fm107
Psalm 19:1-4 and Romans 1:20
- May 12, 2009
- 1,133
- 139
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
As I explained at post 127, a completed canon isn't sufficient for the Christian life, as a book cannot possibly replace God personally speaking to you and mentoring you.
From an exegetical standpoint, the cessationist position is literally a joke. I once found about 20 allusions to charismatic dynamics in a single chapter of the Bible (it was Mark 1 as I recall). As Jack Deere noted, no one reads the NT and concludes cessationism on that basis. The real motif is experience, he said. For example he himself wasn't seeing any miracles in his own life and therefore needed an exegetical excuse to explain them away. When a cessationist looks to experience (both past and present) as proof of his position, he violates his own Sola Scriptura-premise.
Admitting that the Bible is not God is dangerous? Admitting that we need the light of the Holy Spirit - Direct Revelation - is dangerous? Why? You seem to think that the primary role of the Christian is to protect the canon. I've got news for you:
(1) Any paranoia of an endangered canon is just cessationist propaganda. I'm not aware of a single Charismatic or Pentecostal in church history who has moved for his own experiences to be canonized. And even if someone had, who is likely to concur? Um...nobody. No Christian that I'm aware of.
(2) Here's the real danger. With 100 billion souls at stake, any lack of Direct Revelation guiding our evangelism is automatically catastrophic. That's why, for example, the NT was careful to define "witnessing" as prophetic utterance (see post 179 on another thread, and post 180).
As your tagline says, "these are just my opinions, not the facts" pretty well sums up your post.
Upvote
0