Shaun King Calls Jesus Statues & Images Are a Form of White Supremacy & Should Be Removed

Christian Sonic Fan

Metal for life!
Jun 13, 2020
160
78
25
Pearisburg, Giles Country, Virginia
✟18,134.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
I think all of this is horribly blown out of the water. Some people invision white Jesus, others invision black Jesus, other invision asian Jesus. If Jesus didn't care about skin color then why would we care about his skin color? God had to choose somebody. The skin color doesn't matter. It's like looking at 3 different Dodge Hellcats and they are all the same in every exact way but you assume that the one that is red goes the fastest even though they all have the same engine. One is blue, and the other is white. It makes no sense. The speed is the same, the gas tanks are the same, it is all the same!

People who think this racist stuff have ENTIRELY too much time on their hands and they are making problems out of thin air with this nonsense and getting people hyped up when there is no need to. It's madness!! I say, who cares if people have paintings of white Jesus. It's the lord and savior and he's the one getting you to salvation if you believe in him. I guess you'll figure out what skin color he is when you're dead. It shouldn't matter and divide people. It's pointless!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: J Bella Funk
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,425
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,201.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
There are bad people everywhere. They are in all departments of public service sadly. The best thing to do is fire them.

And when they don't get fired?

Donald Trump didn't call for cops to do anything.

Lies, and you know it.

The cops shot tear gas into protester crowds by their own will because the protesters were acting like clowns and burning down businesses and vandalism. No cop would do such a thing if the people were acting peaceful about it all. Trump called for cops to defend themselves.

Lies, and you know it.

There is law and order. The issue is that people think that it's Burger King all day every day and they want it their way when that is not the reality of America. There is law and order. It's just that nobody wants to be peaceful about it.

Lies, and you know it.

The freer the market, the freer the people. Have you ever heard of that? It's true. Just look to Sweden.

You mean Sweden, the evil socialist tyranny that we've consistently been told it is for years by the liars on the right?

They are all the same things. The difference is that they get more oppressive each time you move to a different system of government. Communism is the most oppressive of the bunch.

Oh, is it now.

The best way to make social safety nets better is to privatize it. That way there will be better quality programs so it will get better. This is what Sweden did. They did it with education, the monorail, etc. etc. Basically, anything that is expensive, just privatize it. When the economy is freer and they have enough money given back via these privatized programs, then they can pay for these social safety nets. I prefer the word "pension" here. I advocate for that instead of the basic stuff we have now in America. If a company does badly then they go under and another program will take over and make it better. That is the free hand of capitalism doing its magic. Consumer and buyer demand. Look up Anders Chydenius. He is the man behind it all. He was before the founders of America and he had the same ideas way before they all did. He's my personal hero.

So you believe that rather than people have the fundamental rights to education, healthcare, and other essential and fundamentals of life; we should instead grant corporations full reign. What a truly and utterly foolish, ignorant, and ultimately evil world view.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Christian Sonic Fan

Metal for life!
Jun 13, 2020
160
78
25
Pearisburg, Giles Country, Virginia
✟18,134.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
And when they don't get fired?
I guess report them? I don't know, you act like there's no hope anywhere. Why is this so hard for you to understand? We've interacted for several days now on different post. I don't understand you. Not one bit. I'm an American. Pure and simple. I'm optimistic but my God I don't understand you. It is completely confusing.
Lies, and you know it.
How is it lies when I genuinely believe it? All I watch is FOX news. There's nothing else on TV worth watching anyways.
You mean Sweden, the evil socialist tyranny that we've consistently been told it is for years by the liars on the right?
They aren't socialists. They are free market capitalists. We have the internet, yet people still believe in the lies that people tell them? It reminds me of what ancient writers said about the country of India and how it was claimed that giant 1 legged people live there and they used their big foot for shade. It is known that this false. Do you not have Google? Can you not look up how Sweden is? It's really easy.
I guess? Why are you trying to get at me? Jesus. Talk about a flash flood. Where did you even come from? You're giving me a headache.
So you believe that rather than people have the fundamental rights to education, healthcare, and other essential and fundamentals of life; we should instead grant corporations full reign. What a truly and utterly foolish, ignorant, and ultimately evil world view.
Evil? And let the national debt pile higher and higher with the basic pensions that everyone gets? If companies fight over customers then it will only get better, otherwise the companies will go under. This will give the government more money and allow them to pay off the national debt. Education companies will fight for customers, healthcare companies will fight for customers, etc. People will be taxed for this because it will be a service. It should not be free. Sweden doesn't allow it, why should America?

Moreover, Tax the poor as well because they are willing to pay. Keep in mind, this is what Sweden does and look how well they are doing. Wonderfully. I don't not believe in socialism. You advocate for that but I don't. It is foolish. Sweden tried it in the 70's and they failed. Good God I have the biggest headache with you right now.

I'm going to hit the ignore button on you. I'd rather have a peaceful conversation, not one like this. I'm not doing this anymore. Talk to the wall I guess, I'm not going to be involved. I'm not going to talk to you anymore.
 
Upvote 0

StephenDiscipleofYHWH

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2018
1,483
378
28
Ransom county
✟69,666.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Then God contradicted himself when he commanded the Cherubim to be made, if God commanded the Cherubim to be made, then that by default disapproves the Iconoclastic interpretation of the second commandment. There’s no way around this, also if your even consistent in your iconoclasm, then the second commandment would also forbid you to have any pictures in your house or to even own a camera. All pictures of Christ, the Theotokos, and the Saints are meant to represent a real reality in heaven, no one worships the images, you’ve effectively refuted your own position, if God commanded images of things in heaven to be made, that refutes your iconoclasm. Also the Bible pretty much destroys any notion of iconoclasm, Joshua bowed face down to the Ark with the Cherubim on them:

And Joshua tore his clothes, and fell to the earth upon his face before the ark of the LORD until the evening, he and the elders of Israel, and put dust upon their heads.

Joshua 7:6
No that's not true at all brother, again. The command of the Lord was to create the cherub and the rest of the Holy temple after the Pattern that is in heaven. Nowhere was it commanded that men should bow down to the Cherub or to worship the Cherub which is exactly what is commanded against when making an image.
Exodus 20:
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.

As far as making an image to the Lord the above command of the Lord applies there also. Then there is also this further elaboration from the Lord on this matter
Acts 17:
29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device.
30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:

Romans 1:
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.


As to that passage from Joshua it is best to remember that the Lord himself commanded him to get up even asking why he was lying upon his face. The Lord did not ask him to lie before the ark, neither did he praise him for it.
Joshua 7:10
10And the LORD said unto Joshua, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus upon thy face?
 
Upvote 0

iLearn

Active Member
Jul 12, 2019
95
36
45
Sabah
✟14,765.00
Country
Malaysia
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
After reading all this, I am now convinced Jesus Christ was not a negro. Before, I wanted to believe Jesus looked like a negro as depicted in the national geographic and I thought all pictures of Jesus as a white person are false. But now I am convinced He was born a white person unless someone prove it to me that his mother Mary was a negro. No offence to BLM but this is a fact Jesus Christ our God was a white dude.
 
Upvote 0

Barney2.0

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2017
6,003
2,336
Los Angeles
✟451,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No that's not true at all brother, again. The command of the Lord was to create the cherub and the rest of the Holy temple after the Pattern that is in heaven. Nowhere was it commanded that men should bow down to the Cherub or to worship the Cherub which is exactly what is commanded against when making an image.
Exodus 20:
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
No one here believes images or icons are worshipped, hence you quoting the second commandment is simply a strawman argument. I already proved Joshua did now dien to the Cherubs, something you didn’t address.

Romans 1:
20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
This is all in the context of exchanging the worship of God to the worship of false pagan gods. Infact the Bible makes it quite clear that Christ has revelaed the image of God and made him visible:

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.

Colossians 1:15

No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is Himself God and is at the Father's side, has made Him known.

John 1:18

Hence to hold to Iconoclasm is by default a denial of the incarnation.

As to that passage from Joshua it is best to remember that the Lord himself commanded him to get up even asking why he was lying upon his face. The Lord did not ask him to lie before the ark, neither did he praise him for it.
Joshua 7:10
10And the LORD said unto Joshua, Get thee up; wherefore liest thou thus upon thy face?
Your misquoting the passage, God didn’t tell Joshua to get up because prostration to the Ark was idolatry, he told him to get up and do something because Israel had fled from the Canaanites and had transgressed God’s Covenant, in Joshua 6:19 we find that the Israelites were not supposed to keep any of treasure they took from the Canaanites, but rather give it to God in his sanctuary, when some of the men of Israel stole the treasure for themselves God commanded Joshua to get up and do something about it instead of praying aimlessly, he didn’t tell Joshua to get up for breaking the second commandment:

But the LORD said to Joshua, “Stand up! Why have you fallen on your face Israel has sinned; they have transgressed My covenant that I commanded them, and they have taken some of what was devoted to destruction. Indeed, they have stolen and lied, and they have put these things with their own possessions. This is why the Israelites cannot stand against their enemies. They will turn their backs and run from their enemies, because they themselves have been set apart for destruction. I will no longer be with you unless you remove from among you whatever is devoted to destruction. Get up and consecrate the people, saying, ‘Consecrate yourselves for tomorrow, for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: Among you, O Israel, there are things devoted to destruction. You cannot stand against your enemies until you remove them. In the morning you must present yourselves tribe by tribe. The tribe that the LORD selects shall come forward clan by clan, and the clan that the LORD selects shall come forward family by family, and the family that the LORD selects shall come forward man by man. The one who is caught with the things devoted to destruction must be burned, along with all that belongs to him, because he has transgressed the covenant of the LORD and committed an outrage in Israel.’”

Joshua 7:10-15


The fact God most likely spoke to him through the Ark meant that the usage of icons was something prescribed in the Old Testament, God didn’t condemned Joshua for prostrating before the Ark either, which obviously means iconography and religous images in general aren’t a violation of the second commandment.
 
Upvote 0

Bobber

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2004
6,604
3,093
✟215,955.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I think all of this is horribly blown out of the water. Some people invision white Jesus, others invision black Jesus, other invision asian Jesus. If Jesus didn't care about skin color then why would we care about his skin color? God had to choose somebody. The skin color doesn't matter. It's like looking at 3 different Dodge Hellcats and they are all the same in every exact way but you assume that the one that is red goes the fastest even though they all have the same engine. One is blue, and the other is white. It makes no sense. The speed is the same, the gas tanks are the same, it is all the same!

People who think this racist stuff have ENTIRELY too much time on their hands and they are making problems out of thin air with this nonsense and getting people hyped up when there is no need to. It's madness!! I say, who cares if people have paintings of white Jesus. It's the lord and savior and he's the one getting you to salvation if you believe in him. I guess you'll figure out what skin color he is when you're dead. It shouldn't matter and divide people. It's pointless!
It's carnal worldly minded nonsense for sure.
 
Upvote 0

StephenDiscipleofYHWH

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2018
1,483
378
28
Ransom county
✟69,666.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
No one here believes images or icons are worshipped, hence you quoting the second commandment is simply a strawman argument. I already proved Joshua did now dien to the Cherubs, something you didn’t address.


This is all in the context of exchanging the worship of God to the worship of false pagan gods. Infact the Bible makes it quite clear that Christ has revelaed the image of God and made him visible:

Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature.

Colossians 1:15

No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is Himself God and is at the Father's side, has made Him known.

John 1:18

Hence to hold to Iconoclasm is by default a denial of the incarnation.


Your misquoting the passage, God didn’t tell Joshua to get up because prostration to the Ark was idolatry, he told him to get up and do something because Israel had fled from the Canaanites and had transgressed God’s Covenant, in Joshua 6:19 we find that the Israelites were not supposed to keep any of treasure they took from the Canaanites, but rather give it to God in his sanctuary, when some of the men of Israel stole the treasure for themselves God commanded Joshua to get up and do something about it instead of praying aimlessly, he didn’t tell Joshua to get up for breaking the second commandment:

But the LORD said to Joshua, “Stand up! Why have you fallen on your face Israel has sinned; they have transgressed My covenant that I commanded them, and they have taken some of what was devoted to destruction. Indeed, they have stolen and lied, and they have put these things with their own possessions. This is why the Israelites cannot stand against their enemies. They will turn their backs and run from their enemies, because they themselves have been set apart for destruction. I will no longer be with you unless you remove from among you whatever is devoted to destruction. Get up and consecrate the people, saying, ‘Consecrate yourselves for tomorrow, for this is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: Among you, O Israel, there are things devoted to destruction. You cannot stand against your enemies until you remove them. In the morning you must present yourselves tribe by tribe. The tribe that the LORD selects shall come forward clan by clan, and the clan that the LORD selects shall come forward family by family, and the family that the LORD selects shall come forward man by man. The one who is caught with the things devoted to destruction must be burned, along with all that belongs to him, because he has transgressed the covenant of the LORD and committed an outrage in Israel.’”

Joshua 7:10-15


The fact God most likely spoke to him through the Ark meant that the usage of icons was something prescribed in the Old Testament, God didn’t condemned Joshua for prostrating before the Ark either, which obviously means iconography and religous images in general aren’t a violation of the second commandment.
Well they are being bowed down to which the Lord commanded against in the Second commandment. As to joshua I did address it and showed the Lord did not praise him but told him to get up. So unless there is a command to worship the Lord with images by bowing down to them or praying to them all that remains is the command not to. No other command is given on this matter. What should be noted though is that the Glory of the lord/his presence would descend upon the Ark, so it was not that Joshua was praying to the ark or bowing down specifically to it but was waiting for the Glory of the Lord to appear above it as the Lord said he would do. Outside of this we cannot find the Lord saying his presence would be upon any other thing on earth(for the purposes of us communicating with him), except within each of us. So unless you can show a passage saying we need an image to bow to or worship so that God's presence could go upon it then you have no basis to keep this practice.

This is all in the context of changing the image of God to that which is corruptible to be worshiped, both in the context of Pagan God's and to make images of the Lord himself to worship them. That is why he said changed the image of God to something else, not simply making no gods. As to Christ being manifest in the flesh there is a reason we do not an exact picture of Christ available and that is because we would end up worshiping the image instead of the Lord. If we were meant to bow to images of God or worship them then it would be clearly known for a fact what he looked like. Since he did not do this all that remains is the command to not make images of God to worship them or bow down before them(which part you keep overlooking).

I didn't say he did, what I did say was that the Lord did not commend him for worshiping him in this way but rather told him to get up and asked why he was even laying there in the first place since there was much that needed done. Again there was no praise or command for this manner of worship, that being the case all that remains is the command against such practices.

It doesn't say he spoke to him through the ark, what we do know is that the Lord would descend upon the Ark to speak to his people something he never said he would do with any other thing except for within each of us as his temple. So there is still no precedent using images or idols for worshiping God. Again the Lord did not praise or command Joshua to bow down before the ark. The difference between what Joshua was doing and what you are advocating for is that the Glory of the Lord would descend upon the Ark of the Covenant and that is not the case with the images and Statues that you use.
 
Upvote 0

Barney2.0

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2017
6,003
2,336
Los Angeles
✟451,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Well they are being bowed down to which the Lord commanded against in the Second commandment. As to joshua I did address it and showed the Lord did not praise him but told him to get up. So unless there is a command to worship the Lord with images by bowing down to them or praying to them all that remains is the command not to. No other command is given on this matter. What should be noted though is that the Glory of the lord/his presence would descend upon the Ark, so it was not that Joshua was praying to the ark or bowing down specifically to it but was waiting for the Glory of the Lord to appear above it as the Lord said he would do. Outside of this we cannot find the Lord saying his presence would be upon any other thing on earth(for the purposes of us communicating with him), except within each of us. So unless you can show a passage saying we need an image to bow to or worship so that God's presence could go upon it then you have no basis to keep this practice.
Then Joshua was an idolater, very simple. I already showed you based on the context of the passage that God didn’t tell Joshua to get up because he was committing idolatry, you misquoted the passage or justify your iconoclasm, God told Joshua to get up so that he could judge those who violated God’s Covenant and his command to not take any of the looted treasure for themselves. Why would any command be given if iconoclasm was never prescribed by scripture, your making an argument from silence without having proved that iconoclasm is even taught in scripture. So if by your logic the indwelling of God in the Ark justifies venerating it, then it should likewise justify the veneration of images of Christ who is God in the flesh and the Theotokos and Saints whom God in his glory and through his Holy Spirit indwells in, so your argument backfires on your own position.

This is all in the context of changing the image of God to that which is corruptible to be worshiped, both in the context of Pagan God's and to make images of the Lord himself to worship them. That is why he said changed the image of God to something else, not simply making no gods. As to Christ being manifest in the flesh there is a reason we do not an exact picture of Christ available and that is because we would end up worshiping the image instead of the Lord. If we were meant to bow to images of God or worship them then it would be clearly known for a fact what he looked like. Since he did not do this all that remains is the command to not make images of God to worship them or bow down before them(which part you keep overlooking).
Your very right in your definition of idolatry, thankfully I have heard of no statue or icon in any Church that exchanges God’s image for it’s own to be worshipped. Also Colossians 1:15 tells us that Christ is the perfect image of the invisible Father, and you worship him, do deny images of the incarnate Lord can be made is to deny the incarnation of the Lord, also no one worships any image here, worship and adoration is given to the Christ that’s depicted, and veneration and honor to those Saints depicted. Didn’t you justify the veneration of Joshua to the Ark because God’s glory dwelt in it, why are you suddenly turning off your Iconoclasm when it comes to Christ. We don’t need to know what Christ looked like to venerate images of him anymore than the Israelites needed to know what kind of snake God wanted the brass serpent to look like for them to build it, literally all your arguments are based on silence. You already defined what the Second Commandment is which is exchanging the image of God for that of creatures to be worshipped, that’s not what icons are, I don’t understand how you even made that admission while still arguing for Iconocalsm based on the Second Commandment.

I didn't say he did, what I did say was that the Lord did not commend him for worshiping him in this way but rather told him to get up and asked why he was even laying there in the first place since there was much that needed done. Again there was no praise or command for this manner of worship, that being the case all that remains is the command against such practices.
So because God didn’t commend Joshua, it somehow means that God disapproved this form of worship, I wonder if you would show the same consistency and apply your logic to Numbers 20:6, if the command was against such practices, then Joshua effectively committed idolatry, you have effectively contradicted yourself again, either Joshua committed idolatry or he didn’t. To make this easy I’m just going to forward you and remind you whatnthe Second Commandment is based on your own definition of what it teaches:

This is all in the context of changing the image of God to that which is corruptible to be worshiped, both in the context of Pagan God's and to make images of the Lord himself to worship them.
If your consistent in what you say, then the Second Commandment wouldn’t touch the veneration of images rather the worship of images, thus Joshua wasn’t committing idolatry when he bowed to the Ark neither is any Christian that venerates an icon of Christ, the Theotokos, or the Saints. Any attempt to argue for Iconoclasm on your part would simply be desperation, you can either leave the heresy of Iconoclasm and admit it isn’t Biblical or your going to change your definition of the Second Commandment in which case your position loses all credibility, and I know that’s what you’ll try and do.

It doesn't say he spoke to him through the ark, what we do know is that the Lord would descend upon the Ark to speak to his people something he never said he would do with any other thing except for within each of us as his temple. So there is still no precedent using images or idols for worshiping God. Again the Lord did not praise or command Joshua to bow down before the ark. The difference between what Joshua was doing and what you are advocating for is that the Glory of the Lord would descend upon the Ark of the Covenant and that is not the case with the images and Statues that you use.
So he spoke through the Ark, if you descend upon the roof to speak to someone it means your talking from the roof, if God descends upon the Ark to speak to his people, it means he speaks from or through the Ark. I thought all images were idolatry, why command the making of the Ark in the first place, your arguing for a position based on your own presupposition of Iconoclasm without having first proven the teaching of Iconoclasm is Biblical, it makes absolutely no sense. God commanded the image of the brass serpent to be made, his glory never descended upon it, so that is also enough to refute your whole argument that God commanded idolatry on only certain occasions. By the way you previously said all image are idolatry, if that is the case, than no images would be present in the Old Testament at all, whether God in his glory descends upon them or not is irrelevant, the fact images are made for any purpose what so ever contradicts Iconoclasm. If he indwells in all us Christians, then your only confirming the veneration of the Saints in images, if his glory rests in us, then we can make images of those people of whom God indwells in as his temple. So are all images idolatry or not? Because if they are, then whether God’s glory descends upon them or not becomes irrelevant since they are still idols, if they aren’t idols, then the position of Iconocalsm automatically becomes moot, this is something your not getting, if any image is made regardless if God’s glory descends upon it or not, then Iconoclasm gets disproven automatically. Also you’ve already said God’s glory dwells within us Christians, that also refutes your own position, so yes every image I have is of people whom God’s glory indwells in both their earthly lives and now as they are in heaven serving God. Everytime you try to defend Iconoclasm your only damaging your position more and more, I’d ask you to be humble and accept Iconoclasm isn’t Biblical, to attempt to argue for it when you keep refuting yourself is impossible, and it’s not your fault, anything false doctrine that’s Unbiblical will fall short of its claims and fall apart quickly when we actually look at the Scriptures.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

StephenDiscipleofYHWH

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2018
1,483
378
28
Ransom county
✟69,666.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Then Joshua was an idolater, very simple. I already showed you based on the context of the passage that God didn’t tell Joshua to get up because he was committing idolatry, you misquoted the passage or justify your iconoclasm, God told Joshua to get up so that he could judge those who violated God’s Covenant and his command to not take any of the looted treasure for themselves. Why would any command be given if iconoclasm was never prescribed by scripture, your making an argument from silence without having proved that iconoclasm is even taught in scripture. So if by your logic the indwelling of God in the Ark justifies venerating it, then it should likewise justify the veneration of images of Christ who is God in the flesh and the Theotokos and Saints whom God in his glory and through his Holy Spirit indwells in, so your argument backfires on your own position.


Your very right in your definition of idolatry, thankfully I have heard of no statue or icon in any Church that exchanges God’s image for it’s own to be worshipped. Also Colossians 1:15 tells us that Christ is the perfect image of the invisible Father, and you worship him, do deny images of the incarnate Lord can be made is to deny the incarnation of the Lord, also no one worships any image here, worship and adoration is given to the Christ that’s depicted, and veneration and honor to those Saints depicted. Didn’t you justify the veneration of Joshua to the Ark because God’s glory dwelt in it, why are you suddenly turning off your Iconoclasm when it comes to Christ. We don’t need to know what Christ looked like to venerate images of him anymore than the Israelites needed to know what kind of snake God wanted the brass serpent to look like for them to build it, literally all your arguments are based on silence. You already defined what the Second Commandment is which is exchanging the image of God for that of creatures to be worshipped, that’s not what icons are, I don’t understand how you even made that admission while still arguing for Iconocalsm based on the Second Commandment.


So because God didn’t commend Joshua, it somehow means that God disapproved this form of worship, I wonder if you would show the same consistency and apply your logic to Numbers 20:6, if the command was against such practices, then Joshua effectively committed idolatry, you have effectively contradicted yourself again, either Joshua committed idolatry or he didn’t. To make this easy I’m just going to forward you and remind you whatnthe Second Commandment is based on your own definition of what it teaches:


If your consistent in what you say, then the Second Commandment wouldn’t touch the veneration of images rather the worship of images, thus Joshua wasn’t committing idolatry when he bowed to the Ark neither is any Christian that venerates an icon of Christ, the Theotokos, or the Saints. Any attempt to argue for Iconoclasm on your part would simply be desperation, you can either leave the heresy of Iconoclasm and admit it isn’t Biblical or your going to change your definition of the Second Commandment in which case your position loses all credibility, and I know that’s what you’ll try and do.


So he spoke through the Ark, if you descend upon the roof to speak to someone it means your talking from the roof, if God descends upon the Ark to speak to his people, it means he speaks from or through the Ark. I thought all images were idolatry, why command the making of the Ark in the first place, your arguing for a position based on your own presupposition of Iconoclasm without having first proven the teaching of Iconoclasm is Biblical, it makes absolutely no sense. God commanded the image of the brass serpent to be made, his glory never descended upon it, so that is also enough to refute your whole argument that God commanded idolatry on only certain occasions. By the way you previously said all image are idolatry, if that is the case, than no images would be present in the Old Testament at all, whether God in his glory descends upon them or not is irrelevant, the fact images are made for any purpose what so ever contradicts Iconoclasm. If he indwells in all us Christians, then your only confirming the veneration of the Saints in images, if his glory rests in us, then we can make images of those people of whom God indwells in as his temple. So are all images idolatry or not? Because if they are, then whether God’s glory descends upon them or not becomes irrelevant since they are still idols, if they aren’t idols, then the position of Iconocalsm automatically becomes moot, this is something your not getting, if any image is made regardless if God’s glory descends upon it or not, then Iconoclasm gets disproven automatically. Also you’ve already said God’s glory dwells within us Christians, that also refutes your own position, so yes every image I have is of people whom God’s glory indwells in both their earthly lives and now as they are in heaven serving God. Everytime you try to defend Iconoclasm your only damaging your position more and more, I’d ask you to be humble and accept Iconoclasm isn’t Biblical, to attempt to argue for it when you keep refuting yourself is impossible, and it’s not your fault, anything false doctrine that’s Unbiblical will fall short of its claims and fall apart quickly when we actually look at the Scriptures.
No he was not an Idolator. Because he was not bowing down before the Ark for any other reasons than to humble himself and to wait for the presence of the Lord which would dwell there to speak with Israel. It was not that the presence of the Lord was always there but it would come down to dwell there when the Lord would speak with Israel. This is something that cannot be said about any of the things you are trying to use this passage for justification to bow before and worship. Because the Lord does not come down to dwell in or upon those images or pictures as he did the Ark, because he never said he would do anything of the sort. What he does say is that he will dwell within each of us. It seems you have not yet understood what the bible is saying on this matter brother.

Or bowed before/to, again bowed before/to is the second half of it which you do in fact do. So you are breaking this command of God since he says either or when talking about worship or bowing before graven images(or even both). So you picked on of them to do, which is still a breaking of the commandment. Christ is the perfect image of the father, but you do not even know what Christ looked like but rather you bow before images that look nothing like him since they all vary wildly in what they look like. If it were necessary for or right for us to make images of him then those images would be uniform without variation in the way/image of how they looked in regards to how he looked on earth as a Hebrew from one of the Twelve tribes. He was not venerating the ark in regards to bowing or worship it, he was bowing before the ark to humble himself and wait for the presence of the Lord to show up and speak with him as the Lord promised he would in exodus. That the pattern of what was made on earth for the earthly temple had to be exact in all likeness of that which was in heaven means that he Lord revealed exactly how every part was to look, that it doesn't describe it in every minute detail to us doesn't do so to those fashioning the snake and other images. And if this were the case about images of Christ then there would only be one exact depiction and not thousands of variations. The second commandment teaches that we do not bow before any image or anything on heaven or earth and that we must worship any image of anything on heaven or earth. Joshua bowed before the Ark of God to wait for the presence of the Lord to descend upon it and to humble himself as he waited. No contradiction just facts.

I do in fact as they are not bowing down to the ark or to any other image but rather to the Glory of the Lord in the same manner Joshua did as he waited for the Glory of God to appear. No Idolatry in either case. What you see as bowing before an ark is in fact Joshua bowing down to humble himself as he waits for the Lord to come down upon the Ark.
Numbers 20:6
6And Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the LORD appeared unto them.

To say the exact same thing for a umpteenth time, the Second commandment teaches that we are not to make any image in the likeness of anything on heaven or on earth to bow down to it or worship it. Those are the two parts of that commandment to not do to images, one or both of which you are clearly doing. Neither of which is shown in either of the passages you quoted. Don't worry brother, the definition given from the bible will not change and my ability to quote that definition over again will not diminish.
Exodus 20:
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

It means that he speaks form atop the ark. All images made to be bowed before/to or worshiped are idolatry again that is the definition given by the Lord. The ark was not made to bowed to, the ark was made for the presence of the Lord to descend upon. Whose presence we bowed to, not the ark but the Glory of God that was literally upon it. God commanded the Snake to be made after the pattern that was in heaven(Hebrews 8:5) that is why the command was given and not for the purpose of bowing before it OR worshiping it. I previously said all images are Idolatry if they are being bowed to or worshiped, I have not changed my argument it remains the same. So if an image is made for a purpose other than to be bowed to/before or worshiped then there is no command against it as the two parts of the second commandment were not to bow to them/before or worship/serve them. No, because an image does not have the Spirit of the Lord in them when we fashion them with out hands. Only this physical Body contains the spirit of God as it is his temple on earth when we die we give up the Spirit and await the Resurrection either first or second on the last day. So to make a statue to someone would not have the Spirit of God in them thus rendering your argument moot, it then goes back to you simply making an image to bow to/before or worship(which second half you deny but first remains true). All images no, all images made to be bowed to/before or worshiped/served yes. The images you make to be bowed to, yes they are idolatry as they break the Lord's very specific commandment. Well the Lord is dwelling within us now, but we do not worship or bow to each other as we each are simply servants of God and not the Master. We are no greater than the angels who we are also not to bow to or worship(Revelation 22:8-9) again refuting the argument of Saint worship/veneration and statue making to bow to. Also the only men serving him in heaven at this time are the twenty four elders, no other person will enter into the third part of heaven until the first resurrection at Christ's return, until then all those who die sleep in the grave.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Rescued One

...yet not I, but the grace of God that is with me
Dec 12, 2002
35,521
6,402
Midwest
✟79,556.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
I find it interesting that many Christians are upset about statues being removed. Isn't it idolatry to be so obsessed with these statues and wanting to protect them?

I'm not terribly concerned about statues, but vandalism is wrong and those people want Americans to forget their history so they can replace our government with socialism.
 
Upvote 0

Barney2.0

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2017
6,003
2,336
Los Angeles
✟451,221.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No he was not an Idolator. Because he was not bowing down before the Ark for any other reasons than to humble himself and to wait for the presence of the Lord which would dwell there to speak with Israel. It was not that the presence of the Lord was always there but it would come down to dwell there when the Lord would speak with Israel. This is something that cannot be said about any of the things you are trying to use this passage for justification to bow before and worship. Because the Lord does not come down to dwell in or upon those images or pictures as he did the Ark, because he never said he would do anything of the sort. What he does say is that he will dwell within each of us. It seems you have not yet understood what the bible is saying on this matter brother.
Your definition of the Second Commandment renders him an idolater, regardless your point is irrelevant. He bows down to the Ark before God even came down to dwell in it, and he didn’t even know God came down until he spoke to him, so your argument that he wasn’t venerating the Ark itself fails.

Or bowed before/to, again bowed before/to is the second half of it which you do in fact do. So you are breaking this command of God since he says either or when talking about worship or bowing before graven images(or even both). So you picked on of them to do, which is still a breaking of the commandment. Christ is the perfect image of the father, but you do not even know what Christ looked like but rather you bow before images that look nothing like him since they all vary wildly in what they look like. If it were necessary for or right for us to make images of him then those images would be uniform without variation in the way/image of how they looked in regards to how he looked on earth as a Hebrew from one of the Twelve tribes. He was not venerating the ark in regards to bowing or worship it, he was bowing before the ark to humble himself and wait for the presence of the Lord to show up and speak with him as the Lord promised he would in exodus. That the pattern of what was made on earth for the earthly temple had to be exact in all likeness of that which was in heaven means that he Lord revealed exactly how every part was to look, that it doesn't describe it in every minute detail to us doesn't do so to those fashioning the snake and other images. And if this were the case about images of Christ then there would only be one exact depiction and not thousands of variations. The second commandment teaches that we do not bow before any image or anything on heaven or earth and that we must worship any image of anything on heaven or earth. Joshua bowed before the Ark of God to wait for the presence of the Lord to descend upon it and to humble himself as he waited. No contradiction just facts.
The Israelites weren’t told what kind of serpent the Brass Serpent had to be before they made it either, your argument of we don’t know how Christ looked like or what type of man he was, therefore we can’t make any images of him is a non sequitur fallacy. The Cherubs in the Temple and the Cherubs on the Ark didn’t look the same exactly, so again this is a non sequitur. No one is saying Joshua is worshipping the Ark, you need to stop the strawman arguments. The passage doesn’t say he was waiting for the presence of the Lord that’s what your reading into it to justify Iconoclasm, Joshua didn’t know the Lord was even going to appear up until the time he actually did, he was aimlessly praying before it due to the Israelite defeat at the hand of the Canaanites that had happened earlier due to their transgressions against the Lord. If there are image sources being venerated, then your Iconoclastic position contains a huge contradiction.

I do in fact as they are not bowing down to the ark or to any other image but rather to the Glory of the Lord in the same manner Joshua did as he waited for the Glory of God to appear. No Idolatry in either case. What you see as bowing before an ark is in fact Joshua bowing down to humble himself as he waits for the Lord to come down upon the Ark.
Numbers 20:6
6And Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they fell upon their faces: and the glory of the LORD appeared unto them.

To say the exact same thing for a umpteenth time, the Second commandment teaches that we are not to make any image in the likeness of anything on heaven or on earth to bow down to it or worship it. Those are the two parts of that commandment to not do to images, one or both of which you are clearly doing. Neither of which is shown in either of the passages you quoted. Don't worry brother, the definition given from the bible will not change and my ability to quote that definition over again will not diminish.
Exodus 20:
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing face down to the Ark, not to the glory of God, unless the Glory of God was already there while Joshua was bowing to the Ark, so your position simply fails by a simple reading of the passages. I thought the Lord rebuked Joshua for bowing down to the Ark, why are you changing your position to Joshua being humble in waiting for the Lord to appear. Previously you argued that because the Lord didn’t commend or praise Joshua and because of the Second Commandment it would make it idolatry, that was literally what you said:

I didn't say he did, what I did say was that the Lord did not commend him for worshiping him in this way but rather told him to get up and asked why he was even laying there in the first place since there was much that needed done. Again there was no praise or command for this manner of worship, that being the case all that remains is the command against such practices.

I quoted Numbers 20:6 to disprove that argument from silence you made. Also as I said Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing before the Ark itself, there’s no mention in it of God’s glory at the specific time here bowed to it, hence your argument fails.

You literally changed your argument and your literally trying to reconstruct the the Second commanded to forbid images that are bowed to specifically so that you can make your case and make your Iconocalsm consistent, “the thou shall not bow to them nor serve them” is not dependent on the first commandment which says not to make any image of anything on heaven on Earth, the second clause to not bow to them isn’t dependent on the first clause of the commandment which is to not make any graven images at all, the second clause is simply an additional warning not to serve or bow to graven images so if you were consistent in your Iconoclastic interpretation of the Second Commandment, then even photographs would come under the condemnation of the Second Commandment and the Old Testament would become inconsistent as we do see images being used in worship numerous times in the Old Testament. You previously said all images are idolatry, your now saying that only images that are bowed to or served as idolatry, so yes you have changed your Iconoclasm so that it can appear consistent, yes your quite right the definition given from the Bible won’t change so your still stuck with the fact that God ends up commanding the making of images and the veneration of certain images and statues, so either God contradicted himself, or not all religous imagery is condemned and the veneration of images isn’t what the Second Commandment is talking about, and that’s obvious given your own definition of what the Second Commandment is:

This is all in the context of changing the image of God to that which is corruptible to be worshiped, both in the context of Pagan God's and to make images of the Lord himself to worship them. That is why he said changed the image of God to something else, not simply making no gods.

It means that he speaks form atop the ark. All images made to be bowed before/to or worshiped are idolatry again that is the definition given by the Lord. The ark was not made to bowed to, the ark was made for the presence of the Lord to descend upon. Whose presence we bowed to, not the ark but the Glory of God that was literally upon it. God commanded the Snake to be made after the pattern that was in heaven(Hebrews 8:5) that is why the command was given and not for the purpose of bowing before it OR worshiping it. I previously said all images are Idolatry if they are being bowed to or worshiped, I have not changed my argument it remains the same. So if an image is made for a purpose other than to be bowed to/before or worshiped then there is no command against it as the two parts of the second commandment were not to bow to them/before or worship/serve them. No, because an image does not have the Spirit of the Lord in them when we fashion them with out hands. Only this physical Body contains the spirit of God as it is his temple on earth when we die we give up the Spirit and await the Resurrection either first or second on the last day. So to make a statue to someone would not have the Spirit of God in them thus rendering your argument moot, it then goes back to you simply making an image to bow to/before or worship(which second half you deny but first remains true). All images no, all images made to be bowed to/before or worshiped/served yes. The images you make to be bowed to, yes they are idolatry as they break the Lord's very specific commandment. Well the Lord is dwelling within us now, but we do not worship or bow to each other as we each are simply servants of God and not the Master. We are no greater than the angels who we are also not to bow to or worship(Revelation 22:8-9) again refuting the argument of Saint worship/veneration and statue making to bow to. Also the only men serving him in heaven at this time are the twenty four elders, no other person will enter into the third part of heaven until the first resurrection at Christ's return, until then all those who die sleep in the grave.
It doesn’t say he spoke from atop the Ark, the passages have him speaking from the Ark, but it doesn’t matter anyways. Actually no, if your consistent in your Iconocalsm, then the Second Commandment would forbid all images, the second clause of the Second Commandment isn’t dependent of the first clause so your argument is simply wrong and erroneous based on a plain reading of the Second Commandment, so that would include ever image in the world if your consistent in your Iconoclasm which is impossible both from a Biblical perspective as we have seen and from a logical perspective. Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bow to the Ark before the presence of the Lord descended upon it, so yes the Ark was bowed down to and people did venerate it. The icons of the Saints are made after the pattern of those in heaven, like I said Iconocalsm isn’t a defendable position from a Biblical perspective. The brass serpent made by the hands of the Israelites didn’t have any spirit in it either, but like you said it represented a real reality in heaven and that was enough cause to make it, the Images of the Saints likewise are representations of a real reality in heaven, icons are a window to heaven, so your argument still is moot. You also misquote Revelation 22:8-9 to attempt to show that the veneration of created beings is idolatry, your making a strawman argument, John didn’t merely bow down to the Angel, he tried to worship it which was why he was rebuked, not merely for bowing down, on the contrary scripture has numerous instances of honor being given to men or creatures by bowing or by prostration in a sense of veneration, ur not worship:

Now Joseph was the governor of the land, the person who sold grain to all its people. So when Joseph's brothers arrived, they bowed down to him with their faces to the ground.

Genesis 42:6

The company of the prophets from Jericho, who were watching, said, "The spirit of Elijah is resting on Elisha." And they went to meet him and bowed to the ground before him.

2 Kings 2:15

Paul likewise tells us to “give honor where honor is due:”

Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

Romans 13:7

It seems you hold to the false doctrine of Soul Sleep, well the Bible makes it clear that everyone that dies especially believers are both conscious and alive with God:


And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew 10:28

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?

Revelation 6:9-10

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Revelation 20:4

Then he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried to the Lord, “O Lord my God, let this child’s soul come into him again.” And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived.

1 Kings 17:21-22

And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

John 11:26
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

StephenDiscipleofYHWH

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2018
1,483
378
28
Ransom county
✟69,666.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Your definition of the Second Commandment renders him an idolater, regardless your point is irrelevant. He bows down to the Ark before God even came down to dwell in it, and he didn’t even know God came down until he spoke to him, so your argument that he wasn’t venerating the Ark itself fails.


The Israelites weren’t told what kind of serpent the Brass Serpent had to be before they made it either, your argument of we don’t know how Christ looked like or what type of man he was, therefore we can’t make any images of him is a non sequitur fallacy. The Cherubs in the Temple and the Cherubs on the Ark didn’t look the same exactly, so again this is a non sequitur. No one is saying Joshua is worshipping the Ark, you need to stop the strawman arguments. The passage doesn’t say he was waiting for the presence of the Lord that’s what your reading into it to justify Iconoclasm, Joshua didn’t know the Lord was even going to appear up until the time he actually did, he was aimlessly praying before it due to the Israelite defeat at the hand of the Canaanites that had happened earlier due to their transgressions against the Lord. If there are image sources being venerated, then your Iconoclastic position contains a huge contradiction.


Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing face down to the Ark, not to the glory of God, unless the Glory of God was already there while Joshua was bowing to the Ark, so your position simply fails by a simple reading of the passages. I thought the Lord rebuked Joshua for bowing down to the Ark, why are you changing your position to Joshua being humble in waiting for the Lord to appear. Previously you argued that because the Lord didn’t commend or praise Joshua and because of the Second Commandment it would make it idolatry, that was literally what you said:



I quoted Numbers 20:6 to disprove that argument from silence you made. Also as I said Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing before the Ark itself, there’s no mention in it of God’s glory at the specific time here bowed to it, hence your argument fails.

You literally changed your argument and your literally trying to reconstruct the the Second commanded to forbid images that are bowed to specifically so that you can make your case and make your Iconocalsm consistent, “the thou shall not bow to them nor serve them” is not dependent on the first commandment which says not to make any image of anything on heaven on Earth, the second clause to not bow to them isn’t dependent on the first clause of the commandment which is to not make any graven images at all, the second clause is simply an additional warning not to serve or bow to graven images so if you were consistent in your Iconoclastic interpretation of the Second Commandment, then even photographs would come under the condemnation of the Second Commandment and the Old Testament would become inconsistent as we do see images being used in worship numerous times in the Old Testament. You previously said all images are idolatry, your now saying that only images that are bowed to or served as idolatry, so yes you have changed your Iconoclasm so that it can appear consistent, yes your quite right the definition given from the Bible won’t change so your still stuck with the fact that God ends up commanding the making of images and the veneration of certain images and statues, so either God contradicted himself, or not all religous imagery is condemned and the veneration of images isn’t what the Second Commandment is talking about, and that’s obvious given your own definition of what the Second Commandment is:




It doesn’t say he spoke from atop the Ark, the passages have him speaking from the Ark, but it doesn’t matter anyways. Actually no, if your consistent in your Iconocalsm, then the Second Commandment would forbid all images, the second clause of the Second Commandment isn’t dependent of the first clause so your argument is simply wrong and erroneous based on a plain reading of the Second Commandment, so that would include ever image in the world if your consistent in your Iconoclasm which is impossible both from a Biblical perspective as we have seen and from a logical perspective. Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bow to the Ark before the presence of the Lord descended upon it, so yes the Ark was bowed down to and people did venerate it. The icons of the Saints are made after the pattern of those in heaven, like I said Iconocalsm isn’t a defendable position from a Biblical perspective. The brass serpent made by the hands of the Israelites didn’t have any spirit in it either, but like you said it represented a real reality in heaven and that was enough cause to make it, the Images of the Saints likewise are representations of a real reality in heaven, icons are a window to heaven, so your argument still is moot. You also misquote Revelation 22:8-9 to attempt to show that the veneration of created beings is idolatry, your making a strawman argument, John didn’t merely bow down to the Angel, he tried to worship it which was why he was rebuked, not merely for bowing down, on the contrary scripture has numerous instances of honor being given to men or creatures by bowing or by prostration in a sense of veneration, ur not worship:

Now Joseph was the governor of the land, the person who sold grain to all its people. So when Joseph's brothers arrived, they bowed down to him with their faces to the ground.

Genesis 42:6

The company of the prophets from Jericho, who were watching, said, "The spirit of Elijah is resting on Elisha." And they went to meet him and bowed to the ground before him.

2 Kings 2:15

Paul likewise tells us to “give honor where honor is due:”

Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

Romans 13:7

It seems you hold to the false doctrine of Soul Sleep, well the Bible makes it clear that everyone that dies especially believers are both conscious and alive with God:


And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew 10:28

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?

Revelation 6:9-10

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Revelation 20:4

Then he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried to the Lord, “O Lord my God, let this child’s soul come into him again.” And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived.

1 Kings 17:21-22

And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

John 11:26
It still stands as the Lord promised to speak to Israel in this manner so Joshua bowing before the Ark to wait for the Lord make perfect sense in the Light of scirpture. Joshua venerating an inanimate object against the Command of God as you contend does not make sense in the Light of Scripture.

When the serpent was made it was made according to the command of God in the exact fashion he wanted it done. If the images of Christ were to follow the same pattern then there would be one uniform image given to be made of him, there is not though so using the snake or the cherub as precedent fails as a valid argument. The passage said he bows before the Ark in prayer, the ark is where the Lord will appear to speak with Israel it is clear from scripture that Joshua was not venerating the ark but rather praying to Lord and waiting/hoping for him to come and speak with him. And still you have not shown any images being worshiped or bowed to, no precedent for idol worship brother.

A simple reading shows that Joshua bowed before the ark in prayer, not to the ark but to the Lord and since we know the Lord goes down upon the ark to speak with Israel it is clear what the purpose of Joshua doing these things was(and I already stated repeatedly what those were). I didn't say he rebuked him, I said that he didn't praise him or command him to do this. Before the argument started I didn't know as much as I do now but the position I hold has not changed, Joshua did have work that needed to be done, the Lord did not praise him for bowing to the ark neither was Joshua bowing to the ark in the first place but rather humbling himself and waiting for the Lord to speak to him as it was told Israel he would speak from the Ark by descending down upon it. And Again I never said Joshua committed Idolatry, what I did say was that Joshua was not bowing to the ark and that there was never a command or praise given to anyone for bowing to the ark or worshiping it.

My argument is the same. The first and second part of this command are indeed dependent upon each other read again:
Exodus 20:
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;

It is very simple do not make any image to bow to or worship. If you make an image and you do not bow down to it or worship it then it is not idolatry. Very simply brother. We do not see God's righteous people worshiping images or bowing to them in the Old or new testament brother as it is commanded against. No contradiction brother, God did not command the images that were after the pattern of heaven(or any images for that matter) to be bowed to or worshiped so there is no breaking of his second commandment. The definition I use is the direct one from scripture, I'm not sure which one you are using brother.

They are both dependent on each other brother it clearly seen and read that way, thou shalt not make any graven image, thou shalt not bow down thyself to them nor serve them. Both the making of the image and the two forms of worshiping the image are dependent first on the image being made. It would follow based on a clear reading of Scripture that only the images and statues made to be bowed down to or worshiped break the second commandment. Joshua bowed down before the ark not to it, and he did so in prayer to the Lord waiting for him to come speak with him(which the Lord did). He did not venerate the ark or bow to it or worship it he instead prayed to the Lord and humbled himself as he waited for the presence of the Lord to appear. So no God's people did not follow the practice of venerating graven images, but rather kept God's second commandment. The saints are not in heaven, they are sleeping in the grave, though again that point is moot since we are not worship or bow to any image at all. It was cause to make it because it had to be a shadow of the heavenly sanctuary pointing towards Christ. The saints are sleeping the grave, and whats more there was never any command to make an image to the saints but there was indeed a command to make an image of the snake(because of its importance to pointing towards the heavenly sanctuary and Christ). And what you are doing is worship also brother, praying to the statues of men who are still sleeping in the grave awaiting the Lord's return who have no power at all at this time but still you pray to them hoping for them to pray on your behalf though they know nothing.

Yes men DID bow before other men, but now we only bow before the Lord. Honour where honor is due does not mean bowing before men, especially to statues of those who are not even awake at this time.

I will reply to the last half in a separate post.
 
Upvote 0

StephenDiscipleofYHWH

Well-Known Member
Jul 11, 2018
1,483
378
28
Ransom county
✟69,666.00
Country
United States
Faith
Apostolic
Marital Status
Single
Your definition of the Second Commandment renders him an idolater, regardless your point is irrelevant. He bows down to the Ark before God even came down to dwell in it, and he didn’t even know God came down until he spoke to him, so your argument that he wasn’t venerating the Ark itself fails.


The Israelites weren’t told what kind of serpent the Brass Serpent had to be before they made it either, your argument of we don’t know how Christ looked like or what type of man he was, therefore we can’t make any images of him is a non sequitur fallacy. The Cherubs in the Temple and the Cherubs on the Ark didn’t look the same exactly, so again this is a non sequitur. No one is saying Joshua is worshipping the Ark, you need to stop the strawman arguments. The passage doesn’t say he was waiting for the presence of the Lord that’s what your reading into it to justify Iconoclasm, Joshua didn’t know the Lord was even going to appear up until the time he actually did, he was aimlessly praying before it due to the Israelite defeat at the hand of the Canaanites that had happened earlier due to their transgressions against the Lord. If there are image sources being venerated, then your Iconoclastic position contains a huge contradiction.


Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing face down to the Ark, not to the glory of God, unless the Glory of God was already there while Joshua was bowing to the Ark, so your position simply fails by a simple reading of the passages. I thought the Lord rebuked Joshua for bowing down to the Ark, why are you changing your position to Joshua being humble in waiting for the Lord to appear. Previously you argued that because the Lord didn’t commend or praise Joshua and because of the Second Commandment it would make it idolatry, that was literally what you said:



I quoted Numbers 20:6 to disprove that argument from silence you made. Also as I said Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bowing before the Ark itself, there’s no mention in it of God’s glory at the specific time here bowed to it, hence your argument fails.

You literally changed your argument and your literally trying to reconstruct the the Second commanded to forbid images that are bowed to specifically so that you can make your case and make your Iconocalsm consistent, “the thou shall not bow to them nor serve them” is not dependent on the first commandment which says not to make any image of anything on heaven on Earth, the second clause to not bow to them isn’t dependent on the first clause of the commandment which is to not make any graven images at all, the second clause is simply an additional warning not to serve or bow to graven images so if you were consistent in your Iconoclastic interpretation of the Second Commandment, then even photographs would come under the condemnation of the Second Commandment and the Old Testament would become inconsistent as we do see images being used in worship numerous times in the Old Testament. You previously said all images are idolatry, your now saying that only images that are bowed to or served as idolatry, so yes you have changed your Iconoclasm so that it can appear consistent, yes your quite right the definition given from the Bible won’t change so your still stuck with the fact that God ends up commanding the making of images and the veneration of certain images and statues, so either God contradicted himself, or not all religous imagery is condemned and the veneration of images isn’t what the Second Commandment is talking about, and that’s obvious given your own definition of what the Second Commandment is:




It doesn’t say he spoke from atop the Ark, the passages have him speaking from the Ark, but it doesn’t matter anyways. Actually no, if your consistent in your Iconocalsm, then the Second Commandment would forbid all images, the second clause of the Second Commandment isn’t dependent of the first clause so your argument is simply wrong and erroneous based on a plain reading of the Second Commandment, so that would include ever image in the world if your consistent in your Iconoclasm which is impossible both from a Biblical perspective as we have seen and from a logical perspective. Joshua 7:6 has Joshua bow to the Ark before the presence of the Lord descended upon it, so yes the Ark was bowed down to and people did venerate it. The icons of the Saints are made after the pattern of those in heaven, like I said Iconocalsm isn’t a defendable position from a Biblical perspective. The brass serpent made by the hands of the Israelites didn’t have any spirit in it either, but like you said it represented a real reality in heaven and that was enough cause to make it, the Images of the Saints likewise are representations of a real reality in heaven, icons are a window to heaven, so your argument still is moot. You also misquote Revelation 22:8-9 to attempt to show that the veneration of created beings is idolatry, your making a strawman argument, John didn’t merely bow down to the Angel, he tried to worship it which was why he was rebuked, not merely for bowing down, on the contrary scripture has numerous instances of honor being given to men or creatures by bowing or by prostration in a sense of veneration, ur not worship:

Now Joseph was the governor of the land, the person who sold grain to all its people. So when Joseph's brothers arrived, they bowed down to him with their faces to the ground.

Genesis 42:6

The company of the prophets from Jericho, who were watching, said, "The spirit of Elijah is resting on Elisha." And they went to meet him and bowed to the ground before him.

2 Kings 2:15

Paul likewise tells us to “give honor where honor is due:”

Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

Romans 13:7

It seems you hold to the false doctrine of Soul Sleep, well the Bible makes it clear that everyone that dies especially believers are both conscious and alive with God:


And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Matthew 10:28

And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth?

Revelation 6:9-10

And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

Revelation 20:4

Then he stretched himself upon the child three times, and cried to the Lord, “O Lord my God, let this child’s soul come into him again.” And the Lord hearkened to the voice of Elijah; and the soul of the child came into him again, and he revived.

1 Kings 17:21-22

And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

John 11:26
They are still sleeping
Rev 6:
11 And white robes were given unto every one of them; and it was said unto them, that they should rest yet for a little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

This comes before the thousand years, it is the first resurreciton that comes after the seven last plagues have been poured upon the earth, after the one world government religious power, after the Image is set up by the lamb like beast that all the earth must worship, after the 144,000 sent out accross the earth to gather the Children of God into his kingdom, and after the mark of the beast is enforced by law on penalty of Death that all may not buy or sell unless they take the mark of the beast in their hand(deed) or forehead(thought).
Revelation 20:
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.

4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.

5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
When a man dies the first death he rests in the grave( Matt 9:24, Mark 5:39, Luke 8:52-53; John 5:28-29; John 6:39-40; John 11:11-14,23-26; Acts 2:24-31; Acts 7:60, 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; 1 Peter 3:18-19; Revelation 6:9-11; Revelation 14:13; 1 Kings 2:10; 1 Kings 11:43; 1 Kings 14:20 Job 7:21, Job 14:10-12, Psalms 13:3; Psalm 16:10, Isaiah 26:19-21; Daniel 12:2) and his thoughts cease, and he has no more part in anything done under the sun. (Psalm 146:4, Ecclesiastes 9:5-6,10, Psalms 6:5). Everyone who has died, both the righteous and the unrighteous, sleep in Sheol/Hades/hell/the grave until Christ’s return, Paul, John, and Peter all tell us that those who have died in Christ have not yet gone to heaven yet but still rest/sleep(Acts 2:29; 1 Cor 11:30; 1 Cor 15:6,18,23,29; 1 Thess 4:13; Revelation 6:9-11; Revelation 14:13) we are told that only at Christ’s return will the dead in Christ be raised(Daniel 12:1-2; Matt 25:31-32; Luke 22:26-28; Acts 24:15; Romans 2:16; 1 Cor 15:51-52; 2 Cor 5:1-11; Philippians 3:8-11; 2 Timothy 4:1;1 Thess 4:16; Revelation 20:4-6) being judged by their works(Matt 12:36-37; Romans 14:12; Revelation 14:13). We are told that the wicked will receive the rewards for their deeds in the second resurrection(Daniel 12:2; Revelation 20:9,11-15) where the dead small and great will stand before the Lord(Romans 14:10; 2 Timothy 4:1; Revelation 20:12) giving account of themselves(Matt 12:36-37; Romans 14:12; 1 Peter 4:5) and being judged out of the books that are opened(Daniel 12:1; Revelation 20:12-13,15) everyone not found in the book of life will be cast into the Lake of Fire to suffer the second death(Ezekiel 18:20; Romans 6:23; James 1:15; Revelation 20:12-15).


Paul tells us that there are two bodies that every man will have. The first body is corruptible flesh(1 Cor 15:42,50,52-53; Philippians 3:21) it is a Natural body(1 Cor 15:44-46) it is an Earthly body of the Earth(1 Cor 15:47-49; Genesis 2:7) bearing the Image of the Earthly(1 Cor 15:49). The second body is Incorruptible(1 Cor 15:42, 51-54; Philippians 3:21) it is a spiritual Body(1 Cor 44-46) it is a body from Heaven(1 Cor 15:47-49) bearing the Image of the Heavenly(1 Cor 15:49). In the light of this understanding it is clearly seen that the earthly house/tabernacle being spoken of in(2 Cor 5:1-2,4) is our current body of the earth(2 Peter 1:13-15) and the Heavenly house we have yet to receive is our New Heavenly body(1 John 3:2). 2 Cor 5:2,4 Paul tells that we at this time do groan within our current tabernacle(body of Flesh/earth) to be clothed upon with our house/tabernacle which is from heaven(Heaven/Spirit) he tells us the same thing in Romans 8:23 saying that we ourselves groan within ourselves waiting for the Adoption to wit the redemption of our body. The redemption of our body occurs at Christ’s return(1 Cor 15:51-52; 1 John 3:2; 2 Cor 5:10; 1 Thess 4:16; 1 Peter 1:5,7) this is when it shall be brought to pass the saying that is written,that death is swallowed up in victory(1 Cor 15:54) that mortality is swallowed up of life(2 Cor 5:4) for it is the Last enemy to be conquered by the Lord(1 Cor 15:26; Revelation 20:14). For this cause also we were given the earnest of the Spirit(2 Cor 5:5; Romans 8:15-16, 23, 26-27). We know then and are confident that while we are at home in the body(Earthly body/Body of Flesh) we are absent from the Lord(1 Cor 15:50; 2 Cor 5:6) until the time that we are changed from corruptible flesh to our incorruptible form at Christ’s coming(1 Cor 15:51-54; 1 Thess 4:16-17; Philippians 3:21) that we may then be present with the Lord forever(1 Thess 4:17). This redemption of the Body(Romans 8:23) is a hope that cannot be seen(Romans 8:24-25). The cause for our walking in faith and not by sight(2 Cor 5:7), but instead with patience waiting for the hope that is seen not(Romans 8:25), is salvation and redemption into an incorruptible and undefiled inheritance reserved in heaven for us to be revealed and received at Christ’s return(1 Peter 1:3-5,7-9; 1 Thess 4:16-17; 1 Cor 15:52). This faith and hope that we have is such that we are confident in saying that at this present time we are willing to be absent from this body(earthly body of Flesh) and to be present with the Lord in heaven at his return(2 Cor 5:8; 1 Thess 4:17), this hope is also why we do not have sorrow over those who have fallen asleep(1 Thess 4:13) but instead comfort each other(1 Thess 4:18) with the understanding and hope of the Resurrection to come(1 Thess 4:14-18; Philippians 3:11). That is why we labour to do the Lord’s work in this Body(2 Cor 5:9; 1 Cor 15:58; Colossians 3:23-24; Ephesians 2:10; Hebrews 6:10-12) that whether absent from him while in this body or present with him at his coming we may be accepted of him, because we all must appear before the Lord to give account of our deeds done in this body(of Earth/flesh) whether they be good or bad(2 Cor 5:10; Matt 12:36-37; Matt 25:31-32; Romans 14:10,12; Revelation 20:12-13).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Josheb

Christian
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
2,196
835
NoVa
✟166,026.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I stated that "the most doggedly Europeanized images of Jesus (blond, blue-eyed, the whole gamut) are from white evangelicals right into the present day."
Yep. And then posted a video made by LDSers, not conservative white evangelicals.

A very different proposition.


And then completely ignored what I said about Prots: we don''t incorrectly think Jesus was blond, blue-eyed, and the "whole gamut" and you won't be able to find an authoritative doctrinal statement saying so. The more accurate way of understanding this is to realize throughout history all ethnicities have created artistic representations of Jesus in their own image (whites as white, blacks as black, Asians as Asian, etc.). Everyone has been racist! Or, to be accurate, everyone has been ethnically bias. There is only one race of humans.

Trying to suggest an LDS cartoon is representative of the White Evangelical Right is Fail.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
39,253
20,260
US
✟1,450,592.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yep. And then posted a video made by LDSers, not conservative white evangelicals.

A very different proposition.


And then completely ignored what I said about Prots: we don''t incorrectly think Jesus was blond, blue-eyed, and the "whole gamut" and you won't be able to find an authoritative doctrinal statement saying so. The more accurate way of understanding this is to realize throughout history all ethnicities have created artistic representations of Jesus in their own image (whites as white, blacks as black, Asians as Asian, etc.). Everyone has been racist! Or, to be accurate, everyone has been ethnically bias. There is only one race of humans.

Trying to suggest an LDS cartoon is representative of the White Evangelical Right is Fail.

I've never said it was from an "authoritative doctrinal statement."

Well, here is Fox spokesperson Meghan Kelly starkly asserting that Jesus is white. Go to 4:10 in the video.


Here is the interesting story of how Jesus became white in America.

How Jesus became white — and why it’s time to cancel that
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Radagast

comes and goes
Site Supporter
Dec 10, 2003
23,821
9,817
✟312,047.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Well, here is Fox spokesperson Meghan Kelly starkly asserting that Jesus is white.

The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the U.S. Census uses "white" to mean "A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa."

On that definition, Jesus was definitely white.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0