Which "Christians" will not be saved?

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes, those with faith are made righteous. The problem comes in assuming HOW this works. The Bible gives us the detailed explanation of HOW it works in Romans and Galatians. Yes, we know THAT it works (as Acts 16 says), but Calvinism and Arminianism build their theological frameworks on assumptions about HOW it works.
Well, I've already agreed that both theologies have errors.

Abraham will be the only person in history (including the resurrected Jesus Christ) who will ever have been made righteous directly for their faith. The rest of us INHERIT that righteousness by kinship.

[Gen 15:5-6 KJV] 5 And he brought him forth abroad, and said, Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be. 6 And he believed in the LORD; and he counted it to him for righteousness.
Who is the "seed" God was talking about when he preached the gospel to Abraham in Genesis 15:5?
Actually, God was letting the childless Abraham that he would have "innumerable" children, like the "number of stars in the sky". Gen 15 doesn't say anything about what is inherited.

[Gal 3:16 NASB] 16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as [referring] to many, but [rather] to one, "And to your seed," that is, Christ.

[Gal 3:18-19 NASB] 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made.
It's clear that the seed (singlular) spoken of in Genesis 12-17 is Jesus. So when God is preaching the gospel to Abraham, He is actually making a promise to Abraham, his descendants, and specifically Jesus Christ. One wonders why God would need to promise salvation to Jesus Christ.
I wonder why one would even think that Jesus Christ needed salvation.

[Gen 17:4-8 KJV] 4 As for me, behold, my covenant [is] with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations. 5 Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee. 6 And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee. 7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. 8 And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God.

[Heb 13:20 NASB] 20 Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, [even] Jesus our Lord,​

Jesus was raised from the dead by the Abrahamic covenant - the covenant of faith in the gospel.
Uh, no. Jesus was raised from the dead by God. His resurrection has nothing to do with the Abe covenant.

The 'everlasting covenant' refers to the fact that salvation in Christ is permanent.

This is profound because it demonstrates that the covenant is effective at giving righteousness to the believer.
The righteousness of Christ is IMPUTED or CREDITED to those who believe. It's not more complex than that.

Jesus gave up his righteousness and took on our sin & iniquity in the great redemptive exchange.

[2Co 5:21 NASB] 21 He made Him who knew no sin [to be] sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

[Isa 53:6 NASB] 6 All of us like sheep have gone astray, Each of us has turned to his own way; But the LORD has caused the iniquity of us all To fall on Him.

[Gal 3:13-14 NASB] 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us--for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE"-- 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.​

How does Jesus get his righteousness back without taking it away from all of us?
You notions are quite new to me. I reject the notion that Jesus "gave up" or "lost" His righteousness. Yes, He did bear our sins on the cross. That means He paid the debt of our sins. It doesn't follow that He lost or gave up His own righteousness.

In fact, it is BECAUSE of His righteousness that He qualified to go to the cross on our behalf.

I can understand that God would take his righteousness and give to Abraham, and give Abraham's sin to Jesus in exchange, but how does Jesus get righteousness back without Abraham getting his sin back?
Faulty question.

Jesus believed the gospel God spoke, and his faith in the gospel - the covenant God made with Abraham - is how scripture says Jesus was raised from the dead.
Please quote the specific verses that says this.

Jesus righteousness went (directly) to Abraham
Nope. It was credited to him.

It says that those who are descendants of Abraham inherit the righteousness given to Abraham - "so that he might be the father of all who believe, that righteousness might be credited to them."
To be "credited" with something does not mean inheriting, as you suppose. In fact, only 1 verse even used the word "heir": v.13 - For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.

But this has nothing to do with any of his descendents being heirs of righteousness.

It says the way to qualify as descendants is to have the same faith as Abraham (faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ).
True.

Since Abraham is our spiritual father, then who is our spiritual mother (hint: it's not Mary)?
The Bible does not speak of believers having a "spiritual mother", in spite of your passage that follows.

[Gal 4:22-31 NASB] 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman. 23 But the son by the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the promise. 24 This is allegorically speaking, for these [women] are two covenants: one [proceeding] from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves; she is Hagar. 25 Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. 26 But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother. 27 For it is written, "REJOICE, BARREN WOMAN WHO DOES NOT BEAR; BREAK FORTH AND SHOUT, YOU WHO ARE NOT IN LABOR; FOR MORE NUMEROUS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE DESOLATE THAN OF THE ONE WHO HAS A HUSBAND." 28 And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. 29 But as at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him [who was born] according to the Spirit, so it is now also. 30 But what does the Scripture say? "CAST OUT THE BONDWOMAN AND HER SON, FOR THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE AN HEIR WITH THE SON OF THE FREE WOMAN." 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of a bondwoman, but of the free woman.

The two covenants talked about in Galatians are 1)faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and 2)works of the law. These are the two covenants that are the two "women" in Galatians 4.
Yet, neither are referred to as anyone's "spiritual mothers".

So if you say 1)"I am made righteous for my faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ", or if you say, 2)"I am made righteous by my faith qualifying me as a descendant of Abraham and all descendants of Abraham inherit the righteousness of Christ because of God's covenant promise with Abraham", what is the difference? Functionally none
Wrong questions. The fact is that no one is "made righteous". And that is what the Catholics claim, since they get their ideas from the Latin, rather than the Greek.

In fact, the Greek (inspired), rather than the Latin (non-inspired) says we are DECLARED righteous. It isn't a process.

.. in both cases we are made righteous for faith in the gospel of Jesus Christ, but the second sentence just has more details about the HOW.
Again, no one is "made righteous". Believers are DECLARED to be righteous. That's what being CREDITED with righteousness means.
 
Upvote 0

Gup20

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2019
654
136
45
Albertville
✟157,738.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Actually, God was letting the childless Abraham that he would have "innumerable" children, like the "number of stars in the sky". Gen 15 doesn't say anything about what is inherited.

I agree... that is from Genesis 3:15, 12:7, 13:15-16, 15:18... but the main point would be the first half of Genesis 17.

I wonder why one would even think that Jesus Christ needed salvation.
When Jesus became a curse and when he had the iniquity of us all fall upon him, and when God made Him who knew no sin to BE sin on our behalf, Jesus would be, at that point literally cursed and sinfilled... though he never sinned. In that redemptive exchange, we would be righteous, though we had always been unrighteous. That is the nature of the exchange... God had to see Jesus as SINFILLED on the cross ... like the scapegoat in animal sacrifices - or the sin offering. The chief priest would put it's hand on the head of the lamb and symbolically transfer the sin of the people to the lamb before slaughtering it. The lamb had to be spotless before the sacrifice, but at the point of sacrifice the sin of the people was transferred to the lamb and it was slain for that sin.

At some literal point, God has to see Christ as sinfilled, and us as righteous. Paul describes this in 2Corointhians and Galatians. We also see this alluded to in the time of Moses when God had him fashion a standard and put a fiery serpent (representing sin) on that standard. It is a picture of Christ on the cross. Not that Christ ever sinned... he never did. But God caused all of our iniquity to be transferred or fall upon him on the cross.

[Num 21:8-9 NASB] 8 Then the LORD said to Moses, "Make a fiery [serpent,] and set it on a standard; and it shall come about, that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, he will live." 9 And Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on the standard; and it came about, that if a serpent bit any man, when he looked to the bronze serpent, he lived.

[Jhn 3:14-16 NASB] 14 "As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; 15 so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life. 16 "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.​


You notions are quite new to me. I reject the notion that Jesus "gave up" or "lost" His righteousness. Yes, He did bear our sins on the cross. That means He paid the debt of our sins. It doesn't follow that He lost or gave up His own righteousness.

In fact, it is BECAUSE of His righteousness that He qualified to go to the cross on our behalf.
[2Co 5:21 NASB] 21 He made Him who knew no sin [to be] sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

[Gal 3:13-14 NASB] 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us--for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE"-- 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

Matthew 27:46
About the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, “ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI?” that is, “MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?”
Sinfulness and righteousness are a binary condition. You are either sinful or righteous... you cannot be both simultaneously. Here we see twice that Paul says Jesus "became sin" and "became a curse." Not that Jesus ever did sin... he BECAME IT for the purpose of the sacrifice... like the unblemished lambs would become the sin of the people before the priest would slay it.

Further, Paul gives us explicit legal detail on how Jesus REDEEMED us. To redeem means to exchange. He bought us with is life - his righteousness. Life and righteousness are essentially synonymous (Gal 3:21).

[Deu 21:22-23 NASB] 22 "If a man has committed a sin worthy of death and he is put to death, and you hang him on a tree, 23 his corpse shall not hang all night on the tree, but you shall surely bury him on the same day (for he who is hanged is accursed of God), so that you do not defile your land which the LORD your God gives you as an inheritance.​

So by how he was killed - on a tree - Jesus was cursed by The Law. Interestingly, we see also how the land of Israel was cursed in that immediately at his death the sky darkened, cursing the land. Is it any wonder the Jews were exiled from their covenanted land for 2000 years?

I can understand that God would take his righteousness and give to Abraham, and give Abraham's sin to Jesus in exchange, but how does Jesus get righteousness back without Abraham getting his sin back?
Faulty question.
I think it's a valid question.. it's like math. You can't subtract from one side of the equation without subtracting from the other side. If Jesus gives his righteousness to someone, but then takes it back, that would necessarily mean that the other person wouldn't have it anymore. Further, that Jesus has scars which remain in his body... he didn't get a new body. He went from righteous, to sinful, to righteous and this is evident in his body. We, who have never been righteous will get a NEW, perfect body at the resurrection.

Please quote the specific verses that says this.
Ok, here goes:

Hebrews 1:4
having become as much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they.


Hebrews 13:20
Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,



[Gal 3:16, 18 NASB] 16 Now the promises (oath, covenant) were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as [referring] to many, but [rather] to one, "And to your seed," that is, Christ. ... 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made.

[1Co 15:20 NASB] 20 But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep.

[Neh 9:7-8 NASB] 7 "You are the LORD God, Who chose Abram And brought him out from Ur of the Chaldees, And gave him the name Abraham (father of many nations). 8 "You found his heart faithful before You, And made a covenant with him To give [him] the land of the Canaanite, Of the Hittite and the Amorite, Of the Perizzite, the Jebusite and the Girgashite-- To give [it] to his descendants. And You have fulfilled Your promise, For You are righteous.

[Deu 7:6-9 NASB] 6 "For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. 7 "The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples, 8 but because the LORD loved you and kept the oath which He swore to your forefathers, the LORD brought you out by a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 9 "Know therefore that the LORD your God, He is God, the faithful God, who keeps His covenant and His lovingkindness to a thousandth generation with those who love Him and keep His commandments;

[Rom 8:11, 15-17 NASB] 11 But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you. ... 15 For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!" 16 The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with [Him] so that we may also be glorified with [Him.]

[Rom 4:13-14, 16-17 NASB] 13 For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants (seed, singular) that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if those who are of the Law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise is nullified; ... 16 For this reason [it is] by faith, in order that [it may be] in accordance with grace, so that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, 17 (as it is written, "A FATHER OF MANY NATIONS HAVE I MADE YOU") in the presence of Him whom he believed, [even] God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist.
If Jesus was going to raise himself from the dead with his own righteousness, why would God have to make a promise to him to be heir of the world? Rather, Jesus waited and relied on God to raise him from the dead... he didn't raise himself.

Nope. It was credited to him.

To be "credited" with something does not mean inheriting, as you suppose. In fact, only 1 verse even used the word "heir": v.13 - For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.

But this has nothing to do with any of his descendents being heirs of righteousness.
Right... cause Jesus still had the choice to die or not... and it was a credit until payment was made in full on the cross.

[Jhn 8:56 NASB] 56 [Jesus Said] "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw [it] and was glad."​

The Bible does not speak of believers having a "spiritual mother", in spite of your passage that follows.
That is two passages... in the NASB translation, whenever it quotes another passage it capitalizes it. In the case of Galatians 4:27, it is quoting Isaiah 54:1. Isaiah 53 is the chapter that is banned from reading in most Jewish synagogues because it is so clearly and obviously talking about Jesus. That culmination of Isaiah 53 is Isaiah 54:1:

[Isa 54:1 NASB] 1 "Shout for joy, O barren one, you who have borne no [child;] Break forth into joyful shouting and cry aloud, you who have not travailed; For the sons of the desolate one [will be] more numerous Than the sons of the married woman," says the LORD.​

Paul specifies that this is allegorical, not literal. On the other hand, it does say that Abraham will literally be the father of many nations. So I guess I agree with you. I have come to think of the Old Testament as not merely the literal history of Israel, but also as a long series of parables with each lesson having a literal and an allegorical meaning. Paul does this with Abraham and Sarah in Romans 4 and Galatians 3, but he also does it with Romans 9 talking about Isaac and Rebekah.

Wrong questions. The fact is that no one is "made righteous". And that is what the Catholics claim, since they get their ideas from the Latin, rather than the Greek.

In fact, the Greek (inspired), rather than the Latin (non-inspired) says we are DECLARED righteous. It isn't a process.


Again, no one is "made righteous". Believers are DECLARED to be righteous. That's what being CREDITED with righteousness means.

[Rom 5:19 NASB] 19 For as through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the One the many will be made righteous.

[Gal 3:21 NASB] 21 Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law.

[Rom 3:24 NASB] 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus;​

Made, credited, imparted, given, justified as, clothed with. All the same. It is something from outside yourself that is applied to you.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said:
"I wonder why one would even think that Jesus Christ needed salvation."
When Jesus became a curse and when he had the iniquity of us all fall upon him, and when God made Him who knew no sin to BE sin on our behalf, Jesus would be, at that point literally cursed and sinfilled... though he never sinned. In that redemptive exchange, we would be righteous, though we had always been unrighteous. That is the nature of the exchange... God had to see Jesus as SINFILLED on the cross ... like the scapegoat in animal sacrifices - or the sin offering.
Still, this isn't anything close to Jesus needing salvation. He is our salvation.

The chief priest would put it's hand on the head of the lamb and symbolically transfer the sin of the people to the lamb before slaughtering it. The lamb had to be spotless before the sacrifice, but at the point of sacrifice the sin of the people was transferred to the lamb and it was slain for that sin.
Yes, the sins of the people transferred to the sacrifical lamb. That still isn't salvation for Jesus. Or that He needed it.

At some literal point, God has to see Christ as sinfilled, and us as righteous.
Uh oh. I see a problem here. Christ's death on the cross does NOT have God "seeing us as righteous". If that were true, then universalism would be true, which it is NOT.

No one is saved on the basis of who Christ died for. He paid the sin debt, yes. But unless and until a person personally trusts in Jesus as their Savior, they aren't saved, and aren't declared righteous.
Sinfulness and righteousness are a binary condition. You are either sinful or righteous... you cannot be both simultaneously.
Righteousness wasn't an issue on the cross.

Here we see twice that Paul says Jesus "became sin" and "became a curse." Not that Jesus ever did sin... he BECAME IT for the purpose of the sacrifice... like the unblemished lambs would become the sin of the people before the priest would slay it.
Still doesn't lead to salvation for Jesus. Or righteousness for peope.

I asked for verses that support what you claimed:
"Jesus believed the gospel God spoke, and his faith in the gospel - the covenant God made with Abraham - is how scripture says Jesus was raised from the dead."
Ok, here goes:

Hebrews 1:4
having become as much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they.

Hebrews 13:20
Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord,


[Gal 3:16, 18 NASB] 16 Now the promises (oath, covenant) were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as [referring] to many, but [rather] to one, "And to your seed," that is, Christ. ... 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made.

[1Co 15:20 NASB] 20 But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep.

[Neh 9:7-8 NASB] 7 "You are the LORD God, Who chose Abram And brought him out from Ur of the Chaldees, And gave him the name Abraham (father of many nations). 8 "You found his heart faithful before You, And made a covenant with him To give [him] the land of the Canaanite, Of the Hittite and the Amorite, Of the Perizzite, the Jebusite and the Girgashite-- To give [it] to his descendants. And You have fulfilled Your promise, For You are righteous.

[Deu 7:6-9 NASB] 6 "For you are a holy people to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. 7 "The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples, 8 but because the LORD loved you and kept the oath which He swore to your forefathers, the LORD brought you out by a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. 9 "Know therefore that the LORD your God, He is God, the faithful God, who keeps His covenant and His lovingkindness to a thousandth generation with those who love Him and keep His commandments;

[Rom 8:11, 15-17 NASB] 11 But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you. ... 15 For you have not received a spirit of slavery leading to fear again, but you have received a spirit of adoption as sons by which we cry out, "Abba! Father!" 16 The Spirit Himself testifies with our spirit that we are children of God, 17 and if children, heirs also, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, if indeed we suffer with [Him] so that we may also be glorified with [Him.]

[Rom 4:13-14, 16-17 NASB] 13 For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants (seed, singular) that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith. 14 For if those who are of the Law are heirs, faith is made void and the promise is nullified; ... 16 For this reason [it is] by faith, in order that [it may be] in accordance with grace, so that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all, 17 (as it is written, "A FATHER OF MANY NATIONS HAVE I MADE YOU") in the presence of Him whom he believed, [even] God, who gives life to the dead and calls into being that which does not exist.​
Why do you think any of these verses say what you just claimed?? None of these verses say anything about Jesus' "faith in the gospel".

If Jesus was going to raise himself from the dead with his own righteousness, why would God have to make a promise to him to be heir of the world?
I think your question is bogus. The Bible already tells us that He wa raised by the power of God. And the promise about being "heir of the world" speaks to the FACT that He died for everyone, and paid the sin debt for everyone.

Rather, Jesus waited and relied on God to raise him from the dead... he didn't raise himself.
I never even suggested that. There wa no need to even bring this up.

Right... cause Jesus still had the choice to die or not... and it was a credit until payment was made in full on the cross.
It should be obvious to any serious student of the Word that Jesus was totally IN the will of His Father. And that His choice would be the SAME choice as His Father's.

That is two passages... in the NASB translation, whenever it quotes another passage it capitalizes it. In the case of Galatians 4:27, it is quoting Isaiah 54:1. Isaiah 53 is the chapter that is banned from reading in most Jewish synagogues because it is so clearly and obviously talking about Jesus. That culmination of Isaiah 53 is Isaiah 54:1:

[Isa 54:1 NASB] 1 "Shout for joy, O barren one, you who have borne no [child;] Break forth into joyful shouting and cry aloud, you who have not travailed; For the sons of the desolate one [will be] more numerous Than the sons of the married woman," says the LORD.​
Well, i don't know what you are talking about here.

Made, credited, imparted, given, justified as, clothed with. All the same. It is something from outside yourself that is applied to you.
Of course. But what it doesn't mean is "made". No one is made righteous. It is a delaration by God. To believers only.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,525
8,427
up there
✟306,620.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Luke 1:68 Blessed be the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people,

".. derived from two Hebrew roots, pdh (???) and g'l (???). " ... Encyclopaedia Judaica

"Pdh is the more general of the two, with cognates of related meaning in Akkadian, Arabic, and Ethiopic. It belongs to the domain of commercial law, and refers to the payment of an equivalent for what is to be released or secured. The verb pdh, unlike g?l, indicates nothing about the relation of the agent to the object of redemption, which in the Bible is always either a person or another living being. Its usage does not differ in cultic activity from that of a normal commercial transaction. In both cases a person or an animal is released in return for money or an acceptable replacement" ... Encyclopaedia Judaica

"G'l is more restricted in usage and does not appear to have cognates in other Semitic languages. It is connected with family law and reflects the Israelite conception of the importance of preserving the solidarity of the clan." "When applied to divine activity, a slight shift occurs in the use of both these terms. Thus, pdh takes on the general meaning of "deliver" and does not involve the notion of the payment of an equivalent. God is, after all, the Lord of the universe and everything belongs to Him." "God's purpose is not to retain the right of possession, but to liberate people, both individuals and groups, from their woes (cf. II Sam. 4:9; I Kings 1:29), including bondage (e.g., Deut. 7:8; 13:6), oppression (e.g., Isa. 1:27; Ps. 119:134), and death (e.g., Hos. 13:14; Ps. 49:16). " "Though g?l, like pdh, loses its strictly juridical connotation when describing divine activity, and takes on the meaning of "deliver" pure and simple (cf., e.g., Gen. 48:16), it still does retain some of its original overtones even when referred to God. Thus, Proverbs (23:10–11) speaks of God as the go?el of ("the next of kin," duty bound to protect) orphans, and Job similarly believes Him to be the go?el of the persecuted (19:25; cf. 19:21–22). " ... Encyclopaedia Judaica

(In everyday matters it meant release of a person or animal by payment or replacement.

HOWEVER in DIVINE matters it did not mean payment or replacement, BUT it meant liberation from bondage or oppression including death.

That was the definitions understood of redemption from the Hebrew in Jesus' day

The Greek meaning was ransom but that conflicts with the notion of liberation)

"the gift of redemption was freely given (redemption means freedom at no cost or penalty)"
 
Upvote 0

Gup20

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2019
654
136
45
Albertville
✟157,738.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I said:
"I wonder why one would even think that Jesus Christ needed salvation."

Still, this isn't anything close to Jesus needing salvation. He is our salvation.

Yes, the sins of the people transferred to the sacrifical lamb. That still isn't salvation for Jesus. Or that He needed it.
[Psa 16:10-11 NASB] 10 For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol; Nor will You allow Your Holy One to undergo decay. 11 You will make known to me the path of life; In Your presence is fullness of joy; In Your right hand there are pleasures forever.

[Act 2:22-33 NASB] 22 "Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know-- 23 this [Man,] delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put [Him] to death. 24 "But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power. 25 "For David says of Him, 'I SAW THE LORD ALWAYS IN MY PRESENCE; FOR HE IS AT MY RIGHT HAND, SO THAT I WILL NOT BE SHAKEN. 26 'THEREFORE MY HEART WAS GLAD AND MY TONGUE EXULTED; MOREOVER MY FLESH ALSO WILL LIVE IN HOPE; 27 BECAUSE YOU WILL NOT ABANDON MY SOUL TO HADES, NOR ALLOW YOUR HOLY ONE TO UNDERGO DECAY. 28 'YOU HAVE MADE KNOWN TO ME THE WAYS OF LIFE; YOU WILL MAKE ME FULL OF GLADNESS WITH YOUR PRESENCE.' 29 "Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. 30 "And so, because he was a prophet and knew that GOD HAD SWORN TO HIM WITH AN OATH TO SEAT [one] OF HIS DESCENDANTS ON HIS THRONE, 31 he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that HE WAS NEITHER ABANDONED TO HADES, NOR DID His flesh SUFFER DECAY. 32 "This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses. 33 "Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured forth this which you both see and hear.

[Gal 3:14, 18-19 NASB] 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. ... 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made.​

To whom was this promise of the Holy Spirit made? It was made to Abraham and to his Seed (singular). Therefore, Christ (the seed), though he could have received his own life back to him and raised himself, he allowed himself to be emptied and crushed for our sake and waited for God to save him through the promise. It is startling to think of God having to give Jesus the Holy Spirit, but that is exactly what scripture says. Therefore, since Christ allowed his resurrection to be given to him rather than using his own righteousness to do it, we can say that Christ allowed himself to be saved, or that Christ needed saving by God (salvation) in order to accomplish the plan of God.

[Phl 2:7-9 NASB] 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, [and] being made in the likeness of men. 8 Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name,​

Uh oh. I see a problem here. Christ's death on the cross does NOT have God "seeing us as righteous". If that were true, then universalism would be true, which it is NOT.

No one is saved on the basis of who Christ died for. He paid the sin debt, yes. But unless and until a person personally trusts in Jesus as their Savior, they aren't saved, and aren't declared righteous.
I do not believe in universalism. I believe that universalism is a lie from Satan. However... over the years as I've studied the issue, I've come to understand a different view that is not widely held. It may be disruptive to your typical understanding, but read through this to the end before passing judgement on it.

Calvinists believe that Christ’s sacrifice and redemption was limited, or only for those whom had been given faith. It is said that Christ only died for those who would have faith in Him. But allow me to offer another model. I believe that Christ’s redemption on the cross and subsequent resurrection was for all, but only those who are of faith will inherit life in the resurrection. In other words, because of Christ, all will be resurrected, but not all will enter the kingdom of heaven. That is only for those who believe the gospel and obtain the righteousness of Christ through the inheritance by kinship with Abraham.

Acts 24:15
having a hope in God, which these men cherish themselves, that there shall certainly be a resurrection of both the righteous and the wicked.

John 5:28
“Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs will hear His voice,
29 and will come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment.


Revelation 21:8
“But for the cowardly and unbelieving and abominable and murderers and immoral persons and sorcerers and idolaters and all liars, their part will be in the lake that burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”

Daniel 12:1
Now at that time Michael, the great prince who stands guard over the sons of your people, will arise. And there will be a time of distress such as never occurred since there was a nation until that time; and at that time your people, everyone who is found written in the book, will be rescued.
2 Many of those who sleep in the dust of the ground will awake, these to everlasting life, but the others to disgrace and everlasting contempt
.


So Christ’s work resurrects each and every human being from Adam’s corporate judgment, but then they are judged as individuals (by Christ). Those who do not have Christ’s righteousness by faith in the gospel then have a second death and are thrown into the lake of fire.

Additionally, try to make sense of this apparent contradiction without this knowledge on resurrection:

Numbers 14:18
The LORD is slow to anger and abundant in lovingkindness, forgiving iniquity and transgression; but He will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and the fourth generations.

Ezekiel 18:20
The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father's iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son's iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

This seems at first to be contradiction, but then you realize that Ezekiel is future prophecy. Numbers describes the law, and what now is. Because of Christ, that original judgment of death will be repealed in lieu of individual judgments. Then, as John 5:28 says, there will be a resurrection of all – the good to a resurrection of life, and the evil to a resurrection of a second judgment and a second death.

I initially came upon this in Romans 5. Romans 5:12-21 can be confusing. It is helpful to make lists and charts when breaking it down. For example, it has phrases like 'just as' and 'the free gift is not like the transgression.' So what I realized is that scripture is comparing and contrasting things... so I had to make a chart of what was "similar" and was was "different".

[Rom 5:16-17 NASB] 16 The gift is not like [that which came] through the one who sinned; for on the one hand the judgment [arose] from one [transgression] resulting in condemnation, but on the other hand the free gift [arose] from many transgressions resulting in justification. 17 For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ.
So on one hand, you have a universal judgement arising from a single sin. Think about it... no only was Adam cursed, but the plants, the animals, the very ground, and all human beings were cursed for one, single sin.

On the other hand - and NOT LIKE the sin - the free gift arose from many sins... many transgressions resulting in justification. So Christ's righteousness isn't forgiving the one, Original Sin, it's forgiving many sins. It occured to me that if we are all 'guilty' of Adam's sin, then forgiving ANY single person in the world would have a universal effect on repealing the judgment of entire universe... since God's judgement of Adam was a universal, corporate judgement for one, single sin.

[1Co 15:21-22 NASB] 21 For since by a man [came] death, by a man also [came] the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive.​

The universal, corporate judgement of Adam has to be repealed in lieu of individual judgments. Here in 1Corinthians we see the universality of Adam's judgment compared to universality of Christ's repeal. But that doesn't mean -- as the universalists suggest -- that everyone will be saved. No, we have an individual judgment in the Great White Throne judgement.

[Rev 20:11-14 NASB] 11 Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat upon it, from whose presence earth and heaven fled away, and no place was found for them. 12 And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is [the book] of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds. 13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead which were in them; and they were judged, every one [of them] according to their deeds. 14 Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.​

I believe that, since there was 1 righteous person in existence (Jesus) it necessitates a repeal of Adam's universal judgement (Adam's death came because of one, single sin). After ALL PEOPLE are resurrected from Adam's corporate judgement there will be individual judgments at the Great White Throne judgment. Then, some will have Christ's righteousness applied to their lives and have eternal life, and some will have eternal death... the second death (the second judgement of death.. an individual judgement rather than Adam's universal judgment).

That will be the full inheritance for the saints. The Holy Spirit in us is a pledge of our full inheritance.

[Eph 1:13-14 NASB] 13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation--having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of [God's own] possession, to the praise of His glory.​


I asked for verses that support what you claimed:
"Jesus believed the gospel God spoke, and his faith in the gospel - the covenant God made with Abraham - is how scripture says Jesus was raised from the dead."
Why do you think any of these verses say what you just claimed?? None of these verses say anything about Jesus' "faith in the gospel".
You are right, they don't say it directly. However, it is heavily implicated, and moreover it is logically sound. It says that God gave the covenant of faith in the gospel to Abraham and to his Seed. It says that Seed to whom God was making the promise through Abraham (the promise of salvation through faith in the gospel) was being made to Jesus Christ. It says that the Holy Spirit is given to those with faith in the gospel qualifying them as Abraham's descendant, and it says that Jesus was given the Holy Spirit, and that he was resurrected through Abraham's eternal covenant.

Hebrews 11:6 says that, without faith it is impossible to please God. When Jesus was water baptized, a voice was heard saying 'this is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased."

[Heb 12:2 NASB] 2 fixing our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of faith, who for the joy set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.

[Heb 10:37-38 NASB] 37 FOR YET IN A VERY LITTLE WHILE, HE WHO IS COMING WILL COME, AND WILL NOT DELAY. 38 BUT MY RIGHTEOUS ONE SHALL LIVE BY FAITH; AND IF HE SHRINKS BACK, MY SOUL HAS NO PLEASURE IN HIM.

[Isa 49:7-8 NASB] 7 Thus says the LORD, the Redeemer of Israel [and] its Holy One, To the despised One, To the One abhorred by the nation, To the Servant of rulers, "Kings will see and arise, Princes will also bow down, Because of the LORD who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel who has chosen You." 8 Thus says the LORD, "In a favorable time I have answered You, And in a day of salvation I have helped You; And I will keep You and give You for a covenant of the people, To restore the land, to make [them] inherit the desolate heritages;

[Psa 22:1, 18-24 NASB] 1 For the choir director; upon Aijeleth Hashshahar. A Psalm of David. My God, my God, why have You forsaken me? Far from my deliverance are the words of my groaning. ... 18 They divide my garments among them, And for my clothing they cast lots. 19 But You, O LORD, be not far off; O You my help, hasten to my assistance. 20 Deliver my soul from the sword, My only [life] from the power of the dog. 21 Save me from the lion's mouth; From the horns of the wild oxen You answer me. 22 I will tell of Your name to my brethren; In the midst of the assembly I will praise You. 23 You who fear the LORD, praise Him; All you descendants of Jacob, glorify Him, And stand in awe of Him, all you descendants of Israel. 24 For He has not despised nor abhorred the affliction of the afflicted; Nor has He hidden His face from him; But when he cried to Him for help, He heard.​

Well, i don't know what you are talking about here.
The two women are the two covenants for justifying someone as righteous. The Law, and Faith in the Gospel (allegorically speaking). Here it is saying that the unmarried woman (those adopted children of Abraham) will give Abraham many more heirs than the married woman (the natural descendants of Abraham or those who are of The Law).

Of course. But what it doesn't mean is "made". No one is made righteous. It is a delaration by God. To believers only.
I have no objection to this... perhaps you could explain the necessity for a distinction.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said this:
"Of course. But what it doesn't mean is "made". No one is made righteous. It is a delaration by God. To believers only."
I have no objection to this... perhaps you could explain the necessity for a distinction.
I did, but I'll repeat it again. The RCC says man is "made righteous", a translation that came from the Latin, whereas the Greek word actually means "a declaration".

so, the RCC views justification as a process that takes one's whole life. iow, there is no immediate salvation. Which is unbiblical.

There is most definitely a necessity for distinction.
 
Upvote 0

Gup20

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2019
654
136
45
Albertville
✟157,738.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I said this:
"Of course. But what it doesn't mean is "made". No one is made righteous. It is a delaration by God. To believers only."

I did, but I'll repeat it again. The RCC says man is "made righteous", a translation that came from the Latin, whereas the Greek word actually means "a declaration".
Which passage are your referring to?

so, the RCC views justification as a process that takes one's whole life. iow, there is no immediate salvation. Which is unbiblical.

There is most definitely a necessity for distinction.
What do you mean by "salvation." Do you mean "made righteous?" Do you mean "resurrected?" Do you mean "filled with the Holy Spirit?" What do you mean by "salvation?"

For example, there are scriptures which discuss the point that we have not completely obtained all that was promised.

[Heb 10:1-2 NASB] 1 For the Law, since it has [only] a shadow of the good things to come [and] not the very form of things, can never, by the same sacrifices which they offer continually year by year, make perfect those who draw near. 2 Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, because the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have had consciousness of sins?

[Phl 3:11-14 NASB] 11 in order that I may attain to the resurrection from the dead. 12 Not that I have already obtained [it] or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus. 13 Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of [it] yet; but one thing [I do:] forgetting what [lies] behind and reaching forward to what [lies] ahead, 14 I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.

[Eph 1:13-14 NASB] 13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation--having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of [God's own] possession, to the praise of His glory.

[Rom 8:22-25 NASB] 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. 23 And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for [our] adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. 24 For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he [already] sees? 25 But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it.​
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Which passage are your referring to?
Rom 2:13 and 3:20.

What do you mean by "salvation."
Salvation refers to being saved, delivered or rescued from something. The Bible uses the word in reference to the soul being saved, delivered, rescued from the lake of fire on the basis of faith in Christ.

However, "salvation" can be thought of in 3 tenses:
1. past tense: we WERE saved from the penalty of sin. Justification.
2. present tense: we ARE BEING saved from the power of sin. Sanctification.
3. future tense: we WILL BE saved from the presence of sin. Glorification.

Do you mean "made righteous?"
No. God does not "make" people righteous. He declares them righteous on the basis of faith in Christ.

Do you mean "resurrected?"
No. Believers will be bodily resurrected when Jesus returns to earth to set up the Millennium.

Do you mean "filled with the Holy Spirit?"
No. All believers have the Holy Spirit indwelling them. But being filled with the Spirit is a command to be obeyed. iow, it isn't automatic or guaranteed. One must first be IN fellowship with the Lord, per 1 John 1:9. And believers are commanded to NOT grieve or quench the Spirit. So the filling sure isn't continuous.

What do you mean by "salvation?"
See above.

For example, there are scriptures which discuss the point that we have not completely obtained all that was promised.

[Heb 10:1-2 NASB] 1 For the Law, since it has [only] a shadow of the good things to come [and] not the very form of things, can never, by the same sacrifices which they offer continually year by year, make perfect those who draw near. 2 Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, because the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have had consciousness of sins?

[Phl 3:11-14 NASB] 11 in order that I may attain to the resurrection from the dead. 12 Not that I have already obtained [it] or have already become perfect, but I press on so that I may lay hold of that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus. 13 Brethren, I do not regard myself as having laid hold of [it] yet; but one thing [I do:] forgetting what [lies] behind and reaching forward to what [lies] ahead, 14 I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus.

[Eph 1:13-14 NASB] 13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation--having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of [God's own] possession, to the praise of His glory.

[Rom 8:22-25 NASB] 22 For we know that the whole creation groans and suffers the pains of childbirth together until now. 23 And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for [our] adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. 24 For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he [already] sees? 25 But if we hope for what we do not see, with perseverance we wait eagerly for it.​
These verses refer to the FUTURE TENSE of salvation; what is to come.

Hope this helps. Great questions.
 
Upvote 0

Gup20

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2019
654
136
45
Albertville
✟157,738.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Rom 2:13 and 3:20.
Both of those references are talking about being justified as righteous. I can accept on your word that it means "declared righteous" because I don't see what difference it makes if you say "made righteous" or "declared righteous." In either case, you are designated as righteous and for what I've been talking about that is all that matters. I don't see any "damage" done to scripture either way, so I'm still not sold on the purpose for the distinction. What theological issue does it create one way or the other? Is there a false doctrine that arises from saying "made righteous" rather than "declared righteous?"

Salvation refers to being saved, delivered or rescued from something. The Bible uses the word in reference to the soul being saved, delivered, rescued from the lake of fire on the basis of faith in Christ.

However, "salvation" can be thought of in 3 tenses:
1. past tense: we WERE saved from the penalty of sin. Justification.
2. present tense: we ARE BEING saved from the power of sin. Sanctification.
3. future tense: we WILL BE saved from the presence of sin. Glorification.
Seems good to me!

No. All believers have the Holy Spirit indwelling them. But being filled with the Spirit is a command to be obeyed. iow, it isn't automatic or guaranteed. One must first be IN fellowship with the Lord, per 1 John 1:9. And believers are commanded to NOT grieve or quench the Spirit. So the filling sure isn't continuous.
I disagree with the statement "Being filled with the Spirit is a command to be obeyed." In fact, it isn't anything we can do on our own... it is a gift of God. The Old Testament uses Circumcision as a type and shadow -- a placeholder of sorts -- for the indwelling of the Holy Spirit.

[Deu 30:6 NASB] 6 "Moreover the LORD your God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your descendants, to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul, so that you may live.

[Rom 2:28-29 NASB] 28 For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. 29 But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God.

[Eph 1:13-14 NASB] 13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation--having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of [God's own] possession, to the praise of His glory.

[Rom 4:9-13 NASB] 9 Is this blessing then on the circumcised, or on the uncircumcised also? For we say, "FAITH WAS CREDITED TO ABRAHAM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS." 10 How then was it credited? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised; 11 and he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while uncircumcised, so that he might be the father of all who believe without being circumcised, that righteousness might be credited to them, 12 and the father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also follow in the steps of the faith of our father Abraham which he had while uncircumcised. 13 For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would be heir of the world was not through the Law, but through the righteousness of faith.

[Act 11:16-17 NASB] 16 "And I remembered the word of the Lord, how He used to say, 'John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.' 17 "Therefore if God gave to them the same gift as [He gave] to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God's way?"

[Act 2:38 NASB] 38 Peter [said] to them, "Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

[Gal 3:14, 22 NASB] 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. ... 22 But the Scripture has shut up everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe.​

It doesn't seem like it's based on obedience, but based on faith. It is something God does (not something we do via obedience) and it is a gift based on faith. In Abraham's pattern of salvation, circumcision was the placeholder for the indwelling of the Holy Spirit and represented the "seal" of the righteousness of faith. Today, the Holy Spirit has taken over (circumcision of the heart) as that seal of having been declared righteous (you like that, eh?)... a pledge of our full inheritance yet to come (the resurrection). Interestingly, and devastatingly to Calvinist theology, in the pattern of Salvation demonstrated by Abraham, faith leads to being declared righteous PRIOR to circumcision. The Calvinists would have us believe that we are indwelled by the Holy Spirit first, and that the Holy Spirit then gives us the faith to believe and be declared righteous. However, that is not what scripture says... it says Abraham was designated as righteous WHILE UNCIRCUMCISED. It says circumcision was the seal of the righteousness of faith, just as Ephesians 1:13-14 says that the Holy Spirit is now that seal of the righteousness of faith. But in both Ephesians 1:13-14 and in Acts 11:16-17 it says that the Holy Spirit indwells AFTER one has believed, not before.

 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Both of those references are talking about being justified as righteous. I can accept on your word that it means "declared righteous" because I don't see what difference it makes if you say "made righteous" or "declared righteous."
Regardless, it does make a difference. The Roman Catholic Church bases their understanding of "made righteous" as a process that occurs throughout one's lifetime, rather than a moment in time declaration of being declared righteous. That's huge.

In either case, you are designated as righteous and for what I've been talking about that is all that matters.
You are wrong. To be "designated" is the same as being "declared". It does not mean to "make", as in a process.


I don't see any "damage" done to scripture either way, so I'm still not sold on the purpose for the distinction.
Well, I've explained it well enough. It's up to you to understand it.

What theological issue does it create one way or the other?
Only that the RCC believes salvation is earned by what one does during their lives, and that salvation isn't even known until after one dies.

Is there a false doctrine that arises from saying "made righteous" rather than "declared righteous?"
Sure. The RCC. Arminians who believe that salvation is based on one's lifestyle.

I disagree with the statement "Being filled with the Spirit is a command to be obeyed."
Well, that's your freedom. But Gal 5:16 IS a command. Check it out on biblehub.com.

In fact, it isn't anything we can do on our own... it is a gift of God.
Nope. The gift from God is the indwelling Holy Spirit. But it seems you aren't aware of that fact.

[Eph 1:13-14 NASB] 13 In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation--having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise, 14 who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of [God's own] possession, to the praise of His glory.
The sealing here isn't a filling. It's a dwelling. To be filled is to obey the command of God. God's commands are His will for our lives. And 1 John 5:14,15 specifically say to pray for God's will.
It doesn't seem like it's based on obedience, but based on faith.
Scripture never says the filling is based on faith. And it is a command. And that takes obedience.

It is something God does (not something we do via obedience) and it is a gift based on faith.
No. See above.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gup20

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 11, 2019
654
136
45
Albertville
✟157,738.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Regardless, it does make a difference. The Roman Catholic Church bases their understanding of "made righteous" as a process that occurs throughout one's lifetime, rather than a moment in time declaration of being declared righteous. That's huge.
...
You are wrong. To be "designated" is the same as being "declared". It does not mean to "make", as in a process.
...
Well, I've explained it well enough. It's up to you to understand it.
Ok, I think I see where you are coming from. Your concern has to do with time. Your issue with the phrase "made righteous" has to do with the idea that "made" means "being made into" or "making" - as if it isn't something that is accomplished already, but something that is progressively advancing slowly.

I guess I never thought of made righteous in a progressive advancing way because the verb made is a past tense verb -- as if it had already been completed. If you said "making righteous" or "becoming righteous" I would think that, but "made righteous" just seems like it's already done to me, so I didn't see where you were coming from.

I agree with you 100% -- at the time of belief we are declared (again a past tense verb) righteous, and there is no progression of making us more righteous than we were at the beginning. I think we can become progressively more sanctified (set apart) and holy because that has to do with ridding our lives of sin. But scripture says:

[Rom 8:1-2 NASB] 1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.​

So at the time of our (genuine) faith we are declared righteous and set free from the law of sin and death. We don't become progressively more righteous... we are -- at that very moment of belief -- more righteous than the pharisees. We have been clothed in Christ's righteousness.

[Mat 5:20 NASB] 20 "For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses [that] of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.

[Isa 61:10 NASB] 10 I will rejoice greatly in the LORD, My soul will exult in my God; For He has clothed me with garments of salvation, He has wrapped me with a robe of righteousness, As a bridegroom decks himself with a garland, And as a bride adorns herself with her jewels.

[Gal 3:27 NASB] 27 For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.​

So the progressive sanctification we experience over time in eliminating sin from our lives has nothing to do with righteousness. Our righteousness is not based on our own actions, but the actions of Christ. It is HIS righteousness that adorns us, not our own... so regardless of the presence of sin in our lives, the righteousness which defines our status is Christ's righteousness which is perfect.

Only that the RCC believes salvation is earned by what one does during their lives, and that salvation isn't even known until after one dies.
Yep... RCC believes a lie from the pit of hell.


Sure. The RCC. Arminians who believe that salvation is based on one's lifestyle.
Both are dead wrong. But there is a much, much better argument than the distinction between made and declared.

[Gal 3:14-19 NASB] 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. 15 Brethren, I speak in terms of human relations: even though it is [only] a man's covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one sets it aside or adds conditions to it. 16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, "And to seeds," as [referring] to many, but [rather] to one, "And to your seed," that is, Christ. 17 What I am saying is this: the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made.​

Here we see that the covenant of faith came 430 years before the covenant of The Law. Once that covenant was ratified (the 2nd half of Genesis 15) IT CAN NO LONGER HAVE CONDITIONS ADDED TO IT!! This means that the covenant of The Law, which came 430 years AFTER the covenant of faith does not add conditions to being declared righteous through faith!


Well, that's your freedom. But Gal 5:16 IS a command. Check it out on biblehub.com.
[Gal 5:16-17 NASB] 16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh. 17 For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please.​

This mirrors what is said in Romans 7-8. Paul says "I say...". It seems less like a command from God and more like an admonishment or instruction from Paul. At any rate, it is not a spiritual command. It is telling us how to "set our minds" on the things of the Spirit so that we do not obey the desires of the flesh. Romans 7-8 is all about finding our true identity as who we are in Christ, not who we are in the flesh.

Nope. The gift from God is the indwelling Holy Spirit. But it seems you aren't aware of that fact.


The sealing here isn't a filling. It's a dwelling. To be filled is to obey the command of God. God's commands are His will for our lives. And 1 John 5:14,15 specifically say to pray for God's will.

Scripture never says the filling is based on faith. And it is a command. And that takes obedience.


No. See above.
The promise of the spirit (salvation, righteousness) is through faith. Dwelling vs Filling is the quantity and quality of His influence AFTER you are joined. I'm talking about salvation (being declared righteous) which is the new birth - our initial introduction to God... the initial re-connection to God.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,703
USA
✟184,557.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Ok, I think I see where you are coming from. Your concern has to do with time. Your issue with the phrase "made righteous" has to do with the idea that "made" means "being made into" or "making" - as if it isn't something that is accomplished already, but something that is progressively advancing slowly.
And that is a huge difference from an instantaneous action.

I guess I never thought of made righteous in a progressive advancing way because the verb made is a past tense verb -- as if it had already been completed.
Well, that's good for you, but you'll have to ask the Catholics why they failed to understand that.

I agree with you 100% -- at the time of belief we are declared (again a past tense verb) righteous, and there is no progression of making us more righteous than we were at the beginning.
Amen!!

I think we can become progressively more sanctified (set apart) and holy because that has to do with ridding our lives of sin.
Absolutely! That is progressive sanctification and has to do with growing up in our salvation. 1 Pet 2:2 - Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation.

But scripture says:

[Rom 8:1-2 NASB] 1 Therefore there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death.​

So at the time of our (genuine) faith we are declared righteous and set free from the law of sin and death. We don't become progressively more righteous... we are -- at that very moment of belief -- more righteous than the pharisees. We have been clothed in Christ's righteousness.
Amen!!

So the progressive sanctification we experience over time in eliminating sin from our lives has nothing to do with righteousness. Our righteousness is not based on our own actions, but the actions of Christ. It is HIS righteousness that adorns us, not our own... so regardless of the presence of sin in our lives, the righteousness which defines our status is Christ's righteousness which is perfect.
:oldthumbsup:

[Gal 5:16-17 NASB] 16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not carry out the desire of the flesh. 17 For the flesh sets its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; for these are in opposition to one another, so that you may not do the things that you please.​

This mirrors what is said in Romans 7-8. Paul says "I say...". It seems less like a command from God and more like an admonishment or instruction from Paul.
According to biblehub.com, the verb is in the imperative mood, the mood of command.

At any rate, it is not a spiritual command. It is telling us how to "set our minds" on the things of the Spirit so that we do not obey the desires of the flesh.
It is most definitely a spiritual command.

Romans 7-8 is all about finding our true identity as who we are in Christ, not who we are in the flesh.
And Gal 5:16 is a command for spiritual living, so as not to gratify the desires of the flesh.

The promise of the spirit (salvation, righteousness) is through faith. Dwelling vs Filling is the quantity and quality of His influence AFTER you are joined.
I must disagree. The indwelling is His presence in the believer. The filling is the use of His power in living the supernatural Christian way of life.
 
Upvote 0

Behold

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2020
837
260
46
Netanya
✟13,908.00
Country
Israel
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you are born again, you are saved and you will go to Heaven.

Being Born Again is the only true proof you are saved.
"you will know them by their fruit"....and yet, you can fake that.
But you can't fake being born again, as only GOD knows this, and you should also be able to recall when your "new birth" happened to you.

If you are not born again, but you are water baptized, and are keeping all the commandments perfectly, and you love your neighbor as yourself, and you have never missed a Church service in 55 yrs, and you die tomorrow after giving all your money away to the poor today, you will go directly to Hell as if you were the worst and most outspoken God hating Christ rejecting monster who was ever born to die.
You might just end up pretty close to that monster and he'll say, "ahh, you also were not born again"..

Religious people, make a mess at understanding why someone goes to hell, and not to heaven.
Religious people, are always trying to get God to accept them and keep them based on their commandment keeping, and lifestyle performance, and endless works of self effort.
Cain tried that trick in Genesis, and God kicked him out also.
Able brought the blood, and God said....>"ACCEPTED"...

Saved people, understood before they were born again, that they are not righteous and can never do anything about this, and need the righteousness of God that Jesus died to give them. And so, they trust Christ and God takes this Faith and in return, He gives them "the gift of righteousness".

Religious but lost people, can never understand this, and in fact, do not want to understand it, as it insults their self righteousness very deeply and tends to make them behave like crazed religious hornets if you put this spotlight of truth on them.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0