We don't have statues in the Coptic Orthodox tradition, but no, of course not. If it is somehow magically wrong for Europeans to make European images of Christ and the saints (leaving aside the statues v. icons v. nothing debate that I don't wanna have), then wouldn't it be just as wrong for Africans to make African images of Christ (there are plenty, if people like Mr. King would bother to look), Middle Easterners to make Middle Eastern images of Christ (ditto), Asians to make Asian images of Christ, etc.? Or is it just wrong because it's Europeans making them, and it's somehow wrong
to be European because of slavery?
This crap has go to stop, and the sooner the better. If you
personally want to remain historically ignorant to the point of attempting to rebirth iconoclasm for supposedly 'anti-racist' purposes, that's your business, but painting it like that's the socially responsible, progressive thing to do is just gross. It's not progressive to deny a continent full of people their right to depict Jesus and the saints in a manner that nativizes them in their culture just because the people making the depictions are a skin color that makes you hate them and/or the 'system' you say the art represents. What it represents to
you is clearly not what it represents to them...or do you think that the people with pictures of 'white Jesus' are worshiping an actual slave driver?
Idiots!