- Oct 21, 2017
- 2,278
- 1,471
- 71
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
In Acts 15:1, they were wanting to require all Gentiles to become circumcised in order to become justified, however, that was never the purpose for which God commanded circumcision, so the problem was that circumcision was being used for a man-made purpose that went above and beyond the purpose for which God commanded it. So the Jerusalem Council upheld the Mosaic Law by correctly ruling against that requirement and a ruling against requiring something that God never commanded should not be mistaken as being a ruling against obeying what God has commanded as if Paul or the Jerusalem Council had the authority to countermand God.
In regard to Galatians 5:2-4, all throughout the Bible, God wanted His people to repent and to return to obedience to His law, and even Christ began his ministry with that message, so it would be absurd to interpret these verses as Paul warning us against doing that and saying that we will be cut off from Christ if we follow Christ. Paul's problem in Galatians was not with those who were teaching Gentiles how to obey God's law as if obedience to God were somehow a negative thing, but rather his problem was with those who were wanting to require Gentiles to obey their works of the law in order to become justified. Christ set a sinless example of how to walk in obedience to the Mosaic Law, he did not hypocritically preach something other than what he practiced, and following what he taught by word and by example is not just for Jews, but for Gentiles too.
Either there were correct and incorrect reasons for someone to become circumcised and Paul was only speaking against the incorrect reasons, or according to Galatians 5:2-4, Paul caused Christ to be of no value to Timothy when he had him circumcised and Christ is of no value to roughly 80% of the men in the US who are circumcised. Rather, the problem was that they were trying to become justified by it. While Paul said in 1 Corinthians 7:19 that circumcision has not value and that what counts is obeying God's commandments, he also said in Romans 3:31 that circumcision has much value in every way, so the issue is that circumcision has no inherent value and that it's value is entirely dirived from whether someone obeys the Mosaic Law (Romans 2:25). In Romans 2:26, the way to tell that a Gentile has a circumcision heart is by observing their obedience to the Mosaic Law, which is the same way to tell for a Jew (Deuteronomy 10:12-16, 30:6). In Jeremiah 9:1-26, having an uncircumcised heart is associated with refusing to know God and forsaking the Mosaic Law.
I have never encountered such a complete misunderstanding of Galatians.....I never thought it was possible ....
You have really misquoted Scripture.....Paul said that circumcision was Of no value and if you put any faith in it you were required to keep “ The Whole Law”.
“ what COUNTS is keeping God’s Commandments”..... That is a flat out lie. Quite the contrary —- Paul said what “ counted “ was “FAITH acting through Love”.The entire Book Of Galatians devotes itself to how we are no longer under ANY Law....we are under Grace....Those new to the Faith should read Galatians for themselves and see how the Poster twisted Scripture....
Upvote
0