I'll have what he's saying...

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
See my comment above...

Hi again pescador,

Look, you can throw up all the one in a million scenarios you can think of. I just don't think that God's desire in this is quite so convoluted or equivocal. I believe that God doesn't want His people to kill. But I also understand that in the days that He gave that law...He gave it only unto Israel. The rest of the world was pretty much free to do whatever it wanted to regarding such matters. I believe that is still the truth of God. That His concern for those striving to follow the teachings of His Son, is for those who have proclaimed that they desire to follow His Son. God's Scriptures seem to have always held out a difference between how those who are His will live and how those who are not His will live.

It wasn't until Jesus came that God's mercy flowed out to the entire world through belief in His Son. However, there is still a separation between those who believe and those who don't as far as God's expectation of how they will live. Paul talks about us (believers) not living as the pagans live. He doesn't then say, "God has commanded you to go out and make those darn pagans live as you do!"

So, you're free to support or not support whatever position on abortion you feel God wants you to support. I support the one that says, 'Thou shalt not kill', but only for myself and I expect it of other born again believers. But the laws of the world, sheesh, read Paul's opening chapter to the Romans. That God has commissioned me to expend my energies working for Him by trying to change the laws of the world...I honestly don't find a single example that God has ever encouraged that or proclaimed that since He said, "let there be light!"

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Would you please explain to me why God sent the tenth plague to Egypt, killing all the firstborn? Why did He allow Herod to kill all the male children two years of age and under? Those were all innocent children.

Abortion is a necessary medical procedure in many cases; in your opinion are all OB/Gyns murderers?

Hi pescador,

I'm afraid you're going to have to be a bit more clear on the point you're trying to make here. I'm not following how God's work through the death angel and Herod's anger being shown by the killing of all the young boys applies to this issue of the legality of abortion in the world.

As to your last question, no. Only those who do murder.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But do reporters know enough about the subject to ask deeper questions? It's been said that a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't already know the answer to. If true why not just print the truth without playing gotcha with the respondent?

Hi OWG,

I'm not familiar with that phrase being applied to reporters. I guess that puts Woodward and Bernstein out in the wood shed. As someone else has responded, I have heard that phrase regarding the practice of law, but I contend that a good reporter often asks questions that he doesn't know the answer to which is why he's asking the question. A lawyer, on the other hand, wants to know what the expected answer will be so that he won't be surprised in his argument. I'm fairly confident that need doesn't apply to the career of reporting.

Can you give me an example where you've seen that used in reporting? Or, where someone that you heard may have said that?

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

pescador

Wise old man
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2011
8,530
4,776
✟498,844.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Hi pescador,

I'm afraid you're going to have to be a bit more clear on the point you're trying to make here. I'm not following how God's work through the death angel and Herod's anger being shown by the killing of all the young boys applies to this issue of the legality of abortion in the world.

As to your last question, no. Only those who do murder.

God bless,
In Christ, ted

God killed all the firstborn of Egypt. Exodus 11:4-6 says "Moses said, “This is what the Lord says: About midnight I [the Lord, not the death angel] will go out among the Egyptians. Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who rules the land, to the firstborn children of female slaves who use their handmills, including every firstborn domestic animal. There will be loud crying throughout Egypt, such as there has never been or ever will be again."

God, after rescuing Joseph and his family by warning them, allowed Herod to kill many innocent children.

Nobody in their right mind thinks that an abortion is admirable, but it MUST be allowed. People and their doctors, including Christian ones, make the best choice that they can, based on medical principles and the parents' wishes. And that's the way it should be. After all, even God allowed his child to be killed.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hi OWG,

I'm not familiar with that phrase being applied to reporters. I guess that puts Woodward and Bernstein out in the wood shed. As someone else has responded, I have heard that phrase regarding the practice of law, but I contend that a good reporter often asks questions that he doesn't know the answer to which is why he's asking the question. A lawyer, on the other hand, wants to know what the expected answer will be so that he won't be surprised in his argument. I'm fairly confident that need doesn't apply to the career of reporting.

Can you give me an example where you've seen that used in reporting? Or, where someone that you heard may have said that?

God bless,
In Christ, ted

I just tossed that in there. Most of those "ya but" questions were answered many times. My favorite example of the way the press spins answers is this,

Reporter to Jones: "Are you a homosexual?"
Jones: "No, of course not".

Headline in paper: "JONES DENIES THAT HE IS A HOMOSEXUAL."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I just tossed that in there. It applies to lawyers.

Hi OWG,

So let me get this straight. You just threw in a comment that you knew wasn't really true to bolster your position in a discussion? Is that about the gist of it? I mean you said that "It's been said that a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't already know the answer to". You've now admitted that it applies to lawyers, as others have pointed out to you...but then you followed up with "If true why not just print the truth without playing gotcha with the respondent?" Ok, well now according to your own admission it isn't true and so your if/then statement becomes bogus.

Seems like the student has learned well from the master.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hi OWG,

So let me get this straight. You just threw in a comment that you knew wasn't really true to bolster your position in a discussion? Is that about the gist of it? I mean you said that "It's been said that a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't already know the answer to". You've now admitted that it applies to lawyers, as others have pointed out to you...but then you followed up with "If true why not just print the truth without playing gotcha with the respondent?" Ok, well now according to your own admission it isn't true and so your if/then statement becomes bogus.

Seems like the student has learned well from the master.

God bless,
In Christ, ted

Regardless. The behavior of the press is inexcusable.

Read the rest of the post.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God killed all the firstborn of Egypt. Exodus 11:4-6 says "Moses said, “This is what the Lord says: About midnight I [the Lord, not the death angel] will go out among the Egyptians. Every firstborn son in Egypt will die, from the firstborn of Pharaoh who rules the land, to the firstborn children of female slaves who use their handmills, including every firstborn domestic animal. There will be loud crying throughout Egypt, such as there has never been or ever will be again."

God, after rescuing Joseph and his family by warning them, allowed Herod to kill many innocent children.

Nobody in their right mind thinks that an abortion is admirable, but it MUST be allowed. People and their doctors, including Christian ones, make the best choice that they can, based on medical principles and the parents' wishes. And that's the way it should be. After all, even God allowed his child to be killed.

Hi pescador,

I'm still not clear on why the accounts of the Scriptures you have posted have any bearing on the issue at hand. As to your last paragraph, you're preaching to the choir. I am not against legal abortion, but I think the practice is wrong in God's eyes and therefore, I'm no longer willing to participate in such a medical procedure if I have any say in it.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Regardless. The behavior of the press is inexcusable.

Read the rest of the post.

Hi OWG,

Ok. Here's the entire post copied and quoted:
But do reporters know enough about the subject to ask deeper questions? It's been said that a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't already know the answer to. If true why not just print the truth without playing gotcha with the respondent?

I'm not sure what the 'rest of the post' is that you want me to read. As I explained, your if/then proposition is not true. It is based on a lie that states 'a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't' already know the answer to'. So, the 'then' part of your if/then proposition is also not true because the case in which you're saying that the 'if' would apply is not true.

So, in simple explanation because it isn't true that reporters only ask questions that they know the answer to already then they ask the questions to get the answers. Which is exactly as it should be before any reporter goes off like a wild shot printing some story without verifying the underlying facts. Now, you call that a 'gotcha', as your article link does also, but if someone makes a statement that turns out to be false or misleading, then before pointing that out to the public through newsprint or media, one has to ask, "Well, didn't you say...' or, "Why did you say..." before going to print. If that's a 'gotcha' then so be it, but it's been a pretty good part of reporting, especially political reporting and especially WH reporting for centuries.

How many times, during the Obama administration, and other administrations before that, did reporters sit in the press room and ask the press Secretary or the president if he was the one doing the speaking, "Sir, didn't you say...", or "so-and-so reported that you said...", "what did you mean when you said...". Think back to the Bush administration and the reporter's constant queries regarding what President Bush had said about the WMD's. I contend that the questions aren't any different than they've always been. But, because this administration makes so many false claims and misleading statements, it just seems like there's an avalanche of such questions.

I've said it before and am certainly willing to repeat it as often as necessary: President Trump is his own worst enemy. A lot of this comes because he speaks off the cuff without thinking and making up his own facts by saying something like, "I've talked to a lot of people..."

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Jamsie
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It is based on a lie that states 'a good reporter doesn't ask a question that he/she doesn't' already know the answer to'.

I did begin the statement with an attribution (however vague) didn't I?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I'm not sure what the 'rest of the post' is that you want me to read.

This.

My favorite example of the way the press spins answers is this,

Reporter to Jones: "Are you a homosexual?"
Jones: "No, of course not".

Headline in paper: "JONES DENIES THAT HE IS A HOMOSEXUAL."
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I did begin the statement with an attribution (however vague) didn't I?

Hi OWG,

I'm sorry, but I don't think they teach in journalism school that 'it's been said' is an attribution.

This.

My favorite example of the way the press spins answers is this,

Reporter to Jones: "Are you a homosexual?"
Jones: "No, of course not".

Headline in paper: "JONES DENIES THAT HE IS A HOMOSEXUAL."

I'm sorry, but I copied and quoted the entire text of your post that you referred me to, or that was under discussion and you're lying again. None of what you've posted above, starting with 'This. My favorite...' is anywhere in the post. You really need to start saying what you mean, my friend.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hi OWG,

I'm sorry, but I don't think they teach in journalism school that 'it's been said' is an attribution.



I'm sorry, but I copied and quoted the entire text of your post that you referred me to, or that was under discussion and you're lying again. None of what you've posted above, starting with 'This. My favorite...' is anywhere in the post. You really need to start saying what you mean, my friend.

God bless,
In Christ, ted

Perhaps if you had asked who said it I would have revealed that it was...me. :) I'm sure most who read it got the meaning.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sistrin

We are such stuff as dreams are made on...
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2012
6,488
3,399
Location Location Location
✟197,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can't believe you guys are actually using Old Testiment doctrine and dogma to argue the modern day abortion issue.

This isn't an issue of what God said to the Israelites. This issue revolves around the fact abortion is a sacrament of the progressive left and their goal is abortion on demand without restriction to include post-birth. And if they get all of that it still won't be enough.

Therefore, when someone makes the comment, as has been made in this thread, that "I'm fine with leaving the legality of abortion just as it is" that is what you are supporting, abortion on demand without restriction to include post-birth.

Deal with that.
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi sistrin,

This issue revolves around the fact abortion is a sacrament of the progressive left and their goal is abortion on demand without restriction to include post-birth. And if they get all of that it still won't be enough.

What a load of horse dung! 'THE' abortion issue is not some 'sacrament' of the progressive left. It's a medical procedure that is often sought by people of all walks of life. Usually because the woman who finds her self pregnant, for whatever reason, doesn't want to be.

According to antiochian.org there are some 46 million abortions performed worldwide. So just take that load of horse dung that it's some 'sacrament' of the left and dump it in the waste can. Antiochian says that the break down of those 46 million abortions is 26 million where abortions are legal and some 20 million where there are restrictions on abortion. According to an NBC news article:Number of abortions in U.S. drops to lowest since they became legal nationwide there are only some 8-900 thousand abortions in the U.S. So no!!! Abortion is not some 'sacrament' of the progressive left and their goal of abortion on demand without restriction. Abortions are a very real and very large segment of our society. They are performed the world over and the U.S. generally performs a lot less than other people groups.

According to Guttmacher.org, 1 in 4 women will have an abortion by age 45. However, in all fairness, that number is calculated by the number of abortions and the number of women. Some women will have multiple abortions and so it likely isn't actually 1 in 4.

However, the point is that abortion is, and often becomes, a serious issue for women who have sexual relations in situations where they are not married, or had sexual relations with someone other than their husband. No, that is not to say that all women who seek abortions are unmarried or fornicators, but the statistics show that a great, great number of them are. For these women, abortion becomes an easy out for the responsibility of having a child that they didn't intend to be carrying.

I contend that before we start telling the world to live by God's law as regards abortion, we begin by telling them to live by God's law as regards sexual relations. That alone would pretty much solve the problem. However, in this world of 'sex in everything', anyone's chances of changing the mores of the people of the world to hold off on sex until they're with the person that they will be spending the rest of their life with, is about as good as a snowball lasting 1 hour in a 400° oven.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
  • Like
Reactions: kybela
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

packermann

Junior Member
Nov 30, 2003
1,446
375
71
Northwest Suburbs of Chicago, IL
✟45,845.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Republican
Hi packerman,

Well, while I do have some Scottish ancestry, I'm not a true Scotsman. I suppose since I don't agree with your premise, that makes me not a true christian in your book. That's ok with me, since it isn't inclusion in your book that I'm shooting for. I'm not really sure how you have determined that any national leader that would stop abortion would be a great president, but be that as it may, there doesn't really seem to be much effort being made on that front from the national level. Some state's governors and legislatures have made changes, but I don't think anything much has changed on the national level.
This is what Pres Trump did for pro-life:
He is the only president ever to speak at the annual March For Life in person
He blocked funding for Planned Parenthood
He selected two justices on the Supreme Court that have decided in case to be pro-life
He imposed restrictions on federal funding of doing experiments on unborn children
He passed executive orders to protect pro-lifers in the medical field
Donald Trump's Pro-Life Presidency | National Review
With the recognized approval of abortion legalization that we have across the nation, which should also be reflected in our legislature, I doubt that any president will likely change abortion laws. Despite what their personal feelings or understanding of the issue is. Right now, in national polling, the acceptance of abortion either in all cases or some, is running above 70%. Those in the 'some' category have a few exceptions for which they would approve of a legal abortion. Despite excuses and explanations of that group, that still makes the doctor the god of life.
Wrong! See previous link.
Also, I used to stand to protest and pray in front of abortion clinics until the last few years (I am physically not able to do this anymore). I am very well aware the difference a president can make in the abortion fight. Bill Clinton put a restriction on how close we abortion protestors can stand in front of an abortion clinic. Barak Obama forced prolife religious organizations, such as Little Sisters to the Poor, to provide abortion coverage to its employees. The abortion fight goes far beyond whether we can overturn Roe v Wade.
But even if it does not change things, we are still called to join the fight. We must all stand before the judgment seat of Christ and give an acount of what we did - whether good or bad. Jesus said that we will be judged on how we treat the least among us. If we allow the least to torn out of their mothers' wombs and did nothing we will hear those words "Depart from me!".
Then we have to depend on whether or not the doctor is honest in his assessment. Back when abortions were illegal we still had abortions.
What if the abolitionists had this defeatist attitude before the Civil War? "We have to depend on whether the slave owners treated their slaves with dignity and respect". No! Slavery is an intrinsic evil. Abortion is an intrinsic evil.
What if the Christians said that they would never be able to change the world, and we just have to depend that the heathen will be good enough to enter heaven.
This defeatist attitude is from the Devil.
Just as today, the use of most recreational drugs is illegal, but we still have recreational drug use. Let's assume that the nation is able to bring about sweeping abortion changes and makes them illegal again. For those with the money to make a difference, wouldn't they just get a doctor to fudge the records a bit?
So what? I protested in front of an abortion clinic for at least five years until I could no longer able. Only once did we convince someone to keep her baby. Even if this is the only baby that we can save it was well worth it.
This is just rationalization on your part, another trick from the Devil. Just because we cannot save all that does not mean we cannot save some.
For me, the issue of the legality of abortion is no different than the issue of the legality of gambling or prostitution or drug use.
Just by using having this attitude shows you are living in darkness. Abortion is the taking the life of an innocent human being. It is murder. Gambling, prostitution, and druge use only involves directly what happens to the user. Abortion is killing another person.
If one, using your definition, is a 'true' christian, they won't have one. Not under any circumstance. If one is a non-believing sinner and has one, what difference will it make on the day of God's judgment? Will they be saved because they didn't get an abortion even though they never believed in God?
True faith means a changed life - a desire to live for God and to please God. If a person says that he has faith in Christ but then is a serial killer. A person who allows a serial killer to continue his killing cannot be a true believer in Christ.
Is God not powerful enough, that if He wants aborted babies saved that His mighty arm can save them?
So since God allowed evil to happen then it cannot be evil? Another Satanic rationalization!
Is not God powerful enough that if He wants He could have prevented the Nazi Holocaust in the killing of Jews? And yet He has not done this! But this done not mean that all those who participated in that will not be condemned.

So, I'm fine with leaving the legality of abortion just as it is. I'd rather expend my efforts, as the not true christian that I am, leading people to the Savior despite whatever sin they may have in their lives. You see, in my understanding, when the people of God fight to change national laws to reflect God's laws, we tend to make the work of God harder because it just riles up those who do not know God and makes them even less willing to hear the truth of God because all they know of Him is that His people are always trying to run our lives.
We must not only have Jesus as Savior but as Lord. When Jesus confronted that woman accused of adultery, He told her "Go and sin no more!". Jesus did not call us just to accept Jesus as Savior. He called us to repent.
You are presenting a sugar-coated gospel, a gospel that conforms the philosophy of this world, if it feels good do it. But Jesus said that the kingdom of God is like as precious pearl of great price that you sell everything to attain it. You, my friend, want the pearl, but you are not willing to give up anything for it.
Friend, assuming the your avatar is of you, then you, like me, are not having many more years in this life. Death will come to both of us sooner than we think. We are nearing the Finish Line. Both of us must constantly examine ourselves to see if we are really in the faith. Time is short and eternity is long. If it turns out that the gospel is as easy as you say, then we can both have a good laugh on the other side. BUT if I am right, and unless you repent, you will face eternity in hell. Are you willing to take that chance?
BTW, it's worth considering that making national laws the law of God didn't even work in Israel. Not even God Himself, speaking directly to the people of Israel through His servant Moses, was able to establish a nation of people who continued to obey His law. If you read the history of Israel, you see that there was this constant running battle between obeying and maintaining God's law and falling off to worship other gods and not obeying His law. God declared through Isaiah, "Hear me, you heavens! Listen, earth! For the LORD has spoken: “I reared children and brought them up, but they have rebelled against me. The ox knows its master, the donkey its owner’s manger, but Israel does not know, my people do not understand.” Woe to the sinful nation, a people whose guilt is great, a brood of evildoers, children given to corruption! They have forsaken the LORD; they have spurned the Holy One of Israel and turned their backs on him.
It was not because they had national laws that were righteous. It was because they had become complacent, which is the sin you are falling into. They had a nice, sugar-coated religion where they did the bare minimum for God and thought they did enough. Is this not what you are advocating?
They turned their back on the law of God. God command them to have an other god besides the true God. This was a national law. But they ignored it. They worshiped Baal, and offered their children as human sacrifices to this idol. Today, we sacrifice our unborn children to the god of convenience. God punished the Israelites for their sin. And could it be that God is punishing us with the coronavirus?

America's sin is also great, but God doesn't ask us to change the laws of nations. God asks us, through the spreading of the gospel, to help Him change the lives and law of individuals.
If you really feel this then why are you so anti-Trump? If God only asks you to spread the gospel, to help Him change the lives and law of individuals then should you not care what Trump said or did? Should you not just pray for his soul? Go out and preach the gospel to others, and do not worry about our President! But you do not do that. You only expect us pro-lifers to do that. But you open this political thread! How can you do that when you preach to us that we should stay out of politics? Practice what you preach!

So, whether or not abortions are legal or illegal on the books of any nation isn't the issue. If one is a true christian, likely by your definition, they won't accept abortion as an alternative to a pregnancy, even if the mother's life is in jeopardy. Why? Because they believe in a God who, no matter when or how they die on this earth, will raise them up on the day of God's judgment and set their feet on firm and fertile ground where there is no more pain or suffering. But that's because they believe in the God who created both the heavens and the earth and all that is them.
A true Christian is against abortion because it is murder and murder is wrong because every male and female is made in the image of God.

So no, I don't choose a national leader based on his stand on abortion. I prefer to choose a national leader based on his own measure of morality and conscience, of which this particular president seems to have so little.
Again, you have a double standard. You previously wrote:
"If one is a non-believing sinner and has one, what difference will it make on the day of God's judgment? Will they be saved because they didn't get an abortion even though they never believed in God?"
According to you, it matters not whether a person has an abortion, all matters is their faith in Christ. But if that is the case, then it does not matter if Trump has lived up to his morality or conscience! All that matters is that Trump believes in Christ! Right? So since Trump will not be judged by God based on his morality then why should you judge him?

Do you really believe that his stance on abortion glosses over the moral deficiencies of his own life, to God? It seems obvious that it does in your understanding of things, but I'd like you to consider that question as our God might consider it.
For someone who believes in a sugar-coated gospel, you are very judgmental of Trump.
True, he has been morally deficient, personally. But he is not my pastor. He is my President. Not one of his policies goes against the commandments of God. This cannot be said about the Democratic party, the party of death. They have on their platform that they love killing unborn children.
As far as Trump's moral deficiencies are concerned, every night I wake up and pray for his soul. I started to do this about two months ago. Someone who is morally deficient needs our prayers. Are you praying for him? Or are you being like the Pharisees and are just judging him and hating him? Don't you see that we should feel sorry for one with moral deficiencies, not hate him? He is only hurting himself. Unless he repents he would go to hell! But maybe that is something you are hoping for. If so, then that would be another indication that you are not a true Christian.
But I cannot rule out the possibility that the prayers of true Christians have already been answered. He may have accepted Christ as Savior and Lord. He may have been on his knees begging God for forgiveness. He may have repented. Only God knows.
I contend that we should, as believers in the one true and living God, spend less time trying to change national laws. There is not one single example that any of the first disciples wasted a moment of their time trying to do so even though we know that Roman law had its moral problems. Paul actually discusses pretty explicitly that we can expect human law and morals to fall pretty far down as time marches on, in his letter to the Romans. Even in the old covenant with Israel, there is not one single incidence where God asked Israel to work to spread the laws, that He had given them through Moses, to the other nations of the world. I really don't understand this evangelical movement to save the world by changing national laws rather than just doing the things that the first disciples did.
Christians had changed the laws. Look at the history of Christianity. The Christians in the first few centuries changed the laws of the Roman Empire in forbidding gladiators and giving women and equal status with men. Before Christianity, men were allowed to have a harem of wives. Christianity fored the Roman empire to only allow a man to have one wife. Temple prostitution was common before the Christians took over. And in the 1800's the Christians were victorious in freeing the slaves. Abraham Lincoln referred to God in his Emancipation Proclamation.
Evil persists when good people do nothing. This is what happened in Nazi Germany. Too many good people did nothing, until it was too late. Tell me this - are you going to feel the same when this evil of abortion spreads to other areas? What if the government forces us to have forced euthenasia - that everything must be killed at the age of 65? Would that be OK with you? Would still just be concerned about spreading the gospel? Or what if the government decided that we have too many women - and so they pass a law that some women, including your daughters (assuming you have daughters) to be exterminated? Would you care or would you just spread the gospel?

But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,...
How do you know that Trump does not now revere Christ as Lord? Where is your gentleness and respect to him?
I say we should adopt more of that act of love that Peter describes for us, than the militancy that our evangelical brethren seems to think honors God.
I do not see any love from you for Trump, only hatred.

For me and my house, abortion is against the law of God, now that I am a child of God. I don't expect that understanding to be the same for those who are not children of God. Again, if you think, "Well, that little baby won't get a chance to grow up to know God." I would respectfully request that you adjust your understanding of the power and righteousness of
And I respectfully request you adjust your understanding of the moral deficiencies in Trump to the power and righteousness of God. I am ashamed to say that I myself have had in mypast more moral deficiencies than Trump was ever accused of doing. Now I often just sit silently in my prayers, amazed on how God has changed me. How can I begrudge this same miracle to anyone, including Trump? I will not even begrudge this miracle to you. I will pray for you.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi packerman,

Obviously this is a hot issue for you. That's fine. You responded:
This is what Pres Trump did for pro-life:
He is the only president ever to speak at the annual March For Life in person
He blocked funding for Planned Parenthood
He selected two justices on the Supreme Court that have decided in case to be pro-life
He imposed restrictions on federal funding of doing experiments on unborn children
He passed executive orders to protect pro-lifers in the medical field

Some of that may be old news. Yes, it is true that President Trump is the first president to attend a March for Life rally. Planned Parenthood does still receive federal funding. As to whether or not his two judge appointments will actually make any changes to the SCOTUS' position regarding abortion is yet to be seen. He did restrict some fetal tissue research, but none of that will have any effect on whether or not someone gets an abortion. It may make some changes as to what happens to any aborted fetus. Trump's EO for healthcare workers expanded the right of such workers to refuse to perform abortions and gender reassignment surgery on the basis of their religious convictions. However, it must be a religious objection.

But even if it does not change things, we are still called to join the fight.

Not anywhere that I can find in the Scriptures. Perhaps you could provide me chapter and verse.

What if the abolitionists had this defeatist attitude before the Civil War? "We have to depend on whether the slave owners treated their slaves with dignity and respect". No! Slavery is an intrinsic evil. Abortion is an intrinsic evil.

The slave trade is not a worthy analogy to the issue at hand. I don't think anyone ever taught or said that there was ever any issue of determining whether slave owners treated their slaves with dignity and respect. Slavery is not an intrinsic evil. God allows for it in the Scriptures. Yes, as we think of slavery today, in light of how Americans treated slaves, it is an intrinsic evil.

Jesus did not call us just to accept Jesus as Savior. He called us to repent.

Yes, Jesus called those who would follow after him, to repent.

It was not because they had national laws that were righteous. It was because they had become complacent, which is the sin you are falling into.

Actually, I believe it's more simple than that. Man's heart is wicked. Who can know it. However, they did have national laws that were righteous and they weren't able to follow them according to God's proclamation to them. You are free to call it complacency, but I see it as just the natural sin of man being manifest in rebellion to God's law. When God gave Israel the law and brought them out of Egypt by mighty signs and wonders to prove Himself to His people, they weren't long in the desert before they fashioned the golden calf.

We can certainly use the word complacent if that suits you, but the Israelites were pretty quick to become complacent. It even cost several thousand of them their lives.

For someone who believes in a sugar-coated gospel, you are very judgmental of Trump.
True, he has been morally deficient, personally.

Yes, I am fairly judgmental regarding Donald Trump, as you seem to be also. Somehow I'm not able to separate the man who is morally deficient, personally, from the man who stands in the WH. You are apparently able to do that. That's good of you, but as I said, I'm not convinced that God separates personal moral deficiency from one's work in a job. As I understand God's word, a man is either morally deficient or he is not. There don's seem to be a lot of qualifiers to be addressed regarding the matter in the Scriptures. Maybe you could show me that also. Chapter and verse. Where do you find that God approves of a man who is morally deficient in his personal life, but praises that man in his work?

God bless,
ted
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,981
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟960,122.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Abortion is an effective population control tool (there are way too many people on the planet). It has been suggested that it has an effect on the crime rate as unwanted, unloved, and uncared for people are often troublesome in that sense. Regarding the morality of it (murdering the unborn) I think it best to leave that judgment up to God. Mankind does many horrible things to itself. We should focus on the things we can change, not the ones we cannot.
 
Upvote 0

packermann

Junior Member
Nov 30, 2003
1,446
375
71
Northwest Suburbs of Chicago, IL
✟45,845.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Republican
Some of that may be old news. Yes, it is true that President Trump is the first president to attend a March for Life rally. Planned Parenthood does still receive federal funding. As to whether or not his two judge appointments will actually make any changes to the SCOTUS' position regarding abortion is yet to be seen. He did restrict some fetal tissue research, but none of that will have any effect on whether or not someone gets an abortion. It may make some changes as to what happens to any aborted fetus. Trump's EO for healthcare workers expanded the right of such workers to refuse to perform abortions and gender reassignment surgery on the basis of their religious convictions. However, it must be a religious objection.
So what if it is old news? Has there been any new news that he is now pro-abortion? It is possible that this is as far that he can go without the support of the court and Congress. But even if it only saved one child it was worth it.

Also, the Federal Appellate just supported Texas banning abortion while we have the coronavirus. This could save another one or two lives. It was a 2 to 1 verdict - one judge apointed by Bush and the other by Trump. So if Hillary, a proabort, became president instead of Trump, this would result in the possible deaths of at least a couple of children.
Not anywhere that I can find in the Scriptures. Perhaps you could provide me chapter and verse.
This is the problem with you only Bible-only Christians. If there not an exact scripture verse then you think you think that that there no rule. But where in scripture is the rule that we should only hold to what is in the Bible? So if soley-the-Bible is not found in the Bible then soley-the-Bible cannot be true. We do not live by the letter of the Law. We do not need a scripture verse for everything we can't do or allowed to do.

I cannot believe that you disagree that we do not need to do as much as we can - even if it seems not to be successful. This shows that you really do not believe in the power of God, even if you preach this. You only preach about the power of God as an excuse for you to do nothing. But the power of God should be a motivation for us to do something - no matter how little, even if it seems not to be successful at all. St Therese of Calcutta once said that God does not call us to be successful. He only calls us to be faithful. And that principle is in the Bible. One person plants the seed. The other waters it. But God causes it to grow (1 Corinthians 3:6).

The teaching of the sovereignty of God is not meant to make us sit back and do nothing. It is meant to motivate us to do whatever we can - whether it be preaching the gospel, starting a mission home to feed the poor, or trying to stop abortions. It is God who causes us to be fruitful and that may not be in our lifetime. He just calls us to be faithful.
The slave trade is not a worthy analogy to the issue at hand. I don't think anyone ever taught or said that there was ever any issue of determining whether slave owners treated their slaves with dignity and respect. Slavery is not an intrinsic evil. God allows for it in the Scriptures. Yes, as we think of slavery today, in light of how Americans treated slaves, it is an intrinsic evil.
I don't think it was ever an issue of whether an abortionist ever treated an aborted fetus with dignity and respect, either.
True, slavery is not an an instrinic evil. But since an abortion is an instrinsic evil, this shows how much worse abortion is to slavery.

Actually, I believe it's more simple than that. Man's heart is wicked. Who can know it. However, they did have national laws that were righteous and they weren't able to follow them according to God's proclamation to them. You are free to call it complacency, but I see it as just the natural sin of man being manifest in rebellion to God's law. When God gave Israel the law and brought them out of Egypt by mighty signs and wonders to prove Himself to His people, they weren't long in the desert before they fashioned the golden calf.
Not sure what you are driving at, but I think that you are excusing their sin because they were only doing what comes naturally. I disagree with that, but very well. So that would mean that Trump only did what came naturally. So why do you hate him and judge him for it?
We can certainly use the word complacent if that suits you, but the Israelites were pretty quick to become complacent. It even cost several thousand of them their lives.
I fail to see how this is germane to our discussion.

Yes, I am fairly judgmental regarding Donald Trump, as you seem to be also.
No, I am not. I am not leaving out the possibility of the power and grace of God. All of his moral deficiencies are old news. The Holy Spirit could have converted him. Not only that, I am not expected Trump to be my pastor. He is my president.
Somehow I'm not able to separate the man who is morally deficient, personally, from the man who stands in the WH.
So how did you feel about Bill Clinton? Did you vote for him? He was not only unfaithful to Hillary he had sex with his intern in the oval office. That is sexual harassment! And not only that, he was credibly accused of raping a woman. At least Trump was never credibly accused of raping a woman! Do you hate Slick Willie as much as you hate Trump?

When Bill Clinton was facing these charges, the Democrats cried "Its the economy, stupid!" Clinton was given a pass because the econmany was good. But, before the coronavirus, the economy was far better under Trump. And yet the ones who shouted "It's the economy, stupid" are now wanting to crucify Trump.

What is the difference between them? Clinton loves killing babies and Trump wants to save them. Isn't a person bent on killing babies morally deficient? Please answer "yes" or "no" on this.
You are apparently able to do that. That's good of you, but as I said, I'm not convinced that God separates personal moral deficiency from one's work in a job. As I understand God's word, a man is either morally deficient or he is not. There don's seem to be a lot of qualifiers to be addressed regarding the matter in the Scriptures. Maybe you could show me that also. Chapter and verse. Where do you find that God approves of a man who is morally deficient in his personal life, but praises that man in his work?

A man's work on the job if evil is part of his moral deficiency. I agree with that. So when Clinton and Obama made it part of the job to make killing babies easier that added to their moral deficiencies. In fact, it was more than moral deficiencies. It made them evil.

I remember once reading that Adolf Hitler was a very pleasant man. He never cheated on his girlfriend. I don't think he every swore. As far as we know, he had none of the moral deficiencies that Trump has. But Hitler was evil! He is considered by many to be one of the most evil men in the world. He was evil because he passed policies for the killing of Jews.

You seem to ignore the fact that passing laws that making the murder of babies legal is a moral deficiency. It is more than that. It is evil!

This is why I am worried about your salvation. I appreciate your friendliness to me. But that does not change the fact that abortion is low on your list of moral deficiencies. But the killing of innocent life should be on top of your list.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi packerman,

Just to let you know that I did read your response to me. However, that isn't what this thread is about and so I'm withdrawing from the discussion of abortion on this thread. If you'd like to continue it, I'll be happy to participate in your thread.

God bless,
In Christ, ted
 
Upvote 0