Is the Rapture biblical?

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That is not the point Jesus was making. His point was the suddenness of their destruction. They were living life to the fullest right up to when it began to rain. Same with Lot. They woke up that morning expecting a day just like yesterday. Before the day was out, they were dead. It was SUDDEN, which is why Paul wrote "sudden destruction."

One day like today SUDDENLY the dead in Christ will fly up out of their graves. An instant later a worldwide earthquake will hit. It will catch the world by surprise.

Jesus further elaborates on who is taken and who is left.

The wicked are taken; the righteous are left.

The suddenness of the event does not change that reality.

Matthew 24
40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are trying to explain away every other passage by your opinion of 1 Thessalonians 4. This is simply NOT true. I take all end times scriptures into account before forming a theory. However, I certainly don't throw out Paul's catching up verse! Paul was the only writer who received revelation of the rapture of the church. Therefore it is critical in forming end time doctrine for the church.

I have shown you that 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9 is climactic, yet you have ducked around the evidence. There are no survivors in that text. There is no 7 years tribulation following it. It is the end of the world. You just bounce to Revelation when cornered, where you admit have no rapture text to sustain your argument.

Are you being totally fair here? You believe there is only one coming so you read that preconceived idea into this verse.

"then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape."

Question: if an earthquake was worldwide - that is the ground shaking everywhere, could anyone "escape" that shaking? (Perhaps if they were flying at the time!). All who are on the ground cannot escape. They are going to get shook! Did everyone in the great earthquake that caused Japan's tsunami die? No! Many lived through it. Paul is not saying that everyone dies!

No one escapes according to the Bible. But in Pretrib, no one dies. The two messages could not be more opposing. I prefer Scripture. The dual aspect of Christ’s return is found in II Thessalonians 1:4-10, where we find a 3rd New Testament reference to the same Greek word kataxioō. It similarly says, “we ourselves glory in you in the churches of God for your patience and faith in all your persecutions and tribulations that ye endure: Which is a manifest token of the righteous judgment of God, that ye may be counted worthy (or kataxioō) of the kingdom of God, for which ye also suffer: Seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you; And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, in flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.”

Paul is here consoling the believers in his day who were experiencing terrible persecution. He assured them that their current distress would be nothing to the future glory awaiting them. He reminded them that there was a day coming when all the wicked would be destroyed and all the righteous would be marvelously transformed and rewarded.

When Jesus appears the righteous and the wicked will be eternally separated. The righteous will inherit the kingdom of God the wicked will be destroyed “from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.” This reading shows us that men must warrant the kingdom of God; it is not given to everyone. Other clear Scripture tells us that there are but few that will experience the eternal kingdom – only those that are “counted worthy.” It is a meritorious thing, just like the catching away of the saints to escape the wrath of God and the reward of the age to come.

This passage recognizes only two types of person – saved and lost – and conclusively confirms that it is only those that know God and obey the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ that will survive the second coming. The rest are expressly destroyed. This agrees with Christ’s words in Luke 20:34-36 that the kingdom of God to come which Christ ushers in at His appearing is solely for those that are suitably qualified.

The only other time the Greek word in view is used is in Acts 5:41 where the disciples rejoiced in their persecution and the fact “they were counted worthy (or kataxioō) to suffer shame for his name.”

Question: how in the world are you going to have people left alive for the sheep and goat judgment when all die the moment Jesus descends? How is there going to be any tares when the parable of the tares plays out?

It's called a general resurrection! If you would care to look at the Bible through the openly and objectively Bible, and ignore what your Pretrib teachers have taught you, you will discover it. I'm sorry that you don't realize that there is a resurrection before the general judgment.

The resurrection/judgment are tied together. It obviously takes one to allow the other. For there to be one general judgment then Scripture must also teach one general resurrection. This I believe Scripture does in several places.

I believe there is one physical resurrection day that sees one all-encompassing raising of mankind. However, within that one resurrection there are two distinct categories of rising embodied: (1) unto “life,” and (2) unto “damnation.” Notwithstanding, there is an undoubted order to the general resurrection; the dead in Christ will rise first, etc.

It is at this great concluding event that both the righteous and the wicked will be raised to face the great final judgment. Notwithstanding, there are two aspects to the one all-consummating resurrection day. Jesus explains in John 5:28-29, “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.”

Please notice “the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth.” We are not just looking at the righteous, we are looking at both the righteous and the wicked. The passage goes on to confirm: “they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.” All that are in the graves will come forth when He comes. The righteous will be ushered into His glorious kingdom, the wicked shall be damned for all eternity in the lake of fire.

The righteous and wicked dead all rise in response to the same sovereign voice - Christ's. Christ’s description of the resurrection depicts a unitary event, albeit in two parts. Part 1 is the elect; Part 2 is the wicked. Jesus explains in John 5:28-29, “Marvel not at this: for the hour is coming, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, And shall come forth.” Evidently there is only one resurrection albeit involving two separated aspects: “they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life; and they that have done evil, unto the resurrection of damnation.”

There is no 1,000 years’ separation mentioned or hinted at in here.

Evidently there is only one resurrection albeit involving two separated aspects.

This reading expressly speaks of a time in history when the dead (both good and evil) “shall hear his (Christ’s) voice, and shall come forth.” Notwithstanding, this perfectly correlates with every explicit reference to the judgment in Scripture that shows both the righteous and wicked being brought to account at the same time. Therefore, both parties must of necessity be raised around the same time to fulfil such. The reading before us substantiates this requirement in the most explicit language possible.

There is one physical resurrection day in which there are two types of raising, (1) unto life, (2) unto damnation. Acts 24:15 says, “there shall be a resurrection of the dead (singular), both of the just and unjust.”

This verse speaks of a singular “resurrection of the dead” not multiple resurrections (plural) of the dead as the Premillennialist would try and intimate. The fact that Paul differentiates between the wicked and the righteous in no way proves that these are two separate resurrections coming at the end of two separate ages split by 1,000 years+ of history (filled with all the produce of the curse – sin, death and corruption). No, it simply demonstrates that there are two types of resurrection in the one final resurrection of the dead at the end. In fact, for Premils to insist on their concept is to force something into the passage that doesn’t truly exist. Scripture constantly distinguishes between the wicked and the righteous even though they are found participating in the same event at the same time. Why would anyone think it strange that the Holy Spirit would identify the two different parties that take part in the general “resurrection of the dead”? After all, it is a normal biblical procedure to distinguish between these two conflicting camps. Although to suggest that the identifying of these two distinct parties indicates two separate events at two separate times is illogical.

Amils could apply the same type of reasoning to 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17 and quickly demolish this Premillennial logic. There Paul identifies two distinct groups: “the dead in Christ” and the “alive" in Christ. Identifying these two distinct groups, which all Premils agree partake in the one physical resurrection. However, this does not in any way support the idea of two separate resurrections.

The resurrection Premils try to make plural is actually feminine singular accusative. It is not plural. Regardless of how much they try, it still remains one singular resurrection involving two parties. That is indeed the general resurrection. It is they forces 1,000 yrs into this reading and every other resurrection/judgment passage. Your lack of corroboration disallows your initial commendable post on supporting Scripture with Scripture. That is why I asked you at the start. I knew there was no support for your literalist approach to Rev 20.

Once again, there is one physical resurrection day in which there are two types of raising, (1) unto life, (2) unto damnation.

Jesus said in Matthew 12:41-42, “The men of Nineveh shall rise (anistemi Strong’s 450) in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here. The queen of the south shall rise up (egeiro Strong’s 1453) in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for she came from the uttermost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here.”

The righteous Old Testament Gentile saint – the queen of the south – is raised at the same time as the wicked Pharisees of Christ’s day to stand before the same judgment seat of Christ.

This is further impressed in the parallel portion in Luke 11:31, only with an additional example, saying, “The queen of the south shall rise up (or) egeiro (Strong’s 1453) in the judgment with the men of this generation, and condemn them: for she came from the utmost parts of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and, behold, a greater than Solomon is here. The men of Nineveh shall rise up (or) anistemi (Strong’s 450) in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.”

Here, the two main words used throughout the New Testament for resurrection are applied to the general resurrection that occurs on Judgment Day when the Old Testament time saints and wicked join the New Testament saints and wicked at the judgment. Remember the queen of the south and Nineveh are presented as Old Testament Gentile saints that will “rise up in the judgment with” the wicked unbelieving Jews of Christ’s day. There is no prolonged parenthesis period separating the resurrection of the wicked dead and the resurrection of the righteous dead. They both “rise up” at the same time. The Old Testament Gentile city of Nineveh is shown to “rise up in the judgment with” (or meta) the religious Jewish world of Christ’s day and “condemn it.” The Greek word meta (3326) is described in Strong’s concordance as “a primary preposition (often used adverbially); properly, denoting accompaniment; ‘amid’.”

Amils therefore maintain that there is one general resurrection, of the just and unjust, at the second advent of Christ. The righteous then inherit the earth in an eternal state. Premils understanding of Revelation 20 conflict with numerous Scripture. Daniel 12:2 teaches a general resurrection at the end of the tribulation. This is in order for a general judgment – sheep/goats, wheat/tares before the same throne at the same time.

Daniel 12:1-3 reveals, “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.”

This reading shows a general resurrection involving two types of people – the righteous and the wicked; one group rises "to everlasting life" the other to "everlasting contempt." The fact that we see a clear description of the general resurrection of the righteous and the wicked tells us that this is a tribulation that occurs prior to the second coming of the Lord Jesus Christ.

The word here for “many” in the original Hebrew (rab) actually means: the abundance, referring to quantity, size, age, number, rank, quality. In the sense it is used here it includes everyone that is in the grave. Namely: “the abundance of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake.”
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus further elaborates on who is taken and who is left.

The wicked are taken; the righteous are left.

The suddenness of the event does not change that reality.

Matthew 24
40 Then shall two be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
41 Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one shall be taken, and the other left.

Obviously we agree on a climatic nature of the Lord's return. But that text actually says the opposite to what you are insinuating. If you look at the Greek it makes it a lot clearer.

Matthew 24:35-41 continues: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one ‘shall be taken’ [Gr. paralambano], and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one ‘shall be taken’ [Gr. paralambano], and the other left.”

Strong’s tells us that the Greek word paralambano in this passage means “to receive near, i.e. associate with oneself in any familiar or intimate act or relation.” The word is interpreted elsewhere in the King James Version as receive, take unto or take with. It portrays the idea of: to take as a companion. The company that is received by Christ in this passage must therefore be those that intimately love and are waiting for His return. They are taken from the destruction that is poured at His appearing and immediately return to regenerated earth. In short, one is taken to safety the other left for destruction.

The word used here to describe the second party in view is the Greek word aphiemi, which carries the meaning to forsake, put away or lay aside. This can never refer to the righteous who God says, in Hebrews 13:5, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.” This is the fate that awaits the wicked alone when Christ comes in all His glory. The words applied to either party in the original determine who and what He is speaking of.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Are you being totally fair here? You believe there is only one coming so you read that preconceived idea into this verse.

"then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape."

Question: if an earthquake was worldwide - that is the ground shaking everywhere, could anyone "escape" that shaking? (Perhaps if they were flying at the time!). All who are on the ground cannot escape. They are going to get shook! Did everyone in the great earthquake that caused Japan's tsunami die? No! Many lived through it. Paul is not saying that everyone dies!

Question: how in the world are you going to have people left alive for the sheep and goat judgment when all die the moment Jesus descends? How is there going to be any tares when the parable of the tares plays out?

I therefore submit that "they shall not escape" does not say all are going to die. It only means what it says, they cannot escape the sudden destruction earthquake. For "escape" Strongs says:
to flee out of, flee away
1. to seek safety in flight
2. to escape

If it is a worldwide earthquake, where could one flee to? Where would there be anywhere the ground is not shaking?earthquake

What are you talking about an earthquake? Where does it even mention one in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9? You have a habit of basing all your beliefs on silence or what your teachers have taught you rather than actually the sacred text.

What is more, there is no escaping Christ's return. No one is left behind will escape, flee, or find safety. It is too late. It is the end of time and the end of the world. That is what the text says. Forget what you have been taught. The text overrides Tim LaHaye.

Where does it teach a 7 years tribulation following it?
Same answer. The 7 years are for Daniel's people, not the church. Why even expect so mething for the Jews in Paul's letters to the church?



This is neither a second coming or a third coming passage. It was a historic passage relating to the time between Daniel and the coming Messiah. It has absolutely nothing to do with some imaginary seven-year tribulation in the future (that is taught nowhere in the inspired text - nowhere). There is not even any mention of tribulation in Daniel 9. You previously admitted all this, yet you continue to resurrect a dead white elephant.

the coming
with them in the clouds There is no touchdown. It is a "coming" according to Paul, but ONLY TO THE CLOUDS. This does not fit Christ's Rev. 19 coming.

That is because: after He has rescued his elect He then destroys all the wicked and regenerates this current corrupt earth, which we then populate for all eternity.

the day of the Lord
so cometh as a thief in the night. Why did Paul include this? Because the rapture will be the TRIGGER for the start of the Day of the Lord. There will be NO TIME between the rapture and the start of the DAY.

The day of the Lord is one day. It is climatic. There is no mortals survive it. There is no future millennium.

For when they shall say, Peace and safety
Notice that this whole series of events BEGINS at a time when people are saying peace and safety. How in the world can you expect a time of peace and safety when most of the world's population has died, the sun and stars refuse to shine, all water has turned into blood, disaster after disaster has happened...how can anyone be thinking peace after the 70th week? It does not fit. However, TODAY someone may be thinking peace and safety! The rapture just could be TODAY.

You rearrange the order of these phrases to let your doctrine fit. But the complacency of the wicked come before their destruction, not afterwards,. Stop trying to gerrymander the sacred text to support a false doctrine. I don't appreciate that! I Thessalonians 5:2-3 says, the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”

For God hath not appointed us to wrath
Paul is hinting strongly that the Day of the Lord is going to be wrath poured out. And that is exactly what John tells us, saying "the day of His wrath."

Exactly! We are caught up and then the wicked are immediately destroyed.

This is the end! Jesus comes on the “day of the Lord” as a “thief in the night.”
Sorry, but this is not what is written! Go back and look: don't take my word for it! John (backed by the Holy Spirit) starts the day of His wrath in chapter 6. There are events in chapters 7 through 18 that MUST and WILL take place between the day of His wrath beginning and Jesus descending to earth to Armageddon.

HOWEVER: credit where credit is due: Jesus DOES come - but a moment before the DAY starts, only to the air, to call up the dead in Christ first. So there IS a coming, but only to the air and only to get the saints. This is NOT his coming as shown in Rev. 19.

Elsewhere in Scripture, we discover that death is the last, final or end enemy, and that it is defeated at the second coming. Paul confirms the validity of this truth and the finality of that day, in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24, stating, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his Coming. Then (or eita or thereupon) cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down (or katargeésee or abolished) all rule and all authority and power.”

The Coming of the Lord, described in this reading, is here carefully located at “the end.” In fact, the whole tenure of the passage is distinctly pointing to a climactic time in history when God separates righteousness and wickedness forever. It is the occasion approaching when Christ finally presents “up the kingdom to God” and will have, as He promised, “put down all rule and all authority and power.” Simultaneously, the glorification of the kingdom of God sees the destruction of the kingdom of darkness. It is the end-game for Satan and the conclusion of his evil efforts to obstruct the plan of God for mankind. Wickedness has finally and eternally been abolished.

1 Corinthians 15:22-24 tells us that “all rule and all authority and power” are finally “put down” or katargeésee or abolished at the “Coming” or parousia of the Lord, which is, as we have established, confirmed in the next sentence as “the end.” The kingdom of God is finally and eternally presented “up,” whereas the kingdom of darkness is finally and eternally “put down.” It is this all-consummating last day that ushers in the end (or completion) of all things.

I mean, the Holy Spirit could not have made it clearer: "they shall not escape." This totally negates the whole Premil paradigm of countless wicked mortals saturating the new earth.
I know what you mean, but you simply don't understand the intent of the Author here. I suspect preconceived glasses clouding understanding again. If an eathquake is worldwide, it would be impossible to escape except by aircraft.

What are you talking about an earthquake? Where does it even mention one in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is not the point Jesus was making. His point was the suddenness of their destruction. They were living life to the fullest right up to when it began to rain. Same with Lot. They woke up that morning expecting a day just like yesterday. Before the day was out, they were dead. It was SUDDEN, which is why Paul wrote "sudden destruction."

One day like today SUDDENLY the dead in Christ will fly up out of their graves. An instant later a worldwide earthquake will hit. It will catch the world by surprise.

It was the both the suddenness and the scale. Please read the sacred text before making your comments.

You are missing the comparison between the days (plural) before and the day of annihilation of all the wicked and the day (singular) of each destruction also. This is crystal clear. We shouldn't have to change Scripture to let our theology fit. We should change our theology to let Scripture fit.

Please answer these questions:

How many wicked survived in Noah's day?
How many wicked survived in Sodom?

After all, this is the actual subject that Christ is speaking of.

You know, in both of these examples, all the elect were immediately and totally rescued and all the wicked were immediately and totally destroyed. So will it be when He appears. All the elect were immediately and totally rescued and all the wicked were immediately and totally destroyed, so will it be when He appears.

Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.”

The plain focus of this teaching in Luke 17 (reference Noah and Lot’s day) is the nature and degree of the judgment that befell the wicked in these two familiar Old Testament stories and especially the extent of that particular wrath. The key element and major emphasis of this discourse is the fact (speaking of the ungodly) that God “destroyed them all.” The comprehensive destruction of the wicked in both of these examples is the important lesson of the narrative; both the whole world of Noah’s day and the whole individual city of Sodom in Lot’s day saw the immediate and complete rescue of the entire righteous coupled together with the immediate and complete destruction of the entire wicked.

Christ plainly and purposefully advanced these two days, where the righteous were graciously rescued just prior to the full annihilation of the wicked, in order to vividly portray the nature and scope of the day of His wrath at the second coming. He deliberates and graphically connected the happenings of both these former days of judgment to the day of His return. Jesus succinctly said, “Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed” (Luke 17:30).

After speaking of the “days of Noe” and the “days of Lot,” the Lord then describes a singular “day” when the righteous were rescued and the wicked were destroyed. Whilst the Lord presents the rebellion and debauchery that preceded both of these judgments as a sign of how things will exist prior to the day of His all-consummating appearing, the main focus of His teaching relates to the focus and scale of the wrath which did fall on these two solemn days of destruction and how they accurately reflect what will happen at the second coming. Both individually and jointly, they supply us with a stunning insight into the nature of the actual day that Christ’s returns and to the days that precede His glorious Second Coming. In their substance and importance these two Old Testament days are distinct and unique. And whilst the nature of the judgment and geographical extent of both appreciably varies, brought-together, they graphically represent (1) the type of catastrophe coming, and (2) the scale of the destruction at the end. Scripture nowhere separates in time the gathering of the Lord's people to Himself with the destruction of the wicked.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,680
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,263.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
This reading shows a general resurrection involving two types of people – the righteous and the wicked; one group rises "to everlasting life" the other to "everlasting contempt."
Bible Prophecy is quite clear as to when this general resurrection will happen; Revelation 20:11-15
When Jesus Returns, He will bring the souls of the Trib martyrs with Him and they will be brought back to life. Revelation 20:4
Revelation 20:5 plainly and indisputably says that the rest of the dead have to wait until the 1000 years have ended. Everyone who has ever lived will stand before God on His Great White Throne and face Judgment.

Any thoughts of a Judgment or anyone getting changed into immortality at Jesus Return, is wrong and conflicts with clear scripture.
 
Upvote 0

keras

Writer of studies on Bible prophecy
Feb 7, 2013
13,680
2,491
82
Thames, New Zealand
Visit site
✟293,263.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
This reading shows a general resurrection involving two types of people – the righteous and the wicked; one group rises "to everlasting life" the other to "everlasting contempt."
Bible Prophecy is quite clear as to when this general resurrection will happen; Revelation 20:11-15
When Jesus Returns, He will bring the souls of the Trib martyrs with Him and they will be brought back to life. Revelation 20:4
Revelation 20:5 plainly and indisputably says that the rest of the dead have to wait until the 1000 years have ended. Everyone who has ever lived will stand before God on His Great White Throne and face Judgment.

Any thoughts of a Judgment or anyone getting changed into immortality at Jesus Return, is wrong and conflicts with clear scripture.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
ALL of the wicked were destroyed. It does not matter how many times you say it, you will always be wrong. The sheep and goat judgment will come AFTER His coming to Armageddon. The parable of the tares will probably come as He descends.

MANY Jews will be saved by Jesus after He descends. Your theory simply won't work.

The age to come has no room for "mortals" Again this is MYTH. NATURAL people will repopulate the earth.

Repeated Scripture locates the replacement of the current heavens and earth with the new heavens and earth and incorruption at the second coming. MORE MYTH. Most students of the bible know that the new heaven and earth do not come until AFTER the millennial reign of Christ.

It seems everything you write is MYTH. I would advise you to get back to study.

The wicked, wickedness, sin, death, corruption, decay are removed when Jesus comes to introduce perfection, glorification and eternity. It is the end!

Romans 8:19-23, “For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption (phthora or decay) into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now. And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, [to wit], the redemption of our body.”

There is a direct connection between the liberation of “creation” and the liberation of the “sons of God.” Both the creature and creation are waiting for “the adoption, [to wit], the redemption of our body” – or resurrection day. This is the day when both will simultaneously be delivered from the aforementioned “bondage of corruption.” The day of redemption is shown throughout Scripture to be the second coming of Christ. It is there is that man experiences the final part of redemption – the redemption of his body.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Bible Prophecy is quite clear as to when this general resurrection will happen; Revelation 20:11-15
When Jesus Returns, He will bring the souls of the Trib martyrs with Him and they will be brought back to life. Revelation 20:4
Revelation 20:5 plainly and indisputably says that the rest of the dead have to wait until the 1000 years have ended. Everyone who has ever lived will stand before God on His Great White Throne and face Judgment.

Any thoughts of a Judgment or anyone getting changed into immortality at Jesus Return, is wrong and conflicts with clear scripture.

Exactly, the millennium/Satan's little season correlates with the intra-Advent period. The GWT is the one and only judgment day.

This age is the millennial kingdom. It started with Christ’s "first resurrection." It will finish with the Coming of Christ and the general resurrection of the dead and general judgment. Premil duplicates everything. Two kingdom ages, two Gospel ages, two ages of death, sin, rebellion, funerals. 2 resurrection days and 2 judgment days. There is nowhere in Scripture that talks about 2 resurrection days (plural) and 2 judgment days (plural), including Revelation 20. They invent 2 Gog/Magog wars at the end of two last days periods. They invent two "first resurrections," 2 new heavens and new earths, 2 “last days” periods. They duplicate the "last day." They have 2 bindings of Satan. They have 2 weddings of the elect (Revelation 19:7-8 and Revelation 21:2), 2 future glorifications and 2 raptures (to facilitate their millennial earth passing away 1,000 years+ after the second coming). What is next? Is anything safe from this faulty mode of interpretation?
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟783,767.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Obviously we agree on a climatic nature of the Lord's return. But that text actually says the opposite to what you are insinuating. If you look at the Greek it makes it a lot clearer.

Matthew 24:35-41 continues: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and took them all away; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one ‘shall be taken’ [Gr. paralambano], and the other left. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one ‘shall be taken’ [Gr. paralambano], and the other left.”

Strong’s tells us that the Greek word paralambano in this passage means “to receive near, i.e. associate with oneself in any familiar or intimate act or relation.” The word is interpreted elsewhere in the King James Version as receive, take unto or take with. It portrays the idea of: to take as a companion. The company that is received by Christ in this passage must therefore be those that intimately love and are waiting for His return. They are taken from the destruction that is poured at His appearing and immediately return to regenerated earth. In short, one is taken to safety the other left for destruction.

The word used here to describe the second party in view is the Greek word aphiemi, which carries the meaning to forsake, put away or lay aside. This can never refer to the righteous who God says, in Hebrews 13:5, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.” This is the fate that awaits the wicked alone when Christ comes in all His glory. The words applied to either party in the original determine who and what He is speaking of.

Where Matthew 24:39 states "...the flood came, and took them all away...", are them the wicked; or are them the righteous (i.e. Noah and his family)?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Non-profit Prophet

Active Member
Dec 30, 2019
163
55
59
Southeastern
✟19,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Read:
1 Thes. 5:
2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.

3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

"They" get left behind. They were not ready. They were not "in Christ."

Where in any of this does it even hint that anyone is “left behind?” Is there anything that specifically leads you to that conclusion, or are you merely “filling in the blanks” because you don’t really what it’s saying?
 
Upvote 0

Non-profit Prophet

Active Member
Dec 30, 2019
163
55
59
Southeastern
✟19,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I know there is no scripture that says word for word that someone has no faith in a pretrib rapture that they would be left behind. However, does it have to be word for word? James tells us that someone with no faith can expect nothing from God.

There’s also no conversation in this thread that said that... I do believe many of those who believe in pre-trib rapture will lose faith in God when the tribulation starts because they misunderstood His Word.
 
Upvote 0

summerville

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2020
1,190
437
77
Atlanta
✟11,428.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
What are you talking about an earthquake? Where does it even mention one in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9? You have a habit of basing all your beliefs on silence or what your teachers have taught you rather than actually the sacred text.

What is more, there is no escaping Christ's return. No one is left behind will escape, flee, or find safety. It is too late. It is the end of time and the end of the world. That is what the text says. Forget what you have been taught. The text overrides Tim LaHaye.



This is neither a second coming or a third coming passage. It was a historic passage relating to the time between Daniel and the coming Messiah. It has absolutely nothing to do with some imaginary seven-year tribulation in the future (that is taught nowhere in the inspired text - nowhere). There is not even any mention of tribulation in Daniel 9. You previously admitted all this, yet you continue to resurrect a dead white elephant.



That is because: after He has rescued his elect He then destroys all the wicked and regenerates this current corrupt earth, which we then populate for all eternity.



The day of the Lord is one day. It is climatic. There is no mortals survive it. There is no future millennium.



You rearrange the order of these phrases to let your doctrine fit. But the complacency of the wicked come before their destruction, not afterwards,. Stop trying to gerrymander the sacred text to support a false doctrine. I don't appreciate that! I Thessalonians 5:2-3 says, the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”



Exactly! We are caught up and then the wicked are immediately destroyed.



Elsewhere in Scripture, we discover that death is the last, final or end enemy, and that it is defeated at the second coming. Paul confirms the validity of this truth and the finality of that day, in 1 Corinthians 15:22-24, stating, “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his Coming. Then (or eita or thereupon) cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down (or katargeésee or abolished) all rule and all authority and power.”

The Coming of the Lord, described in this reading, is here carefully located at “the end.” In fact, the whole tenure of the passage is distinctly pointing to a climactic time in history when God separates righteousness and wickedness forever. It is the occasion approaching when Christ finally presents “up the kingdom to God” and will have, as He promised, “put down all rule and all authority and power.” Simultaneously, the glorification of the kingdom of God sees the destruction of the kingdom of darkness. It is the end-game for Satan and the conclusion of his evil efforts to obstruct the plan of God for mankind. Wickedness has finally and eternally been abolished.

1 Corinthians 15:22-24 tells us that “all rule and all authority and power” are finally “put down” or katargeésee or abolished at the “Coming” or parousia of the Lord, which is, as we have established, confirmed in the next sentence as “the end.” The kingdom of God is finally and eternally presented “up,” whereas the kingdom of darkness is finally and eternally “put down.” It is this all-consummating last day that ushers in the end (or completion) of all things.



What are you talking about an earthquake? Where does it even mention one in 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9?

Who are "Daniel's People?

13 But we would not have you ignorant, brethren, concerning them that fall asleep; that ye sorrow not, even as the rest, who have no hope.
 
Upvote 0

summerville

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2020
1,190
437
77
Atlanta
✟11,428.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
There’s also no conversation in this thread that said that... I do believe many of those who believe in pre-trib rapture will lose faith in God when the tribulation starts because they misunderstood His Word.

Jesus said to flee to the mountains when they saw the Abomination of Desolation as described in Daniel. They did. They fled to Pella.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Davy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Nov 25, 2017
4,861
1,022
USA
✟267,597.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No one has to insert a pretrib rapture. Paul did that for us, thank you.

AS for the carcases, did you read about the parable of the tares? WHEN was Jesus speaking of? Of course His coming as shown in Rev. 19. This passage has nothing to do with Paul's rapture. Could we then say your post is a red herring?

Before anyone can get even close... to understanding Christ's parable of the tares, they must first learn basic reading comprehension, and not make mistakes with Scripture like the end of Luke 17 where Jesus answered His disciples' question to show the 1st one 'taken' is NOT to Him.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Your doctrinal theory is manifestly built upon silence. I think you see that! You force your doctrine into text after text where it doesn't exist. No writer or prophet in Scripture knew or taught Pretrib. With this ad-hoc form of hermeneutics you could literally make the Bible say anything ... and indeed that is what Dispies do.
Not at all! I know where to look for the right information. I know the 70th week comes first from Daniel, but know that there are chapters on the 70th week in Revelation. I know the 70th week was designed by God for DANIEL'S people, not the church. I know the church is not going to be on earth during the 70th week. This is just common beliefs of the church around the world today.

Someone on a thread said that the rapture was only believed in the US. I immediately found 50 people in Africa that were believers and asked them if they believed in a rapture to heaven. I think only 2 of the 50 did not believe. It is NOT a believe common to the US. It is written plainly in the scriptures. It is up to each individual if they choose to believe it or not.

This is not forcing a belief on any verse: the verse really does say we will be caught up. Why is this so difficult to believe? And Paul really did write that while those in Christ get caught up, those NOT in Christ get caught in sudden destruction.

Where in Revelation is Paul's rapture? As I have said, John was not shown the rapture so did not write it. But we can still determine where: Paul tells us (not in these words) that the rapture will trigger the Day of the Lord. We can easily see in Revelation 6 that the Day of the Lord starts at the 6th seal. Therefore, logic tells us the rapture must come just before the 6th seal. Then when we study the 5th seal, we see that they are martyrs of the church age, and are told that judgment is not coming until the last church age martyr is killed. It is just common sense then, the rapture will happen in Revelation between the 5th and 6th seal.

My friend, this is forcing nothing - it is just understanding the intent of the Author when these scriptures were written. I wonder: do you ever ask God what He intended in a scripture? I do OVER AN OVER AND OVER.

No writer or prophet in Scripture knew or taught Pretrib. Now you are bringing YOUR theory into the discussion - forcing your opinion upon scriptures to make they say what you think they should say. There are HOLES in a posttrib theory - holes that you ignore post after post.

I asked: how are you going to get to the marriage and supper - and your answer was, you don't need to! We, the church, are the bride of Christ! He is the groom. OF COURSE the church will be at the marriage and supper! But how sad: the posttrib doctrine cannot accomplish that! The marriage and supper are IN HEAVEN. It is over before Christ descends. That is clear in scripture. So posttribbers just rearrange what is written (forcing?) and say the marriage and supper will be on the earth or in the air. How silly can people be? Don't rearrange scripture to fit a theory! Form theory from scripture AS WRITTEN!

Let's just try our best to discover the AUTHOR'S intent in end times scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Where Matthew 24:39 states "...the flood came, and took them all away...", are them the wicked; or are them the righteous (i.e. Noah and his family)?

Good question jgr!

Matthew 24:35-41 continues: “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, And knew not until the flood came, and ‘took them all away [airo]; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Then shall two be in the field; the one ‘shall be taken’ [paralambano], and the other left [aphiemi]. Two women shall be grinding at the mill; the one ‘shall be taken’ [paralambano], and the other left [aphiemi].”

Some Christians try to identify the phrase here “one shall be taken” with the wicked. They equally apply the phrase “the other shall be left” to the righteous. There are a few reasons to question that notion. Firstly, Strong’s tells us that the Greek word paralambano in this passage means “to receive near, i.e. associate with oneself in any familiar or intimate act or relation.” The word is interpreted elsewhere in the King James Version as receive, take unto or take with. It portrays the idea of: to take as a companion. The company that is received by Christ in this passage must therefore be those that intimately love and are waiting for His return. They are taken from the destruction that is poured at His appearing and immediately return to regenerated earth. In short, one is taken to safety the other left for destruction.

This is plainly referring to the catching away of the saints, and the marriage of the Lamb. This is the exact same word that Christ used in John 14:3 when He promised His disciples that He would come again to receive them, saying, “In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive [paralambano] you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.”

Secondly, Matthew uses a different Greek word to describe the wicked that were ‘taken’ at the time of the flood in v. 39 than that used to describe those that are ‘taken’ at Christ’s return in vv. 40-41. He employs the word airo. It simply means to take away, put away or remove. It describe those that are taken in the judgment in Noah’s day (in v. 39).

The word paralambano on the other hand relates to those that are taken or rescued from the judgment (in vv. 40-41) at Christ’s coming. This again supports the idea that those that are taken are the righteous here and that those that are left are the wicked. It would therefore seem, Matthew uses two completely different words to distinguish between two completely contrasting takings.

Thirdly, the word used here to describe the second party in view is the Greek word aphiemi, which carries the meaning to forsake, put away or lay aside. This can never refer to the righteous who God says, in Hebrews 13:5, “I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.” This is the fate that awaits the wicked alone when Christ comes in all His glory. The words applied to either party in the original determine who and what He is speaking of.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Before anyone can get even close... to understanding Christ's parable of the tares, they must first learn basic reading comprehension, and not make mistakes with Scripture like the end of Luke 17 where Jesus answered His disciples' question to show the 1st one 'taken' is NOT to Him.
I think we all understand that vultures are not going to feast on any bodies of the church.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,184.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Really?
With that belief, you fall over at the starting gate, in Bible Prophecy understanding.

That is your opinion, and it carries no merit. Are you actually going to address my posts and the Scriptures therein that forbid Premil?
 
Upvote 0