20 major reasons to reject the Premillennial doctrine

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marilyn C

Pre-tribulation.
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2013
4,818
598
Victoria
✟597,987.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good questions, and thanks for your gracious approach to discussion. It is challenging and refreshing to see.

I could ask: why did God create man when He knew man would fall short. Because man is the problem, and God is the answer.


Good. We now have two important points we agree on.
  1. Salvation was never secured on the grounds of race.

  2. Christ is the root of the Olive tree. Israelis believers and Gentile believers are in Christ.
So my next question, is in reply to your answer.

I asked you previously `Why God would make a nation that He knew would not obey Him.

You replied - I could ask: why did God create man when He knew man would fall short. Because man is the problem, and God is the answer.


The difference is that Adam was made perfect, while Israel was already sinful. Adam had every opportunity to obey God, as he had no bias to sinfulness, while Israel was always sinful. So that is no comparison.

However in Adam`s sinful state we know that God did not expect him to redeem himself. Thus also Israel in their sinful state, God does not expect them to redeem themselves.

So why did God give Israel the law if He knew they could not keep it? Why set them a task He knew they would fail?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good. We now have two important points we agree on.
  1. Salvation was never secured on the grounds of race.

  2. Christ is the root of the Olive tree. Israelis believers and Gentile believers are in Christ.
So my next question, is in reply to your answer.

I asked you previously `Why God would make a nation that He knew would not obey Him.

You replied - I could ask: why did God create man when He knew man would fall short. Because man is the problem, and God is the answer.


The difference is that Adam was made perfect, while Israel was already sinful. Adam had every opportunity to obey God, as he had no bias to sinfulness, while Israel was always sinful. So that is no comparison.

However in Adam`s sinful state we know that God did not expect him to redeem himself. Thus also Israel in their sinful state, God does not expect them to redeem themselves.

So why did God give Israel the law if He knew they could not keep it? Why set them a task He knew they would fail?

Israel were set apart to be an example/light to the nations. That was their assignment, but they failed miserably at that. The Law was given to expose the weakness and untrustworthiness of man and their absolute need of a Redeemer. The Law showed Israel that they were created to trust God for everything. It also showed them that they needed divine supervision and aid. That is the story from the beginning. Man is messed up, prone to go the wrong way, and in need of God's help.

The Scriptures are essentially God revealing Himself to mankind through the communication of knowledge. As we analyze the ancient Hebrew text we see a notable and central theme mounting: that of the arrival of a Redeemer Messiah to rescue man from his sinful condition. This came in the form of direct prophecies, old covenant offices, ceremonial typology and a tapestry of unfolding preparation. In fact, Jesus Christ is the key to understanding the biblical covenants. Even though they did not have a full revelation of Him, the old covenant prophets were preoccupied with Christ’s person, His appearance and His ministry. The Old Testament text gradually and assuredly steered history onward to the fulfillment of every ancient promise. There is a steady unfolding continuity of plan and purpose from the Old to the New Testament, concentrated on the promised Messiah. Christ is indeed God’s final and fullest revelation.

The corporate oneness of sinful man from the beginning is seen in the federal designation “in Adam.” This stands in stark contrast to the elect of God who are said to be “in Christ.” The phrase “in Christ” describes the elect’s participation in His substitutionary earthly work as a man Savior and Redeemer. Without Christ sinless life, His atoning death and victorious resurrection there is no removal of sin, no forgiveness, no spiritual freedom, no victory over death and hell.
 
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The only way that you come to such a conclusion is by denying that the beast and Satan has been around for 2000 years and that there has been countless millions of Christian martyrs throughout that period. This refutes your Premil arguments.


This is real simple. Clearly, the little season meant in Revelation 6:11 occurs during this same short time made mention of in Revelation 12:12. If this same little season meant in Revelation 6:11 is meaning this same little season meant in Revelation 20, this indicates that there has to be a thousand year period preceding it. So where in all of Revelation 12 do you propose a thousand years fit?

I have asked this question numerous times of numerous Amils, and have yet to see one single Amil show where the thousand years logically fit in Revelation 12. If it can't logically fit before this war in heaven, and that it can't logically fit during the short time mentioned in Revelation 12:12, because that short time includes the little season mentioned in Revelation 6:11, where else in Revelation 12 do you propose it fits? Does not Revelation 12 cover at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years many of you are claiming satan is in the pit? Once again, where do you propose this thousand years logically fits in Revelation 12?

As for me, I can tell you exactly where it logically fits in Revelation 12. It fits after the events recorded in Revelation 12:17 are entirely fulfilled. IOW, this indicates satan is initially bound after the fulfillment of Revelation 12:17, and not already bound before this is fulfilled.

I think one of the biggest obstacles I'm personally encountering, I'm getting the impression that some of you are not fully grasping what I'm actually arguing. That makes these discussions that much more difficult when one side is not fully grasping what the other side is actually arguing.

To even begin to prove your version of Amil, you first have to show how the little season in Revelation 6:11, and the little season in Revelation 20, that these are one and the same. Totally impossible for you or anyone to do when Revelation 20:4 is already telling us that the little season in Revelation 6:11 is already fulfilled before satan is loosed from the pit, and that this same little season happens during satan's short time of wrath according to Revelation 12 and other Scriptures as well. And guess what follows satan's short time in Revelation 12? The 2nd coming, that is what. And at this point satan hasn't even been bound yet according to Revelation 12.


In the OP you list 17 reasons why the Premil doctrine should be rejected. Some of those reasons might be good reasons, so I'm not claiming none of your reasons are reason enough to reject Premil. Yet at the same time, as to my post here, I have submitted in return, several reasons why Amil should be rejected as well. Until Amils first deal with my arguments and show where my arguments took a wrong turn, then show the correct way to understand some of these things, until then my reasons for rejecting Amil are just as valid as you feel your reasons for rejecting Premil are.

A good start for Amils would be this. Simply show in the text in Revelation 12 where you feel the thousand years logically fit, where they begin and where they end, then explain why you feel it logically fits where you are proposing. Once again, keeping in mind that Revelation 12 covers at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years Amils claim satan is in the pit. Obviously then, if Amils are correct here, they should be able to easily point out in Revelation 12 the beginning and the end of this thousand years.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is real simple. Clearly, the little season meant in Revelation 6:11 occurs during this same short time made mention of in Revelation 12:12. If this same little season meant in Revelation 6:11 is meaning this same little season meant in Revelation 20, this indicates that there has to be a thousand year period preceding it. So where in all of Revelation 12 do you propose a thousand years fit?

I have asked this question numerous times of numerous Amils, and have yet to see one single Amil show where the thousand years logically fit in Revelation 12. If it can't logically fit before this war in heaven, and that it can't logically fit during the short time mentioned in Revelation 12:12, because that short time includes the little season mentioned in Revelation 6:11, where else in Revelation 12 do you propose it fits? Does not Revelation 12 cover at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years many of you are claiming satan is in the pit? Once again, where do you propose this thousand years logically fits in Revelation 12?

As for me, I can tell you exactly where it logically fits in Revelation 12. It fits after the events recorded in Revelation 12:17 are entirely fulfilled. IOW, this indicates satan is initially bound after the fulfillment of Revelation 12:17, and not already bound before this is fulfilled.

I think one of the biggest obstacles I'm personally encountering, I'm getting the impression that some of you are not fully grasping what I'm actually arguing. That makes these discussions that much more difficult when one side is not fully grasping what the other side is actually arguing.

To even begin to prove your version of Amil, you first have to show how the little season in Revelation 6:11, and the little season in Revelation 20, that these are one and the same. Totally impossible for you or anyone to do when Revelation 20:4 is already telling us that the little season in Revelation 6:11 is already fulfilled before satan is loosed from the pit, and that this same little season happens during satan's short time of wrath according to Revelation 12 and other Scriptures as well. And guess what follows satan's short time in Revelation 12? The 2nd coming, that is what. And at this point satan hasn't even been bound yet according to Revelation 12.


In the OP you list 17 reasons why the Premil doctrine should be rejected. Some of those reasons might be good reasons, so I'm not claiming none of your reasons are reason enough to reject Premil. Yet at the same time, as to my post here, I have submitted in return, several reasons why Amil should be rejected as well. Until Amils first deal with my arguments and show where my arguments took a wrong turn, then show the correct way to understand some of these things, until then my reasons for rejecting Amil are just as valid as you feel your reasons for rejecting Premil are.

A good start for Amils would be this. Simply show in the text in Revelation 12 where you feel the thousand years logically fit, where they begin and where they end, then explain why you feel it logically fits where you are proposing. Once again, keeping in mind that Revelation 12 covers at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years Amils claim satan is in the pit. Obviously then, if Amils are correct here, they should be able to easily point out in Revelation 12 the beginning and the end of this thousand years.

The different parallels in Revelation show different aspects or camera views of the same game, a game where Jesus conquers Satan and his kingdom at every turn. Revelation is therefore a victorious book for the believer to read, contrary to how Premil interprets it. Premil is always lauding the power and influence of Satan during this intra-Advent period. Amil is always exalting the power, authority, influence and dominion of Christ and the Church as it brings the good news of Christ to the nations.

So, we have to step back from the narrative and trace the fate of the whole demonic kingdom and find out how any of them arrived there. We need to look for clues. Remember, we cannot divide up the fate of the kingdom of darkness any more than we can the kingdom of God. They are a harmonious entity. They are collectively represented by their head, just like the kingdom of God is by its head.

Revelation is just like every other book in the Bible speaking about two kingdoms that are in constant spiritual conflict with each other. The apostle is giving insight into different aspects of the invisible and visible warfare going on in this current age. When the kingdom of darkness is described they are shown to be currently spiritually restrained and curtailed in regard to their power and influence. The kingdom of God on the other hand is depicted as a triumphant kingdom that is ruling over a defeated demonic realm and the Church is shows to be a militant army bringing life and hope to an ignorant world. Revelation is a victorious book showing the power and influence of Christ, His angels and His people over every aspect of the demonic realm.

John was simply shown a number of parallel visions - one after the other, all culminating in the climactic Coming of Christ - from different camera angles. Each parallel concentrates on the same time period and the symbolic ongoing events that occur throughout, viewing them from slightly different camera angles. Sometimes God is speaking primarily of the elect, sometimes He is majoring on the wicked. Sometimes He is describing the evil of the invisible demonic angelic realm the exploits of the invisible angelic realm of God. Sometimes He is describing the righteous in heaven, sometimes the righteous on earth. Sometimes it is the humans that reside within the kingdom of darkness, sometimes it is the invisible demonic host that reside there. Sometimes He is focusing in on the fate of demons (Rev 9), sometimes the beast and false prophet (Rev 13 and Rev 17-19), and sometimes Satan (Rev 12 & Rev 20). That does not assume the absence of the rest in the picture. No! It just reveals different camera views of the same overall war, only concentrating on different aspects.

Although coming from divergent angles, the parallels are carefully interwoven like a linen cloth. Often to establish the meaning and format of the book, we have to meticulously and patiently fit the jig-saw pieces together in order to see the unfolding picture. That is not to say we have a full revelation of this peculiar book, but we can have an insight into this inspired book.

Revelation 12

Revelation 12 sheds some lights on these queries. It helps us understand the transition of God’s people from the Old to the New. We, notably, see a figurative woman in this chapter who exists before Christ’s birth and who continues to thrive after His ascension. She is symbolically represented in Revelation 12:1 as “a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars.” This passage depicts this woman bringing our Savior into this world. She is described in Revelation 12:5 as birthing “a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.”

Who is the “man child” who “was to rule all nations with a rod of iron,” and “was caught up unto God, and to his throne”? This is Israel’s Messiah Jesus Christ. He is the promised seed. He is the offspring of the woman. He is the Holy One of Israel. He is the ultimate expression of true Israel. The woman therefore must be an Israeli woman. But not an apostate woman, who was previously rejected of God in the Old Testament, but a faithful woman. This woman has to refer to faithful Israel. Anyway, God’s true people are often described in Scripture as a woman. The 12 stars on her crown either represent divine authority or are symbolic of the 12 tribes of Israel. It was from this Israeli woman that Christ was produced.

The detail before us powerfully shows us the continuity and continuation of faithful Israel after the earthly life, death and resurrection of our Lord. Revelation 12:17 confirms that the woman represents those that accept Christ (the Messiah) as Savior and Lord. Despite Satan persecuting the woman (Revelation 12:15-16), those who survive of the woman’s seed are all those that expressly “keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Christ (Israel’s Messiah) is the common bond that joins the household of faith in the Old with the New. Apostate Judaism can never fit this description, with its hostility to Jesus. They therefore have no part in this figurative woman. We are clearly looking at God’s true covenant people – the elect throughout time. This was God’s preserved remnant within national Israel in the Old Testament and are the redeemed Church from throughout the nations in this New Testament era.

After Christ ascended up into heaven, and after Satan was banished from heaven, through the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, this elect people, that are represented by this chosen woman, are described as those that overcame him [the devil] by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death(Revelation 12:11). This woman clearly transcends both covenants. She was manifestly before the incarnation (as she brought forth Christ), but she is also alive and active after the cross (as she is seen advancing the Gospel of Christ). This shows us that the New Testament is the continuation of faithful Israel.

True Israel did not therefore go away. It recognized Israel’s Messiah and embraced Him as Lord. That spiritual company coalesced around John the Baptist. The prophet was called to be the forerunner of Christ. He introduced Him to Israel. His direct preaching separated that which was counterfeit from that which was real. He caused a dividing of the people by only baptizing those Israelis who were willing to “bring forth … fruits meet for repentance.” (Matthew 3:8).

Revelation 12:5-11 places the defeat of Satan at the resurrection/ascension: "And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days. And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death."

This takes us into the great commission that started to spread through all nations after Satan's casting down. This corresponds with Revelation 20 where Satan is bound after the first resurrection.

Previous to Satan's eviction, God was Israel's God, not the Gentiles God. Satan ruled the nations. But through this casting out of Satan, after man's penalty had been paid in full, he no longer had anything to accuse the elect over. It was indeed finished! The powerful spread of the Gospel to the Gentiles lifting the deception that kept them bound. Satan was now bound. The boot was on the other foot. With the global expanse of the great commission the Gentiles now are without excuse. The ignorance is gone. The veil is lifted. The means by which God lifts deception is the preaching of the Word of God. This has now been successfully ongoing throughout the nations for 2000 years.

Satan's defeat came after the resurrection. Here is when he got his eviction notice, and here is "when" salvation came to the "whole world" - not just one nation Israel. The deception enveloping the Gentiles was lifted - praise God. They are now without excuse, just like those in the OT that rejected salvation. Salvation has now come to the nations. But Satan had to first be cast down. He had to be defeated. Christ’s life, death and resurrection safely secured that. As a result the Church becomes a militant overcoming organism.

Christ predicted shortly before He destroyed the power of Satan at the cross, in John 12:30-33: Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out. And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me. This he said, signifying what death he should die.”

Christ’s death, burial and resurrection was the decisive blow against Satan. His defeat has already been wrought. This passage plainly shows the powerful result of Calvary and the deep impact it had upon Satan. It shows us that Satan is now under Christ’s feet and is now subject to His Sovereign will. Satan and his minions are barred from heaven. They have been banished after they were defeated 2,000 years ago.

Before being cast out of heaven through Christ’s victorious assault on his kingdom the devil had access to both heaven and earth. He had the ability to come before God to accuse the brethren of their sins. When he was cast down he no longer had access to heaven but only to earth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BABerean2
Upvote 0

Marilyn C

Pre-tribulation.
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2013
4,818
598
Victoria
✟597,987.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Israel were set apart to be an example/light to the nations. That was their assignment, but they failed miserably at that. The Law was given to expose the weakness and untrustworthiness of man and their absolute need of a Redeemer. The Law showed Israel that they were created to trust God for everything. It also showed them that they needed divine supervision and aid. That is the story from the beginning. Man is messed up, prone to go the wrong way, and in need of God's help.

The Scriptures are essentially God revealing Himself to mankind through the communication of knowledge. As we analyze the ancient Hebrew text we see a notable and central theme mounting: that of the arrival of a Redeemer Messiah to rescue man from his sinful condition. This came in the form of direct prophecies, old covenant offices, ceremonial typology and a tapestry of unfolding preparation. In fact, Jesus Christ is the key to understanding the biblical covenants. Even though they did not have a full revelation of Him, the old covenant prophets were preoccupied with Christ’s person, His appearance and His ministry. The Old Testament text gradually and assuredly steered history onward to the fulfillment of every ancient promise. There is a steady unfolding continuity of plan and purpose from the Old to the New Testament, concentrated on the promised Messiah. Christ is indeed God’s final and fullest revelation.

The corporate oneness of sinful man from the beginning is seen in the federal designation “in Adam.” This stands in stark contrast to the elect of God who are said to be “in Christ.” The phrase “in Christ” describes the elect’s participation in His substitutionary earthly work as a man Savior and Redeemer. Without Christ sinless life, His atoning death and victorious resurrection there is no removal of sin, no forgiveness, no spiritual freedom, no victory over death and hell.

Yes I agree that the Law was to expose their sinfulness and lead them to Christ.

So why did God make the nation that couldn`t obey Him, why did He not just concentrate on individuals who would turn to Him? Why work with the nation of Israel for centuries and make a priesthood and kingship, and a `promised land` if all that was for naught?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes I agree that the Law was to expose their sinfulness and lead them to Christ.

So why did God make the nation that couldn`t obey Him, why did He not just concentrate on individuals who would turn to Him? Why work with the nation of Israel for centuries and make a priesthood and kingship, and a `promised land` if all that was for naught?

We should never forget; the outward appearance of God’s people has been a developing organism from the beginning. From Adam to Abraham fellowship between God and His people was practiced globally through individual families, and the worship of God was restricted to the individual family structure. The husband (and father) was considered the priest in the home. Up until Abraham, the relationship between God and His people had no shared ethnic or community status. There was a broad wide-reaching universality to God’s relationship with man. The Tower of Babel altered that. This disastrous man-made endeavor caused the confusion of tongues, the dividing up of mankind into autonomous ethnic groups, races and languages, and the scattering of humanity throughout the globe.

There is no biblical indication that the people of God before Abraham were a recognized cohesive ethnic society. With God’s selecting of the patriarch to be the father of the faith that all changed. His offspring became an established people-group. That is why every living Jew takes their identity from Abraham.

NT Wright says of Abraham, “Abraham emerges within the structure of Genesis as the answer to the plight of all humankind. The line of disaster and of the ‘curse’, from Adam, through Cain, through the Flood to Babel, begins to be reversed when God calls Abraham and says ‘in you shall all the families of the earth be blessed’” (The New Testament and the People of God).

It was through Abraham that the people of God became a distinct cohesive organized community. His offspring became a recognized company of believers. They were identified as a people of faith. Within this group they could collectively worship God and enjoy close spiritual intimacy with each other.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,679
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,262.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Have you known any Christians who are now dead?
Where are they now? .
My own parents were godly people. They now rest in their graves, as does every person who has died. They will be raised on the Last Day; after the Millennium, to stand before God and when their names are found in the Book of Life, they will receive immortality. Revelation 20:11-15
Thinking that immortality or 'glorified bodies' will happen before then, is a direct contradiction of plain scripture.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,679
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,262.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I know it is hard to get you to address Scripture, but I will keep on trying. It overrides your private interpretation. The writer to the Hebrews censures your beliefs in Hebrews 12:18, 22-23, saying, “For ye are not come (plural perfect active indicative) unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest … But ye are come (plural perfect active indicative) unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect.”

Here, currently, we see where the dead in Christ are right now. They are not hovering about aimlessly upon death as you would suggest. These highlighted references in the original relate to the present, and are active, meaning the subject continues to exist in the state indicated by the verb. They relate to the here-and-now and are ongoing. They speak of our immediate entry into the kingdom of God and our current spiritual standing in the New Jerusalem. The heavenly Jerusalem is more than a future hope (even though it most assuredly is that), it is a present reality.
You; SG are a dreamer! You have a fantasy complex, a fanciful notion that people can live in heaven. Revelation 20:5 plainly states that excepting for the Trib martyrs, the rest of the dead will remain 'asleep' in their graves until after the 1000 year Millennium.

What the Hebrews scripture and other verses are saying, is a reiteration of the great Promise of Jesus in John 3:16, that believers will have Eternal life.
Your quote above, was written to living people, not to the dead.
Believers have come into that Promise and their names are Written in the Book of Life.
When that Book is opened, those worthy will live in the heavenly Jerusalem, which will be on earth. Revelation 21 to 22
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: One Son
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My own parents were godly people. They now rest in their graves, as does every person who has died. They will be raised on the Last Day; after the Millennium, to stand before God and when their names are found in the Book of Life, they will receive immortality. Revelation 20:11-15
Thinking that immortality or 'glorified bodies' will happen before then, is a direct contradiction of plain scripture.

So the dead spirit sleeps beside their dead corpse?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You; SG are a dreamer! You have a fantasy complex, a fanciful notion that people can live in heaven. Revelation 20:5 plainly states that excepting for the Trib martyrs, the rest of the dead will remain 'asleep' in their graves until after the 1000 year Millennium.

What the Hebrews scripture and other verses are saying, is a reiteration of the great Promise of Jesus in John 3:16, that believers will have Eternal life.
What you quote above, was written to living people, not to the dead.
Believers have come into that Promise and their names are Written in the Book of Life.
When that Book is opened, those worthy will live in the heavenly Jerusalem, which will be on earth. Revelation 21 to 22

He spoke 2000 years ago in the presence tense. He described the spirits of the redeemed in heaven. You cannot squeeze out of that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,679
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,262.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
So the dead spirit sleeps beside their dead corpse?
As your preference is to believe your own fantasies rather that what the Bible actually teaches, this discussion is pointless.
He spoke 2000 years ago in the presence tense. He described the spirits of the redeemed in heaven. You cannot squeeze out of that.
Most prophesies are Written in the present tense. That is because their fulfilment is certain.
What you need to get out of is thinking that dead Christians are now in the heavenly Jerusalem. Or any notions of living Christians going there.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As your preference is to believe your own fantasies rather that what the Bible actually teaches, this discussion is pointless.

Most prophesies are Written in the present tense. That is because their fulfilment is certain.
What you need to get out of is thinking that dead Christians are now in the heavenly Jerusalem. Or any notions of living Christians going there.

It seems like it is impossible for you to engage without hurling insults. How sad!

Hebrews 12:22-24 says, “But ye are come (plural perfect active indicative) unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect. And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel."
  • The location in view is expressly "the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem."
  • The time is now! It is written in the present tense.
  • Those who populate now are "God the Judge of all," "Jesus the mediator of the new covenant," "an innumerable company of angels," and "To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven ... to the spirits of just men made perfect."
This could not be clearer!

This narrative relates to the present, and are active, meaning the subject continues to exist in the state indicated by the verb. They relate to the here-and-now and are ongoing. They speak of our immediate entry into the kingdom of God and our current spiritual standing in the New Jerusalem. The heavenly Jerusalem is more than a future hope (even though it most assuredly is that), it is a present reality.

Interestingly, we see “the spirits of just men made perfect,” who correlate with “the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands.” The beast is simply this world, and his mark is that final mark of reprobation which the damned ultimately receive.

Our understanding of Hebrews 12 is also aided by Ephesians 2:5-6, which says, speaking of God, “Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus.” Through the first resurrection we enjoy heavenly authority by being “in Christ Jesus.” We belong to Christ and are therefore spiritually seated with Him today. Ephesians 1:3 also supports, saying, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.”
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Marilyn C

Pre-tribulation.
Site Supporter
Dec 26, 2013
4,818
598
Victoria
✟597,987.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It was through Abraham that the people of God became a distinct cohesive organized community. His offspring became a recognized company of believers. They were identified as a people of faith. Within this group they could collectively worship God and enjoy close spiritual intimacy with each other.

So....can you show me where in scripture within this people of faith they enjoyed close spiritual intimacy with each other? (as you said)
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,679
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,262.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Hebrews 12:22-24 says...
The location in view is expressly "the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem."
The time is now! It is written in the present tense.
  • Those who populate now are "God the Judge of all," "Jesus the mediator of the new covenant," "an innumerable company of angels," and "To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven ... to the spirits of just men made perfect."
This could not be clearer!
What can not be clearer is that indisputable fact that we DO NOT now, live in the city of the Living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.
The Lords faithful people will do so in the future, but there are many trials and tests for us all before that time. Revelation 21:1-7
Believing that we do now, is hopelessly delusional.
 
Upvote 0

BABerean2

Newbie
Site Supporter
May 21, 2014
20,614
7,484
North Carolina
✟893,665.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My own parents were godly people. They now rest in their graves, as does every person who has died. They will be raised on the Last Day; after the Millennium, to stand before God and when their names are found in the Book of Life, they will receive immortality. Revelation 20:11-15
Thinking that immortality or 'glorified bodies' will happen before then, is a direct contradiction of plain scripture.

Mat 10:28 And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

Most of those who have died in the past no longer have a body in the grave.
It has returned to the dust. Many of those who died at sea no longer have a body, since their components have been eaten by sea creatures.

During ancient times the Jews placed the body in a tomb until only the bones were left. The bones were then sometimes gathered and placed in a stone box. Some of those boxes have been found during modern times. See the link at the bottom.

Where are the souls of your parents at this time?


Heel bone of crucified man
In a stone box, the only trace of crucifixion

.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

TMarcum

Member
May 26, 2020
18
4
56
Indiana
✟8,758.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is real simple. Clearly, the little season meant in Revelation 6:11 occurs during this same short time made mention of in Revelation 12:12. If this same little season meant in Revelation 6:11 is meaning this same little season meant in Revelation 20, this indicates that there has to be a thousand year period preceding it. So where in all of Revelation 12 do you propose a thousand years fit?
I do not believe the little season in Rev 6:11 is the same little season as Rev 12:12 or Rev 20:3.

I think we agree that the souls that John saw under the alter (Rev 6:9-11) are prophets and holy men living under the Mosaic Law who were killed. And when white robes were given them, signifying their redemption in Christ? It was told them to rest a little season. When do you believe this seal was opened and when does the vision occur?

I have always believed this seal was opened by Jesus at his resurrection. If he told them to rest a little season, then this little season cannot be the same little season of Rev 12:12 or Rev 20:3. The little season of Rev 6:11 is now (as we live today in 2020). The little season of Rev 12:12 & Rev 20:3 will be in the future when the beast ascends out of the pit and goes into perdition. The saints in the future are not killed by the beast until he is loose from the pit for 42 months.


I have asked this question numerous times of numerous Amils, and have yet to see one single Amil show where the thousand years logically fit in Revelation 12. If it can't logically fit before this war in heaven, and that it can't logically fit during the short time mentioned in Revelation 12:12, because that short time includes the little season mentioned in Revelation 6:11, where else in Revelation 12 do you propose it fits? Does not Revelation 12 cover at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years many of you are claiming satan is in the pit? Once again, where do you propose this thousand years logically fits in Revelation 12?

The 1000 years of Rev 12 is between Rev 12:5 to Rev 12:9.
The time starts when the child was caught up to his throne until the time he was cast out of heaven:
Rev 12
5 And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

This is the range of the 1000 years. The next verse jumps forward 1000 years to Rev 12:9. There is a gap between verse 8 & 9 which consists of the MK period that Satan is bound.

In Rev 12:9, Satan was cast out of the pit into the earth when he goes into perdition. The saints that overcome him are the ones that do not worship the beast and are killed by him. They are beheaded and they love not their lives unto death. They gave their lives to be martyred, rather than worship the beast. The Woe is upon the of the earth and sea. These are the ones whose names are not written in the book of life and worship the beast. You can see what the beast will do to them in Rev 14:11. Also in Rev 17:15-18 where the beast made the harlot naked.

Rev 12
9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
10 And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
13 And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.


In the OP you list 17 reasons why the Premil doctrine should be rejected. Some of those reasons might be good reasons, so I'm not claiming none of your reasons are reason enough to reject Premil. Yet at the same time, as to my post here, I have submitted in return, several reasons why Amil should be rejected as well. Until Amils first deal with my arguments and show where my arguments took a wrong turn, then show the correct way to understand some of these things, until then my reasons for rejecting Amil are just as valid as you feel your reasons for rejecting Premil are.

A good start for Amils would be this. Simply show in the text in Revelation 12 where you feel the thousand years logically fit, where they begin and where they end, then explain why you feel it logically fits where you are proposing. Once again, keeping in mind that Revelation 12 covers at least the past 2000 years, the same 2000 years Amils claim satan is in the pit. Obviously then, if Amils are correct here, they should be able to easily point out in Revelation 12 the beginning and the end of this thousand years.

Let me know if you need me to show you any other text.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So....can you show me where in scripture within this people of faith they enjoyed close spiritual intimacy with each other? (as you said)

I am surprised that you would question that. There are countless examples of that in the OT. I preached on one such case on Tuesday night at Bible study.

I am surprised that you would question that. There are countless examples of that in the OT. I preached on one such case on Tuesday night at Bible study.

Do you remember what the Moabite Ruth said to Naomi in Ruth 1:16-18? "Intreat me not to leave thee, or to return from following after thee: for whither thou goest, I will go; and where thou lodgest, I will lodge: thy people shall be my people, and thy God my God: Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the LORD do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me. When she saw that she was stedfastly minded to go with her, then she left speaking unto her."

This shows us the depth of intimacy and the spiritual bond that existed during the old covenant.

Another example that came immediately to mind was David and Jonathan. David testified in 2 Samuel 1:25-26 about his love for Jonathan: "How are the mighty fallen in the midst of the battle! O Jonathan, thou wast slain in thine high places. I am distressed for thee, my brother Jonathan: very pleasant hast thou been unto me: thy love to me was wonderful, passing the love of women."

No one could surely deny the spiritual bond that existed between the true people of God in the OT. These people were all part of true Israel, within natural Israel. They were the believing remnant. They were in union and communion with God and each other and in union and communion with other. They were the household of faith. They were the true children of Abraham.

Romans 9:6-13 explains how God’s people and the seed of promise are not a natural but a spiritual seed. In his thesis on the promised seed, we find Jacob and us the believing Gentiles. He asserts:
“For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sara shall have a son. And not only this; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth. It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.”

The whole of Paul’s teaching in this New Testament passage is establishing who “the children of God” really were/are. We see that Abraham had a natural lineage and also a spiritual lineage. Significantly, it was only the spiritual seed that carried any spiritual credentials. Paul distinguished here between biological Israel and faithful Israel. He shows that these are two different diverse peoples. In doing this he is attempting to illustrate the impotence of the natural and the potency of the spiritual.

Just because they belonged to Israel (or the natural seed of Abraham) did not signify that they were God’s chosen people. He shows how “the children of the flesh” are not “the children of God;” it is rather “the children of the promise” – faithful believing Israel. How can Dispensationalists get around this? No one should miss the distinction between the true spiritual seed of Abraham and the mere natural seed. Plainly: “they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children” (Romans 9:6). Paul demonstrates that it is “the children of the promise” that “are counted for the seed.” This spiritual company are the ones that really matter.

How do Dispensationalists not get this? They have a wrong perception of who the Old Testament people of God are. Because of this they get confused about who the New Testament people of God are. That Hebrew of the Hebrews Paul the Apostle blows apart the fleshly genetic hope of the natural children of Abraham. He then demonstrates how the favor of God does not rest on ethnicity. Their racial credentials mean nothing. Those within the natural Abrahamic family that reject God’s offer of salvation were not under blessing but under a curse. They were not in any considered as God’s chosen people. Whilst God’s blessing would be upon Abraham’s seed it would not be because of natural pedigree but for spiritual pedigree.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What can not be clearer is that indisputable fact that we DO NOT now, live in the city of the Living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.
The Lords faithful people will do so in the future, but there are many trials and tests for us all before that time. Revelation 21:1-7
Believing that we do now, is hopelessly delusional.

I will try and ignore your repeated insults. It does nothing to advance your position, quite the contrary.

We living believers are not dead yet, but since the first resurrection we are now seated in heavenly places. That is our standing in Christ. Jesus opened heaven up to the elect (both living and dead). He emptied Abraham's bosom and took the dead in Christ in heaven. I do not know why you fight that so vehemently. Your struggle is definitely with Scripture. That is seen by your repeated ducking of the Scriptures presented to you.

Heaven is not just a future hope for the believer, it is a present reality.

Christ was a heavenly man. He was from above. We see this in John the Baptist’s words in John 3:31, "He that cometh from above (the Greek word is anothen) is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all."

When Christ came to this earth mankind encountered heaven face-to-face. God had stepped out of eternity into time.

But it is not just that He was a heavenly man that came from eternity. Jesus said in the exact same chapter in John 3:3: “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again (or anothen or born from above), he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

He was a heavenly man who became an earthly man so that we earthly men could become heavenly men.

A Christian is no longer worldly, they are heavenly! If your heart is out there in this world this morning, then that is who you are. That is your identity. That’s what lights your fire! That is where you belong.

But for most people here this morning the world has lost its charm.

Ephesians 2:4-6 says, “God … hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus.”

Ephesians 1:3 also corroborates, saying, Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.”

How are we seated in heavenly places?

Because He is! Remember, we are in Him! We are one with Him! His life is our life. We are hidden in Him. He is our legal head!

· He lived on our behalf.
· He died on our behalf.
· He rose from the dead on our behalf.
· He reigns in heaven tonight on our behalf.

We are spiritually united to Him!

Jesus is described as “the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die” (John 6:50). When we partake of Him we partake of the heavenly realm. It is this that gives us our citizenship is in heaven. It is this the causes us to lay up our treasure in heaven. We are no longer earthlings, but heavenly creatures.

Philippians 3:20 tells us that “our citizenship is [now] in heaven.”

This proves: we are not earthly beings having a heavenly experience, we are heavenly beings having an earthly experience.

Hebrews 12:22 says (in the present tense), ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.”

Heaven is a different world. It is governed by different rules. It is different priorities. Its focus is the glory of God. Righteousness is preeminent. Justice prevails. Order is its environment. Peace, joy and rest or what results.
 
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I do not believe the little season in Rev 6:11 is the same little season as Rev 12:12 or Rev 20:3.

I think we agree that the souls that John saw under the alter (Rev 6:9-11) are prophets and holy men living under the Mosaic Law who were killed. And when white robes were given them, signifying their redemption in Christ? It was told them to rest a little season. When do you believe this seal was opened and when does the vision occur?

I have always believed this seal was opened by Jesus at his resurrection. If he told them to rest a little season, then this little season cannot be the same little season of Rev 12:12 or Rev 20:3. The little season of Rev 6:11 is now (as we live today in 2020). The little season of Rev 12:12 & Rev 20:3 will be in the future when the beast ascends out of the pit and goes into perdition. The saints in the future are not killed by the beast until he is loose from the pit for 42 months.

It takes me a long time to type up responses sometimes. So not trying to avoid your other points, there is only so much I can address at a time.


This is yet another example of where some of your thinking and my thinking on some of these things are miles apart.

IMO, the following is the more correct way to understand this part in Revelation 6:11---- little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.


This connects with the following, for one.

Revelation 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.

Which then connects with the following.

Revelation 13:5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

Revelation 13:7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.

Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

Based on this alone, and there are numerous other Scriptures I could bring up as well, how you conclude that the little season mentioned in Revelation 6:11 is not meaning any of the events I submitted above from Revelation 12 and Revelation 13, defies logic.

What also defies logic is how anyone, in light of what Revelation 20:4 tells us in regards to there already being martyrs during the 42 month reign of the beast before satan is ever loosed from the pit, that this same 42 months is actually meaning after the thousand years rather than prior to them.

I don't agree with Preterists on numerous issues, yet the majority of them, if not all of them, are also Amil, and that many of them at least agree, from what I have gathered from past discussions by some of them, that the 42 month reign of the beast is before the thousand years, and not after the thousand years like some other Amils tend to think. These Preterist Amils at least have the chronology of events correct, while some other Amils don't. As to the latter, these particular Amils are basing their arguments on incorrect chronology of events, thus the reason for my arguments against their position.


According to Revelation 20:4, since there are already martyrs during the 42 month reign of the beast before satan is ever loosed from the pit, any right minded thinking person is not then going to place this 42 month reign after the thousand years where it doesn't belong and can't fit, but is instead going to place this 42 month reign as already fulfilled and in the past when the the thousand years initially begin.

This presents a major problem for some versions of Amil. The 42 month reign has to precede the 2nd coming. Totally impossible if some Amils think that the thousand years began 2000 years ago, and that according to Revelation 20:4 the 42 month reign of the beast has to be prior to the beginning of the thousand years. This of course is not a problem for Premil. Premil is the only position that actually logically works with these chronology of events. Per Premil it would look like this---the 42 month reign of the beast followed by the 2nd coming and the beginning of the thousand years. As can be seen, the 42 month reign does precede the 2nd coming without contradicting anything in Revelation 20:4.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
IMO, the following is the more correct way to understand this part in Revelation 6:11---- little season, until their fellowservants also and their brethren, that should be killed as they were, should be fulfilled.

The saints are waiting to be avenged during the 5th seal:

Revelation 6:10 They cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?

The saints are avenged at the destruction of the harlot.

Revelation 19:2 for his judgments are true and just; for he has judged the great prostitute who corrupted the earth with her immorality, and has avenged on her the blood of his servants.”

Revelation 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints, and of all who have been slain on earth.”

The beast is used to destroy the harlot as part of God's plan. God uses the beast to avenge the blood of the saints.

Revelation 17:16 And the ten horns that you saw, they and the beast will hate the prostitute. They will make her desolate and naked, and devour her flesh and burn her up with fire, for God has put it into their hearts to carry out his purpose by being of one mind and handing over their royal power to the beast, until the words of God are fulfilled.

So how can the resting of the saints until they are avenged = the little season of satan, IF the saints are avenged PRIOR to the destruction of the beast and PRIOR to satan being released according to the premil understanding?


 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.