- Feb 10, 2019
- 634
- 118
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Largely, I use free will to mean man choosing toward God, emphatically Lord Jesus Christ.
After corresponding and speaking with free-willians about the scriptural errancy of free will, a trend emerges about interpretations.
Free-willians cry foul when I interpret free-willian's writings, yet free-willians manipulatively interpret free will into the Word of God imagining that it's acceptable.
Because of this, free-willians exhibit hypocrisy.
Free-willians express the concept to God: do as I say, not as I do.
I accurately paraphrase and restate the writings of free-willians to demonstrate their error; on the other hand, free-willians add to and subtract from scripture to fabricate their free will foundation, and this is demonstratable.
INCIDENT EXAMPLE ONE
For example, a free willian wrote that "I could refute it all, but you've shown that would be a waste of time" thus essentially writing that discussing scripture was "a waste of time", so I paraphrased the free willian by indicating the free willian called discussing scripture worthless. The free-willian later called it "complete misrepresentation", yet the free-willian not once cited scripture for the free-willian's unsupported promotion of free will for Adam in the subject thread, so hypocrisy manifests. The free-willian takes offense at my interpretation of the free-willian's writings, but the free-willian thinks that God just needs to take the free-willian's interpretation of scripture.
Discussing scripture is not "a waste of time".
The Word of God does not return void (Isaiah 55:11).
The Word of God is good for correction (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
The Word of God will never pass away (Matthew 24:35).
The Word of God is the Power of God unto salvation (Romans 1:16).
The free-willian fails to understand about the Power of God (1 Corinthians 1:24).
INCIDENT EXAMPLE TWO
In another incident as an example, another free-willian quoted commentary which I pointed out the superiority and importance of scripture to wit the free-willian replied "I DO NOT QUOTE COMMENTARIES", so instead of acknowledging the free-willian's use of commentary the free-willian denied using commentary in a traceable lie in the thread.
INCIDENT EXAMPLE THREE
In yet a third example, free willians rarely acknowledge correction about their misinterpreted scripture. Very frequently they disappear from a thread, go silent about the subject, or switch subjects - in some cases circling back to repeat their exposed error. A different free-willian acknowledged the free-willian's misinterpretation of scripture with "I can see that you have found room to squirm around Rev. 22:17" after the free willian misinterpretation was exposed. That free willian response sounds quite unrepentant for trying to alter Revelation 22:17.
In the pride of free-willian claimed choice toward God, they are unapologetic for their exposed errors again and again. Exposed by the Word of God, yet they are not only unapologetic to God for trying to abuse the Word of God, but they appear unrepentant in their pride. The proud will fall in the last day without the intervention of the Sovereign Lord (Proverbs 16:18, 2 Peter 2:9-10).
Free-willians exhibit more than hypocrisy that angers God, their free will foundation is shifting sand (Matthew 7:21-23, Matthew 7:26-27).
Lord Jesus railed against hypocrites when the Word of God says "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence" (Matthew 23:25, more Matthew 23:13-36).
Many Biblical passages express the evil of man altering scripture, including Revelation 22:18-19.
The Sovereignty of God in man's salvation with no basis in man's choice is absolutely evident when taking scripture with scripture as is prudent, and it is done in this essay: Almighty God's Awesome Creation In Amazing Splendor
SCRIPTURE CROSS REFERENCING
Cross referencing scripture functions in this manner.
Lord Jesus says "you did not choose Me, but I chose you" (John 15:16).
In the same passage, Lord Jesus says "I chose you out of the world" (John 15:19), so Jesus' words include salvation in the passage.
Jesus uses "you" to refer to all believers in all time for many reasons, including that after the ascension of Jesus the Apostle Peter spoke of the Gentiles when he said to the apostles and brethren "And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, 'John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit'" (Acts 11:16), and Lord Jesus told the "you" at the same time as John 15:16 and John 15:19 with His words of "I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; [that is] the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, [but] you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you" (John 14:26-27).
The sequence, John 15:16 - John 15:19 - Acts 11:16 - John 14:26:27, ties everything together, so this is a first avenue for man's inability to choose Jesus.
Investigating a separate avenue of bringing God's exclusive choosing of man unto salvation is the passage:
"When the disciples heard [this], they were very astonished and said, 'Then who can be saved?' And looking at [them] Jesus said to them, 'With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.'" (Matthew 19:25-26). This exchange exposes that man cannot "do" something to be saved, and that "do" includes man "doing" a choosing of Jesus.
The correlation between John 15:16 - John 15:19 - Matthew 19:25-26 ties everything together, so this is a second avenue for man's inability to choose Jesus.
This concludes the cross referencing scripture example.
God saves (Psalm 3:8, John 15:5), and man has no say in the matter (John 15:16). God sanctifies (Leviticus 20:8, John 15:5). God gets all glory in the salvation and sanctification of man (Isaiah 42:8).
God declares Who God is by the Word of God.
Humility is contrary to free will because free will includes a person exercising a choice, so there is pride in the claim of being able to choose.
Do you think a free willian can stick to scripture and remain a free willian?
After corresponding and speaking with free-willians about the scriptural errancy of free will, a trend emerges about interpretations.
Free-willians cry foul when I interpret free-willian's writings, yet free-willians manipulatively interpret free will into the Word of God imagining that it's acceptable.
Because of this, free-willians exhibit hypocrisy.
Free-willians express the concept to God: do as I say, not as I do.
I accurately paraphrase and restate the writings of free-willians to demonstrate their error; on the other hand, free-willians add to and subtract from scripture to fabricate their free will foundation, and this is demonstratable.
INCIDENT EXAMPLE ONE
For example, a free willian wrote that "I could refute it all, but you've shown that would be a waste of time" thus essentially writing that discussing scripture was "a waste of time", so I paraphrased the free willian by indicating the free willian called discussing scripture worthless. The free-willian later called it "complete misrepresentation", yet the free-willian not once cited scripture for the free-willian's unsupported promotion of free will for Adam in the subject thread, so hypocrisy manifests. The free-willian takes offense at my interpretation of the free-willian's writings, but the free-willian thinks that God just needs to take the free-willian's interpretation of scripture.
Discussing scripture is not "a waste of time".
The Word of God does not return void (Isaiah 55:11).
The Word of God is good for correction (2 Timothy 3:16-17).
The Word of God will never pass away (Matthew 24:35).
The Word of God is the Power of God unto salvation (Romans 1:16).
The free-willian fails to understand about the Power of God (1 Corinthians 1:24).
In another incident as an example, another free-willian quoted commentary which I pointed out the superiority and importance of scripture to wit the free-willian replied "I DO NOT QUOTE COMMENTARIES", so instead of acknowledging the free-willian's use of commentary the free-willian denied using commentary in a traceable lie in the thread.
In yet a third example, free willians rarely acknowledge correction about their misinterpreted scripture. Very frequently they disappear from a thread, go silent about the subject, or switch subjects - in some cases circling back to repeat their exposed error. A different free-willian acknowledged the free-willian's misinterpretation of scripture with "I can see that you have found room to squirm around Rev. 22:17" after the free willian misinterpretation was exposed. That free willian response sounds quite unrepentant for trying to alter Revelation 22:17.
Free-willians exhibit more than hypocrisy that angers God, their free will foundation is shifting sand (Matthew 7:21-23, Matthew 7:26-27).
Lord Jesus railed against hypocrites when the Word of God says "Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and of the dish, but inside they are full of robbery and self-indulgence" (Matthew 23:25, more Matthew 23:13-36).
Many Biblical passages express the evil of man altering scripture, including Revelation 22:18-19.
The Sovereignty of God in man's salvation with no basis in man's choice is absolutely evident when taking scripture with scripture as is prudent, and it is done in this essay: Almighty God's Awesome Creation In Amazing Splendor
SCRIPTURE CROSS REFERENCING
Cross referencing scripture functions in this manner.
Lord Jesus says "you did not choose Me, but I chose you" (John 15:16).
In the same passage, Lord Jesus says "I chose you out of the world" (John 15:19), so Jesus' words include salvation in the passage.
Jesus uses "you" to refer to all believers in all time for many reasons, including that after the ascension of Jesus the Apostle Peter spoke of the Gentiles when he said to the apostles and brethren "And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, 'John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit'" (Acts 11:16), and Lord Jesus told the "you" at the same time as John 15:16 and John 15:19 with His words of "I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; [that is] the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, [but] you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you" (John 14:26-27).
The sequence, John 15:16 - John 15:19 - Acts 11:16 - John 14:26:27, ties everything together, so this is a first avenue for man's inability to choose Jesus.
Investigating a separate avenue of bringing God's exclusive choosing of man unto salvation is the passage:
"When the disciples heard [this], they were very astonished and said, 'Then who can be saved?' And looking at [them] Jesus said to them, 'With people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.'" (Matthew 19:25-26). This exchange exposes that man cannot "do" something to be saved, and that "do" includes man "doing" a choosing of Jesus.
The correlation between John 15:16 - John 15:19 - Matthew 19:25-26 ties everything together, so this is a second avenue for man's inability to choose Jesus.
This concludes the cross referencing scripture example.
God declares Who God is by the Word of God.
Humility is contrary to free will because free will includes a person exercising a choice, so there is pride in the claim of being able to choose.
Do you think a free willian can stick to scripture and remain a free willian?