The thing is Jesus isn't going to let you change His context, unless you can show it will benefit his subtext - only then you would say "He should have known the context was going to change" -- its a lose lose situation.
I don't think you honour the Evolution that is already there, that's the problem - like if because of Evolution's discovery, you were able to improve the life prospects of every living thing on Earth: then I would say "yes, it is worthwhile believing in Evolution" the problem is, it forecloses on anything but less suffering - not saying how, why or where - and does not embrace suffering as a result at all (well if God allows suffering, for the sake of character, who are you to say "we'll do it without You!"?).
I suppose there is some sense in that God made a way where there was no way - like if I try to "quantify suffering" I immediately know, I have steered away from science to the purely conceptual and am not taking advantage of the word, as it stands. That is a lesson worth learning! There is no mathematical extension of life, that needs to calculate the weight of its own ignorance or suffering (or ineptitude for that matter).
The development of Evolution, then, has to address at what loss it is running, if it attempts the purely conceptual, under pretensions of doing greater than God would presuppose would matter. This is basically why I have suffered my entire life, with word salad: because I keep being told that Evolution is purely conceptual - when if that is the case, it is a purely statistical exercise, with a subtext of one degree of power - a "pretext" (and indeed where is the power of that pretext, coming from?).
It is the definition of madness, to suggest that the infinite parallel of a statistical analysis somehow gives life? Creation, yes, we can see that differing responses create differing outcomes - but a pretext adding incentive to the same creations over and over again, is somehow powerful? There is no power, there!
I think that in the end, what matters, is your "personal Evolution" - that one day you will cast off your old Evolution and embrace a new one, with only as much of the past persecutions as are truly necessary. That is scriptural: the word says we lose nothing for God, without gaining, even with persecutions, even more. The more perfectly we can understand this, the more we can drive a wedge between science and philosophy (one that lesser philosophy will have to accept).
