Meaning, maybe God deems you as 'rich.' Maybe God wants you to give away all possessions to follow Him. Otherwise, maybe talk is cheap, and you are not really a follower? Have you done this? If not? Why not? How do you know God is not referring to you? Do you know the meaning of 'rich'? Do you know why such a passage does not refer directly to you?
The problem with trying to give you an answer to these questions is that it would not be enough, not because of any conflict or problem on my part, but because you're not really looking for a clear understanding of Jesus' teachings; you're a nitpicker. The presumption is that if you can find some problem in me, then that will somehow invalidate the teachings of Jesus. Even if there were no person on the planet who obeyed Jesus' teachings (or at least tried to obey them) you would still have no cause to defame them.
You're behavior is quite similar to a different skeptic who recently posted on this forum about creating a "bible massacre" game. The idea was to shock people by all the horrific violence that God meted out on the people, so they'd understand just how horrible he really is. When I suggested the game should include context and an explanation of the motivations behind the various actions God takes in such situations, I was told that such details were not necessary. Why ruin a shocking massacre with troublesome details like context and motive? This is what nitpickers excel at; look for the shocking, the contradictory, the absurd and ignore any sincere exploration of those details which may provide genuine answers.
Here's another example of nitpicking from you:
I guess the next question becomes, how many Commandments can one break, and still claim to love Jesus?
We show our love for Jesus by at least trying to apply the values of his Kingdom. Yes, we'll fail along the way, but God offers grace so that we may try again. It's not a haggle with God, forging some kind of contractual obligation with him (though I recognize that even professing Christians tend to get in to this kind of thing). Grace, faith, and obedience work together. Learning how to appreciate each of them is part of what it means to become spiritually mature and to move closer to the kind of people God created us to be.
Some of us get tripped up along the way, focusing on one to the exclusion of the others and this leads to problems. But, a wise person will learn to recognize the necessity of all three and balance them in harmony and wisdom will come from a persistent attempt to at least try to obey Jesus.
But you don't see that because you're too busy enjoying what you perceive to be gotcha moments of contradiction between these concepts. You niggle at people who demonstrate any hint of imbalance and it's almost certain you do this to address some dissatisfaction in your own spirit. Either you're deliberately misunderstanding the way these concepts work, or you're blinded by the bitterness of some past hurt that you can't see past.
Here's another example to illustrate this point:
1. For instance, if 'nothing can separate' His chosen humans, then it would not matter what the human did, from that moment forward. These humans could blaspheme God, later think God doesn't exist, etc, and this human is still a-okay?
The context of the reference is that nothing (outside of our own free will) can force us away from God. Even with a gun to your head, you still have a choice. And yet, you do not reply with the obvious lesson. Instead, you see an opportunity to cause more confusion by ignoring the context and egging the other person on as though the verse really may mean that one could intentionally blaspheme God and God would be powerless to deal with it. It's an absurd notion but, you respond as though you believe the notion merits more exploration. Yes, you phrase the last comment of the paragraph as a question, which, as a nitpicker is wont to do, you'll point out to me, because that's the technicality which disguises the trouble-making in your spirit (i.e. hey, I'm only asking a question).
Nearly all of your comments are like this.