JohnDB
Regular Member
The small portion of the conversation we are having is just that...a very small portion.Why did God kill the firstborn?
According to what I read in Exodus 11:4-8, one purpose was to make a distinction between the Egyptians and God's people > Exodus 11:4-8. No Jewish child died.
Also, the LORD said to Moses that He intended to multiply His wonders in Egypt, so Pharaoh would know the LORD is God. So, God did care what Pharaoh thought, I can see from this. Even though God is so superior to us humans, yes He cares how we feel about Him. So, God is not conceited, if He cares about us; He even does answer to us; He answered to Pharaoh by His actions, not only His words. Conceited humans, though, can feel they answer to no one.
He had already told Pharaoh, but Pharaoh possibly demanded evidence. And so God gave him evidence, but he was not able to relate to it. So, then God gave Pharaoh evidence that he could relate to.
"Be careful what you ask for, because you may get it."
So, in a way, who really killed the children? And look what happened to a lot of those Egyptian men, later > they died in the Red Sea.
People insist we have free will. Well, there are ways we can effect what becomes of our children. And then we can blame someone else . . . including God. If God is not sovereign, why to free will claiming blame God?
Now, not all Bible claiming people believe all children are innocent. God's word says that before we trusted in Jesus (Ephesians 1:12), we were His "enemies" (Romans 5:10). So, if people believe all children start off innocent and then become "enemies" (Romans 5:10) . . . that would be a major change to happen in every child. My understanding at this time is every unborn person is a seed of who and how he or she will become later. No one starts as a saint in the womb, but then becomes an evil person. But if we become born of God and His love, by trusting in Jesus, our Father starts us fresh in His love and corrects us to become children of His all-loving love.
And it seems clear the LORD is saying the Egyptians were not His people > that would include the children. He made such a distinction, including by the death of children who were not His people. This can help to show how we do need to get saved by Jesus.
A lot of things of the Old Testament are an object lesson, about how things can be without Jesus. What if we were without police? Yes, police might at times rightly and selectively kill someone; but what if there were no police??
But Jesus was with His disciples, one time, when people of an area rejected them. And "James and John" asked Jesus if they should call down "fire" to destroy those people. And what did Jesus do?
"But He turned and rebuked them, and said, 'You do not know what manner of spirit you are of. For the Son of Man did not come to destroy men's lives but to save them.' And they went to another village." (in Luke 9:51-56)
So, Jesus does care about our lives. And Jesus is God as His Son . . . perfectly all who God is.
But there is judgment. And if a human of any age is without God and how He has us loving > "He who loves his life will lose it," Jesus says in John 12:25. Without Jesus, they would lose their lives, one way or another.
So, much of the early scriptures give us object lessons of how things can go, without Jesus: even God Himself did marvelous wonders and so proved Himself; yet even His own people left Him, a number of times. So, without His Son Jesus, even what God Himself does can not work!
But ones will demand more evidence and could get it. And still they might be like Pharaoh and end like he did.
Because, actually, the real proof is how Jesus in us shares all His own good of His love with us > "and you will find rest for your souls." (in Matthew 11:28-30)
You have to go back and see the entire discussion we were having to see exactly what we were talking about without isolating this one small part to understand why I said what I did.
Upvote
0