I said:
"Scripture certainly refutes your ideas."
Only because you make them do so.
I can't "make" the Scriptures do anything. I can only point out what they say.
To you, having been reborn of God's seed makes no difference in a man's life.
That is unscriptural.
You need to read my posts BEFORE you make such irresponsible and incorrect comments.
A believer has been BORN AGAIN. 1 Peter 1:23 They have the INDWELLING Holy Spirit. Gal 3:2,5 They have a NEW NATURE. 2 Cor 5:17 They possess the gift of ETERNAL LIFE. John 5:24, 6:47 They become a CHILD OF GOD. John 1:12, Gal 3:26
But, you have repeatedly denied that you still possess your human nature, which is corrupt. I've shown you Paul's own testimony about his own struggle with that nature, but you just close your eyes to the truth. Romans 7 proves your opinions wrong.
So does 1 Tim 1:15 where Paul told Timothy that he was the worst of sinners, and he wrote that in the present tense, which you've also closed your eyes to.
As an old nature is part of the "old things" that have "passed away" in 2 Cor 5:17, it is ludicrous to imagine it still remains in those with a divine nature.
Wrong again. The new nature is in addition to the original one. And every believer faces the choice of which nature to obey. That's what Romans 6 is all about.
Paul's writings refute your opinions.
Your idea of retaining anything of the old man counters Christ's prophetic words in Matt 9:17... "Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved."
Wrong again. That would mean Paul countered Christ's prophetic words. That is ludicrous.
You put a new Spirit into an old man, and he shall perish.
OK, show me any verse that supports your opinion.
Just as Peter said in Acts 2:38..."Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost."
Turn from sin and get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of past sins and you will receive the indwelling of the Holy Ghost.
Go ahead and keep using a verse that applied ONLY to those who physically participated in Christ's crucifixion. If that verse applies to believers today, why didn't Paul say anything about repentance in his answer to the jailer in Acts 16:31?
Oh, right. You don't have an answer.
It is because you deny Jesus' words in Matt 7:15-20 about false prophets that you cannot "count on fruit".
It is you who deny the truth of Scripture. I haven't denied anything Jesus said.
Let's look at that passage:
15 “Watch out for
false prophets.
They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
16 By
their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize
them.
The red words are the subject of the passage; false prophets. Jesus wasn't comparing or contrasting true and false prophets at all. He didn't even mention true prophets.
You would fit into the false prophet by your false teaching that believers no longer have a human nature and therefore no longer sin.
The proof of your false teaching is 1 John 1:8. John said anyone who claims to be without sin is self deceived and has no truth in them.
He literally said "if we say". But by including himself, as an apostle, he was including any believer. You "claim" to be "walking in the light", but by your own words, you have demonstrated that you do not believe the words of Scripture.
Those who claim to be without sin are self deceived and have no truth in them.
Romans 6 reveals the choice believers have between presenting themselves to their sinful nature or their new nature.
Romans 7 reveals Paul's own struggle with his sinful nature. It was written in the present tense, and there is no support for claiming he was using the "historical present". There is no evidence from the context that he was speaking of any "former time", which is the usual "explanation" of the text.
1 Tim 1:15 is an admission that Paul considered himself to be a sinner as he wrote to Timothy.
Here is a trustworthy saying that deserves full acceptance: Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners—of whom
I am the worst.
You can deny whatever you want. But the words are clear. If your theory were correct, he would have written "of whom I WAS the worst". But he didn't.
All of these totally destroy your opinions and false teaching.