20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

Status
Not open for further replies.

7xlightray

Newbie
Jun 30, 2013
515
29
✟15,256.00
Faith
Christian
Revelation 19:11-16: And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

In this narrative He comes as the Lord of glory and removes all evil with the power of His Word. He returns as a man of war to destroy all those left behind. Revelation 19:11 says, in righteousness he doth judge and make war.” The imagery surrounding Christ in this reading is that of wrath and judgment. The nations have missed their day of opportunity like the wicked in previous judgments, now they must face their deserved recompense of destruction and eternal punishment. Christ comes in glory and power to pour out wrath, and we learn "His eyes were as a flame of fire.” Here we see the indignation that Christ has for these enemies of God upon the earth. Those that are left behind of the nations – without exception – are trampled into a lost eternity on this moment of time.

The solemn language relates to the wrath of God being poured out on those left behind at the Coming of Christ. This proves that “the nations” will not survive the wrath that emanates from Christ. How can any nation survive this closing destruction? This is final justice being meted out of the lost.

“Smite (or patasso) the nations.”

Christ is seen pouring out His wrath without mixture upon the nations as He smites them in His fury witha sharp swordthat comes out of his mouth.” What is the result of this act? It shall “smite the nations” that have missed the catching away. This is what awaits the nations. They are going to be smitten. The word for “smite” in this text is the Greek word patasso, which means to strike with a weapon or to smite fatally. It means to smite down, cut down, to kill, slay.

The Old Testament prophet Isaiah predicted in Isaiah 13:13: “I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger. Every one that is found shall be thrust through; and every one that is joined unto them shall fall by the sword.”

What sword?

Isaiah 26:21 adds: “For, behold, the LORD cometh out of his place to punish the inhabitants of the earth for their iniquity: the earth also shall disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain. In that day the Lord with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that is in the sea.”

Earlier in Revelation 2:16, we find Jesus predicting: “I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.”

Christ is not coming as Saviour of the world at the end but as its Judge. This is a solemn day for the wicked. Here we see the great final battle of the ages between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness. On one side on earth you have the wicked confederacy of the beast’s armies on earth (namely all the wicked) arrayed against the armies of heaven (appearing in the sky) which relates to the people of God that are redeemed.

There are clearly two opposing armies in view here in this reading: the army of God, led by Christ, and the army of Satan. One is totally victorious; the other one is totally annihilated. This is talking about two kingdoms that are at war - the kingdom of God and the kingdom of darkness. This is consistent with repeated Scripture.

There are only 2 peoples on this earth in God's eyes - the redeemed and the wicked. These both are armies in conflict with each other. When Jesus returns the elect are caught up, the wicked are destroyed. These 2 peoples/armies carry one of 2 marks - God's mark or the world's mark of reprobation. This is a book full of symbolism denoting the great battle between light and darkness. There are only two different peoples in this life, they are walking two different roads, in two different directions, to two different destinations. The Christian is bound for heaven; the sinner is bound for hell. One group has the mark of the Father the other the mark of the beast. One is rescued in the marriage of the lamb, the other is destroyed.

The army of heaven (embodying the redeemed of all ages) returns after being caught up for the marriage of the lamb, leaving just one army on earth – the wicked. That is why this passage makes clear that this ‘left behind’ army is totally destroyed. This clearly rebuts Premil and forbids it. It leaves no goats left to saturate its millennium. Revelation 19:19 describes the righteous redeemed army, which includes the elect of all time (those that possess the spiritual robes of Christ's righteousness). It is this company that is rescued by Christ before He pours out His wrath upon the wicked. This will be like the destruction of the wicked in Noah and Lot’s day. The world was destroyed by water in Noah’s day and Sodom was obliterated by fire in his day.

Let us be clear: He is coming to smite down the nations, not corral them into some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted thousand-years age. It says that “he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” This is not a pretty sight. This is not loose talk by God. This is not something that the nations should look forward to. What awaits the nations that have rejected Christ is utter destruction and devastation. The nations left behind are totally destroyed. Christ destroys them by the very utterance of His mouth.

The two words interpreted “fierceness” and “wrath” here are thumos and orge which are regularly employed in the New Testament to mean ‘fierceness, indignation, wrath and vengeance’. The word orge carries the additional meaning of ‘violent passion’. Clearly the Lord is not happy with those left behind. Like those left behind in Noah’s day and Sodom they face an awful end, as they receive the reward of their rejection of Christ.

Revelation 2:25-27 says, “that which ye have already hold fast till I come. And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations: And he shall rule (poimaino) them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be ‘broken to shivers’ (suntribo): even as I received of my Father.”

The concluding phrase (“shall they be broken to shivers”) is actually taken from the lone Greek word suntribo (Strong’s 4937) meaning to crush completely, i.e. to shatter. This would suggest a total obliteration of the wicked at His appearing.

We cannot ignore the crucial words suntribo (to break to shivers) in Revelation 2:25-27 and patasso (to smite) in Revelation 19:15.

The same Shepherd who will comfort His sheep (the elect) will also destroy the goats (the wicked). This teaching is taken from Psalm 2:1-12. See what it is saying: “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill of Zion. I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession.Thou shalt break (ra` a`) them with a rod of iron; ‘thou shalt dash them in pieces’ (naphats) like a potter's vessel. Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth. Serve the LORD with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in him.”

Why do you also ignore the Hebrew here? The Hebrew word ra` a` means to spoil: literally, by breaking to pieces; figuratively, to make (or be) good for nothing. The Hebrew word naphats here derives from a primitive root; to dash to pieces, or scatter.

The picture here is of a Shepherd with a rod. However, this is NO ordinary Shepherd with NO ordinary rod. The Shepherd here is Christ, and He is coming in His wrath at the end of this age to deal with the wicked thus the significance of the rod of iron. He is a jealous Shepherd who is finally coming to destroy those that have rejected Him. The shepherding is clearly associated with the FINAL separation.

The Lord encounters only 2 types of people when He comes – saved or lost, sheep or goats. The sheep enter into their eternal inheritance; the goats receive their eternal punishment. Nothing could be simpler. You invent some 3rd group of humans that are too righteous to be destroyed at the second coming, yet too wicked to be rescued, yet Premil argue among themselves who they actually are. The reality is: they don't exist.

Nowhere in any of these passages is there any insinuation of a 1,000 years shepherding (or ruling) over the nations -as Premil alleges. What is more, Nowhere in Rev 20 is there any mention of (1) a rod of iron, (2) Christ on earth, (3) and therefore Christ ruling on earth with a rod of iron for 1,000 years. You will only find that in the Premil textbooks.
I was not suggesting "rule (= shepherd them) with a rod of iron" was necessarily a good thing, nor bad, more to do with process, and time, as it is written "as the shepherd separates." and those sitting with Him on thrones.

Here, may we do this passage first..

Acts 1:6 They therefore, when they were come together, asked him, saying, Lord, dost thou at this time restore the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know times or seasons, which the Father hath set within his own authority.

..how do you answer this?
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,680
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,263.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
What I have underlined in verse 29 is meaning during the 6th seal events. .
That is purely your opinion. You fail to support it with scripture and the descriptions of both events do not match.
Why would there still be another 7-10 years after the conclusion of the 70th week?
The time gap is told to us at the Seventh Seal; about a half hour in heaven equals about 10 to 20 earth years.
About the time required for all that is prophesied to happen from the Sixth seal until the Return.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Zao is life
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is purely your opinion. You fail to support it with scripture and the descriptions of both events do not match.

Matthew 24:29 Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:


Revelation 6:12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood;
13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind.


If what I have underlined are not referring to the same events, this indicates you think the stars fall from heaven on 2 separate occasions within a few years of each other. And I guess it is a coincidence on top of that, rather than someone maybe trying to tell us something here, that in both passages the sun is darkened, the moon shall not give her light, and that the stars of heaven fall?


-------------------------
Blood moon: Also known as a total lunar eclipse. It's when the shadow of Earth casts a reddish glow on the moon, the result of a rare combination of an eclipse with the closest full moon of the year. There was one in the UK in January 2019, with the next one set to be visible over South America, North America and parts of Europe and Africa on May 16, 2022. Space fans in the UK won't be able to see every phase of this eclipse, but should be able to see it at totality when the Moon appears with a reddish-orange glow.
Full moon dates for 2020, including July's Thunder Moon
---------------------------

Maybe it's me, but it sounds like to me the moon became as blood(Revelation 6:12)---sounds a lot like---and the moon shall not give her light(Matthew 24:29)
 
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
The Premil kingdom is not at all pristine and Eden-like. That is the Amil "new earth." Premils cannot decide whether their alleged future millennium is corrupt or pristine, whether it is the new heavens and new earth or whether it is a rerun of our age.

The Premil new earth is full of sin, sinners, death, widespread deception and feigned worship. It has Christ deceived by multiple millions of charlatans making their way to Jerusalem to watch the slitting of throats of goats and lambs for sin futile useless offerings. We then see the wholesale millennial evangelistic bust when Satan at the drop of the hat claims the millennial inhabitants for himself (as the sand of the sea)? This whole proposal is a massive sham.

Peter speaking to the religious Jews in Acts 3:19-21 confirms the concluding nature of the Second Advent, saying, “Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord; And he (God) shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution (apokatastasis or reconstitution) of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.”

The Jews to whom Peter was addressing knew the “restitution of all things” meant a re-creation of the world which would restore it to an Eden-like, pre-flood, condition with the curse removed. Premillenialism doesn’t allow this. This school of thought holds to a new earth blighted by all the various evils of the curse and scared by increasing violence which mirrors our sin-cursed age. In the end the Premil millennium ends up in anarchy, the saints being finally surrounded by the wicked as the sand of the sea. Iniquity has prospered in an age supposedly governed by Christ with an iron rod. This just doesn’t add up.

There is a BIG difference between how Amils interpret Revelation 20 and what Premils attribute to it. In fact, it is day-and-night. You see your millennial age as some type of perfect or semi-perfect glorified or semi-glorified state with Christ and the saints reigning in their glorified bodies (even though you cannot find it in the text). Amils see it as this current imperfect age on this current corrupt earth.

Despite the glory, supposed personal rule of Christ on earth and the so-called submissiveness of the nations that Premils attribute to their millennial kingdom, surely we are looking at the biggest religious turn-around in history in the Premil scenario – with the swift overthrow of the majestic unchallenged sovereign righteous rule of Christ on a semi-glorified earth with a “rod of iron” overturned which the en-mass desertion of billions of millennial inhabitants to Satan in the greatest global uprising in history from the four corners of the earth as “the sand of the sea” against the “camp of the saints”?

This purported millennium of bliss of submissiveness that Premils try to portray ends up an unmitigated debacle. Amils and Postmils look forward to eternal bliss at the second coming. Creation will be finally purged of wickedness, all the wicked, rebellion and all corruption forever.

Seems you don't understand the Millennial Kingdom at all.
Premillennialists still see a perfect new heavens and new earth after this world is destroyed, we just see a 1000 year reign on THIS earth, in a state that is better than it is now because it is directly ruled by the Lord Jesus Christ and God's Law, and Satan will be absolutely powerless for 1000 Years. Not your weaksauce spiritualizing 1000 years where Satan creates Islam, Mormonism, etc, you know, deceiving the nations, while you claim that just because the gospel is spreading that's the same as Satan deceiving the nations "no more". You've taken an act of God that is awe inspiring and reduced it to something common and simplistic, just people preaching the gospel.
You turn scripture into hyperbole and combine a bunch of different events into 1 event even when they are given with completely different details.

Have you in any of your wall of text posts addressed how Revelation 19's second coming of Jesus has Him coming with a sword on a white horse and having carrion birds feeding on the corpses afterward which doesn't fit the idea of Jesus' second coming instantly consuming the entire world in fire.

How do you reconcile Revelation 19 as being the same event as Zephaniah 3:8?
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Seems you don't understand the Millennial Kingdom at all.
Premillennialists still see a perfect new heavens and new earth after this world is destroyed, we just see a 1000 year reign on THIS earth, in a state that is better than it is now because it is directly ruled by the Lord Jesus Christ and God's Law, and Satan will be absolutely powerless for 1000 Years. Not your weaksauce spiritualizing 1000 years where Satan creates Islam, Mormonism, etc, you know, deceiving the nations, while you claim that just because the gospel is spreading that's the same as Satan deceiving the nations "no more". You've taken an act of God that is awe inspiring and reduced it to something common and simplistic, just people preaching the gospel.
You turn scripture into hyperbole and combine a bunch of different events into 1 event even when they are given with completely different details.

Have you in any of your wall of text posts addressed how Revelation 19's second coming of Jesus has Him coming with a sword on a white horse and having carrion birds feeding on the corpses afterward which doesn't fit the idea of Jesus' second coming instantly consuming the entire world in fire.

How do you reconcile Revelation 19 as being the same event as Zephaniah 3:8?

What happens to this rotten, sin-cursed planet when Christ returns as a thief?

Rev 16:15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
Rev 16:16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
Rev 16:17 And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done.
Rev 16:18 And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great.
Rev 16:19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.
Rev 16:20 And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.

What is described above is an earthquake that moves all the islands and destroys the mountains.
What would this do to the surface of the present earth?

Peter was looking for the New Heavens and the New Earth, on the Day of the Lord, when He comes as a thief in 2 Peter 3:10-13.
Many of us are looking for the same thing as Peter.

.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
What happens to this rotten, sin-cursed planet when Christ returns as a thief?

Rev 16:15 Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.
Rev 16:16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
Rev 16:17 And the seventh angel poured out his vial into the air; and there came a great voice out of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, It is done.
Rev 16:18 And there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon the earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great.
Rev 16:19 And the great city was divided into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell: and great Babylon came in remembrance before God, to give unto her the cup of the wine of the fierceness of his wrath.
Rev 16:20 And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.

What is described above is an earthquake that moves all the islands and destroys the mountains.
What would this do to the surface of the present earth?

Peter was looking for the New Heavens and the New Earth, on the Day of the Lord, when He comes as a thief in 2 Peter 3:10-13.
Many of us are looking for the same thing as Peter.

.

How are Carrion birds feeding on corpses if the entire planet is destroyed.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I was not suggesting "rule (= shepherd them) with a rod of iron" was necessarily a good thing, nor bad, more to do with process, and time, as it is written "as the shepherd separates." and those sitting with Him on thrones.

Here, may we do this passage first..

Acts 1:6 They therefore, when they were come together, asked him, saying, Lord, dost thou at this time restore the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know times or seasons, which the Father hath set within his own authority.

..how do you answer this?

As I showed you in the last post, the rule of Christ has been ongoing from His ascension. When He comes again that is to separate the sheep from the goats, reward the sheep and destroy the wicked.

Remember the disciples were probably all there when Christ announced that He was removing the kingdom favor from the physical nation and giving it to a new spiritual nation. Jesus asked the religious Jews in Matthew 21:42-44, “Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.” The disciples had a spiritual

This truth must surely have provoked intrigue in the disciples’ minds that were gradually being drawn out of the old covenant system into the new covenant reality. It might even have had a bearing upon the question being asked in Acts 1:6. Being citizens of Israel, they probably wanted lucidity on this matter before Christ ascended to the father.

The instruction in this narrative from the Savior begs an obvious question for Premils (especially in the light of their thinking on Acts 1:6): is the teaching of Christ in Matthew 21:42-44 also speaking of a future earthly millennial kingdom? Of course, the answer is ‘no!’ This teaching is speaking about the spiritual blessing and favor that would be taken from physical Israel and the old covenant theocracy and transferred to the New Testament Church after the cross. The same disciples that asked the question reference the kingdom in Acts 1:6 would probably have witnessed this incident in the temple in Matthew 21 as He informed Israel’s leaders of the great seismic change that was occurring in their midst. Even if they didn’t have a full revelation of the gravity of this turn-around, this must have been a great talking point for both Christ’s disciples and the religious Jews.

We can detect a lack of consistency here with the Premil argument and mode of interpretation. It seems like they interpret the kingdom of God as spiritual when it suits and then change it to refer to their future millennium when it fits their own partial understanding.

Why would this question not be spiritual? Such an understanding would fit better with the context and the repeated New Testament teaching on the spiritual advice of the kingdom. Jesus said in Matthew 24:13-14: And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.”

The new covenant arrangement was completely different from the old. The kingdom of God referred to all those that had experienced the favor of God by coming to Christ and exhibiting the “fruits” of salvation. Israel’s willful rejection of God’s only provision for sin and uncleanness was God’s means for reaching the nations. It is not strange that the disciples would have wondered at Israel’s part on the new playing field and the new impending awakening. Would Israel ever again enjoy spiritual blessing?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Seems you don't understand the Millennial Kingdom at all.
Premillennialists still see a perfect new heavens and new earth after this world is destroyed, we just see a 1000 year reign on THIS earth, in a state that is better than it is now because it is directly ruled by the Lord Jesus Christ and God's Law, and Satan will be absolutely powerless for 1000 Years. Not your weaksauce spiritualizing 1000 years where Satan creates Islam, Mormonism, etc, you know, deceiving the nations, while you claim that just because the gospel is spreading that's the same as Satan deceiving the nations "no more". You've taken an act of God that is awe inspiring and reduced it to something common and simplistic, just people preaching the gospel.
You turn scripture into hyperbole and combine a bunch of different events into 1 event even when they are given with completely different details.

Ok, let us establish what you believe

Is there sin in your future millennium?
Are there sinners in your future millennium?
Is there sickness in your future millennium?
Is there crying in your future millennium?
Is there dying in your future millennium?
Is there rebellion in your future millennium?
Is there decay in your future millennium?

Have you in any of your wall of text posts addressed how Revelation 19's second coming of Jesus has Him coming with a sword on a white horse and having carrion birds feeding on the corpses afterward which doesn't fit the idea of Jesus' second coming instantly consuming the entire world in fire.

How do you reconcile Revelation 19 as being the same event as Zephaniah 3:8?

Scripture has a habit of concentrating on different aspects of the Lord’s coming. Sometimes the focus is Christ. Sometimes the focus is man. Sometimes the focus is the fate of the universe. Sometimes the focus is the wicked. Sometimes the focus is a righteous. Sometimes the subject is humans. Sometimes it is angels. Sometimes it is the visible realm and sometimes it is the invisible realm. Sometimes the subject is the living, sometimes the subject is the dead. Sometimes the subject is heaven. Sometimes the subject is earth. Sometimes the subject is hell. Sometimes it is the beast. Sometimes it is Satan. This does not negate the fact that many simultaneous things can be happening at the one time. Remember, Scripture can only talk about one subject at a time.

Zephaniah 1:2-3 says, I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the LORD. I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD."

Zephaniah 3:8 says, Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy.


These passages show that the destruction that occurs when Jesus comes will be wholesale. None will be able to survive it. What replaces the removal of this current corrupt set-up is a new perfect world free of sin and sinners, crying and dying, death and decay. This couldn't be any more climactic.

This leaves a massive problem for Premils: there are no wicked to populate their so-called future millennium.

The whole thrust of Revelation 19 surrounds a climactic end to the world. Like the rest of Scripture, it records the complete rescue of the saints in the “marriage of the lamb” and the complete destruction of the wicked when the fowls consume the entire wicked left behind. The passage makes no allowance for goats-survivors in this great destruction passage or mortals squeezing into a supposed future millennium. This reading seems to fit in with the scriptural pattern of an all-consummating Coming - all the wicked being consumed.

Revelation 19:11-16, “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall shepherd them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

A plain reading of the passage before us reveals that Christis coming back with wrath to execute judgment and destroy all those left behind. He is not going to reward men for their rebellion by leading them unto the glorified new earth. Neither is Christ coming to engage in some ill-fated war against evil for a thousand years – that is not remotely in the text. The King of kings and Lord of lords will not have to fight for victory. He already won that decisively at the cross.

Christ is seen pouring out His wrath without mixture upon the nations as He smites them in His fury with “a sharp sword” that comes “out of his mouth.” What is the result of this act? It shall “smite the nations” that have missed the catching away. This is what awaits the nations. They are going to be smitten. The word for “smite” in this text is the Greek word patasso, which means to strike with a weapon or to smite fatally. It means to smite down, cut down, to kill, slay.

Let us be clear: Heis coming to smite down the nations, not corral them into some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted millennial age. It says that “he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” This is not a pretty sight. This is not loose talk by God. This is not something that the nations should look forward to. What awaits the nations that have rejected Christ is utter destruction and devastation. The nations left behind are totally destroyed. Christ destroys them by the very utterance of His mouth.

The two words interpreted “fierceness” and “wrath” here are thumos and orge which are regularly employed in the New Testament to mean ‘fierceness, indignation, wrath and vengeance’. The word orge carries the additional meaning of ‘violent passion’. Clearly the Lord is not happy with those left behind. Like those left behind in Noah’s day and Sodom they face an awful end, as they receive the reward of their rejection of Christ.

Verses 17-18 says, “I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. The loipoy (or remaining ones) those left behind were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.”

Please see that the wicked are destroyed by the sword of His voice. This is complete wholesale total destruction - for those left behind. There are no survivors!

The feasting part of the marriage supper of the Lamb is a symbolism depicted the destruction of the wicked. Why can this not be a symbolic depiction of the return of Christ and the events that accompany it (including the destruction of the wicked)?

The first part of the narrative outlines a detailed account of the assignment given to “the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven” by the heavenly messenger. The “fowls” are instructed to “come and gather” themselves “together unto the supper of the great God” in order that they would “eat”:

1. The flesh of kings,
2. The flesh of captains,
3. The flesh of mighty men,
4. The flesh of horses, them that sit on them,
5. The flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.

This passage powerfully and solemnly reveals the full extent of the devastation that is to be focused upon the wicked on the day of God’s wrath. In perfect keeping with the rest of Scripture, this narrative graphically shows us that the destruction that occurs will be immediate, absolute and total and that, at this stage – after “the marriage of the Lamb” (Rev 19:7) – everyone left behind will be completely consumed; the birds of heaven filling themselves with “the flesh of all men.” Significantly, the suffix “both free and bond, both small and great” is added in order to fully impress the enormity and all-inclusive nature of this feast.

Conclusion

The second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ will be a unique day in the annals of human history and unprecedented in its all-consummating character. Obviously, no other day has ever seen the end of the world and the final complete defeat of every last enemy of righteousness, truth and Almighty God. Neither has any other day seen the destruction of all wickedness by way of fire before. Notwithstanding, the Lord draws our specific attention to two notable days in human history to compare it with, and to fully illustrate the character and finality of this all-consummating day. These two particular days are familiar to most and are found in Holy Writ (both in the Old Testament), and give us an unparalleled insight into the nature, extent and detail of judgment on that impending last day. While, evidently there is no previous individual bygone historic example of a total global annihilation of the wicked by fire, these two individual days, when joined together, vividly portray what will occur on the final day of time. These two former days being (1) the day that Noah entered into the ark and (2) the day that Lot was rescued out of Sodom.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This alone shows that even your interpretation can't work. What you have submitted from Revelation 12:17, this part---and went to make war with the rest of her children, who keep the commandments of God and hold to the testimony of Jesus---is meaning this in Revelation 13:7---And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them.

According to Revelation 20:4, unless one wants to claim John was mistaken when he recorded what he did in that verse, these saints that satan goes off to make war against in Revelation 12:7 and Revelation 13:7, they are not martyred after the thousand years during satan's little season, they are already martyred before satan is even loosed, therefore there is zero connection with that of Revelation 12:7 and Revelation 13:7, with that of satan's little season after the thousand years.

Not necessarily. Depends on how the beast is to be understood.

I view the beast of revelation as symbolic for an amalgamation of beasts of Daniel 7

The beasts of daniel 7: lion (1 head), bear (1 head), leopard (4 heads), beast (1 head, 10 horns).

The beast of revelation: body like a leopard, mouth like a lion, feet like a bear, with 7 heads and 10 horns.

Therefore, imo, the beast is the earthly kingdoms (babylon, persia, Greece, Rome) in association with the book of Daniel that persecute the people of God culminating in the crucifixation of Christ and little horn's persecution of the body of Christ through the influence of a cast out satan.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I happens on the same day.

.
If when Jesus second coming consumes all the wicked with the brightness of His coming (2 Thessalonians 2:8), and you refer to that as the whole world being destroyed by Fire as in 2 Peter 3:10 or Zephaniah 3:8 as the same event, then there are no Carrion birds, and no corpses to feed on, because the whole planet is destroyed.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Ok, let us establish what you believe

Is there sin in your future millennium?
Are there sinners in your future millennium?
Is there sickness in your future millennium?
Is there crying in your future millennium?
Is there dying in your future millennium?
Is there rebellion in your future millennium?
Is there decay in your future millennium?



Scripture has a habit of concentrating on different aspects of the Lord’s coming. Sometimes the focus is Christ. Sometimes the focus is man. Sometimes the focus is the fate of the universe. Sometimes the focus is the wicked. Sometimes the focus is a righteous. Sometimes the subject is humans. Sometimes it is angels. Sometimes it is the visible realm and sometimes it is the invisible realm. Sometimes the subject is the living, sometimes the subject is the dead. Sometimes the subject is heaven. Sometimes the subject is earth. Sometimes the subject is hell. Sometimes it is the beast. Sometimes it is Satan. This does not negate the fact that many simultaneous things can be happening at the one time. Remember, Scripture can only talk about one subject at a time.

Zephaniah 1:2-3 says, I will utterly consume all things from off the land, saith the LORD. I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the LORD."

Zephaniah 3:8 says, Therefore wait ye upon me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy.


These passages show that the destruction that occurs when Jesus comes will be wholesale. None will be able to survive it. What replaces the removal of this current corrupt set-up is a new perfect world free of sin and sinners, crying and dying, death and decay. This couldn't be any more climactic.

This leaves a massive problem for Premils: there are no wicked to populate their so-called future millennium.

The whole thrust of Revelation 19 surrounds a climactic end to the world. Like the rest of Scripture, it records the complete rescue of the saints in the “marriage of the lamb” and the complete destruction of the wicked when the fowls consume the entire wicked left behind. The passage makes no allowance for goats-survivors in this great destruction passage or mortals squeezing into a supposed future millennium. This reading seems to fit in with the scriptural pattern of an all-consummating Coming - all the wicked being consumed.

Revelation 19:11-16, “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall shepherd them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

A plain reading of the passage before us reveals that Christis coming back with wrath to execute judgment and destroy all those left behind. He is not going to reward men for their rebellion by leading them unto the glorified new earth. Neither is Christ coming to engage in some ill-fated war against evil for a thousand years – that is not remotely in the text. The King of kings and Lord of lords will not have to fight for victory. He already won that decisively at the cross.

Christ is seen pouring out His wrath without mixture upon the nations as He smites them in His fury with “a sharp sword” that comes “out of his mouth.” What is the result of this act? It shall “smite the nations” that have missed the catching away. This is what awaits the nations. They are going to be smitten. The word for “smite” in this text is the Greek word patasso, which means to strike with a weapon or to smite fatally. It means to smite down, cut down, to kill, slay.

Let us be clear: Heis coming to smite down the nations, not corral them into some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted millennial age. It says that “he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” This is not a pretty sight. This is not loose talk by God. This is not something that the nations should look forward to. What awaits the nations that have rejected Christ is utter destruction and devastation. The nations left behind are totally destroyed. Christ destroys them by the very utterance of His mouth.

The two words interpreted “fierceness” and “wrath” here are thumos and orge which are regularly employed in the New Testament to mean ‘fierceness, indignation, wrath and vengeance’. The word orge carries the additional meaning of ‘violent passion’. Clearly the Lord is not happy with those left behind. Like those left behind in Noah’s day and Sodom they face an awful end, as they receive the reward of their rejection of Christ.

Verses 17-18 says, “I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. The loipoy (or remaining ones) those left behind were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.”

Please see that the wicked are destroyed by the sword of His voice. This is complete wholesale total destruction - for those left behind. There are no survivors!

The feasting part of the marriage supper of the Lamb is a symbolism depicted the destruction of the wicked. Why can this not be a symbolic depiction of the return of Christ and the events that accompany it (including the destruction of the wicked)?

The first part of the narrative outlines a detailed account of the assignment given to “the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven” by the heavenly messenger. The “fowls” are instructed to “come and gather” themselves “together unto the supper of the great God” in order that they would “eat”:

1. The flesh of kings,
2. The flesh of captains,
3. The flesh of mighty men,
4. The flesh of horses, them that sit on them,
5. The flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.

This passage powerfully and solemnly reveals the full extent of the devastation that is to be focused upon the wicked on the day of God’s wrath. In perfect keeping with the rest of Scripture, this narrative graphically shows us that the destruction that occurs will be immediate, absolute and total and that, at this stage – after “the marriage of the Lamb” (Rev 19:7) – everyone left behind will be completely consumed; the birds of heaven filling themselves with “the flesh of all men.” Significantly, the suffix “both free and bond, both small and great” is added in order to fully impress the enormity and all-inclusive nature of this feast.

Conclusion

The second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ will be a unique day in the annals of human history and unprecedented in its all-consummating character. Obviously, no other day has ever seen the end of the world and the final complete defeat of every last enemy of righteousness, truth and Almighty God. Neither has any other day seen the destruction of all wickedness by way of fire before. Notwithstanding, the Lord draws our specific attention to two notable days in human history to compare it with, and to fully illustrate the character and finality of this all-consummating day. These two particular days are familiar to most and are found in Holy Writ (both in the Old Testament), and give us an unparalleled insight into the nature, extent and detail of judgment on that impending last day. While, evidently there is no previous individual bygone historic example of a total global annihilation of the wicked by fire, these two individual days, when joined together, vividly portray what will occur on the final day of time. These two former days being (1) the day that Noah entered into the ark and (2) the day that Lot was rescued out of Sodom.

First thing's first, the Millennium, is not the same thing as the new heavens and new earth, or eternity, you need to stop with that connection because that's not what Premils believe. The fact that it is a 1000 year period should be enough to tell you that the Millennium is not Eternity, or the New Heaven and New Earth.

The Millennial Kingdom is on THIS earth, not new, and New Jerusalem does not descend from heaven onto it.

So yes, the Millennium still has the characteristics of this current earth, it is in a better state being ruled by Christ, but it is not perfection.

I see a destruction by the sword that comes from his mouth, carrion birds feeding which means there's still a planet and animals on it, so it cannot be the same event as the destruction by fire, where the whole planet is destroyed near instantaneously. The destruction by fire, Is a separate event.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
First thing's first, the Millennium, is not the same thing as the new heavens and new earth, or eternity, you need to stop with that connection because that's not what Premils believe. The fact that it is a 1000 year period should be enough to tell you that the Millennium is not Eternity, or the New Heaven and New Earth.

The Millennial Kingdom is on THIS earth, not new, and New Jerusalem does not descend from heaven onto it.

So yes, the Millennium still has the characteristics of this current earth, it is in a better state being ruled by Christ, but it is not perfection.

I see a destruction by the sword that comes from his mouth, carrion birds feeding which means there's still a planet and animals on it, so it cannot be the same event as the destruction by fire, where the whole planet is destroyed near instantaneously. The destruction by fire, Is a separate event.

Who are qualified to escape the destruction of Christ upon the wicked and on what grounds?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
First thing's first, the Millennium, is not the same thing as the new heavens and new earth, or eternity, you need to stop with that connection because that's not what Premils believe. The fact that it is a 1000 year period should be enough to tell you that the Millennium is not Eternity, or the New Heaven and New Earth.

The Millennial Kingdom is on THIS earth, not new, and New Jerusalem does not descend from heaven onto it.

So yes, the Millennium still has the characteristics of this current earth, it is in a better state being ruled by Christ, but it is not perfection.

I see a destruction by the sword that comes from his mouth, carrion birds feeding which means there's still a planet and animals on it, so it cannot be the same event as the destruction by fire, where the whole planet is destroyed near instantaneously. The destruction by fire, Is a separate event.

And when are you going to address the rest of the post?
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,680
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,263.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
If what I have underlined are not referring to the same events, this indicates you think the stars fall from heaven on 2 separate occasions within a few years of each other.
Stars; meteorites, satellite debris, etc fall from the sky all the time. Nothing exclusive about that.
Blood moon: Also known as a total lunar eclipse.
Wrong.
A lunar eclipse is when the moon is shadowed by the earth. It simply ceases to reflect the sun, in other words; it is dark.
Occasionally the moon will shine reddish brown when low on the horizon, shining thru dust clouds. The liar John Hagee made a mint out his book, using this phenomenon as a prophecy fulfillment.

The real fulfilment will come when the mass of superheated hydrogen ejected from the sun, as Isaiah 30:26 says will happen; strikes the oxides of the moon dust.
That mass will then force all our satellites to crash back to the earth. Like ripe figs falling!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If when Jesus second coming consumes all the wicked with the brightness of His coming (2 Thessalonians 2:8), and you refer to that as the whole world being destroyed by Fire as in 2 Peter 3:10 or Zephaniah 3:8 as the same event, then there are no Carrion birds, and no corpses to feed on, because the whole planet is destroyed.

Mat 13:37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
Mat 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
Mat 13:39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
Mat 13:40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
Mat 13:41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
Mat 13:42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Mat 13:43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.


2Th 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,
2Th 1:8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:

2Th 1:9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
2Th 1:10 When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.


2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.



Rev_18:9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,


Rev_18:18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!


Everything, and everyone who is not fireproof is going to burn sometime that day.

.
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,478
2,330
43
Helena
✟206,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Who are qualified to escape the destruction of Christ upon the wicked and on what grounds?

And when are you going to address the rest of the post?

Mat 13:37 He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;
Mat 13:38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
Mat 13:39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
Mat 13:40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
Mat 13:41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;
Mat 13:42 And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.
Mat 13:43 Then shall the righteous shine forth as the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Who hath ears to hear, let him hear.


2Th 1:7 And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels,

2Th 1:8 In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ:
2Th 1:9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;
2Th 1:10 When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.


2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
2Pe 3:11 Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness,
2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
2Pe 3:13 Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.



Rev_18:9 And the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her, shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning,


Rev_18:18 And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!


Everything, and everyone who is not fireproof is going to burn sometime that day.

.

Both of you guys keep doing the same thing. Taking multiple events and rolling it into a single event.

There are 2 events described, Jesus returning on a white horse and slaying people with a sword coming out of His mouth, and consuming the entire planet in the fire of His jealousy. They're not the same thing or the same event. It doesn't matter how much scripture you throw at me describing the world being consumed in fire, because I believe that is going to happen too. But I place it at the end of Revelation 20, not in Revelation 19. One has fire from heaven, the other does not.

Why the insistence on combining events that are described as different events?
You have to understand that Revelation as a book is a key to the chronology of all other prophetic scripture. That's its point. To give you details and timing of things that have been more vague elsewhere in the bible.

That's why Daniel was told to seal up some things, because they were not to be revealed yet, people in the old testament times were not ready to deal with the full truth. Only after having the complete bible were we given the chronology. In earlier books, the rapture, second coming, and end of the world all sound like it's all happening simultaneously, but Revelation shows that there are time between these events. The sun and moon darkening in the sky as Jesus tells His disciples in the Olivet Discourse is not the destruction of the world as the rest of the Olivet Discourse seems to read out, but it's the gathering of His saints, and Revelation gives us the timing of the event. It's in the middle, at the 6th seal. Things still happen after that, so it's not the end of the world.

You keep talking about "a plain reading" and yet you won't do a plain reading of chapter 20. You reject the chapter and make an abstraction of it that makes it meaningless. If you had your way you'd just rip out the part of the page John was writing for everything above verse 11.

I have a friend who did this when we were younger, we'd be telling stories to new friends and he'd basically combine every crazy thing we did over an entire summer into one night and I'd have to remind him that one thing happened in June, another thing happened in July.. etc.
You guys are reminding me of him, combining all end time prophecy into a single instantaneous moment.
 
Upvote 0

7xlightray

Newbie
Jun 30, 2013
515
29
✟15,256.00
Faith
Christian
As I showed you in the last post, the rule of Christ has been ongoing from His ascension. When He comes again that is to separate the sheep from the goats, reward the sheep and destroy the wicked.

Remember the disciples were probably all there when Christ announced that He was removing the kingdom favor from the physical nation and giving it to a new spiritual nation. Jesus asked the religious Jews in Matthew 21:42-44, “Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes? Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.” The disciples had a spiritual

This truth must surely have provoked intrigue in the disciples’ minds that were gradually being drawn out of the old covenant system into the new covenant reality. It might even have had a bearing upon the question being asked in Acts 1:6. Being citizens of Israel, they probably wanted lucidity on this matter before Christ ascended to the father.

The instruction in this narrative from the Savior begs an obvious question for Premils (especially in the light of their thinking on Acts 1:6): is the teaching of Christ in Matthew 21:42-44 also speaking of a future earthly millennial kingdom? Of course, the answer is ‘no!’ This teaching is speaking about the spiritual blessing and favor that would be taken from physical Israel and the old covenant theocracy and transferred to the New Testament Church after the cross. The same disciples that asked the question reference the kingdom in Acts 1:6 would probably have witnessed this incident in the temple in Matthew 21 as He informed Israel’s leaders of the great seismic change that was occurring in their midst. Even if they didn’t have a full revelation of the gravity of this turn-around, this must have been a great talking point for both Christ’s disciples and the religious Jews.

We can detect a lack of consistency here with the Premil argument and mode of interpretation. It seems like they interpret the kingdom of God as spiritual when it suits and then change it to refer to their future millennium when it fits their own partial understanding.

Why would this question not be spiritual? Such an understanding would fit better with the context and the repeated New Testament teaching on the spiritual advice of the kingdom. Jesus said in Matthew 24:13-14: And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.”

The new covenant arrangement was completely different from the old. The kingdom of God referred to all those that had experienced the favor of God by coming to Christ and exhibiting the “fruits” of salvation. Israel’s willful rejection of God’s only provision for sin and uncleanness was God’s means for reaching the nations. It is not strange that the disciples would have wondered at Israel’s part on the new playing field and the new impending awakening. Would Israel ever again enjoy spiritual blessing?
I do not receive my doctrine from Premils text books, nor any other textbook, nor any man.

Peter had no understanding of God excepting the Gentiles at this time. And Jesus said that the holy spirit would come in not many days from now (so he was not referring to a spiritual kingdom), and the question Peter asked had to do with timing, and he received the timing for when the holy spirit would come, not many day from now.

Acts 1:6-7
Jesus said it wasn't for him to know the times or seasons, which the Father hath set within his own authority.

No one knew, not in heaven, nor on the earth, neither under the earth, no one, not even Jesus (Revelation 5), until He was slain, received it, and opened the seven seals (which was pertaining to the future), and gave it to John (which was long after Peter). Jesus didn't know the time of His return, nor about the 1,000 years. If Jesus had known the times or seasons, He would have told Peter (Revelation 1:1).
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Both of you guys keep doing the same thing. Taking multiple events and rolling it into a single event.

There are 2 events described, Jesus returning on a white horse and slaying people with a sword coming out of His mouth, and consuming the entire planet in the fire of His jealousy. They're not the same thing or the same event. It doesn't matter how much scripture you throw at me describing the world being consumed in fire, because I believe that is going to happen too. But I place it at the end of Revelation 20, not in Revelation 19. One has fire from heaven, the other does not.

Did Jesus say the wicked tares are gathered first and thrown into the "fire", before the wheat is gathered into the barn, in the parable of the wheat and tares from Matthew chapter 13?

Is the "fire" found at the end of Matthew 25:31-46?

Did Paul describe Christ returning "in flaming fire" taking vengeance on those who do not know God in 2 Thessalonians 1:7-10?

Does Peter describe the earth being "burned" on "the day of the Lord", when He "comes as a thief" in 2 Peter 3:10-13?


Can you explain why the time of the judgment of the dead, with reward for some, and destruction for others is found in Revelation 11:18, and also at the end of chapter 20?


.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I do not receive my doctrine from Premils text books, nor any other textbook, nor any man.

Peter had no understanding of God excepting the Gentiles at this time. And Jesus said that the holy spirit would come in not many days from now (so he was not referring to a spiritual kingdom), and the question Peter asked had to do with timing, and he received the timing for when the holy spirit would come, not many day from now.

Acts 1:6-7
Jesus said it wasn't for him to know the times or seasons, which the Father hath set within his own authority.

No one knew, not in heaven, nor on the earth, neither under the earth, no one, not even Jesus (Revelation 5), until He was slain, received it, and opened the seven seals (which was pertaining to the future), and gave it to John (which was long after Peter). Jesus didn't know the time of His return, nor about the 1,000 years. If Jesus had known the times or seasons, He would have told Peter (Revelation 1:1).

This is so wrong on so many fronts. Jesus was/is/ and always will be God. He knew what He was teaching. It was the disciples that were confused with their hyper-literal racial mindset.

The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving a spiritual response to their question.

Before the question came Christ was exhorting the disciples on the need for patience as they awaited the empowerment of the Holy Ghost to take the Gospel out to “the whosoever.” Everything about the context is spiritual. The Lord was stating “that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence (Acts 1:4-5).

Surely an unbiased look at these introductory comments would give us insight into what the Lord was teaching and what actually provoked the question that followed it. Undoubtedly the Lord was giving spiritual instruction about a spiritual kingdom that would shortly come with great power and fire? This is not territorial language.

What is “the Promise of the Father” here? Is it a material physical kingdom or is it a spiritual heavenly kingdom? Is it a millennial kingdom similar to this evil age, filled with death and rebellion, or was He speaking of the power of the Holy Ghost that would fall upon the disciples to empower them to bring the good news of Christ to all nations – starting in Jerusalem?

Evidently, Christ was referring to the day of Pentecost where the Church received its Holy Ghost baptism of fire. The whole discourse here is spiritual and revolved around the development of this spiritual kingdom subsequent to Christ’s ascension. Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

The disciples then interjected with a question: Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?”

Premillennialists attribute much extravagant, extensive and grandiose detail to this simple question. They build a whole school of thought pertaining to a supposed period after the second coming out of this basic inquiry. They call it a millennial age and make it a Jewish-orientated kingdom. Nevertheless, and significantly, New Testament Scripture knows nothing of such an old-covenant-type Jewish age. That has been reduced to the history books.

What Premillennialists fail to see is: there is no mention of a future period after the second coming in the question, neither is there any intimation of that. There is not even any mention of the second coming, never mind a belief in a thousand-year reign of Christ on a still corrupt earth! No one could derive such a doctrine from this straightforward question. It would have to be taught elsewhere for it to enjoy veracity.

The most that we could take from this is that they may indeed have anticipated the introduction of a parochial, territorial and old-covenant-type physical kingdom. But that is far from a foregone conclusion. We can only, at best, speculate on that. Even if that was their assumption, that in no way proves that it was a legitimate hope. The disciples were often misguided in their expectations and narrow-minded in their tribal aspirations. They frequently saw no further than the borders of Israel. We see that played in the book of Acts, with their reluctance to advance the Gospel to the Gentiles.

It is hard to read the motives and intention of the question. Many times, the disciples were not getting the full meaning of Christ's teaching. He sent His whole ministry correcting and re-directing them. So it could have been a patriotic desire. But Christ's response nails it. That is what is key, not the disciples question. Premils tend to ignore the context and response and just talk about one verse in this narrative. That is because it suits their theology.

Regardless, it doesn’t really matter what the disciples thought, we need to rather ascertain what Christ thought and taught. We should remember: that this question came in the midst of a spiritual discourse about the kingdom of God arriving in power at Pentecost. Christ's reply is key. It is powerful. It is direct. It nails the literalist’s interpretation of this in a carnal earthly sense.

John Stott ably explains: “Verse six reveals the distraction that came up during this time … I can imagine Jesus closing His eyes and shaking His head. ‘After all this time, you still don’t get it?’ He must have thought. The mistake they made was to misunderstand both the nature of the kingdom and the relation between the kingdom and the Spirit. John Calvin commented, ‘There are as many errors in the question as words’. The verb, the noun and the adverb of their sentence all betray confusion about the kingdom. The verb ‘restore’ shows that they were expecting a political and territorial kingdom; the noun ‘Israel’ that they were expecting a national kingdom; and the adverbial clause ‘at this time’ that they were expecting its immediate establishment. They still expected Jesus to seize the reins of religious and political power and become the leader of a worldwide Jewish empire, through which God would rule the earth. In this context, one could infer that these disciples’ understanding of the nature of Christ’s kingdom was little better than had been displayed by the Jews in the days of the Maccabees or by the Zealots in Jesus’ own day.”

The main issue is not so much what did the disciples mean, it is rather: what was Jesus actually teaching here? Before and after the question the topic was expressly the coming empowerment of the spiritual kingdom of God at Pentecost.

Bible students can speculate all they want as to what was going on in the disciples’ heads. They could debate over whether they were grasping the spiritual thrust of Christ’s teaching about them being part of a spiritual renewal in Israel and further afield, or whether they anticipated the Pharisaical hope of the Messiah overthrowing the Romans and reigning on a physical throne in Jerusalem. Notwithstanding, the most important aspect of this text is not the disciples question, it is Christ’s response.

Whilst it is difficult to understand the thinking of the disciples here, what is clear is what Christ was saying before the question and what Christ said after the question. That is more important than the disciples question. This gives us context to the question. This gives us perspective on what the kingdom really looked like.

Jesus reply to the disciples is telling. He responded: “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power (or dunamis), after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:7-8)

If the disciples did have some glorious future natural earthly hope of a Jewish kingdom containing all the old covenant structures, rights and customs then Jesus wasn’t buying into it. In fact, He totally rebuked such a concept by His spiritual response. If their hope was spiritual then He ably explained the development of that spiritual kingdom – from the small nation of Israel to the Gentile nations. He was outlining the great commission and showing them their evangelistic mission field.

Regardless of their thinking, one thing is certain, Christ definitely (and unambiguously) outlines a spiritual response. Christ’s measured response to the disciples’ query supports the notion of a spiritual kingdom in this age; proving it to be in perfect accord with, and a continuation of, His teaching in relation to the kingdom of God (the subject He was undoubtedly advancing prior to the disciples’ enquiry). The nature of Christ’s reply shows us the spiritual nature of the kingdom of God in our current age.

Christ did in no way here ignore or dismiss the disciples’ query about natural Israel, as some would have us believe, rather the contrary, He directly addressed it in His response. In doing so, He reiterated His earlier teaching on the impending spiritual empowerment that would come upon the kingdom, just prior to the disciples’ interjection; only now He geographically confirmed that the spread of that message would embrace the actual nation of Israel (the locations of “Jerusalem,” “Judaea” and “Samaria” being identified). Nonetheless, in His response, He went further, widening out the disciples limited vision, which was still very localised, to encompass “the uttermost part of the earth.”

Christ’s response was that His kingdom was spiritual and not territorial. The focus was not going to be limited to Israel, but would expand to all nations. The disciples would thus, after a short season of tarrying in Jerusalem and an indispensable empowerment from on high, be living “witnesses” of the kingdom of God not only in their own natural land as they had wondered but throughout all the world. This is indeed what happened! This indeed is what is happening right now. This is definitely not talking about some imaginary age sandwiched in-between the second coming of Christ and the new heavens and new earth.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.