- Jan 2, 2006
- 6,762
- 1,269
- 69
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
No, actually I have not. There are 2 different beasts revealed in Revelation 13. The 1st one is a kingdom beast. The "another beast" starting at verse 11 is the 2nd beast and is a beast king (related to the beast king idea in the Book of Daniel, for all the historical beasts represented a king and a kingdom). Instead what many here have done, is to wrongly assign the kingdom beast of Rev.13:1 as the beast king. So what you're accusing me of it's actually what others are doing.
Wrong wrong wrong.
Nebuchadnezzar was not a kingdom nor the Medes and Pewrsians and Alexander! these were people!
The lamb with horns is a religious not a political or religious figure! Everything he does is religious in nature.
I have never heard of religious leaders to worship a kingdom.
The beast out of the sea is the antichrist! The culmination of the Daniel prophecies and the Olivet discourse. the lamb with horns is the false prophet. And at Jesus returns he throws people ( not a kngdom ) into the lake of fire. SDimple grammar alone rules out the beast being a kingdom!
The idea of a beast and false prophet for the end are only ROLES the coming Antichrist will play. I know that just destroys... men's little doctrines all dreamt up about the false prophet, but so be it, as there is NO mention of the false prophet doing miracles in the Rev.13 chapter. Yet per Rev.16, the beast (king) and false prophet are shown doing miracles along with the dragon. That puts them all together as one person, because our Lord Jesus in His Olivet discourse (per the Greek) warned us about only one pseudo-Christ coming to work the "great signs and wonders" in Jerusalem. Same thing with Apostle Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2:4 and John in Revelation 13:11-14; they warned us about only one specific person coming to work the signs and wonders that will deceive. The early Church fathers interpreted the coming Antichrist that's to work the great signs and wonders being a certain individual too, so that isn't some strange new idea.
We have reached an end. If you cannot recognize that the antichirst is not the lamb with two horns then you need to learn grammar before you can argue cogently.
One verse destroys your concept:
20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
2 people are cast into the lake of fire- not one who filled two roles!
Upvote
0