The True Church? I'm Disillusioned.

Can you be Eastern Orthodox and a Universalist at the same time?


  • Total voters
    34
  • This poll will close: .
Status
Not open for further replies.

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,594
12,122
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,181,104.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
That's just semantics. You chose to add those words, which you put below a line of stars.
There is no line of stars at the bottom of my post, and it is the same thing at the bottom of every post of mine so it is clearly part of my CF profile.
I have no idea why you would deliberately add different irrelevant texts to the bottom of each of your posts. Why would you assume that anyone would automatically understand that they were not part of your post? The line of stars seems to highlight it rather than delineate it.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
yes, really, not a torture chamber. we don't read it that way. it helps if you know WHAT we believe about a certain passage prior to commenting on our belief.

That's merely semantics. You can cover a snake in chocolate syrup & call it a chocolate bar, but it's still a snake & always will be.

Your God:

1. Sends people to endless suffering.
2. He could have prevented this by annihilation or other means.
3. Therefore He is a sick sadist infinitely worse than Hitler, Satan & Stalin combined.

The sufferings of just one individual in that hell forever will infinitely surpass all the combined sufferings during human mortal history. The comparison is like one drop of water to trillions of universes full of nothing but water.

there's the issue, love is always free, so it is never forced.

If God knew that without His forcing them to be saved, they would reject Him for all eternity & be tormented, then He would be a monster if He didn't force them to be saved. Similarly, many believe He will force aborted babies into heaven without their having chosen it of their own free will. Likewise, many believe He will force others in heaven to remain there forever without having a free choice to reject God as many angels of heaven once did. So, given that, forcing would not appear to be an issue with Love Omnipotent. At least not in the after life (i.e. after death, the hereafter).

God's love does not expire like a carton of milk, so Love Omnipotent will pursue the salvation of sinners for as long as it takes into eternity to save them. Eternity allows an infinite number of chances to receive salvation & be delivered from hell's torments. If every free will choice has a 50% chance of going either way, it would be mathematically impossible for one to reject God forever. Therefore universal salvation is truth.

love does not annihilate.

It saves all. Though given only the choice between annihilation and a being getting endless torments, it would choose the more loving & merciful of the two. Therefore endless hell is a myth.

If God created human beings such that they are (1) "eternally existing (as He Himself is)", so that it would be impossible to annihilate them even if Love Omnipotent wanted to, and (2) if He knew in advance that some of them would spend eternity rejecting Him, then (3) He is a monster for having created them that way.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Neither of these can possibly be temporary because if at any time everyone who says Lord Lord to Jesus enters heaven then Matthew 7:21 becomes a false statement and likewise if at any time those who blaspheme the Holy Spirit are forgiven then Luke 12:10 becomes a false statement.

So you didn't read the links i provided? Well, let's start with Matthew 7:21:


Where does this say "Jesus will save all mankind even the unrighteous after death?

Are those who openly reject(ed) Jesus still considered His people?
Luke 19:26-27
26 For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.


Where did that say anyone will NEVER be saved, but sadisticlly tortured throughout endless eons?

It's incredibly - lame - for a Jesus you think will monstrously fry people for ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever and ever...

If that were His belief, why is it entirely absent from Scripture? Why is Scripture instead - full - of lame warnings like the above, ALL of which are perfectly harmonious with the many passages that support universalism. By quoting Lk.19:26-27 you only shoot your own dogma in the foot...yet again.
Got anymore - lame - ones you want to post - to add to the lists of those you already have?


Mt.1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins.
Mt.2:6b ...my people Israel.

The "His people" referred to are Israel (2:6) of the context. IOW people like Judas Iscariot, the son of perdition, & the Pharisees who were blaspheming Christ & or the Holy Spirit, etc.

Mt.18:23 Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants. 24 And when he had begun to reckon...
34 And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. 35 So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.

Furthermore, the context of Matthew 5:25-26, both before & after those 2 verses, is making references to Gehenna. Verses 21-26 have to do with anger & being reconciled & v.22 warns of Gehenna. In verses 27-30 the subject is adultery & v.30 warns regarding Gehenna.

Matt 5:25-26 Come to terms quickly with your adversary before it is too late and you are dragged into court, handed over to an officer, and thrown in jail. I assure you that you won't be free again until you have paid the last penny.

"They must pay (as GMac says) the uttermost farthing -- which is to say, they must tender the forgiveness of their brethren that is owed, the repentance and sorrow for sin that is owed, etc. Otherwise they do stay in prison with the tormenters. (their guilt? their hate? their own filthiness?) At last resort, if they still refuse to let go that nasty pet they've been stroking, they must even suffer the outer darkness. God will remove Himself from them to the extent that He can do so without causing their existence to cease. As Tom Talbot points out so well, no sane person of free will (and the child must be sane and informed to have freedom) could possibly choose ultimate horror over ultimate delight throughout the unending ages." Why affirm belief in Hell?


Then of course we have.

Matthew 7:21-22
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works?

You would have us believe that verse 21 does not say
"Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;"
But instead means,
"everyone shall enter the kingdom of heaven righteous and unrighteous alike."

Did you miss verse 22 of the context which is speaking of what will happen on a certain "day", not eternal destinies? Nothing there states they cannot be saved at some point in the future beyond that "day".

By the same kind of logic you would have us believe that no one will be saved because all have been unrighteous & 1 Cor.6:9 says:

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God?"

Remember this:

.
● 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
(9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neitherfornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
(10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
● Galatians 5:19-21
(19) Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
(20) Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
(21) Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall NOT inherit the kingdom of God.
● Ephesians 5:3-5
(3) But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
(4) Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
(5) For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
In three different epistles [books] Paul lists many people who do not have any inheritance in the kingdom of heaven. Please show a verse, two or more would be better, where Paul says “Oops I made a mistake, all these people will be reconciled even if they were sinful and unrighteous when they died."

Where does Paul ever qualify his warnings about who cannot enter the kingdom of God by saying "not until they repent & cease being unrighteous?" I can't seem to find that
qualification anywhere in Paul's writings. Do you suppose that Paul forgot to put that in and that is why unis today have to interject that into every one of Paul's warnings?


It's right in front of your eyes, if you read the next verse after those you quoted:

1 Cor 6:9-11

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

"And SUCH WERE SOME OF YOU: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."

As a commentator says:

"Wait a minute. If the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God, why does Paul say "and such were some of you?" If they were unrighteous, then how did they inherit the kingdom?"

"They had to be cleansed first, of course. As long as anyone is not cleansed, they have no part inside. But once cleansed, they they entered the kingdom."

So the passages you quoted are perfectly harmonious with universal salvation.

https://www.tentmaker.org/books/hope_beyond_hell.pdf
Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism

Heb.10:28 A man that hath set at nought Moses' law dieth without compassion on the word of two or three witnesses: 29 of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be judged worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?

Stoning to death is not a very sore or long lasting punishment. People suffered far worse deaths via the torture methods of the eternal hell believing Medieval Inquisitionists and the German Nazis under Hitler.

Therefore, if the writer of Hebrews believed that wicked, rebellious, Christ rejectors would be punished with something so monstrous as being endlessly annihilated or tormented, he would not have chosen to compare their punishment to something so lame as being stoned to death.

Clearly he did not believe Love Omnipotent is an unfeeling terminator machine or sadist who abandons forever the beings He created in His own image & likeness so easily.


Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism

75 UR verses + 100 proofs + 150 reasons etc:
Web Online Help

213 Questions Without Answers:
Questions Without Answers
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
There is no line of stars at the bottom of my post.

Line of stars, line of dots, whatever.

Now back on topic, you didn't answer this:

The human soul is completely free to reject God's love endlessly.

Even those in heaven, like the saints & angels & angels of heaven who fell?

So do you also think those in "hell" will be offered an endless number of free choices to accept God's love?

Do you think it is mathematically likely anyone would reject God forever?

If you think they will be condemned to endless tortures on the day of judgement, has Love Omnipotent already seen that they will reject Him an infinite number of times through all eternity?

If so, why did He allow them to be created in the first place, knowing this would be their fate? Somewhat lacking in wisdom is He not?

And why not annihilate them to save them from infinite tortures? To force them to be tortured infinitely would be sadistic, infinitely worse than Hitler, Satan and Stalin combined.

It is hatred of God which places them in torment, it isn't God's doing. God has in fact done everything possible to bring about salvation to all mankind, but no one can be forced to love God.

Did you read this thread or at least the OP:

If endless conscious torments were true, is God a monster?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
No, they choose it themselves.

Do they "jump" into the lake of fire? Or are they "thrown" there:

The Eastern/Greek Orthodox New Testament:

Rev.20:10 The devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulphur, where the beast and the false prophet are also. They will be tormented day and night, unto ages of ages.

https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/books/or...tament-(The-Eastern-Greek-Orthodox-Bible).pdf

Your God:

1. Sends people to endless suffering.
2. He could have prevented this by annihilation or other means.
3. Therefore He is a sick sadist infinitely worse than Hitler, Satan & Stalin combined.

The sufferings of just one individual in that hell forever will infinitely surpass all the combined sufferings during human mortal history. The comparison is like one drop of water to trillions of universes full of nothing but water.
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,594
12,122
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,181,104.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Rev.20:10 The devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulphur, where the beast and the false prophet are also. They will be tormented day and night, unto ages of ages.
The devil, the beast, and the false prophets are thrown in. It doesn't mention anybody else.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,560
20,078
41
Earth
✟1,466,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
That's merely semantics. You can cover a snake in chocolate syrup & call it a chocolate bar, but it's still a snake & always will be.

Your God:

1. Sends people to endless suffering.
2. He could have prevented this by annihilation or other means.
3. Therefore He is a sick sadist infinitely worse than Hitler, Satan & Stalin combined.

The sufferings of just one individual in that hell forever will infinitely surpass all the combined sufferings during human mortal history. The comparison is like one drop of water to trillions of universes full of nothing but water.



If God knew that without His forcing them to be saved, they would reject Him for all eternity & be tormented, then He would be a monster if He didn't force them to be saved. Similarly, many believe He will force aborted babies into heaven without their having chosen it of their own free will. Likewise, many believe He will force others in heaven to remain there forever without having a free choice to reject God as many angels of heaven once did. So, given that, forcing would not appear to be an issue with Love Omnipotent. At least not in the after life (i.e. after death, the hereafter).

God's love does not expire like a carton of milk, so Love Omnipotent will pursue the salvation of sinners for as long as it takes into eternity to save them. Eternity allows an infinite number of chances to receive salvation & be delivered from hell's torments. If every free will choice has a 50% chance of going either way, it would be mathematically impossible for one to reject God forever. Therefore universal salvation is truth.



It saves all. Though given only the choice between annihilation and a being getting endless torments, it would choose the more loving & merciful of the two. Therefore endless hell is a myth.

If God created human beings such that they are (1) "eternally existing (as He Himself is)", so that it would be impossible to annihilate them even if Love Omnipotent wanted to, and (2) if He knew in advance that some of them would spend eternity rejecting Him, then (3) He is a monster for having created them that way.

you still don't understand (or at this point, I would say refuse to) our understanding of hell. if you want to actually have a conversation with us, fine. if you just want to try to browbeat us with some anti-Calvinist talking points, you can do that too, but since we aren't Calvinists, it'll probably be as effective as it was the last time you were on here.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Did you miss verse 22 of the context which is speaking of what will happen on a certain "day", not eternal destinies? Nothing there states they cannot be saved at some point in the future beyond that "day".

I already addressed this. His statement pertaining to “on that day” is completely separate from the statement that not all who say to Him Lord Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven.


“"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.'”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭7:21-23‬ ‭NASB‬‬

He didn’t say not everyone who says Lord Lord to Me will enter heaven on that day, He said they won’t enter heaven period. Will not happen ever. What happens “on that day” is they will be rejected and they will make excuses for their disobedience but they can’t fool God. They were false prophets who were outwardly appearing to be Christians but inwardly they were not. Verse 22 doesn’t change the meaning of verse 21 in any way. I already explained this before and you didn’t reply.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
The devil, the beast, and the false prophets are thrown in. It doesn't mention anybody else.

It does here:

Rev.20: 15 Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.

No, they choose it themselves.

Do they "jump" into the lake of fire? Or are they "thrown" there:

The Eastern/Greek Orthodox New Testament:

Rev.20:10 The devil who deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulphur, where the beast and the false prophet are also. They will be tormented day and night, unto ages of ages.

https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/books/or...tament-(The-Eastern-Greek-Orthodox-Bible).pdf

Your God:

1. Sends people to endless suffering.
2. He could have prevented this by annihilation or other means.
3. Therefore He is a sick sadist infinitely worse than Hitler, Satan & Stalin combined.

The sufferings of just one individual in that hell forever will infinitely surpass all the combined sufferings during human mortal history. The comparison is like one drop of water to trillions of universes full of nothing but water.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I already addressed this. His statement pertaining to “on that day” is completely separate from the statement that not all who say to Him Lord Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven.


“"Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?' And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.'”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭7:21-23‬ ‭NASB‬‬

He didn’t say not everyone who says Lord Lord to Me will enter heaven on that day, He said they won’t enter heaven period. Will not happen ever. What happens “on that day” is they will be rejected and they will make excuses for their disobedience but they can’t fool God. They were false prophets who were outwardly appearing to be Christians but inwardly they were not. Verse 22 doesn’t change the meaning of verse 21 in any way. I already explained this before and you didn’t reply.

That was refuted in my post to you as follows (see also the quote at the bottom, which i've added as additional points re this topic):

Did you miss verse 22 of the context which is speaking of what will happen on a certain "day", not eternal destinies? Nothing there states they cannot be saved at some point in the future beyond that "day".

By the same kind of logic you would have us believe that no one will be saved because all have been unrighteous & 1 Cor.6:9 says:

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God?"

Remember this:

.
● 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
(9) Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neitherfornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
(10) Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
● Galatians 5:19-21
(19) Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
(20) Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
(21) Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall NOT inherit the kingdom of God.
● Ephesians 5:3-5
(3) But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;
(4) Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.
(5) For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
In three different epistles [books] Paul lists many people who do not have any inheritance in the kingdom of heaven. Please show a verse, two or more would be better, where Paul says “Oops I made a mistake, all these people will be reconciled even if they were sinful and unrighteous when they died."

Where does Paul ever qualify his warnings about who cannot enter the kingdom of God by saying "not until they repent & cease being unrighteous?" I can't seem to find that
qualification anywhere in Paul's writings. Do you suppose that Paul forgot to put that in and that is why unis today have to interject that into every one of Paul's warnings?


It's right in front of your eyes, if you read the next verse after those you quoted:

1 Cor 6:9-11

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

"And SUCH WERE SOME OF YOU: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God."

As a commentator says:

"Wait a minute. If the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God, why does Paul say "and such were some of you?" If they were unrighteous, then how did they inherit the kingdom?"

"They had to be cleansed first, of course. As long as anyone is not cleansed, they have no part inside. But once cleansed, they they entered the kingdom."

So the passages you quoted are perfectly harmonious with universal salvation.


---------


I don't see how these people fail to see the point of this passage and misinterpret what Jesus said. Jesus specifically referenced those believers who called Him LORD. Jesus said to them not everyone who calls me Lord shall enter the kingdom and gives the reason which is because they practiced lawlessness. Thus Jesus' point is that despite doing the miraculous, they lived their lives as hypocrites. Consequently, they will not enter the kingdom. However, Jesus did not say they will never enter the kingdom did He? It is illogical for them to conclude that 'not entering' and 'never entering' are one and the same thing. That is sheer presumption unsupported by the text itself. For example, I want to enter a grocery store but when I get there I realize the store has not yet opened to the public and thus I cannot enter the store. Is it then logical to conclude that I can never enter the store? That would be a ludicrous assumption to make! Yet that is what these people base their infernal argument on. Sheer nonsense! In the same way, just because those in Matt 7 cannot enter the kingdom due to their disobedient lives in this age, it is not logical to conclude that they are forever banned from entering the kingdom in a future age.

Moreover, it you look back at v.14 in Matt 7 it states:
"How narrow is the gate and difficult the way that leads to life, and few are those who find (heuriskontes | εὑρίσκοντες | pres act ptcp nom pl masc) it!"
Heuriskontes is a present tense participle more accurately translated as "finding." Thus there are few who are (presently) finding the narrow gate. The verse does not state that others will not find it at some point in the future. This parallels and reinforces vs.21-23 which states that those believers fail to enter the kingdom/narrow gate because of their disobedience but it does not state that they will never, ever find it in in the future.

What people also fail to realize is that entering the kingdom does not refer to heaven. Entering the kingdom refers to co-reining with Jesus during his Millennial reign on the earth. The whole goal of the Christian life is not to live forever in heaven. Instead "eternal" life which actually means aionion/"age-during" life refers to life during the Millennial Age. The ultimate example of this are the martyrs who are beheaded for their faith during the tribulation. Rev 19:4 states that as a result of their faithfulness, they will live and reign with Christ for 1,000 years. Thus those believers in Matt 7 are disqualified from the greatest privilege which is to rule and reign with Jesus during the millennium - not for an eternity. Christians have been duped into believing that eternal life means life forever with God in heaven when instead it means resurrected aionion life, ruling with Jesus for 1,000 years on the earth.

Addendum: I just had an "aha" moment after reading what I wrote. One can counter their argument by agreeing with them. Since they interpret will not enter as never enter - so be it. That is because believers in this age who live disobedient lives as those in Matt 7 did will never inherit the kingdom because they will never inherit the privilege of ruling with Christ in the Millennial kingdom.

ClementofA links
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wait a minute. If the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God, why does Paul say "and such were some of you?" If they were unrighteous, then how did they inherit the kingdom?"

Jesus is speaking about those who are presently unrighteous, they will not inherit the kingdom of God, that is very apparent because of Paul’s statement “Such were you”. What your doing is using two different messages in scripture to build a doctrine that contradicts Matthew 7:21. He did not say they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven on that day, He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period. Those who die in the state of unrighteousness, who are not cleansed of their sins by Christ’s atonement will not enter heaven. The same goes for those who are in a state of uncleansed unrighteousness when He returns. There is no atonement after death or after Jesus returns, that’s the cut off point.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Jesus is speaking about those who are presently unrighteous, they will not inherit the kingdom of God, that is very apparent because of Paul’s statement “Such were you”.

To use your logic with Mt.7:21, the statement:

"Know ye not that THE UNRIGHTEOUS shall not inherit the kingdom of God?" (1 Cor.6:9)

means they will never enter the kingdom of God. Period. And since all men have been unrighteous, therefore no one will ever enter the kingdom of God. And everyone will be lost.

With Mt.7:21 you state:

"He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period."

That's just like 1 Cor.6:9 above. Except your logic fails there. Likewise it fails at Mt.7:21.

Just as the unrighteous of 1 Cor.6:9 can later become righteous & enter the kingdom, so also can those not doing the will of God of Mt.7:21 later do the will of God.

He did not say they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven on that day, He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period.

"On your rebuttal theory, Jesus must be saying that no one ever shall enter the kingdom of God, since we’re all sinners who have at some point not done the will of our Father in the heavens but have done injustice instead, also thus sinning against the Holy Spirit (since the Holy Spirit is God and every sin is a sin against God)."

"Nope, don’t try to get around it: Jesus said those who sin shall never, never enter into the kingdom of the heavens, that’s an eternal statement and unless the speaker expressly indicates that there is a limited time frame within which his statement is true we should assume that the statement is eternally true: “X will not happen” must be the same as “X will never happen”. Any other interpretation of such statements changes their meaning."

"DON’T TRY TO GET AROUND THE OBVIOUS TOTAL AND HOPELESSLY PERMANENT DAMNATION PREACHED IN THE BIBLE! YOU CAN NEVER EVER EVER BE SAVED FROM YOUR SIN AND ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF THE HEAVENS!"

"If your rebuttal was correct in principle, no one could ever be saved."

"But I don’t think I’m unbiblically changing the meaning of Jesus’ statement in that verse, if I conclude from other verses (including closely nearby) that Jesus does in fact think people who do not do the will of God can be empowered and led by God to do the will of God and so enter into the kingdom of the heavens."

"That’s why I wrote, “No one enters the kingdom of God (== of “the heavens”, a respectful euphamism for God which Matthew usually prefers), who does not do the will of God. Strictly speaking, Jesus doesn’t say there that those who are currently not doing the will of God will never come to do the will of God (and so shall never be entering into the kingdom of the heavens).” And then pointed out, in some detail (which I could add to), that to interpret that saying as though such people told to depart shall never come to do the will of God but shall be bad fruit produced by God (since God was clearly empowering those of all people to do and know various miraculous things), would thus put us on par with the false teachers being condemned by Christ there."

"The sin against the Holy Spirit isn’t an exception (though by now you’ve probably gotten through the video lecture(s) on that). The Pharisees being thus condemned are also being put into the same situation as the man they insisted God wouldn’t or couldn’t save, but whom Jesus saved anyway. I’m sure as hell not going to insist that Jesus can’t or won’t save them! – I’d be doing what God will be punishing them for doing! Besides if God can save Paul and Peter from doing the equivalent of blaspheming against the Holy Spirit, then He can save those Pharisees, too."

"That still doesn’t mean anyone can or will be entering into the kingdom of God while still sinning against the Holy Spirit and otherwise refusing to do justice. Never and not are still one hundred per cent true, but that’s what Jesus is talking about. He isn’t talking about doers of injustice as such never-not ever being saved into doing justice and cooperating with the Holy Spirit and honoring the Son and the Father (and the Holy Spirit)."


He did not say they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven on that day, He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period.

This was quoted in my previous post:

"I don't see how these people fail to see the point of this passage and misinterpret what Jesus said. Jesus specifically referenced those believers who called Him LORD. Jesus said to them not everyone who calls me Lord shall enter the kingdom and gives the reason which is because they practiced lawlessness. Thus Jesus' point is that despite doing the miraculous, they lived their lives as hypocrites. Consequently, they will not enter the kingdom. However, Jesus did not say they will never enter the kingdom did He? It is illogical for them to conclude that 'not entering' and 'never entering' are one and the same thing. That is sheer presumption unsupported by the text itself. For example, I want to enter a grocery store but when I get there I realize the store has not yet opened to the public and thus I cannot enter the store. Is it then logical to conclude that I can never enter the store? That would be a ludicrous assumption to make! Yet that is what these people base their infernal argument on. Sheer nonsense! In the same way, just because those in Matt 7 cannot enter the kingdom due to their disobedient lives in this age, it is not logical to conclude that they are forever banned from entering the kingdom in a future age."

He did not say they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven on that day, He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period.

This also was quoted in my previous post:

"What people also fail to realize is that entering the kingdom does not refer to heaven. Entering the kingdom refers to co-reining with Jesus during his Millennial reign on the earth. The whole goal of the Christian life is not to live forever in heaven. Instead "eternal" life which actually means aionion/"age-during" life refers to life during the Millennial Age. The ultimate example of this are the martyrs who are beheaded for their faith during the tribulation. Rev 19:4 states that as a result of their faithfulness, they will live and reign with Christ for 1,000 years. Thus those believers in Matt 7 are disqualified from the greatest privilege which is to rule and reign with Jesus during the millennium - not for an eternity. Christians have been duped into believing that eternal life means life forever with God in heaven when instead it means resurrected aionion life, ruling with Jesus for 1,000 years on the earth."

"Addendum: I just had an "aha" moment after reading what I wrote. One can counter their argument by agreeing with them. Since they interpret will not enter as never enter - so be it. That is because believers in this age who live disobedient lives as those in Matt 7 did will never inherit the kingdom because they will never inherit the privilege of ruling with Christ in the Millennial kingdom."

He did not say they will not inherit the kingdom of heaven on that day, He said they won’t inherit the kingdom of heaven period.

In the most ancient manuscripts there are no periods, no punctuation marks, no spaces between letters, the letters are all capitals, no chapters & no verses. So who can say the passage wasn't spoken like this:

21 "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter 22 in that day. Many will say to Me, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons and in your name perform many miracles? 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’

Those who die in the state of unrighteousness, who are not cleansed of their sins by Christ’s atonement will not enter heaven.

Not until they are cleansed like everyone else.

The same goes for those who are in a state of uncleansed unrighteousness when He returns. There is no atonement after death or after Jesus returns, that’s the cut off point.

There's no cut off point after which Scripture says anyone can "never be saved".

Lam.3:31For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:
32But though he cause grief, yet will he have compassion according to the multitude of his mercies.
33For he doth not afflict willingly nor grieve THE CHILDREN OF MEN. (KJV, emphasis mine)

1 Cor.3:15 If any man’s work is burned, he will suffer loss, but he himself will be saved, but as through fire.

Mt.1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins.
Mt.2:6b ...my people Israel.

The "His people" referred to are Israel (2:6) of the context. IOW people like Judas Iscariot, the son of perdition, & the Pharisees who were blaspheming Christ & or the Holy Spirit, etc.

Rom.11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

Rev.5:13 And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are on the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.

Rom 5:18 Consequently, then, as it was through one offense for ALL MANKIND for condemnation, thus also it is through one just act for ALL MANKIND for life's justifying."

Rom 5:19 For even as, through the disobedience of the one man, THE MANY were constituted sinners, thus also, through the obedience of the One, THE MANY shall be constituted just."

1 Cor.15:22 AS in Adam ALL die SO ALSO in Christ shall ALL be made alive.

1 Cor.15:28 And when ALL shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put ALL under him, that God may be all in ALL.

Col.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.


*****************************************************************


I destroyed all your "proof texts" against universalism showing they failed as such "proof texts". That's why your quoted verses are so lame. If Scripture actually taught the endless tortures or endless annihilation doctrine, why isn't it being shouted in the most clear language repeatedly from Genesis to Revelation. Such doctrines are a joke.

Yet another lame, feeble, failing attempt to support your theology. Nothing there states there are no more chances after the second coming. Nothing there states the Love of Love Crucified the Omnipotent has expired like a carton of milk & the Almighty is powerless to save. Nothing states Love unending will hold grudges, bitterness and hate against anyone for all eternity, as your theology would have us believe.

Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism

75 UR verses + 100 proofs + 150 reasons etc:
Web Online Help

213 Questions Without Answers:
Questions Without Answers

https://www.tentmaker.org/books/hope_beyond_hell.pdf

If endless conscious torments were true, is God a monster?

"You are fully, completely, and thoroughly adored by God."
"You are fully, completely, and thoroughly adored by God."

May the Lord keep, bless & heal you.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
On your rebuttal theory, Jesus must be saying that no one ever shall enter the kingdom of God, since we’re all sinners who have at some point not done the will of our Father in the heavens but have done injustice instead, also thus sinning against the Holy Spirit (since the Holy Spirit is God and every sin is a sin against God)."

Salvation is not based on obedience it’s based on repentance and faith. The false prophets mentioned in Matthew 7 did not have a genuine faith so they did not receive Christ’s atonement, hence “I never knew you”. Your confusing the difference between the Corinthians who have received Christ’s atonement and the false prophets who have not received His atonement. That’s the distinguishing factor that separates these two groups and these two messages.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Since when is St. Justin's a place for two non-denominational Christians to debate each other? Surely this conversation between Clement of A and BNR32FAN would be better hosted elsewhere.

Im sorry friend I will respect your request. I was just replying to his comment to my post. I won’t engage in the discussion anymore.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: dzheremi
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,565
13,723
✟429,802.00
Country
United States
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
It's okay. Discussion is fine, but it should at least include Eastern Orthodox Christians, since this entire part of the message board exists for you and I (non-EO people) to engage with them, not to argue among each other.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Since when is St. Justin's a place for two non-denominational Christians to debate each other? Surely this conversation between Clement of A and BNR32FAN would be better hosted elsewhere.

Id just like to add that I actually consider myself to be a nondenominational who has a tendency to lean towards the Orthodox doctrines pertaining to salvation. Just saying.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Salvation is not based on obedience it’s based on repentance and faith.

Oh, really:

Heb.5:9 And being perfected, He became the cause of eonian salvation to all who are obeying Him, (CLV)

Repentance is obedience. And true faith is inseparable from obedience.

Rom.1:5 through whom we have received grace and apostleship unto obedience of faith among all the Gentiles on behalf of His name,

Rom.16:26 but now having been made manifest also through the prophetic Scriptures, according to the commandment of the Eternal God, having been made known to all the Gentiles unto the obedience of faith--

Even the passage we are discussing - Mt.7:21 - speaks of the requirement of doing God's will.


Your confusing the difference between the Corinthians who have received Christ’s atonement and the false prophets who have not received His atonement. That’s the distinguishing factor that separates these two groups and these two messages.

What confusion is that. I never made a comparison between the two. So irrelevant. And you didn't address the points made in my post.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,613
7,380
Dallas
✟888,542.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Oh, really:

Heb.5:9 And being perfected, He became the cause of eonian salvation to all who are obeying Him, (CLV)

Repentance is obedience. And true faith is inseparable from obedience.

Rom.1:5 through whom we have received grace and apostleship unto obedience of faith among all the Gentiles on behalf of His name,

Rom.16:26 but now having been made manifest also through the prophetic Scriptures, according to the commandment of the Eternal God, having been made known to all the Gentiles unto the obedience of faith--

Even the passage we are discussing - Mt.7:21 - speaks of the requirement of doing God's will.

Can you name one person who is completely obedient? If obedience is required for salvation there won’t be a single man in heaven. Repentance on the other hand is another story. There won’t be a single person in heaven who hasn’t repented.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.