Will a Christian stand up for me about this?

Amittai

baggage apostate
Aug 20, 2006
1,426
491
✟41,180.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Huh? Who determined or ever said they were good souls? (that's not in line with any Scripture, and is opposed to all Scripture)

I was only calling them that! Maybe someone else understands what it reflects about how I felt about people . . .
 
Upvote 0

Amittai

baggage apostate
Aug 20, 2006
1,426
491
✟41,180.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
??
Why would they ??

Interesting question, given how little I hear this sort of thing mentioned.

It would be a sort of cross between Abraham's prayer for the inhabitants of a certain city, and St Paul's (with a sacrificial attitude) for the people he had been nurturing.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,944
11,098
okie
✟214,996.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Interesting question, given how little I hear this sort of thing mentioned.

It would be a sort of cross between Abraham's prayer for the inhabitants of a certain city, and St Paul's (with a sacrificial attitude) for the people he had been nurturing.
Who did Abraham speak up for ?

Which Scripture from Yahweh thru the Apostle Paul are you referring to ?
 
Upvote 0

Greengardener

for love is of God
Site Supporter
May 24, 2019
633
597
MidAtlantic
✟175,913.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Pardon my semi-inarticulacy earlier, for a fuller picture here are some more thoughts. It appears some of you know what I mean.

At one time, some decent people were allowed to have the upper hand in affairs, who would want ordinary boys and men to have the scope (if their families allowed) to develop their own sense of integrity and their own discretion in what in religious jargon is termed "purity".

Alongside this there were and still are the repressive moralising and finger-pointing involving shaming and put-downs in families and sects.

Enter the goons who use the latter as excuse to undermine the nascent integrity and discretion of those less powerful than themselves (but kid us into swearing they are "empowering" us).

(This was reinforced by the television images being filmed with the hands of a personality out of "camera view" but not out of cameramens' view and knowledge, where they shouldn't have been about the person of girls hardly older than me, in order to simultaneously subliminally and openly degrade them, in relation to largely indifferent "music".)

I've never been comfortable with the sort of hand-wringing, nagging, megaphoning and victim-blaming that has been coming from churches. Nor with the "moral equivalency" that I have witnessed: a clergyman told us he was very nearly as degenerate as us and "regaled" us with an instance of his "fantasies" (turning us into his "confessors") and very strangely has moved to another country.

Sorry I don't have the title of Russ Parker's book any more. What he is talking about, is a kind of intercession - a kind of carrying the world on our shoulders - that I think some denominations used to do, from time to time, a long time ago (last heard of in Austria in 1955).
Russ Parker - Healing Wounded History? Looks like it's an easy find to google his titles, and there are several.
 
Upvote 0

Amittai

baggage apostate
Aug 20, 2006
1,426
491
✟41,180.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Hi Greengardener, do you (and other forum members) think Russ's ideas are heretical?

Something very like what he recommends worked well in Austria in 1955.

I'm only touching on this, because it seems a more constructive alternative than acquiescing to young and middle aged folks' integrity being undermined by "conservative social forces".
 
Upvote 0

Ed1wolf

Well-Known Member
Dec 26, 2002
2,928
178
South Carolina
✟132,665.00
Country
United States
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
Pardon my semi-inarticulacy earlier, for a fuller picture here are some more thoughts. It appears some of you know what I mean.

At one time, some decent people were allowed to have the upper hand in affairs, who would want ordinary boys and men to have the scope (if their families allowed) to develop their own sense of integrity and their own discretion in what in religious jargon is termed "purity".

Alongside this there were and still are the repressive moralising and finger-pointing involving shaming and put-downs in families and sects.

Enter the goons who use the latter as excuse to undermine the nascent integrity and discretion of those less powerful than themselves (but kid us into swearing they are "empowering" us).

(This was reinforced by the television images being filmed with the hands of a personality out of "camera view" but not out of cameramens' view and knowledge, where they shouldn't have been about the person of girls hardly older than me, in order to simultaneously subliminally and openly degrade them, in relation to largely indifferent "music".)

I've never been comfortable with the sort of hand-wringing, nagging, megaphoning and victim-blaming that has been coming from churches. Nor with the "moral equivalency" that I have witnessed: a clergyman told us he was very nearly as degenerate as us and "regaled" us with an instance of his "fantasies" (turning us into his "confessors") and very strangely has moved to another country.

Sorry I don't have the title of Russ Parker's book any more. What he is talking about, is a kind of intercession - a kind of carrying the world on our shoulders - that I think some denominations used to do, from time to time, a long time ago (last heard of in Austria in 1955).
Scientific studies have shown that teenagers having sex before marriage is not good especially for girls but it is also not good for boys either. They should not be treated over harshly however, fornication is not the unforgivable sin.
 
Upvote 0

HatedByAll

Changed by the Grace of God
Sep 13, 2019
148
149
Southeast
✟61,994.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
My experience with sex education was during the early '70's. The textbook was the normal "use contraception message" I am sure was the common message at that time. But, that is not what the class heard. A coach taught the class, and the basic summary of what he taught was, pull it out before you are through and wash it off and urinate right afterwards in a vigorous manner. Of course, all this was said with the same colloquial language that was commonly used by teenage boys.

Based on my experience, sexual education could be very destructive if taught by the wrong individuals even if the material in the textbook had any limited value.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,636
6,398
✟295,051.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I want to give constructive-minded agnostics a chance to join in this thread but they had better have a better-than-good reason to contradict me.

Exactly 50 years ago, when I and my classmates were aged 14 and we were at a secular state-run school, several new teachers came in and told us, during lessons, we should be having sex before marriage.

This is COMPLETELY different from informal material circulated by us amongst ourselves. I am reporting something that was handed down to us from authority.

Are any Christians going to do what Russ Parker says, "representative confession"?

I would tell you to not listen to simple authority.

People should give you their reasons for wanting you to do something and clarify their priority's so you can decide what value decisions to make.
 
Upvote 0

Amittai

baggage apostate
Aug 20, 2006
1,426
491
✟41,180.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
That was their very pretext themselves. We were children. This was abused of authority.

Now I didn't agree but I considered it a waste of class time and a distortion of the mores of my fellows.

Lots of children are tongue tied, realistically.
 
Upvote 0

Beanieboy

Senior Veteran
Jan 20, 2006
6,296
1,213
60
✟50,122.00
Faith
Christian
I want to give constructive-minded agnostics a chance to join in this thread but they had better have a better-than-good reason to contradict me.

Exactly 50 years ago, when I and my classmates were aged 14 and we were at a secular state-run school, several new teachers came in and told us, during lessons, we should be having sex before marriage.

This is COMPLETELY different from informal material circulated by us amongst ourselves. I am reporting something that was handed down to us from authority.

Are any Christians going to do what Russ Parker says, "representative confession"?

I went to a public school. We were taught most of it at 15-16, including birth control, our changing bodies, etc. We were never told what to do, but rather, told that only we could make that decision.

What I appreciated was that we could literally ask any question about anything.
We also had a Family Living class where we had a child to show how much work it is.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums