Any objections on this forum to sharing some good news about promising therapys for Covid19?

Gary K said:

I see they left the hydroxychloroquine + zinc regimen off the graph. It's the most promising of all the combinations. It's the secret sauce because it works to shut down the virus' ability to replicate. Zinc has a ++ ionic charge and so cannot pass through the cell wall on it's own easily. Hydroxychloroquine is the transport for it through the cell wall as it also has an ionic charge that allows it bind to the zinc and pass it through the cell wall.

A doctor gives a very thorough explanation of how this works at the following link.

What About Hydroxychloroquine As a Treatment For COVID-19? — Fulcrum7

Click to expand...

BobRyan said:

Hi - I would like permission to post this POV.. (beware ( it is a bit of good news about progress in treating Covid19)

===========================================

.
French study of 1,000+ patients, including seniors, see 98% success rate with hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin regimen | CLG News

Clinical medical trials for hydroxychloroquine show astounding clinical results - Geller Report News

==============================


Some facts we probably all already know about but are not politicizing science or pandemics.

1. Fact 1 - President Trump did NOT introduce Hydroxychloroquine to the united states in 1955 - (nor does he claim to have done so). He cannot be condemned for its existence.
2. Fact 2 - since 1955 that drug has had a lot of testing -- and a lot of use.
3. Fact 3 - no one has shown that it is "better to die of covid19 than to suffer a remotely possible side-affect from a drug that has been available and in use since 1955" -- not even the CIA internal memo to its employees on best practices.

In one of the recent Covid19 trials having 1000 patients treated with Hydroxychloroquine

French study of 1,000+ patients, including seniors, see 98% success rate with hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin regimen | CLG News
French study of 1,000+ patients, including seniors, see 98% success rate with hydroxychloroquine-azithromycin regimen | CLG News

it was observed that the drug had 98% success rate and no side affects of the medication were observed among the 1000 during the trial

Who among those actually suffering with Covid19 in the hospital would not want to be given "that chance" to survive!!!?

Why else are all those doctors and nurses dealing with Covid-19 patients asking for this drug for themselves if in fact they are the ones rejecting it for others?
===========================================
from: Hydroxychloroquine - Wikipedia
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), sold under the brand name Plaquenil among others, is a medication used to prevent and treat malaria in areas where malaria remains sensitive to chloroquine.[2] Other uses include treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and porphyria cutanea tarda.[2] It is taken by mouth.[2] It is also being studied as a treatment for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).[3][4]

Common side effects include vomiting, headache, changes in vision, and muscle weakness.[2] Severe side effects may include allergic reactions, vision problems, and heart problems.[2][5] Although all risk cannot be excluded, it remains a treatment for rheumatic disease during pregnancy.[6] Hydroxychloroquine is in the antimalarial and 4-aminoquinoline families of medication.[2]

Hydroxychloroquine was approved for medical use in the United States in 1955.[2] It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the safest and most effective medicines needed in a health system.[7] In 2017, it was the 128th most commonly prescribed medication in the United States, with more than five million prescriptions.[8][9]

============================

Now for a recent story that is not really remarkable on the surface but some have tried to politicize it. --

"The Washington Post’s Devlin Barrett is reporting that on March 27, a CIA website for employees warned that hydroxychloroquine (which has been used to treat malaria) could have dangerous side effects. On that website, according to Barrett, a CIA representative asserted, “At this point, the drug is not recommended to be used by patients except by medical professionals prescribing it"

Fine - so as we all know -- it is a prescription only medication - so why do they have to say "get it by prescription only --- when speaking to CIA employees?" ... well maybe... it's because... they are CIA!

In other words - as part of their ordinary job duties some of them might have access to prescription-only drugs that are obtained without an actual prescription. So then they are being warned not to go outside the normal parameters for this drug.

As for some who complain about the drug - notice that the article above does not say

1. This therapy does not work for Covid19
2. This has worse affects than dying of Covid19
3. all use of hydroxychloroquine is now deemed bad medical practice

All of that pretty obvious - not really remarkable news, but at the same time it is a promising therapy for the pandemic until a vaccine shows up.

========================
If it turns out that this POV is not allowed on this forum please remove my thread and let me know the reasons.

Thanks.

==================================================
AWR has had several medical experts looking at the above information and promoting it.


BTW (just added this today) - AWR just published a video reporting that FAR-UVC neutralizes aerosolized Covid19 in about 3 minutes and is only needed at very low doses via UV lights in public places to reduce the risk by over 90%.

And here is another source looking at it as well.
UV Light That Is Safe for Humans but Bad for Bacteria and Viruses

And of course AWR is also promoting studies showing the benefit of sunlight, vitamin D3 and hydrothermal contrast therapy that we all know and love.

Click to expand...

The novel coronavirus has infected roughly 4.1 percent of the population in California’s Los Angeles County, suggesting the region’s outbreak is far more widespread than previously thought, between 28 and 55 times higher than the number of confirmed cases, new research shows, echoing the findings of a similar study elsewhere in the state.

However, the new data, if accurate, also indicates that the coronavirus death rate in L.A. County, the most populous in the country, is lower than initially predicted.

Researchers from the University of Southern California (USC) and the L.A. Department of Public Health gleaned the data from antibody testing of about 863 county residents. Antibodies are an indication that an individual’s immune system has responded to a past infection.

On Monday, CNBC reported:

USC and the health department released preliminary study results that found that roughly 4.1% of the county’s adult population has antibodies to the coronavirus, estimating that between 221,000 adults to 442,000 adults in the county have had the infection.

This new estimate is 28 to 55 times higher than the 7,994 confirmed cases of Covid-19 [coronavirus illness] reported to the county in early April. The number of coronavirus-related deaths in the county has now surpassed 600, according to the Department of Public Health. The data, if correct, would mean that

the county’s fatality rate is lower than originally thought.

If accurate, the top end of the estimated number of L.A. County residents who may have contracted the virus would amount to more than half (56 percent) of the total number of cases in the United States, while the lower range would equal to about 30 percent of the overall number in America.

Stanford University researchers who looked at California’s Santa Clara County, much less populated than its L.A. counterpart, reached similar conclusions, finding that the coronavirus outbreak may be more widespread but less deadly than originally estimated.

The Stanford University researchers found that between 2.5 percent and 4.2 percent of county residents had antibodies to the coronavirus by early April, the Los Angeles Times reported on Friday, adding:

Click to expand...

Gary K said:

In a couple of studies done in California by USC and Stanford on the number of people who have antibodies to the coronavirus in their system the cornoavirus has been demonstrated to have infected 28 to 55 times more of the population in two counties than the case count had indicated. Thus the the death rates in those two counties are only a small fraction of what the media has been telling us it is. In other words the coronavirus is no more lethal than, and actually less lethal than some, forms of the flu.

According to these two studies and the implications from them, this coronavirus pandemic is a media driven frenzy.



To read the rest of the article click on the following link. L.A. County: Coronavirus Outbreak 55X More Widespread, Less Deadly

Click to expand...

reddogs said:

It always was, and we can see what its purpose was, and now they are trying to panic people by saying a 'second wave' is coming, just pandering for a purpose that isnt too hard to discern.

Click to expand...

reddogs said:

It always was, and we can see what its purpose was, and now they are trying to panic people by saying a 'second wave' is coming, just pandering for a purpose that isnt too hard to discern.

Click to expand...

Amos 7:7 Surely the Lord God will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets.

Click to expand...

Led by Mark Pimentel, MD, the research team of the Medically Associated Science and Technology (MAST) Program at Cedars-Sinai has been developing the patent-pending Healight platform since 2016 and has produced a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating pre-clinical safety and effectiveness of the technology as an antiviral and antibacterial treatment. The Healight technology employs proprietary methods of administering intermittent ultraviolet (UV) A light via a novel endotracheal medical device. Pre-clinical findings indicate the technology’s significant impact on eradicating a wide range of viruses and bacteria, inclusive of coronavirus. The data have been the basis of discussions with the FDA for a near-term path to enable human use for the potential treatment of coronavirus in intubated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Beyond the initial pursuit of a coronavirus ICU indication, additional data suggest broader clinical applications for the technology across a range of viral and bacterial pathogens. This includes bacteria implicated in ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP).

“Our team has shown that administering a specific spectrum of UV-A light can eradicate viruses in infected human cells (including coronavirus) and bacteria in the area while preserving healthy cells,” stated Dr. Pimentel of Cedars-Sinai. Ali Rezaie, MD, one of the inventors of this technology states, “Our lab at Cedars-Sinai has extensively studied the effects of this unique technology on bacteria and viruses. Based on our findings we believe this therapeutic approach has the potential to significantly impact the high morbidity and mortality of coronavirus-infected patients and patients infected with other respiratory pathogens. We are looking forward to partnering with Aytu BioScience to move this technology forward for the benefit of patients all over the world.”

Click to expand...