FDA gives emergency approval to Hydroxychloroquine & Chloroquine to treat COVID-19

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
From the "We're officially ignoring the French studies but providing approval anyway", files: FDA gives anti-malaria drugs emergency approval to treat COVID-19 | ABC News

In a statement released Sunday night, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced it had received 30 million doses of hydroxychloroquine sulfate and one million doses of [c]hloroquine phosphate donated to a national stockpile of potentially life-saving pharmaceuticals and medical supplies. Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, which are oral prescription drugs used primarily to prevent and treat malaria, are both being investigated as potential therapeutics for COVID-19.

The statement noted that the FDA had issued an emergency-use authorization to allow both donated drugs "to be distributed and prescribed by doctors to hospitalized teen and adult patients with COVID-19, as appropriate, when a clinical trial is not available or feasible."
 
  • Informative
Reactions: jacks

Johan_1988

Active Member
Jun 17, 2019
321
176
36
Durban
✟30,451.00
Country
South Africa
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Single
It's use has seen great success so far and has shortened recovery times from weeks to day's. It has also helped elderly patients recover. So a very good move by the US FDA. Just hope the rest of the world follows suit. In my country it can really help with all the people who have HIV and TB whom are most vulnerable and with our elderly folks as well.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,502
6,053
64
✟336,560.00
Faith
Pentecostal
I'm glad we are giving it a shot. We don't know it will work for everyone, but at least we are trying. Even if it doesn't help in all cases, if it helps the majority then it's worth it. If it stops or slows the death rate that's excellent.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,160
36,483
Los Angeles Area
✟827,898.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

The statement noted that the FDA had issued an emergency-use authorization

EUA's are only supposed to be issued when the benefits outweigh the risks. It will be interesting to see if this has been evaluated by FDA.

(see also)
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
I hope it works! It's scary not to have medical testing done beforehand, but we can't really wait when it's coming down to death without treatment.
Exactly!

As with many adversities in life one must face them prepared only with what's at hand, not with what one might like to have.
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,753
64
Massachusetts
✟341,879.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
EUA's are only supposed to be issued when the benefits outweigh the risks. It will be interesting to see if this has been evaluated by FDA.
The public health people I know are baffled by this action, since it's based on essentially no evidence. Their conclusion is that it must be a political decision.
 
Upvote 0

SoldierOfTheKing

Christian Spenglerian
Jan 6, 2006
9,230
3,041
Kenmore, WA
✟278,166.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
The public health people I know are baffled by this action, since it's based on essentially no evidence. Their conclusion is that it must be a political decision.

There can’t be evidence one way or the other until it’s tried. That’s how science works.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟298,148.00
Faith
Christian
Trial drug can significantly block early stages of COVID-19 in engineered human tissues

They have started to test a promising new drug (hrsACE2) on engineered human cells that seems to inhibit the coronavirus too. Things are looking up. :)

In cell cultures analyzed in the current study, hrsACE2 inhibited the coronavirus load by a factor of 1,000-5,000. In engineered replicas of human blood vessel and kidneys -- organoids grown from human stem cells -- the researchers demonstrated that the virus can directly infect and duplicate itself in these tissues. This provides important information on the development of the disease and the fact that severe cases of COVID-19 present with multi-organ failure and evidence of cardiovascular damage. Clinical grade hrsACE2 also reduced the SARS-CoV-2 infection in these engineered human tissues.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟298,148.00
Faith
Christian
If I had corona-virus I would certainly like the option to try this drug. HERE is the FDA Fact Sheet on it.

I would too. Considering the amount of lung damage alone that the corona virus can cause, I'd be inclined to take my chances with a possible cure rather than just let it run it's course, particularly if things started to go downhill and hospitalization was required.

I think this is a reasonable option at this point in time actually. A full and complete scientific "test' is in order of course, but I think you could find any number of willing test subjects about now.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jacks
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,160
36,483
Los Angeles Area
✟827,898.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
There can’t be evidence one way or the other until it’s tried. That’s how science works.

In a controlled experiment where people are taking data down, yes, but that's not what's happening.

FDA just gave approval for it to go out into the public. No one is collecting information on efficacy. Even if someone was collecting information, nothing is blinded, much less double blinded. There still won't be any evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Michael

Contributor
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
25,145
1,721
Mt. Shasta, California
Visit site
✟298,148.00
Faith
Christian
In a controlled experiment where people are taking data down, yes, but that's not what's happening.

FDA just gave approval for it to go out into the public. No one is collecting information on efficacy. Even if someone was collecting information, nothing is blinded, much less double blinded. There still won't be any evidence.

It might be possible to look at the death rates of early cases here in the US, and compare them to the ages and death rates of patients who test positive and who are then given these drugs. It's not a perfect test of course, but considering the circumstances, I think it's a reasonable compromise.

I certainly wouldn't want to be part of a test program and provided only a placebo.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,721
7,753
64
Massachusetts
✟341,879.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There can’t be evidence one way or the other until it’s tried. That’s how science works.
And there are lots of people trying in systematic ways already. I'm not just being pedantic here -- I've seen any number of highly touted drugs that lots of people were sure were going to be great, for everything from cancer to acid reflux to Ebola. Most of them turn out to be not so good in the end.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,160
36,483
Los Angeles Area
✟827,898.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
FDA revokes emergency authorization for antimalarial drugs touted by Trump as covid-19 treatment
The agency said hydroxycholoroquine and a related drug probably don’t work.

The FDA said it had concluded that it “is no longer reasonable to believe” that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are effective in treating the disease. “Nor is it reasonable to believe,” the agency said, "that the known and potential benefits of these products outweigh their known and potential risks.”
 
  • Informative
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

Larniavc

Leading a blameless life
Jul 14, 2015
12,340
7,678
51
✟314,759.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
FDA revokes emergency authorization for antimalarial drugs touted by Trump as covid-19 treatment
The agency said hydroxycholoroquine and a related drug probably don’t work.

The FDA said it had concluded that it “is no longer reasonable to believe” that hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are effective in treating the disease. “Nor is it reasonable to believe,” the agency said, "that the known and potential benefits of these products outweigh their known and potential risks.”
Who knew that Mr Trump would be very definitely wrong about this?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums