unfulfilled Predictions?

England to Declare War During the U.S. Civil War? Did Ellen G. White predict that England would declare war against the United States?

Here is the context of her comment and it is not what you are claiming:

"England is studying whether it is best to take advantage of the present weak condition of our nation, and venture to make war upon her. She is weighing the matter, and trying to sound other nations. She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home, and that other nations would take advantage of her weakness. Other nations are making quiet yet active preparations for war, and are hoping that England will make war with our nation, for then they would improve the opportunity to be revenged on her for the advantage she has taken of them in the past, and the injustice done them. A portion of the Queen's subjects are waiting a favorable opportunity to break their yoke; but if England thinks it will pay, she will not hesitate a moment to improve her opportunities to exercise her power, and humble our nation. When England does declare war, all nations will have an interest of their own to serve, and there will be general war, general confusion" (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 1, p. 259).

Note the conditional character of these statements: "She fears, if she should commence war abroad, that she would be weak at home." "But if England thinks it will pay." Then follows the sentence: "When England does declare war. . . ." It is evident that Mrs. White is here using the word "when" as a synonym for "if," which is good English. In fact, if we do not thus understand the word "when" in this connection, we have an unusual situation--a series of problematical "ifs" is followed by a simple statement that England is going to declare war. Thus Mrs. White's last sentence would make pointless her preceding sentences.

A similar use of the word "when" is found on the preceding page in her work: "When our nation observes the fast which God has chosen, then will He accept their prayers as far as the war is concerned." No one will argue that the word "when" in this connection introduces a simple statement concerning a future fact that will undebatably happen.

An inspired parallel to this "if" and "when" construction is found in Jeremiah 42:10-19. The prophet speaks to Israel about abiding in Palestine rather than going down into Egypt:

"If ye will still abide in this land. . . ." Verse 10.
"But if ye say, We will not dwell in this land. . . ." Verse 13.
"If ye wholly set your faces to enter into Egypt. . . ." Verse 15.
"When ye shall enter into Egypt . . . ." Verse 18.

It is evident that the phrase "when ye shall enter into Egypt" is synonymous with "if ye shall enter into Egypt."

With the clause "when England does declare war," understood as synonymous with "if England does declare war," the statement changes from a prediction to a statement of mere possibility, but a possibility, however, whose full potentialities many might not realize.

So as you can see with the context added back in it does not say what your trying to claims it says.



You got your facts wrong again, EGW did not have her first vision until after 1844 after the great disappointment from the predictions of William Miller (Baptist). She was not even a part of the SDA church which did not start until 21st May 1863. I think what your referring to is the Millerite movement. Started by William Miller who was a Baptist. The Millerite movement was a world wide movement that was made up of many Christian denominations including. At this time EGW was a Methodist. These were the first group after studying the scriptures alone from the book of Daniel which showed a timeline to what they believed was the second coming *1843-1844. After the great disappointment it was revealed that the scripture timeline was correct but the event was wrong. By a careful study of the scriptures the event outlined in 1844 was that of the investigative judgement and the great day of atonement and Jesus work on our behalf in the heavenly Sanctuary. From this understanding of the scriptures some time latter (1863) people from all different denominations from the Millerite movement after careful study of the scriptures moved to develop the new SDA Church in 1863.

...........

So nothing personal but all you are providing is other peoples rehash of EGW quotes pulled from context to try and make them say things they do not say like many do with the scriptures.

Wouldn't your time be better spent discussing scripture if you believe that there is something wrong with the teachings of the SDA Church? Let me know if you want to discuss the scriptures with me. Until then this one for me is a waste of time.

Hope this is helpful

I'm familiar with the start of SDA, after Miller's prediction flopped. Some others, EGW included, stated that Miller had the right date, but the wrong event. That's when they invented "investigative judgment", which is NOT found in Scripture.

She, & the SDA, have other false doctrines. For instance, she revived an old false and heretical doctrine that Jesus is the archangel Michael, & a friend of hers, Dr. Ben Wilkinson, wrote the "foundation book" for the Satanic KJVO myth. But my purpose in creating this thread was to post some of EGW's false prophecies & doctrines, as challenged by another member.

Here's a real gem of false & heretical from her Early Writings,, I believe, on P. 45 thereabouts:

"I saw that the mysterious signs and wonders and false reformations would increase and spread. The reformations that were shown me were not reformations from error to truth. My accompanying angel bade me look for the travail of soul for sinners as used to be. I looked, but could not see it; for the time for their salvation is past."[/I]

She wrote that trash, in an apparent misinterp of Rev. 22:11 He who is unjust, let him be unjust still; he who is filthy, let him be filthy still; he who is righteous, let him be righteous still; he who is holy, let him be holy still.”

Here's another failed prophecy she made about the return of Jesus This conference took place in 1856.

"I was shown the company present at the Conference, Said the angel: "Some food for worms, some subjects of the seven last plagues, some will be alive and remain upon the earth to be translated at the coming of Jesus."
(Ellen G. White, 1 Testimonies, p. 131-132. May 27, 1856.)

Almost all modern "prophets" say they're not prophets, claiming to make "predictions" instead. White did the same, but can anyone doubt she was making prophecies, & that many of them failed ?[/B]
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'm familiar with the start of SDA, after Miller's prediction flopped. Some others, EGW included, stated that Miller had the right date, but the wrong event.

She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.

That's when they invented "investigative judgment", which is NOT found in Scripture.

Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.


She, & the SDA, have other false doctrines. For instance, she revived an old false and heretical doctrine that Jesus is the archangel Michael, ?[/B]

as compared to the historic fact that -

1. SDAs have had published statements of belief since 1872 and not one of them ever said that "Jesus is the archangel Michael".

2. Many SDAs as well as Bible scholars in many denominations - admit that the "Angel of the LORD" in the Bible is in fact God the Son. Maybe this is where you get confused on that point.

3. Jesus is the human name of God the Son - incarnate as a human. It does not mean that God the Son is "just a mere human". A lot of people admit to this obvious Bible fact.

4. Some SDAs believe that Michael is the warrior name for God the Son. But none of our scholars teach that God the Son was "just an angel" or "a created being".

Details matter when accusing others. Even for Christians who are not happy with the Seventh-day Adventist church.
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.
She was old enough to know what she was writing. But perhaps her serious head injury at age 9 had affected her mind.



Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

It's not mentioned at all in any of those Scriptures.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.

That doesn't make it any less a cult.




as compared to the historic fact that -

1. SDAs have had published statements of belief since 1872 and not one of them ever said that "Jesus is the archangel Michael".

I posted an excerpt from your guru's own writings where she called Jesus "Michael".

2. Many SDAs as well as Bible scholars in many denominations - admit that the "Angel of the LORD" in the Bible is in fact God the Son. Maybe this is where you get confused on that point.

Not a bit confused. Michael is an archangel; Jesus is the Son of God & is Himself also God. He and Michael are separate beings.

3. Jesus is the human name of God the Son - incarnate as a human. It does not mean that God the Son is "just a mere human". A lot of people admit to this obvious Bible fact.

4. Some SDAs believe that Michael is the warrior name for God the Son. But none of our scholars teach that God the Son was "just an angel" or "a created being".

Never said He was. But Michael is not Jesus.

Details matter when accusing others. Even for Christians who are not happy with the Seventh-day Adventist church.

And your 'details' so far are only opinions. The SDA is merely a quasi/pseudo Christian cult that twists Scripture to try to fit its own doctrines.
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Here, EGW refers to Jesus & the archangel Michael being one & the same :

Patriarchs and Prophets page 761—
Again: Christ is called the Word of God. John 1:1-3. He is so called because God gave His revelations to man in all ages through Christ. It was His Spirit that inspired the prophets. 1 Peter 1:10, 11. He was revealed to them as the Angel of Jehovah, the Captain of the Lord’s host, Michael the Archangel.

"Michael, or Christ, with the angels that buried Moses"
(Jude 9, Spiritual Gifts, IV a, p. 158)

"There is none that holdeth with me in these things but Michael (Christ) your prince."
(Desire of Ages p.99)

Thus, the SDA teaches that same heresy. To do otherwise would be to deny their guru & chief founder.
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
In Great Controversy, P. 428, EGW wrote :

"This door was not opened until the mediation of Jesus was finished in the holy place of the sanctuary in 1844. Then Jesus rose up and shut the door of the holy place, and opened the door into the most holy, and passed within the second veil, where He now stands by the ark, and where the faith of Israel now reaches. I saw that Jesus had shut the door of the holy place, and no man can open it; and that He had opened the door into the most holy, and no man can shut it (Rev. 3:7,8)."1

"So when Christ entered the holy of holies to perform the closing work of the atonement, He ceased His ministration in the first apartment.

But Hebrews 9:24 says, For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us.

Nowhere does Scripture say what EGW wrote. The first SDAs concocted this story to try to win over the Millerites by saying Miller had the right date, but the wrong event in 1844. Both Miller & the SDAs were wrong. But the SDAs still teach "investigative judgment" today, thanx to their guru's writings.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.

She was old enough to know what she was writing.

hint: she wasn't writing anything at age 15 or 16 or 17. Are you following the details in the posts??
 
  • Agree
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Here, EGW refers to Jesus & the archangel Michael being one & the same :

And claiming that Jesus is infinite God the Son - not a Created being. With the Holy Spirit as third Person of the Godhead.

Are you following the details in the posts??
 
  • Like
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
2. Many SDAs as well as Bible scholars in many denominations - admit that the "Angel of the LORD" in the Bible is in fact God the Son. Maybe this is where you get confused on that point.

Not a bit confused.

Thanks. I find that somewhat reassuring.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
I'm familiar with the start of SDA, after Miller's prediction flopped. Some others, EGW included, stated that Miller had the right date, but the wrong event.

She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.

That's when they invented "investigative judgment", which is NOT found in Scripture.

Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.


She, & the SDA, have other false doctrines. For instance, she revived an old false and heretical doctrine that Jesus is the archangel Michael, ?[/B]

as compared to the historic fact that -

1. SDAs have had published statements of belief since 1872 and not one of them ever said that "Jesus is the archangel Michael".

2. Many SDAs as well as Bible scholars in many denominations - admit that the "Angel of the LORD" in the Bible is in fact God the Son. Maybe this is where you get confused on that point.

3. Jesus is the human name of God the Son - incarnate as a human. It does not mean that God the Son is "just a mere human". A lot of people admit to this obvious Bible fact.

4. Some SDAs believe that Michael is the warrior name for God the Son. But none of our scholars teach that God the Son was "just an angel" or "a created being".

Details matter when accusing others. Even for Christians who are not happy with the Seventh-day Adventist church.

And your 'details' so far are only opinions.

Everyone has free will and you are welcome to believe as you wish.
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.



hint: she wasn't writing anything at age 15 or 16 or 17. Are you following the details in the posts??

You're basically repeating yourself. I never said she influenced Miller at all; after the "Great Disappointment, Miller basically went back to watching the north end of a southbound horse as it pulled his plow.

And she certainly wrote about the members of that 1856 conference. You SDAs don't like admitting that because it makes your guru look bad. (Which she was.)
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.



Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.




as compared to the historic fact that -

1. SDAs have had published statements of belief since 1872 and not one of them ever said that "Jesus is the archangel Michael".

2. Many SDAs as well as Bible scholars in many denominations - admit that the "Angel of the LORD" in the Bible is in fact God the Son. Maybe this is where you get confused on that point.

3. Jesus is the human name of God the Son - incarnate as a human. It does not mean that God the Son is "just a mere human". A lot of people admit to this obvious Bible fact.

4. Some SDAs believe that Michael is the warrior name for God the Son. But none of our scholars teach that God the Son was "just an angel" or "a created being".

Details matter when accusing others. Even for Christians who are not happy with the Seventh-day Adventist church.



Everyone has free will and you are welcome to believe as you wish.

You're repeating yourself again, as you have no real answers to the truths posted here.

So, I'll repeat myself a little: THERE'S NOTHING ABOUT "INVESTIGATIVE JUDGMENT" IN THE VERSES YOU CITED ! That whole doctrine is false, & just another of EGW's inventions.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.

She was old enough to know what she was writing.

hint: she wasn't writing anything at age 15 or 16 or 17. Are you following the details in the posts??

You're basically repeating yourself.

Only the details you keep ignoring - as in the case above.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
51,298
10,590
Georgia
✟909,568.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
That's when they invented "investigative judgment", which is NOT found in Scripture.

Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.

So, I'll repeat myself a little: THERE'S NOTHING ABOUT "INVESTIGATIVE JUDGMENT" IN THE VERSES YOU CITED ! .

until you read them

details matter... even when making accusations against others.
 
Upvote 0

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BobRyan said:
She was all of 16 at the time of that failed event and had not written anything as a claimed prophet nor influenced Miller in the least regarding his Bible study on prophecy in Daniel 7 and 8.



hint: she wasn't writing anything at age 15 or 16 or 17. Are you following the details in the posts??



Only the details you keep ignoring - as in the case above.
Peat & repeat. You're still wrong. Saying it over & over won't make it right.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

robycop3

Newbie
Sep 16, 2014
2,435
539
✟107,962.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Those who read Daniel 7 find it.
Those who read Romans 2 find it.
Those who read 2 Cor 5:10 find it.

At least we can say that of what Christianity Today called the "5th largest Christian denomination in the world" as of Feb 2015.



until you read them

details matter... even when making accusations against others.

The "investigative judgment" simply isn't in those verses, unless you're using a King George Version edited by EGW. Again, saying it over & over won't make it correct.
 
Upvote 0