Savior of the World, or Eternal Failure?

agapelove

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2020
840
754
28
San Diego
✟50,506.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
If "aion" means "eternal" as I have proved then it can't actually mean the end of something thus here it is being used hyperbolically. Why is that so difficult? But as I have previously said neither "aion" or "aionios" are ever defined by adjectives which indicate a period less that eternity.

You have proven nothing, actually.

And actually "aion" and "aionios" are defined by adjectives MANY TIMES in the Bible that indicate a period less than eternity as PER MY LAST POST. μέλλοντι mellonti/to be about to (Ephesians 1:21), ἐπερχομένοις eperchomenois/coming (Ephesians 2:7), τέλη telē/the end (1 Corinthians 10:11).

It's actually frustrating how little sense you make.
The end of life as we know it = eternity does not make sense figuratively OR literally.

Moreover, here are some things from the Old Testament that were supposedly "aionious":

The Jews' excellency. Isaiah 60:15
Aaron and his sons' priesthood. Exodus 40:15
The Mosaic System. Genesis 17:7
The Jews' possession of Canaan. Genesis 17:8

All the above, among other ages in the Bible, have seen their demise.

These were all covenants made by God. God takes his covenants extremely seriously so why would he have employed figure of speech to make a promise? If something was not meant to last forever GOD WILL NOT PROMISE THAT IT WILL.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Irrelevant. Irrefutable does not mean that everything the Jews believed was correct by someone's opinion today. The Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and Talmud, which I quoted, are irrefutable sources for the historical beliefs and practices of the Jews, including before and during the time of Jesus. Can you provide any kind of credible, verifiable, historical evidence which disproves anything I posted?



iu



"Not giving heed to Jewish myths, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth." (Titus 1:14).

Jesus said re the Pharisees: "...in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men." (Mt.15:8-9)

"All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:" (2 Tim.3:16)

Jesus, speaking to Pharisees, said:

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

2 Timothy 4:4: And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
If "aion" means "eternal" as I have proved then it can't actually mean the end of something thus here it is being used hyperbolically. Why is that so difficult? But as I have previously said neither "aion" or "aionios" are ever defined by adjectives which indicate a period less that eternity.
Matthew 13:38-40
38 The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;
39 The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels.
40 As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.
The world is not literally a field. Metaphor. Children are not literally seeds or tares. metaphor. The devil does not literally sow anything. Metaphor. The angels do not literally reap. metaphor.
The end of life as we know it is not literally an eternity. Hyperbole.
I guess the native Greek speaking translators of the Eastern Greek Orthodox Bible know what they are talking about.

Then why didn't the EGO translators render aion as "eternity" in Mt.13:40?

And why didn't you quote them instead of some other Bible translation that uses the word "world". EGO uses "age" for aion at Mt.13:40, not "world".

And at Mt.24:3 EGO again translated aion as "age" [not "eternal" or "eternity"]:

Mt.24:3 As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him in private, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be? What is the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?”

http://fortsmithorthodox.org/NEW TESTAMENT.pdf
https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/books/or...tament-(The-Eastern-Greek-Orthodox-Bible).pdf

Does that look like hyperbole?

To quote you:

"If the plain senses makes good sense, then it is nonsense to look for any other sense."

"lots of folks when scripture as written contradicts their assumptions/presuppositions, no problem, they just blow them off as SPAM-fig. Symbolic, poetic, allegory, metaphor,
figurative, anything but literal."

Hyperbole! Hyperbole! etc. etc. Who agrees with me

Evidently no one.

I note that as with many groups whenever scripture as written contradicts one's doctrine they often explain it away by making it figurative, imagery, metaphor, hyperbole, idio[ma]tic, etc. Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to, doing that.

Sound familiar?
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Even the hardest, cruelest, most brutal men cannot torture their fellow men for more than two or three hours without growing weak, faint, and sick (see Fox Book of Martyrs). However, Christian leaders teach that our Lord will torture His victims through endless ages. The Scripture reveals that Christ Jesus is the kindest, the most tender-hearted and merciful Person this world has ever known. His mercy endures forever, or to all generations of time. The doctrine of eternal torment pictures Him to be the most horrible monster, the most beastly, brutal, cruel, vicious Person this world has ever known. The governments of this world, ruled by unregenerated men, put their rebels in prisons, and the very worst offenders they put to death. But our Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator and Redeemer of the world, will mercilessly torture those who offend Him to the most hideous and incomprehensible degree. Surely, this pagan and Romish doctrine of eternal torture does NOT glorify HIM!

One of the theologians of the Church of England (Jeremy Taylor) speaks of the fate of the wicked in the following terms: "In hell every sense and organ shall be assailed forever with its own appropriate and most exquisite sufferings. We are amazed at the inhumanity of Phalaris who roasted men in his brazen bull, but THAT WAS A JOY IN COMPARISON WITH HELL." And here is what the renowned evangelist, C. H. Spurgeon, said on the same subject: "There is real fire in hell. The body shall be suffused with agony; your head tormented with racking pains; your eyes starting from their sockets; your ears tortured with horrid sounds; your pulse rattling with anguish; your limbs crackling in the flame; every vein a pathway for the fire to tread; every nerve a string on which the devil shall forever play the diabolical tune of hell's unutterable lament."

Source: The Savior of the World, by J. Preston Eby
Kindgdom Bible Studies Savior of the World Series Part 1
 
  • Winner
Reactions: ClementofA
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,396
81
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟528,512.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Even the hardest, cruelest, most brutal men cannot torture their fellow men for more than two or three hours without growing weak, faint, and sick (see Fox Book of Martyrs). However, Christian leaders teach that our Lord will torture His victims through endless ages. The Scripture reveals that Christ Jesus is the kindest, the most tender-hearted and merciful Person this world has ever known. His mercy endures forever, or to all generations of time. The doctrine of eternal torment pictures Him to be the most horrible monster, the most beastly, brutal, cruel, vicious Person this world has ever known. The governments of this world, ruled by unregenerated men, put their rebels in prisons, and the very worst offenders they put to death. But our Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator and Redeemer of the world, will mercilessly torture those who offend Him to the most hideous and incomprehensible degree. Surely, this pagan and Romish doctrine of eternal torture does NOT glorify HIM!

One of the theologians of the Church of England (Jeremy Taylor) speaks of the fate of the wicked in the following terms: "In hell every sense and organ shall be assailed forever with its own appropriate and most exquisite sufferings. We are amazed at the inhumanity of Phalaris who roasted men in his brazen bull, but THAT WAS A JOY IN COMPARISON WITH HELL." And here is what the renowned evangelist, C. H. Spurgeon, said on the same subject: "There is real fire in hell. The body shall be suffused with agony; your head tormented with racking pains; your eyes starting from their sockets; your ears tortured with horrid sounds; your pulse rattling with anguish; your limbs crackling in the flame; every vein a pathway for the fire to tread; every nerve a string on which the devil shall forever play the diabolical tune of hell's unutterable lament."

Source: The Savior of the World, by J. Preston Eby
Kindgdom Bible Studies Savior of the World Series Part 1


Good grief: My eyes are beholding a nightmare. Fortunately a new Day breaks with that ghastly nightmare being swallowed by our God eating thanantos.

Even the hardest, cruelest, most brutal men cannot torture their fellow men for more than two or three hours without growing weak, faint, and sick (see Fox Book of Martyrs).

However, Christian leaders teach that our Lord will torture His victims through endless ages. The Scripture reveals that Christ Jesus is the kindest, the most tender-hearted and merciful Person this world has ever known.

His mercy endures forever, or to all generations of time. The doctrine of eternal torment pictures Him to be the most horrible monster, the most beastly, brutal, cruel, vicious Person this world has ever known.

The governments of this world, ruled by unregenerated men, put their rebels in prisons, and the very worst offenders they put to death. But our Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator and Redeemer of the world, will mercilessly torture those who offend Him to the most hideous and incomprehensible degree.

Surely, this pagan and Romish doctrine of eternal torture does NOT glorify HIM!

One of the theologians of the Church of England (Jeremy Taylor) speaks of the fate of the wicked in the following terms: "In hell every sense and organ shall be assailed forever with its own appropriate and most exquisite sufferings. We are amazed at the inhumanity of Phalaris who roasted men in his brazen bull, but THAT WAS A JOY IN COMPARISON WITH HELL."

And here is what the renowned evangelist, C. H. Spurgeon, said on the same subject: "There is real fire in hell. The body shall be suffused with agony; your head tormented with racking pains; your eyes starting from their sockets; your ears tortured with horrid sounds; your pulse rattling with anguish; your limbs crackling in the flame; every vein a pathway for the fire to tread; every nerve a string on which the devil shall forever play the diabolical tune of hell's unutterable lament."

Source: The Savior of the World, by J. Preston Eby
Kingdom Bible Studies Savior of the World Series Part 1
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Good grief: My eyes are beholding a nightmare. Fortunately a new Day breaks with that ghastly nightmare being swallowed by our God eating thanantos.
Yes.
The "gospel" (bad news) of Damnationism says:
Receive the free gift of salvation offered on your behalf, or be incinerated. (for all eternity)
Because God loves you and wants what is best for you.
(and do it quick, before you get hit by a bus or something) - lol
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes.
The "gospel" (bad news) of Damnationism says:
Receive the free gift of salvation offered on your behalf, or be incinerated. (for all eternity)
Because God loves you and wants what is best for you.
(and do it quick, before you get hit by a bus or something) - lol
A totally false depiction. Please show us us where anyone has actually said "Receive the free gift of salvation offered on your behalf, or be incinerated. (for all eternity)" or words to that effect. You will not find any such.
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And actually "aion" and "aionios" are defined by adjectives MANY TIMES in the Bible that indicate a period less than eternity as PER MY LAST POST. μέλλοντι mellonti/to be about to (Ephesians 1:21), ἐπερχομένοις eperchomenois/coming (Ephesians 2:7), τέλη telē/the end (1 Corinthians 10:11).
Three verses are NOT many and none of the three have an adjective modifying "aion."
The Jews' excellency. Isaiah 60:15
Aaron and his sons' priesthood. Exodus 40:15
The Mosaic System. Genesis 17:7
The Jews' possession of Canaan. Genesis 17:8
Would you like to see my list of OT verses where "olam" is defined as eternal? Can you show me where "olam" or "ad" are ever defined as a period less than eternal." Here are three vs. where "olam" is defined as eternal.

Ezekiel 27:36
(36) The merchants among the people shall hiss at thee; thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt be any more. [עד־עולם/ad-olam]
In this vs. “olam” is contrasted with “never shall be”, “age(s),” a finite period, is not the opposite of “never shall be,” “eternal” is
Dan 7:14
(14) He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting [ עולם] dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.
In this vs. “olam” is contrasted with “will not pass away” and “never be destroyed,” “age(s),” a finite period, does not equate to “will not pass away, never be destroyed”, “eternal” does.
Ecclesiastes 3:14
(14) I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: [ עולם] nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.
In this vs. "nothing can be added or taken away from God’s acts." is contrasted with "olam" “age(s),“ a finite period, does not equate to “nothing can be added or taken away from God acts” “eternal” does.
These were all covenants made by God. God takes his covenants extremely seriously so why would he have employed figure of speech to make a promise? If something was not meant to last forever GOD WILL NOT PROMISE THAT IT WILL
You will have to ask God why He chose the words He did instead of trying to make scripture fit your assumptions/presuppositions.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,385
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,116.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, he is the savior. It just doesn’t mean that all will have eternal life.
So you are claiming that Jesus is an eternal failure then?
Father God sent his Son to be the Savior of the world. Did he succeed, or fail?

1 John 4:14
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be the Savior of the world.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FineLinen
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
A totally false depiction. Please show us us where anyone has actually said "Receive the free gift of salvation offered on your behalf, or be incinerated. (for all eternity)" or words to that effect. You will not find any such.

Seriously?

This is your mission, if you choose to accept it:

Read posts 984 & 985 & report back here.
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Would you like to see my list of OT verses where "olam" is defined as eternal?

Been there. Done that.

Can you show me where "olam" or "ad" are ever defined as a period less than eternal."

What happened the last time i showed you a list of them? You claimed they were all hyperbole? What, then, would be the point in showing you the list again?

Here are three vs. where "olam" is defined as eternal.

I see you don't support that claim with any scholarly quotes, but just your opinion.


Ezekiel 27:36
(36) The merchants among the people shall hiss at thee; thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt be any more. [עד־עולם/ad-olam]

In this vs. “olam” is contrasted with “never shall be”, “age(s),” a finite period, is not the opposite of “never shall be,” “eternal” is

Your argument is based on a misleading, erroneous, deceptive translation, hence dismissed. Better is this rendering:

Exek.27:36 Merchants among the peoples have shrieked for you, Wastes you have been, and you are not--to the eon!'" (CLV)

Dan 7:14
(14) He was given authority, glory and sovereign power; all nations and peoples of every language worshiped him. His dominion is an everlasting [ עולם] dominion that will not pass away, and his kingdom is one that will never be destroyed.

In this vs. “olam” is contrasted with “will not pass away” and “never be destroyed,” “age(s),” a finite period, does not equate to “will not pass away, never be destroyed”, “eternal” does.

Again the issue is related to translation. Compare:

Dan.7:14 to Him is granted jurisdiction and esteem and a kingdom, and all the peoples and leagues and language-groups shall serve Him; His jurisdiction, as an eonian jurisdiction, will not pass away, and His kingdom shall not be confined.

1 Cor.15:24 thereafter the consummation, whenever He may be giving up the kingdom to His God and Father, whenever He should be nullifying all sovereignty and all authority and power." 25 For He must be reigning until He should be placing all His enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy is being abolished: death. 27 For He subjects all under His feet. Now whenever He may be saying that all is subject, it is evident that it is outside of Him Who subjects all to Him.



Ecclesiastes 3:14
(14) I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: [ עולם] nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.

In this vs. "nothing can be added or taken away from God’s acts." is contrasted with "olam" “age(s),“ a finite period, does not equate to “nothing can be added or taken away from God acts” “eternal” does.



So according to you one of "God's acts" was parting the Red Sea & that means the act lasted "for ever", eh. Gotcha.

The next verse states:

Eccl.3:15a That which is, it already was, And what is to come already has been...

And you think we should take everything this author says as the "gospel truth". Gotcha.

"Ecclesiastes: The Inspired Book of Error":

"The book of Ecclesiastes, or "the Preacher," is unique in scripture...This book is filled with error. And yet it is wholly inspired. This may confuse some people,..."

Message: Ecclesiastes: The Inspired Book of Error (Ecclesiastes)

Eccl.3:14 I know that all the One, Elohim, is doing, It shall be for the eon; Onto it there can be nothing to add, And from it there can be nothing to subtract; The One, Elohim, He does it that they may fear before Him. (CLV)

Nothing here states that each individual act of God lasts forever. Rather the idea seems to be that they are all perfect.

"olam: long duration, antiquity, futurity":
Strong's Hebrew: 5769. עוֹלָם (olam) -- long duration, antiquity, futurity

OLAM occurs in verse 31 here:

Lamentations 3:22 and 3:31-33, The steadfast love of the Lord NEVER ceases, his mercies NEVER come to an end. . . .
Lam.3:31 For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:
32 For if He causes grief, Then He will have compassion According to His abundant lovingkindness. 33 For He does not afflict willingly Or grieve the SONS OF MEN.…

Jonah said "the earth with her bars was about me for ever(OLAM)". But only until he left three days later (Jon. 1:17; 2:6).
"A Moabite is forbidden to enter the Lord‘s congregation forever (OLAM). But only until the 10th generation. (De. 23:3).
Hills are everlasting (OLAM). But only until made low and the earth is burned up (Ge. 49:26; De. 33:15; Is. 40:4; 2Pe. 3:10).
Mountains are everlasting (OLAM). But only until they are scattered (Hab. 3:6).
A slave serves his master forever (OLAM). But only until death ends his servitude (Ex. 21:6).The Mosaic covenant is everlasting (OLAM). But only until it vanishes away (Le. 24:8; He. 8:7-13).
The Aaronic priesthood is everlasting (OLAM). But only until the likeness of Melchizedek arises (Ex. 40:15; Nu. 25:13; He. 7:14-22).
These ―stones are to be a memorial forever (OLAM). Where are they now (Jos. 4:7)?
The leprosy of Naaman shall cling forever (OLAM). But only until
his death, of course (2K. 5:27).
God dwells in Solomon‘s temple forever (OLAM). But only until it is destroyed (2Ch. 7:16; 1K 8:13; 9:3).
Animal sacrifices were to be offered forever (OLAM). But only until ended by the work of Christ (2Ch. 2:4; He. 7:11-10:18).
Circumcision was an everlasting (OLAM) covenant. But only until the new covenant (Ge. 17:9-13; 1Co. 7:19; Ga. 5:6)."

https://www.tentmaker.org/books/hope_beyond_hell.pdf

Furthermore, olam is equivalent to the Greek aionion. Isaiah 54:4 LXX refers to aionion shame that is finite:

4 You should not fear that you were disgraced, nor should you feel ashamed that you were berated. For shame everlasting(aionios) you shall forget; and the scorn of your widowhood in no way shall you remember any longer (Apostolic Bible Polygot, LXX)

The same phrase, and Greek words, for "shame everlasting"(aionios) in Isa.54:4 occur again at Dan.12:2 LXX, which i have higlighted within the brackets:

Dan.12:2 καὶ πολλοὶ τῶν καθευδόντων ἐν γῆς χώματι ἐξεγερθήσονται οὗτοι εἰς ζωὴν αἰώνιον καὶ οὗτοι εἰς ὀνειδισμὸν καὶ εἰς [αἰσχύνην αἰώνιον]

Isa.54:4 μὴ φοβοῦ ὅτι κατῃσχύνθης μηδὲ ἐντραπῇς ὅτι ὠνειδίσθης ὅτι [αἰσχύνην αἰώνιον] ἐπιλήσῃ καὶ ὄνειδος τῆς χηρείας σου οὐ μὴ μνησθήσῃ

Kata Biblon Wiki Lexicon - αἰσχύνη - shame/disgrace/dishonor (n.)

Strong's Greek: 152. αἰσχύνη (aischuné) -- shame

In Isa.54:4 aionios/eonian is finite: "For shame everlasting[eonian] you shall forget"

In that light we might consider that the exact same phrase from the LXX scholars, "shame everlasting [eonian]" in Dan.12:2, may also be finite.

Dozens of examples of aionios as a finite duration in Koine Greek:

Two Questions

If Jesus wished to express endless punishment, then He would have used expressions such as "endless", "no end" & "never be saved" as per:

could an 'eternal punishment' simply mean that once instituted it will not change?

Jesus didn't use such words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.

100 Scriptural Proofs That Jesus Christ Will Save All Mankind
100 Scriptural Proofs That Jesus Christ Will Save All Mankind
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Poor dear Noli: put on your specs.

His children = yes.

ALL the "children of men" = yes.

"For the Lord will not cast off for ever: though he cause grief, yet will he have compassion according to the multitude of his mercies. For he does not afflict willingly nor grieve the children of men."

Until there is serious advance into Abba, you are banned from the Choir!

All the children of men? No! We must be born again to become a child of God.

And I am banned from the choir, for my singing doesn't even qualify as a joyful noise! :ebil:
 
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And certain groups ignore such credible sources as the 1917 Jewish Publication Society English translation of the OT and the Eastern Greek Orthodox NT. And they totally reject BDB and BDAG.
OBTW the Greek grammar classes were not that bad especially if one had learned to speak some Greek before hand.

We both know they do not adhere to grammar, definitions and common usage but go to obscure unaccepted meanings by obscure authors or use the heretical works of the ancient fathers they repented of. It is a cult like mentality and I suspect they believe themselves to be the true flock and we are on the outside and if we die this way will have have to toast for awhile until we accept their position.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
And certain groups ignore such credible sources as the 1917 Jewish Publication Society English translation of the OT


IMO it's not so much ignoring as considering it full of errors as per this post & discussion:

Could most modern translations be in error?


In our previous discussions i have pointed out some problems with the JPS version. As a search of the site regarding the topic shows.

and the Eastern Greek Orthodox NT.

Far from ignoring this, i have spent considerable time looking into this version. Did you know it consistently renders Greek phrases literally rather than with the self contradictory "forever and ever" nonsense of many versions?

And they totally reject BDB and BDAG.

That is false. And as i've shared with you before, & still awaiting your reply to re BDAG:

Here is what BDAG says re Col.1:20:

"...found only in Christian writers...reconcile everything in his own person, i.e. the universe is to form a unity, which has its goal in Christ Col 1:20..." (A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament & Other Early Christian Literature (BDAG), 3rd edition, 2000, p.112).

Co.1:16 For by Him ***ALL*** was created that are in HEAVEN and that are on EARTH, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers.
All was created through Him and for Him.
20 and by Him to reconcile ***ALL*** to Himself, by Him, whether on EARTH or in HEAVEN, having made peace through the blood of His cross.

This states the purpose of Love Omnipotent's - divine will - in sending His Son:

For God did not send His Son into the world that He might judge the world, but that the world would be saved through Him. (Jn.3:17)

The IVA ("that") is used in Jn.3:17 above. BDAG says “In many cases purpose and result cannot be clearly differentiated, and hence ἵνα is used for the result that follows
according to the purpose of the subj. or of God. As in Semitic and Gr-Rom. thought, purpose and result are identical in declarations of the *divine will*…”
Перевод ἵνα с греческого на все языки

The IVA also occurs in Phil.2:9-11:

Phil.2:9 For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10 so that at the name of Jesus EVERY KNEE WILL BOW, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (NASB)

What is the "world" in Jn.1:29; 3:17, 4:42 according to BDAG? According to BDAG by "world" in such verses is meant "humanity in general". Jesus Himself would be the only exception:

The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. (Jn.1:29)
They said to the woman, "We now believe not only because of your words; we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this man truly is the Savior of the world. (Jn.4:42)
For God did not send His Son into the world that He might judge the world, but that the world would be saved through Him. (Jn.3:17)

And BDAG again, re Rom.5:18, is quoted in this commentary:

"Paul declares, however, that the effects of Christ's obedience are far greater for mankind than the effect of Adam's fall. For the third (5:15) and fourth (5:17) times in this chapter he makes explicit use of the 'qal wahomer' ("from minor to major") form of argument that is commonly used in rabbinic literature, expressed by "much more"...cf. earlier use at 5:9,10...And as in the case of the typology previously used (5:14), here, too, the form of the argument is antithetical. The grace of God extended to humanity in the event of Christ's death has abounded "for the many" (5:15b), which corresponds to the "all" of 5:12,18. The free gift given by God in Christ more than matches the sin of Adam and its effects; it exceeds it..."

"Contrasts are also seen in the results of the work of each. Adam's trespass or disobedience has brought condemnation (κατάκριμα, 5:18); through his act many were made sinners (5:19). Christ's "act of righteousness" results in "justification of life" (δικαίωσιν ζωῆς) for all (5:18). The term δικαίωσιν can be translated as "justification" (NIV, NRSV; but RSV has "acquittal") - the opposite of "condemnation". The word ζωῆς ("of life") is a genitive of result, providing the outcome of justification, so that the phrase may be rendered "justification resulting in life". 108

108. BDAG 250 (δικαίωσιν): "acquittal that brings life". The construction is variously called a "genitive of apposition", an "epexegetical genitive" or "genitive of purpose". Cf. BDF 92 (S166). The meaning is the same in each case: justification which brings life."

"The universality of grace in Christ is shown to surpass the universality of sin. Christ's "act of righteousness" is the opposite of Adam's "tresspass" and equivalent to Christ's
"obedience", which was fulfilled in his being obedient unto death (Phil 2:8). The results of Christ's righteous action and obedience are "justification resulting in life for all persons"...5:18...and "righteousness" for "many" (5:19). The term "many" in 5:19 is equivalent to "all persons", and that is so for four reasons: (1) the parallel in 5:18 speaks in its favor; (2) even as within 5:19 itself, "many were made sinners" applies to all mankind, so "many will be made righteous" applies to all; (3) the same parallelism appears in 5:15, at which "many" refers to "all"; and (4) the phrase "for many" is a Semitism which means "all", as in Deutero-Isaiah 52:14; 53:11-12; Mark...10:45; 14:24; Heb.12:15. The background for Paul's expression is set forth in Deutero-Isaiah, where it is said that "the righteous one"...the Lord's servant, shall make "many" to be accounted righteous, and he shall bear their sins ...Isa.53:11..."

"It is significant, and even astounding, that justification is here said to be world-embracing. Nothing is said about faith as a prerequisite for justification to be effective, nor about faith's accepting it."

(Paul's Letter To The Romans: A Commentary, Arland J. Hultgren, Eerdmans, 2011, 804 pg, p.227, 229)
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So your view of Heb.9:27 is that everyone is going to receive a "condemning judgment"?

Nope, see I read the whole counsel of God!

Where & how does it refute anything i posted?

Well ti does grammatically and etymylogically but you will never accept those.

That is your mantra along with some SDA here. Even though we have shown you folks verse after verse supporting universalism.

Is SDA a 7th day adventist? And no you have not shown verse after verse supporting universalism. What you have done is shown verse after verse that could have implied UR if there were not all the verses that show UR is biblicall wrong!

No scripture there, just human opinion.

The Bible.

Well I still await the verse that shows where a person in the lake of fire can repent. Not some implied or maybe verse,. God set many verses showing how man can repent in this life, but not one showing one can repent i th eeternal life!

You shouldn't assume Greek has only one word that can include the idea of correction. In English, for example, look at all the words similar to or synonymous with "correction":

Thesaurus results for CORRECTION


Paideia is used in the NT for the instruction, training & discipline of children, namely those of God.

"Definition...the rearing of a child, training, discipline" (NAS concordance).

OTOH if someone breaks into the home where those children are being trained & disciplined, and then is arrested and taken to a rehabilitative institution, he is being punished for his own good. The people being punished in Matthew 25 are not children being taught & disciplined, but criminals about to be punished. So Jesus chose the correct word there.

Well as that is the most widely used word, I await to see others. Kolasis in its primary and secondary usages mean punishment! YOu still need to show why Matt. 25 should be the 3rd definition of correction, especially in light of the fact the only other time in the Bible it is used (1 JOhn 4) it is punishment!

But for correction there is dithorsis, epithorsis and sofronismos! All these are much better terms to use for a punishing type of correction or reformation but especially paidiera
 
Upvote 0

ClementofA

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 10, 2016
5,459
2,197
Vancouver
✟310,073.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
What you have done is shown verse after verse that could have implied UR if there were not all the verses that show UR is biblicall wrong!

So you would agree with the following remark, eh:

...
Did Paul teach that all men will be saved, regardless? These verses seem to say that.
* Romans 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
* Romans 5:19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.
* 1 Timothy 2:4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
* 1 Timothy 4:10 For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe.

Would you like to add some more to that list of UR verses? Such as any from the following lists:

Unique Proof For Christian, Biblical Universalism

75 UR verses + 100 proofs + 150 reasons etc:
Web Online Help

213 Questions Without Answers:
Questions Without Answers


Well I still await the verse that shows where a person in the lake of fire can repent.

I'll be waiting forever for any that say anyone will "never be saved".

If Jesus wished to express endless punishment, then He would have used expressions such as "endless", "no end" & "never be saved" as per:

How Scripture expresses endless duration (not aion/ios) (paradise, hell, punishment) - Christianity - - City-Data Forum

Jesus didn't use the best words & expressions to describe endlessness in regards to punishment, because He didn't believe in endless punishment.

ENDLESSNESS not applied to eschatological PUNISHMENT in Scripture:

could an 'eternal punishment' simply mean that once instituted it will not change?

12 points re forever and ever (literally to/into "the ages of the ages") being finite:

For the Lord will NOT cast off FOR EVER:


Kolasis in its primary and secondary usages mean punishment!

Punishment can be corrective.

Matthew 25:46
Augustine's ignorance & error re Matthew 25:46
City-Data Forum - View Single Post - What does Matthew 25:46 mean?
What does Matthew 25:46 mean? (Gomorrah, Gospel, unpardonable, hell) - Christianity - - City-Data Forum
Have you been decieved by your Bible translation?
Is aionion necessarily coequal in duration with aionion (in Mt.25:46)?
An argument for "eternal conscious torment"
Matthew 25:46 paralllel argument with Rom 5 19:
Universalist Understanding?

KOLASIS:
Are You of Israel?

YOu still need to show why Matt. 25 should be the 3rd definition of correction, especially in light of the fact the only other time in the Bible it is used (1 JOhn 4) it is punishment!

In John 4 it refers to "punishment" in this life, not in the after life.

Of course punishment can be corrective.

In 1 John 4 it is fear that has "punishment".

Of course fear can be corrective.

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and knowledge.

Therefore, my dear friends, as you have always obeyed--not only in my presence, but now much more in my absence--continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling,

My flesh trembleth for fear of thee; and I am afraid of thy judgments.


But for correction there is dithorsis, epithorsis and sofronismos!

The first two failed in an internet search. The third makes no reference to corrective punishment of criminals or saints, which can be rehabilitative, but to:

"Definition
  1. an admonishing or calling to soundness of mind, to moderation and self-control
  2. self-control, moderation"
Sophronismos Meaning in Bible - New Testament Greek Lexicon - New American Standard


All these are much better terms to use for a punishing type of correction or reformation but especially paidiera

It seems not (see above) & my previous post addressed this:

Paideia is used in the NT for the instruction, training & discipline of children, namely those of God.

"Definition...the rearing of a child, training, discipline" (NAS concordance).

OTOH if someone breaks into the home where those children are being trained & disciplined, and then is arrested and taken to a rehabilitative institution, he is being punished for his own good. The people being punished in Matthew 25 are not children being taught & disciplined, but criminals about to be punished. So Jesus chose the correct word there.

Another way universalists may answer your point is in the following thread, where virtually the exact same point as yours was raised by the OP. Here are IMO two of the best responses (among several other UR approaches there tackling the issue):

"This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience. By rejecting this, some have made shipwreck of their faith, among whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme.(I Tim 1:18-20 ESV)"

"The English “may learn” is in the active voice, but the Greek word is in the passive voice, which in its lexical form is none other than “παιδευω” (or “paideuo” as you write it). “that they may be chastised not to blaspheme”. Rotherham’s translation puts it this way, "that they may be taught by discipline not to be defaming. To be taught by discipline is to be chastised."

"Now it’s true that Hymenaeus and Alexander were once believers, but they made shipwreck of their faith! There were no longer believers. Until Paul handed them over to Satan for chastisement, they were doubtless impenitent as well. They were blaspheming!"

"Though unbelievers whom God sends to hell may be impenitent, they will become penitent after they are chastised, just as Paul expected Hymenaeus and Alexander to be after they received their chastisement from Satan."

Words Meaning "Chastisement" Not Used of the Impenitent


"Nothing there indicates they are repentant yet; and what is there indicates they are not only unreprentant but shipwrecked as thoroughly (if not moreso) as in Hebrews 10, which is also about ex-believers (not about pre-Christian unbelievers) as you are very well aware."

"(Similarly, Paul hands over the Stepmom-Sleeping Guy (who might actually be either Alexander or Hymaneous) to Satan for the destruction of his flesh in 1 Cor 6, with an expectation that the SSG’s spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord to come. Not before the coming of the day of the Lord, but in the day of the Lord: the salvation then is contrasted to his punishment now.)"

"Rev 3:19 uses the same term in regard to people who, although nominally Christian, are still clearly being impenitent about their sins or Christ wouldn’t be threatening them with vomiting them out of His mouth! “Be zealous then AND REPENT!!” "

"Paul exhorts fathers to be nurturing their children in the discipline (same term) and the admonition of the Lord. (Eph 6:4) The term admonition {nouthesia} is used where people are impenitently and even gravely sinning, such as in Paul’s instructions at Titus 3:13, “A sectarian man, after one and a second admonition, refuse, being aware that such a one has turned himself out, and is sinning, being self-condemned.” "

"And in Heb 12, where you started with all this in another thread, the context of discipline is not merely that of training or exercise, but of punishment, as the Hebraist’s own reference to the Proverb indicates. (The same term for “exposing” is used here, too, as in Rev 3:19 where Christ warns impenitent Christians to repent or be vomited from His mouth. And the term for “scourging” is the same as just previously in 11:36 where the Hebrew prophets and fathers were scourged by unbelievers among the Jews, in punishment.)"

"Your challenge was met and answered (by Paidion, quite appropriately) out of the gate; and now I’ve added to it."

"Meanwhile, your own attempt elsewhere to argue that {kolasis} means the same at both Matt 25 and 1 John 4, resulted in you eventually arguing that the term when used at 1 John 4 has nothing to do with hopeless punishment or even punishment from God at all, while still insisting that the same meaning must be applied at Matt 25 as at 1 John 4. (In order to avoid discussing the actual narrative and thematic contexts of the judgment there, which I went to the trouble to post in detail.)"

"So you’re running out of words for punishment. Time to give up on {paid-} and move on to {timo-} without bothering to check around on site for what people have argued about it first. (And without bothering to check what the Hebraist’s OT citations involved, for checking what he meant by {timoria}.)"

Words Meaning "Chastisement" Not Used of the Impenitent
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

agapelove

Well-Known Member
May 1, 2020
840
754
28
San Diego
✟50,506.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Three verses are NOT many and none of the three have an adjective modifying "aion."

Galatians 1:4 present/instant, ἐνεστῶτος (enestōtos)
Ephesians 1:21 this/demonstrative signifying more than one, τούτῳ (toutō)
Ephesians 1:21 the one to come/τῷ μέλλοντι (tō mellonti)
Matthew 28:20 very end of the/συντελείας τοῦ (synteleias tou)
Hebrews 9:26 the end of the/συντελείᾳ τῶν (synteleia tōn)
Matthew 24:3 of the end/συντελείας (synteleias)

If you want more you will have to open up your Bible yourself.

Can you show me where "olam" or "ad" are ever defined as a period less than eternal." Here are three vs. where "olam" is defined as eternal.

I'm pretty sure I just gave you four instances where olam was defined as a period less than eternal.

The Jews' excellency. Isaiah 60:15
Aaron and his sons' priesthood. Exodus 40:15
The Mosaic System. Genesis 17:7
The Jews' possession of Canaan. Genesis 17:8

Are you making God out to be a liar?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old.
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
28,578
6,064
EST
✟993,185.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Galatians 1:4 present/instant, ἐνεστῶτος (enestōtos)
Ephesians 1:21 this/demonstrative signifying more than one, τούτῳ (toutō)
Ephesians 1:21 the one to come/τῷ μέλλοντι (tō mellonti)
Matthew 28:20 very end of the/συντελείας τοῦ (synteleias tou)
Hebrews 9:26 the end of the/συντελείᾳ τῶν (synteleia tōn)
Matthew 24:3 of the end/συντελείας (synteleias)
In none of these vss. is there an adjective or phrase describing/defining "aionios" as a period less that "eternal." No, none, zero.
I'm not sure you understand what I am asking. An adjective a describing word, big, little, long, short etc or a phrase that defines/describes. Here are two of my verses.

John 3:15
(15) That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal [αιωνιον] life.
John 3:16
(16) For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting [αιωνιον] life.
In these two verses Jesus pairs “aionion” with “should not perish.” "Should not perish" is a quality of "aonios life."
Note, it does not just say "whosoever believeth in him has everlasting [αιωνιον] life." Which certain heterodox groups interpret as "age during" or some such nonsense" But Jesus further describes "aionion' life" as "should not perish."
Believers could eventually perish in a finite period, thus by definition “aionion life” here means eternal or everlasting life.

If you want more you will have to open up your Bible yourself.
I haven't seen any yet.
I'm pretty sure I just gave you four instances where olam was defined as a period less than eternal.
I'm certain you did not.
The Jews' excellency. Isaiah 60:15
Aaron and his sons' priesthood. Exodus 40:15
The Mosaic System. Genesis 17:7
The Jews' possession of Canaan. Genesis 17:8
You still do not understand what I am saying. Not a vs. where something/someone that is not eternal is referred to as "olam." But a vs, where "olam" is defined/described as less than eternity.
For example,

Habbakuk 1:12
(12) LORD, are you not from everlasting? [ עולם] My God, my Holy One, you will never die. You, LORD, have appointed them to execute judgment; you, my Rock, have ordained them to punish.
God is "olam"/eternal and will never die.
Jeremiah 50:5
(5) They will ask the way to Zion and turn their faces toward it. They will come and bind themselves to the LORD in an everlasting [ עולם] covenant that will not be forgotten.
The covenant is eternal and will not be forgotten.
Are you making God out to be a liar?
No! Are you?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0