- Nov 29, 2011
- 8,530
- 4,776
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
But what if you don't accept it?
That's a decision one has to make. The debt has been paid regardless.
Upvote
0
But what if you don't accept it?
Jesus does not save anyone then. He only makes it possible for people to save themselves = self-righteousness.That's a decision one has to make. The debt has been paid regardless.
Jesus bore the sins of all men, to make salvation possible for everyone. His purpose was to open the door to the Father, that whoever believes in him will be saved. Mission accomplished! It is finished!
Concerning Matt 1:21. You don't think Jesus only died for the Jews, do you?
Jesus does not save anyone then. He only makes it possible for people to save themselves = self-righteousness.
That's a decision one has to make. The debt has been paid regardless.
If that's your interpretation then you should re-read what the Bible says about it.
Jesus' sacrifice paid the price for all sin by everyone. If a debt has been paid then it no longer exists. Whether people accept that or not has no bearing on the fact.
If the son shall set you free you are free indeed... That is real freedom
Good Day, Pescador
To whom was the debt owed?
Why does the debt exist?
What is the total price to be paid?
In Him,
Bill
If he died for all, all would be saved and they are not.If that's your interpretation then you should re-read what the Bible says about it.
Jesus' sacrifice paid the price for all sin by everyone. If a debt has been paid then it no longer exists. Whether people accept that or not has no bearing on the fact.
If he died for all, all would be saved and they are not.
Your logic is seriously flawed. All are potentially saved; all they have to do is accept the gift.
If I send you a gift and you won't open it that doesn't negate my gift.
Why are you trying to argue against this most fundamental Christian truth? If you're trying to sound clever or intelligent you're having just the opposite effect.
I'm not sure where you're going with this, or why. You are right when you say, "Jesus Christ has done everything necessary for the salvation of all mankind then all will be saved without any further conditions applied."
All are saved, but they must accept that fact for themselves. It's a two-part action.
Again, if I send you a gift and you throw it away without accepting it whose fault is that?
I won't continue this discussion if all you want to do is argue.
You have added a condition for salvation. Jesus Christ has only accomplished a portion of the salvation process and leaves the other portion for people to accomplish. My question is whether He was unable to accomplish complete salvation for all of humanity without any strings attached or whether He was merely unwilling to do so.
The Bible adds a condition my friend, we need to be born again.
Potentially saved = none saved.Your logic is seriously flawed. All are potentially saved; all they have to do is accept the gift.
If I send you a gift and you won't open it that doesn't negate my gift.
Why are you trying to argue against this most fundamental Christian truth? If you're trying to sound clever or intelligent you're having just the opposite effect.
When Jesus refers to his sheep or the elect or to the "overcomers" in the gospels and book of Revelation he means those who God wrote in the book of life from before the foundation of the world. God's very elect. From the book of Genesis to Revelation God had a special group of people in mind to spend eternity with and he had a group of people that he decided to punish. This doesnt make God unjust or unfair because even if God decided to only save one sinner he would have been a kind and merciful God worthy of worship and praise. If he decided to save none and just completely wipe out or punish his creation he would be just. But he decided nothing of the sort. From the very beginning God decided to save a large number of people that no man can count. From across the whole world. As for those God chose to punish theres nothing unfair or unjust about it because we are ALL guilty.
His creation sinned the punishment for sin is death. Therefore all deserve to be punished. It's only due to God's overwhelming grace and mercy that God saved any of us.
Even if that would be just (to save none), would it be love, and would it be merciful?
To expand the question, would it be love and mercy to decide certain individuals from the beginning of time to be punished without any hope of salvation?
Oh yes. God's love and mercy is shown in the fact that Christ died for us. God willingly sacrificed himself to be with his own people. If that's not love and mercy, I dont know what is. You know when it comes to God choosing the Jews nobody beats an eye or calls anything unfair. If all we had in the Old Testament were promises to save the Kewish people and that's all there was than nobody would blink an eye but when God reveals that his elect extends past the Jews and throughout the whole world people get offended.
God is just, loving, and merciful all at the same time. Nobody knows just exactly how many people are with God right now at this moment. Nobody knows the final number that will be in heaven just that it's a number greater than the stars and a number greater than any man can count from across the whole world! I don't know about you but that shows God's love and mercy to us. Because we were ALL guilty and God set us free! God never abandons or forsakes his people and he loves all of us equally. That is love my friend!