It is not revisionist history as around the second or third allegation some leaders and other were calling for Kavanaugh to no longer be the nominee. Schumer, Gillibrand, Merkely, Jayapal, Markey, Mendez (wanting withdrawal and if no withdrawal, then an investigation), wanted him to resign as the nominee at some point, either at the point of 2 or 3 allegations, regardless of an investigation.
Which does not refute anything I said. Again, they wanted investigations, the Republicans refused, so Democrats started to say (about the 2nd or 3rd allegation) that Kavanaugh should withdraw -- though most of them still qualified their call for withdrawal by saying withdraw or let's have an investigation.
This is Schumer's comment, “I strongly believe Judge Kavanaugh should withdraw from consideration. If he will not, at the very least, the hearing and vote should be postponed while the FBI investigates all of these allegations." Again, they called for investigations first and were stonewalled by Republicans. So, they then called for withdrawal but said they'd still settle for an investigation -- after it became clear that Republicans had no interest in having the allegations fully investigated, but just wanted to gloss over them on the way to approving Kavanaugh.
And there were a chorus of Dem Senators calling for Franken to resign on nothing more than allegations.
Great, but still largely supports the idea that Democrats have largely not been hypocritical. With Biden they still might support that, as well. In this case, it is still almost 3 months until the convention, where the Democratic nominee will be officially decided.
So what? That history tells me absolutely nothing about the veracity of allegations made against a specific person.
Sure they can still complain and their complaints can still be valid.
You seem to have missed (or ignored) my point. Regardless, in Franken's case, it was about 3 weeks before Senators called for his resignation on Dec 6. About 2 weeks after the initial allegation (which was made Nov 17), the complaint was sent to the Senate Ethics committee on recommendations by Senators of both parties, and this was done after several other women stepped forward accusing Franken of sexual misconduct. On Dec 6 there were two new allegations, at which point Democratic Senators started asking Franken to resign.
You see a very similar pattern in the Kavanaugh allegations, just compressed a bit more. On Sept 14 the matter was initially given by Sen. Feinstein to the FBI. On Sep 23 there were two new allegations. During this time, Republicans were trying to block any FBI investigation into the allegations, and were showing they weren't serious about investigating the claims in the Senate. On Sep 26, after multiple allegations, Democrats started calling for the nomination to be withdrawn, and in most statements they stated they had no issue with an FBI investigation rather than Kavanaugh resigning -- again, they'd been seeking that for almost two weeks, at that point.
In Biden's case, we still appear to have only a single accuser, at this point. The other calls for resignation/withdrawal came only after there were multiple allegations. Further, in Kavanaugh's case, they wanted an investigation and just needed for Republicans to delay the nomination process. Republicans refused, intent on "fast tracking" Kavanaugh's nomination -- so Democrats called for his withdrawal. In Biden's case, the Democrats have that "delay" -- they have almost three months for investigations. Regardless, neither time did calls for resignations begin after a single allegation.