Is the Rapture biblical?

Non-profit Prophet

Active Member
Dec 30, 2019
163
55
59
Southeastern
✟19,306.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Dispensationalist Pretrib writers wrongly argue that Revelation 4:1 is the secret rapture,

That’s been a really well-kept secret... not even the Bible spoke of it. .

Truthfully though, this is the first I’ve heard a specific verse associated with that false doctrine.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:9 is a vivid record of Christ’s coming and what accompanies it. The text declares: “if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain ‘shall be caught up’ [Gr. harpazō] together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words. But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape. But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief. Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober. For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night. But let us, who are of the day, be sober, putting on the breastplate of faith and love; and for an helmet, the hope of salvation. For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ.”

One thing we should acknowledge as we dissect this text is that “the coming of the Lord” is synonymous here with “the day of the Lord.” Moreover, this passage is exhorting the Church to remain watchful as this final day approaches. Man should prepare himself for this great and terrible day because it will spell the end of time, the end of the wicked and the end of all rebellion.

After comforting the Church, Paul then warns it: Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.

After outlining the awfulness of that day for those left behind, the suddenness of its arrival, and the fact that none left behind will escape, Paul makes clear that we are not ignorant of this day and will therefore not be caught unprepared. Christ is going to rescue us – by being caught up – from this awful sudden and total destruction that is going to destroy the wicked. Clearly, we are here when the coming of Christ arrives as a thief in the night, but are prepared and, as a consequence, rescued to escape the awful destruction.

One of the first matters that we encounter in this passage, and which eliminates much of the error circulating within pretribulationist circles today, is the fact that when Christ comes again it is “with” and “for” His saints in one glorious single second coming. Verse 14 of our reading explicitly states, “them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.”

Therefore, there are not two separate comings or parousias of the Lord separated by a notional 7-year period – one for His Church and another with His Church. In fact, nowhere in this reading does it even vaguely intimate such. The second coming (parousia) of the Lord will see the immediate and complete rescue of the saved and the immediate and complete destruction of the damned (ruling out any notion that the tribulation comes after the second advent).

The un-indoctrinated Bible scholar must surely admit that this text oozes definite climactic detail. It first of all shows our Lord coming unexpectedly; it also reveals the fate that befalls all those on earth – both saved and unsaved. Whilst this is shown to be a day anticipated by God’s people, it is one that catches the wicked unawares. After the removal of the righteous all that awaits those left behind is total “destruction” (1 Thessalonians 5:3).

The wrath of God that arrives on this climactic day is described as “sudden destruction.” This whole narrative is a record of Christ’s one and only future coming. Contrary to what Pretribs impute into this text (namely that that Christ is only coming “for” His saints), this reading describes how Christ comes both “with” and “for” His people the next time. Verse 14 of our reading explicitly states, “them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.” Those living will be “caught up” to meet Jesus when He appears. This is the ultimate uniting of the elect on earth (the live in Christ) and those in heaven (the dead in Christ).

It is accompanied by the great sound of the trump ushering in the end. The word rendered “remain” in our King James Version (which relates to those that are alive at Christ’s coming) is interestingly the Greek word perileipo, which means “to survive.” Thus, we can take from this reading that the Lord is returning for those who remain by surviving. These are tribulation saints.

This coming is not only sudden but noisy. Christ is not coming secretly with an apologetic whisper but publicly with a triumphant cry. He appears with “with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God.” This trumpet will sound and bring forth the elect from all nations. I Thessalonians 5:2-7 confirms that it isn’t just Christ’s coming that is sudden but also the destruction that accompanies.

Likening Christ’s return to “a thief in the night” capably serves to impress the surprising nature of this coming for the lost. It shows that the wicked are caught abruptly in their folly at the apocalypse. The “sudden destruction” is so impactful and thorough that none escape. This is explicit in the narrative. The wicked are totally and completely destroyed, allowing no room for the Pretrib theory of a subsequent 7yrs trib packed with unsaved people.

The opposite to “wrath” here is shown to be “salvation.” Salvation involves a person taking a hold of eternal life. The antithesis is therefore a person experiencing eternal torment. The wrath of God will be poured out on the wicked at the end. They will then experience the second death.

To get around the climactic detail of this passage Pretribs try to separate the day of the Lord from the second coming of Christ. This totally distorts the wording, the harmony and the thrust of this passage and its detailed description of the fate of the saved and the lost. The day of the Lord is pushed 7 years ahead of the coming of Christ even though there is no mention of such in this text. Pretrib is therefore exposed by this text.

The writer actually warns the believer in the light of the awful unexpected destruction that overcomes the wicked at the coming of Christ for the believer to be watchful of that day so “that that day should overtake you as a thief.” We are told to “watch and be sober” of that day.

Let us try and sum up what this much-debated passage is telling us about Christ’s coming.

This is sudden, climactic and totally destructive. It sees God rescuing His elect and destroying the wicked.

One thing we should acknowledge as we dissect this text is that “the coming of the Lord” is synonymous here with “the day of the Lord.”
If the rapture comes a moment before the sudden destruction start of the Day of His wrath, then they cannot be the synonymous. Some argue that wrath is written at the 6th seal but does not start until the 7th.

Paul wrote that God won't make any appointments for us with His wrath, so I think it is rapture first, with wrath following hard after.

You are right: we are to be watchful. It could be any day.

the fact that when Christ comes again it is “with” and “for” His saints in one glorious single second coming.

Sorry, but this is myth. I did not say it, John did. The Day of His wrath begins at the 6th seal in Rev. 6, but there will be another coming in chapter 19, over 7 years later. The DAY then starts before the 70th week and continues on - perhaps through the entire millennium.

The rapture - PAUL'S rapture - and Jesus second coming will be a moment before the earthquake at the 6th seal. But here He comes only to the air. It most certain is a coming as Paul wrote: His SECOND coming. It is further proof that John SAW the raptured church in chapter 7, shortly after the 6th seal events. John did not see the rapture - did not see the church arrive in heaven, but show the church in the throne room shortly after they arrived: the large group too large to number. Think of it: probably 40 to 50 generations of believers all in one place at one time! The raptured church will be BY FAR the largest group mentioned in Revelation.

Between the 6th seal and chapter 19 there are a whole lot of events take place: The 7 trumpets in the first half of the week, then the 7 vials in the last half, just to mention a few of the many events that will separate the rapture and His third coming. Yes, I said 3rd. I can count and I am not afraid to write it.

He came ONCE to die. He will come the SECOND time FOR His saints, but only to the air, then will come WITH His saints for His third (3rd) coming.

“them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.” Sorry, my friend, but these are not coming on white horses, nor are they coming for Armageddon. They are SPIRITS coming to join with their new, resurrection bodies. Neither will this group be the entire Bride of Christ.

Therefore, there are not two separate comings or parousias of the Lord separated by a notional 7-year period – one for His Church and another with His Church. In fact, nowhere in this reading does it even vaguely intimate such.
You are mistaken. The problem is only that you have not SEEN two more comings. They are certain written and easy to see without preconceived glasses.

AGain notice where John put the start of the DAY: it is at the 6th seal. At this time in the vision (and in reality when it begins) the BOOK has not yet been opened to reveal the 70th week. This book cannot be opened until ALL SEVEN seals are opened first. What we read in chapter 8 after the 7th seal is what is written INSIDE the book now opened.

Before chapter 19 then, and Christ's 3rd coming WITH His saints, the 7 trumpets must be sounded. The man of sin must enter the temple and declare He is God. Then those in Jerusalem must flee. The Beast then goes to war and takes out three kings - and becomes the 8th. He will then develop his MARK and erect and IMAGE. Then he and the false prophet will force people to bow and worship the image or lose their head. The beheaded BEGIN to show up in heaven in chapter 15. Finally, to shorten those days of GT, God will pour out the vials of His wrath. Finally, the 7th vial will end the week. Then the marriage and supper will take place in heaven.

FINALLY, after all this, Jesus will descend with the armies of heaven - all on white horses.
Your theory then of only one more coming won't fly. It does not match what is written.

the Greek word perileipo, which means “to survive.” Sorry, but it also means to be left over or remain. That fits far better than survive. That is why all the translators use "remain."

The “sudden destruction” is so impactful and thorough that none escape. This is explicit in the narrative. The wicked are totally and completely destroyed, allowing no room for the Pretrib theory of a subsequent 7yrs trib packed with unsaved people. No, all will not be killed. This takes place before the 70th week. Think about that: the 6th trumpet will kill 1/3....of those who are dead? NOT! The truth is, SOME will die in the sudden destruction earthquake, but not all. Don't read into a verse what is not there! It is clear you read this with preconceptions that cloud your understanding. you cannot get around the fact that this will take place in chapter 6, LONG before chapter 19! What are you going to do with the 70th week that goes from chapter 8 to chapter 16?

Always know, anyone who rearranges Revelation to fit a theory will always be proven wrong.

The opposite to “wrath” here is shown to be “salvation.” Salvation involves a person taking a hold of eternal life. The antithesis is therefore a person experiencing eternal torment. Sorry, but John has not arrived yet (in chapter 6) with eternity. You are jumping the gun here. Those IN CHRIST will get caught up and so avoid the sudden destruction earthquake. Some of those left behind will be killed in that earthquake.

Will all those killed be lost forever? That depends on if they had time to repent.

To get around the climactic detail of this passage Pretribs try to separate the day of the Lord from the second coming of Christ.
No we don't. It IS His second coming. He came once to die. He will come the second time for the rapture, but only to the air. By the way, JOHN does the separating: dead in Christ first, then a moment later those alive and in christ caught up, then those left behind suffer in the sudden destruction earthquake which John tells us is the beginning of the Day of the Lord. Again I remind you, this is the 6th seal of the book which contains the 70th week. There is NO WAY you can move this event anywhere. It is and will always be BEFORE any part of the 70th week.

The day of the Lord is pushed 7 years ahead of the coming of Christ even though there is no mention of such in this text. Pretrib is therefore exposed by this text. This is just more nonsense by a postribber who will not believe the texts used. The truth is, NO ONE can move this 6th seal ANYWHERE. It is and always will be the next to the last seal sealing the BOOK that contains the 70th week. All this makes postrib doctrine collapse. Pretrib (at lest some of us) believes this text exactly as it is written, recognizing that this is after the rapture and before the start of the week. Pretrib certainly is not guilty of rearranging Revelation to fit a theory!

I am truly amazed at some of your arguments. I think you can do better.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
There is no such thing as "Paul's rapture" or even a "rapture" in the original Greek. That was taken from a translation of a translation and is man-made, not God-breathed. I prefer the biblical phrases 'caught up', 'catching away' or our 'gathering together'. The word rapture is an extra-biblical term and is so associated with Pretrib error.

Dispensationalist Pretrib writers wrongly argue that Revelation 4:1 is the secret rapture, and that Revelation 4-19 is a harmonious chronological 7-year tribulation period. However, there isn’t one single reference to a seven-year tribulation in the book of Revelation as there also isn’t in the whole of the New Testament. In fact, there is only one reference to the term seven-years in the New Testament in Luke 2:36. It describes “Anna” living with her “husband seven years from her virginity.” No other reference!!! When Pretribber are pressed they quote Daniel 9 which (1) is an historic account that has already been fulfilled, (2) which related to Messiah’s first Coming and which makes no reference to a supposed rapture and a third Coming of Christ.

When we examine the time-periods embodied within Revelation 4-19 we significantly find that they add up to a period of 19 years, 4 ½ days and 3 hours.

5 months – the wicked tormented (Rev 9:5-10).
1 year, 1 month, 1 day, 1 hour – four angels prepared to pour out the 6th trumpet judgment (Rev 9:15)
42 months – the temple trampled by Gentiles (Rev 11:2).
1260 days – the two witnesses prophesy (Rev 11:3).
3 ½ days – two witnesses lie dead (Rev 11:9).
1260 days – woman flees into the wilderness (Revelation 12:6).
Times, time, and half a time – woman nourished in the wilderness (Rev 12:14).
42 months – power given to the beast (Rev 13:5).
1 hour – the beast receives power with the ten kings (Rev 17:12).
1 hour – Babylon destroyed (Rev 18:10-19).

5 x 3 ½ years + 1 year = 18 ½ years.
5 months + 1 month = 6 months (or ½ year).
3 ½ days + 1 day = 4 ½ days.
3 x 1 hr = 3 hrs.

TOTAL 19 years, 4 ½ days and 3 hours.
There is no such thing as "Paul's rapture" or even a "rapture" in the original Greek. That was taken from a translation of a translation and is man-made, not God-breathed. I prefer the biblical phrases 'caught up', 'catching away' or our 'gathering together'. The word rapture is an extra-biblical term and is so associated with Pretrib error.

It really does not matter what we call it. What matters is it is REAL. You are only showing us your disdain (or ignorance of the fact) for the Latin translation from which "rapture" originated.

I think you should rewrite this and take out "pretrib error." The error have been on your side here. God is pretrib.

Dispensationalist Pretrib writers wrongly argue that Revelation 4:1 is the secret rapture Agreed: but they are just as mistaken as you are. Any beginning reader could tell us that verse was JOHn caught up around 95 AD. It has NOTHING to do with the rapture. Good job on this point.

Revelation 4-19 is a harmonious chronological 7-year tribulation period. Again, good job. If indeed any pretribbers have even hinted of this they are wrong. However, your theory is probably just as wrong. Just so you know, the 70th week is marked by 7's: the 7th seal gets the book opened that contains the 70th week. The 7th trumpet marks the midpoint, and the 7th vial ends the week. Don't tells us the 70th week cannot be found anywhere. The truth is, YOU can't find it due to preconceived theories.

HINT: what is two times 1260? What is two times 42 months? What is two times 3.5?

If one cuts an apple into two equal halves and all watching examine each half and declare it is a half apple...it follows that there had to be a whole apple to start. For example, if one cut a half apple in half, all that is left is two quarters. To cut something in haven and end up with halves, there MUST BE a whole to begin with. Just saying....

Your adding is comical at least. I will give you that.

What you MISS:
The 42 months of trampling,
The 1260 days of witnessing,
The 1260 days of fleeing,
The 3.5 years of feeding,
The 42 months of authority,

All these are running parallel to each other. Each represents the same period of time but with a different countdown. All begins at or near the midpoint of the week and to go the end of the week. Therefore, adding them just shows lack of understanding.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Really? How? Where is your rapture before Revelation 19?
I will explain:

The rapture will come a moment before wrath begins. You know this much. But God's Day of wrath begins at the 6th seal which is before any part of the 70th week.

The church has been waiting all these years at the 5th seal: the martyrs of the church age. The next seal starts wrath which you know is still future.

By the way, there is no rapture mentioned in chapter 19. But there is the marriage and supper in heaven mentioned. How are you going to get to heaven for the marriage?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I think the book you are talking about is the one written by the Jesuit Manuel de Lacunza under the assumed name of Rabbi Ben-Ezra as a "converted Jew". The book was finished in 1790, and then circulated in manuscript form before it was published at Cadiz, Spain, in 1812. This was during the time of Cortez in Spain, and after Cortez the book was suppressed, and as much as possible withdrawn from circulation. Lacunza died in June 1801, before the book was ever published in book form.

Rev. Edward Irving, a Presbyter of the Church of Scotland, who had been the assistant to Dr. Chalmers in Glasgow, translated this book of Lacunza from the Spanish in 1826, and it was published in English by L.B. Seely and Son, Fleet Street, London, in 1827.

This is the origin of Pretrib. It is not in the Bible. It s a Jesuit invention!
MYTH! God originated pretrib, passed it to Paul via revelation, and Paul wrote it. Too bad you don't understand it.

look: if you wish to be left behind to tribulate, that is between you and God. Please don't try and convince others to stay behind and face God's wrath. He has given us a way of escape. Why argue? Why not just take what God has offered: a way to escape what is coming?
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,531
8,429
up there
✟306,957.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
How are you going to get to heaven for the marriage?
We don't The Kingdom comes down out of Heaven at which time the King and Kingdom function as one. A supper comes after a marriage. We don't need to be present at the marriage.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
1. Where is a tribulation mentioned in Daniel 9?
2. Where is a 7-year tribulation mentioned in Daniel 9?
3. Where is the rapture mentioned in Daniel 9?
4. Where is a 3rd coming mentioned in Daniel 9?
5. Where in Daniel 9 does it tell us to sever the last 7 years off from this harmonious prophecy relating to Christ’s 1st Coming and propel it 2,000 years into the unknown?
6. Where is antichrist mentioned in Daniel 9?
7. Where does it say that antichrist will make a peace covenant with Israel for 7 years in Daniel 9?
8. Where does it say that antichrist will break a peace covenant with Israel in Daniel 9?
9. Where are the tribulation saints mentioned in Daniel 9?
10. Where does it mention the rebuilding of a third temple?
1 & 2. Daniel did not call it "tribulation or a "7 year tribulation." Try verse 27.
3. How funny! The rapture is for the Gentile church! The 7 years is for Daniel's people.
4. Daniel 9 only covered the 70th week, not what would come later - as in His 3rd coming.
5. As I have written over and over, Daniel Himself inserted a gap. Notice that the events of 70 AD come BEFORE the mention of the final week.
6. Daniel never used the term "Antichrist." Christ had not yet come.
7. Tell us by proper English what the antecedent is to the "HE." (Verse 27)
8. See answer for 6.
9. Notice that Daniel tells us the entire 70 weeks (including the 70th) is for HIS PEOPLE.
10. Why do you insist all these things must be found in Daniel 9? We have MANY end times scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
We don't The Kingdom comes down out of Heaven at which time the King and Kingdom function as one. A supper comes after a marriage. We don't need to be present at the marriage.
Sorry, but Revelation 19 shows us the marriage and supper in heaven BEFORE Christ and the armies of heaven descend.

The marriage is for the Bride. Have you not seen how the rapture follows the typical Jewish wedding?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
That is typical ad-hoc Dispy hermeneunics. That is why many of us have abandoned that school of thought.

What scriptural warrant is there for, in unprecedented manner, decapitating this harmonious cohesive Messianic prophecy, aimlessly and indefinitely projecting the final week 2000 years+ into the unknown to a supposed end-time 7 year period, when it was perfectly fulfilled in the life and time of our Lord’s ministry, especially when there is absolutely NO corroborated in the New Testament for this 70th week gap-theory. As we have already stated, probably, the most distasteful aspect of this corrupt teaching is how they corruptly attribute it to anti-Christ at the end when it explicitly relates to Christ and His atonement 2000 years ago? To be honest, with this form of hermeneutics you could potentially corrupt any Old Testament passage and apply it to whatever time-period or matter one wishes.

The text does not in any way demand a gap; the Futurists unilaterally (without any scriptural warrant and for his own reason) chooses to insert one there in order to support his unsound theology. Those who do or condone such are unquestionably gap-theorists.

The text does demand – “Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to (1) finish the transgression, and to (2) make an end of sins, and to (3) make reconciliation for iniquity, and to (4) bring in everlasting righteousness, and to (5) seal up the vision and prophecy, and to (6) anoint the most Holy” (Daniel 9:24).

These 6 things elements must therefore be fulfilled (1) in Messiah, and (2) must come mid-way through the final week. The desolation is not within the 70 weeks, it is the visible result of the fulfilment of numbers 1-6 in the midst of the week i.e. the rendering of the temple’s former use obsolete.

What is the greater abomination, rejecting the once all-sufficient sacrifice of Calvary, as the Jews evidently did (and are doing), or abolishing or rejecting any idolatrous animal sacrifices in an imaginary temple? The Pretrib scenario is fanciful anyway as the temple has been (and is being) built – Christ’s body.

The overspreading of abominations” was the rebellious idolatrous continuing of the temple sacrifices by the Jews after they were abolished at Calvary. And despite God allowing them time to repent in the intervening 40-year period (AD 30-AD 70), they stubbornly rebelled. The blasphemous continuing of the old order – the abolished (imperfect) sacrifices – occasioned the destruction of the temple – 40 being a perfect probationary period. When the practising of the temple sacrifices had reached their allotted time-span, God destroyed them and the temple.

If you wish to be left behind, that is between you and God. There WILL BE a pretrib rapture, but it will not be for those with NO FAITH in it. God gives nothing from heaven without faith.
Think about it! Do you have any faith in being caught up as Paul has written - just before wrath begins?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,616
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,763.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I presume you mean the bride being the New Jerusalem.
No, the bride will be those members of the Body of Christ on earth that are prepared for the pretrib rapture and will be caught up.

Yes, it will be the very same people in the city after the thousand years.
 
Upvote 0

timothyu

Well-Known Member
Dec 31, 2018
22,531
8,429
up there
✟306,957.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
No, the bride will be those members of the Body of Christ on earth that are prepared for the pretrib rapture and will be caught up.
Not what Rev. says. Wedding guests are guests, not brides. Rather arrogant to think of being greater than the Kingdom.
 
Upvote 0

jgr

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 25, 2008
9,692
5,007
✟784,067.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No, the bride will be those members of the Body of Christ on earth that are prepared for the pretrib rapture and will be caught up.

Yes, it will be the very same people in the city after the thousand years.

Who in the pre-19th-century historical true Church espoused a pretrib rapture?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One thing we should acknowledge as we dissect this text is that “the coming of the Lord” is synonymous here with “the day of the Lord.”
If the rapture comes a moment before the sudden destruction start of the Day of His wrath, then they cannot be the synonymous. Some argue that wrath is written at the 6th seal but does not start until the 7th.

Paul wrote that God won't make any appointments for us with His wrath, so I think it is rapture first, with wrath following hard after.

You are right: we are to be watchful. It could be any day.

the fact that when Christ comes again it is “with” and “for” His saints in one glorious single second coming.

Sorry, but this is myth.

I did not say it, John did. The Day of His wrath begins at the 6th seal in Rev. 6, but there will be another coming in chapter 19, over 7 years later. The DAY then starts before the 70th week and continues on - perhaps through the entire millennium.

Again, this has been repeatedly and ably rebutted in this thread and others. Pretribbers have zero grounds for their gap theory. If you were directed to go to the next state and told and told it was exactly a 490-mile journey (right down to the very yard). You were told that in-between the starting point and your destination you would pass two important landmarks, the first after 49 miles, which was accurate to the very yard. The next was a further 434 miles ahead (bringing your journey to 483 miles in total), which also occurred right down to the very yard. The journey's end would be a final 7 miles down the road from your second landmark, making your total journey 490 miles. Exactly half way between 483 miles and 490 (486 ½ miles) you would witness a monumental landmark that would surpass anything you have ever seen. How would you then feel if you were told when you hit the second landmark that your final location was still a possible 2,000+ miles down the road with NO exact finishing point? Such an idea would be totally unthinkable in the natural, but unprecedented in God's economy. God always fulfills His promises.

The rapture - PAUL'S rapture - and Jesus second coming will be a moment before the earthquake at the 6th seal.

Again, there is no such mention of a rapture in Scripture. That is a Pretrib invention to support false doctrine. You need to listen and respond to other peoples rebuttals instead of always talking and avoiding.

But here He comes only to the air. It most certain is a coming as Paul wrote: His SECOND coming. It is further proof that John SAW the raptured church in chapter 7, shortly after the 6th seal events. John did not see the rapture - did not see the church arrive in heaven, but show the church in the throne room shortly after they arrived: the large group too large to number. Think of it: probably 40 to 50 generations of believers all in one place at one time! The raptured church will be BY FAR the largest group mentioned in Revelation.

The text itself refutes your reasoning. The wrath of God that arrives on this climactic day is described as “sudden destruction.” I Thessalonians 5:2-7 confirms that it isn’t just Christ’s coming that is sudden but also the destruction that accompanies. Likening Christ’s return to “a thief in the night” capably serves to impress the surprising nature of this Coming for the lost. It shows that the wicked are caught abruptly in their folly at the apocalypse. The “sudden destruction” is so impactful that none escape. That is explicit in the narrative. Furthermore, we learn that the swiftness that the travail of childbirth comes upon a woman will be the way destruction suddenly hits the wicked. It is not saying that the whole child-birth experience is like the coming of the Lord, which would be needed to allow for the Premil understanding. That is not found in this text. In doing this they diminish the sudden nature of the destruction.

This whole narrative is a record of Christ’s one and only future coming. Contrary to what Pretribs impute into this text (namely that that Christ is only coming “for” His saints), this reading describes how Christ comes both “with” and “for” His people the next time. Verse 14 of our reading explicitly states, “them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.”

Hello!!! Those living will be “caught up” with "the dead in Christ" to meet Jesus when He appears. This is the ultimate uniting of the elect on earth (the live in Christ) and those in heaven (the dead in Christ).

“them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.”
Sorry, my friend, but these are not coming on white horses, nor are they coming for Armageddon. They are SPIRITS coming to join with their new, resurrection bodies. Neither will this group be the entire Bride of Christ.

Where is your supposed "rapture" in Revelation???

Revelation 19 is the one-and-only second coming. It is the 6th recap in Revelation. The horses are part of the apocalyptic genre of Revelation and is not intended to literal physical animals riding in the air. Is Jesus a literal lamb? Is He a literal lion? Of course not! Is Satan a literal dragon? Is he a literal serpent? Of course not!

Therefore, there are not two separate comings or
parousias of the Lord separated by a notional 7-year period – one for His Church and another with His Church. In fact, nowhere in this reading does it even vaguely intimate such.
You are mistaken. The problem is only that you have not SEEN two more comings. They are certain written and easy to see without preconceived glasses.

AGain notice where John put the start of the DAY: it is at the 6th seal. At this time in the vision (and in reality when it begins) the BOOK has not yet been opened to reveal the 70th week. This book cannot be opened until ALL SEVEN seals are opened first. What we read in chapter 8 after the 7th seal is what is written INSIDE the book now opened.

Revelation 6:13-14 relates to the final destruction described in Isaiah 34 to the appearance of the Lord at the second coming, where the wicked finally receive their reward. The sixth seal says, “And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?”

This passage, which is speaking of the exact same scene as Rev 19, asks a simple question: "who shall be able to stand?” This of course is a rhetorical question: meaning the answer is obvious. Well, it is obvious to those who don't have a theological agenda to impute into the text. No one that is left behind will survive the wrath of God that He pours out on the ungodly on this fateful final day. So rather than rewarding all those that attack Jerusalem by allowing them to inherit the new earth, Christ destroys them and their rebellion.

So as to remove any confusion over the full extent of those that will be destroyed who are left behind, the Holy Spirit says: "the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man." Obviously if a human isn't "free" they are "a bondman" (or a slave).

Before chapter 19 then, and Christ's 3rd coming WITH His saints, the 7 trumpets must be sounded. The man of sin must enter the temple and declare He is God. Then those in Jerusalem must flee. The Beast then goes to war and takes out three kings - and becomes the 8th. He will then develop his MARK and erect and IMAGE. Then he and the false prophet will force people to bow and worship the image or lose their head. The beheaded BEGIN to show up in heaven in chapter 15. Finally, to shorten those days of GT, God will pour out the vials of His wrath. Finally, the 7th vial will end the week. Then the marriage and supper will take place in heaven.

FINALLY, after all this, Jesus will descend with the armies of heaven - all on white horses.
Your theory then of only one more coming won't fly. It does not match what is written.

You have to prove your second coming before you even get to your third coming, until you do we can only consider Revelation 19 to be the one-and-only second coming.

the Greek word perileipo, which means “to survive.”
Sorry, but it also means to be left over or remain. That fits far better than survive. That is why all the translators use "remain."

1 Thessalonians 4:14-17 declares, “if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the [Gr. parousia] of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain [Gr. perileipo] shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.”

Pretribulationists employ this narrative as supposed proof that Christ is coming in a two-stage return, firstly, at ‘the rapture’ to the sky for his saints and, secondly, at the revelation of Christ (which they say is different from the rapture and is a third coming 7 years later) which they argue involves the Lord’s ‘coming to the earth with His saints’. However, one of the first truths we encounter in this passage, and which immediately eliminates much of the folly circulating within Pretribulationist circles today, is the fact: ‘when Christ comes again it is with and for His saints in one glorious single second coming’. Verse 14 of our reading explicitly states, “them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.” Furthermore, the second party of Christians at this great climatic event are those believers that are “alive” are said to “remain.” Interestingly, when we examine the meaning of the word “remain,” we find it is the Greek word perileipo, which means “to survive.” Therefore, we can deduce from this meaning that the Lord is returning for those who remain by surviving.

The “sudden destruction” is so impactful and thorough that none escape. This is explicit in the narrative.
The wicked are totally and completely destroyed, allowing no room for the Pretrib theory of a subsequent 7yrs trib packed with unsaved people.
No, all will not be killed. This takes place before the 70th week. Think about that: the 6th trumpet will kill 1/3....of those who are dead? NOT! The truth is, SOME will die in the sudden destruction earthquake, but not all. Don't read into a verse what is not there! It is clear you read this with preconceptions that cloud your understanding. you cannot get around the fact that this will take place in chapter 6, LONG before chapter 19! What are you going to do with the 70th week that goes from chapter 8 to chapter 16?

Always know, anyone who rearranges Revelation to fit a theory will always be proven wrong.

Pretribbers are always fighting with the actual text. They have a habit of making wild evasive unsubstantiated statements rather than addressing the text under discussion they get into their usual evasive what-aboutery tactics with some other text?

Pretribbers refuse to let the Scripture speak for itself.

Revelation 10:5-7 says of the Second Advent and the concluding last trumpet, “And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, and sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer: but in the days of the voice of the seventh angel, when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.”

For those who would lightly dismiss this important narrative as anything other than a magnificent picture of the Lord Jesus Christ and His glorious Second Coming, they do unwisely ignore the great wealth of explicit and consistent end-time teaching on this subject and divorce the undoubted harmony of this chapter from the rest of New Testament prophetic teaching. We must first of all recognise, this is the second of seven similar symbolic parallels relating to intra-advent period, each of which take us up to the one final future all-consummating Coming of Christ (the day of God’s wrath) and the end of the world (when time shall undoubtedly be no more). This pattern of repeating the record of the same event from different angles is common throughout Scripture on most themes, none more that the glorious Coming of Christ.

The statement: “the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets refers to the many Old Testament predictions by the prophets of the end of the world and the introduction of a new perfect arrangement. There are many passages describing the day of the Lord.

The third parallel in Revelation 11:15 also makes reference to the seventh angel with the last trump, again being in complete agreement with consistent New Testament teaching (including the conclusion of the second parallel in Revelation 10) on this single, final, all-consummating nature of the Second Advent, saying, “And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, the kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.”

The whole import and wording of the remainder of the passage perfectly supports the King James Version rendering and confirms the all-consummating nature of the Second Advent, which says, “when he shall begin to sound, the mystery of God should be etelesthee (or) finished.” It should be noted that the word etelesthee is a very strong all-consummating word that is rightly translated ‘finished’ in this reading and is consistently interpreted: completed, concluded, expired and accomplished.

The supposition that some Premillennialists thus advance is totally negated by (1) the consistent interpretation of the word elsewhere in Scripture, (2) the all-consummating nature of the reading, and (3) the undoubted fact that the last trumpet elsewhere ushers in the end – seeing the destruction of the wicked/world.

Also, whatever particular individual event this narrative is speaking of, it is of no small importance to Bible prophecy and to God’s “prophets,” who evidently from this reading spoke often of this day and also of its detail. The reading expressly declares, “the mystery of God should be finished, as he hath declared to his servants the prophets.” There is no more need for prophets. There is no more need for spiritual predictions. We will now know everything.

The next verse, verse 18 then reveals how the Second Advent ushers in the general judgment, saying, “And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou shouldest (1) give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great; and shouldest (2) destroy them which destroy the earth. And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail.”

The last trump is the time when “the time of the dead, that they should be judged.” This is the last trump, which is after the thousand years. It the time when the righteous expressly receive their “reward” and when Christ will “destroy” the wicked. For those that refuse to bow the knee to Christ it will be a time of “wrath.” We see here that there are two parties standing before the same throne receiving two diverse sentences.

One cannot help but note the finality attached to the sounding of the seventh trumpet. This is particularly striking when you then compare this to the trumpet passages that connect to the second coming of the Lord. The link is unquestionable.

Whichever way you look at it, there is an unquestionable finality surrounding the echo of the seventh trumpet. This corresponds with the conclusiveness associated with Second Coming passages elsewhere in Scripture. Let us look at some of the all-consummating detail.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The opposite to “wrath” here is shown to be “salvation.” Salvation involves a person taking a hold of eternal life. The antithesis is therefore a person experiencing eternal torment. Sorry, but John has not arrived yet (in chapter 6) with eternity. You are jumping the gun here. Those IN CHRIST will get caught up and so avoid the sudden destruction earthquake. Some of those left behind will be killed in that earthquake.

Will all those killed be lost forever? That depends on if they had time to repent.

Stop avoiding. Where is your so called rapture in Revelation?

To get around the climactic detail of this passage Pretribs try to separate the day of the Lord from the second coming of Christ.
No we don't. It IS His second coming. He came once to die. He will come the second time for the rapture, but only to the air. By the way, JOHN does the separating: dead in Christ first, then a moment later those alive and in christ caught up, then those left behind suffer in the sudden destruction earthquake which John tells us is the beginning of the Day of the Lord. Again I remind you, this is the 6th seal of the book which contains the 70th week. There is NO WAY you can move this event anywhere. It is and will always be BEFORE any part of the 70th week.

Daniel 9:2 says: “In the first year of his reign I Daniel understood by books the number of the years, whereof the word of the LORD came to Jeremiah the prophet, that he would accomplish seventy years in the desolations of Jerusalem. And I set my face unto the Lord God, to seek by prayer and supplication, with fasting, and sackcloth, and ashes.”

Are these seventy years linear, congruent and sequential?

Daniel 9:21-24: “while I was speaking in prayer, even the man Gabriel, whom I had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to fly swiftly, touched me about the time of the evening oblation. And he informed me, and talked with me, and said, O Daniel, I am now come forth to give thee skill and understanding. At the beginning of thy supplications the commandment came forth, and I am come to shew thee; for thou art greatly beloved: therefore understand the matter, and consider the vision. Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy.”

Every sensible theologian of all end-times views see these initial seventy years in Daniel 9 congruent and sequential, why would see the "seventy weeks" any different?

The day of the Lord is pushed 7 years ahead of the coming of Christ even though there is no mention of such in this text. Pretrib is therefore exposed by this text.
This is just more nonsense by a postribber who will not believe the texts used. The truth is, NO ONE can move this 6th seal ANYWHERE. It is and always will be the next to the last seal sealing the BOOK that contains the 70th week. All this makes postrib doctrine collapse. Pretrib (at lest some of us) believes this text exactly as it is written, recognizing that this is after the rapture and before the start of the week. Pretrib certainly is not guilty of rearranging Revelation to fit a theory!

I am truly amazed at some of your arguments. I think you can do better.

Revelation 6:12-14 also relates this final destruction described in Isaiah 34 to the appearance of the Lord at the second coming, where the wicked finally receive their reward. We learn, “And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake; and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood; And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places. And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?”

This is speaking of the Coming of Christ in His wrath at the end at time that will also see the wicked and this current earth destroyed. No one could surely imagine that this current earth could survive the stars hitting this earth at the end. The word for stars here is aster (Strong’s 792), from where we get our word asteroids from. It the picture before us: “the stars of heaven fell unto the earth.”

This is indeed a terrifying day for those left behind. In fact, it is so horrific that the wicked cry out “to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb.” There is no doubt from the wording of this that the wrath of God accompanies the Lord’s return. The wicked are expressly trying to “hide … from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb.” This is a terrible day for the lost. The terror is magnified by the fact it is too late for hope.

There is none that escape this judgment. The rich and poor, the free and bond are all included. It says: “the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains; And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb”

It is not just this earth that is replaced at Christ’s return but also the heavens. The heavens above will also be dissolved when He comes. V 14 tells us: “And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places.”This narrative fits in with every other Second Coming passage that describes the end of the world at His Advent

This dark portrayal is completed by an apt rhetorical question, and one that Premils should consider, “and who shall be able to stand?” The answer of course is simple: none! No one could survive such a cataclysmic judgment – never. The nature and enormity of the destruction is too overwhelming. The earth, elements and the heavens are changed forever being regenerated by fire never to be the same again. Those on the earth after the catching away will simply be destroyed with this current earth.

This narrative alludes to the exact same scene as that described in Isaiah 34. In near word-for-word language, this solemn passage depicts God’s final judgment on the world, and shows God’s final wrath upon both the elements and the wicked that are left behind at Christ’s appearing. Moreover, the rhetorical question at the end of the above narrative demands the evident answer – none! In fact, Isaiah 34 actually supplies the required answer to the concluding question in Revelation 6:14 “who shall be able to stand?” saying, “none shall pass through it for ever and ever.” Assuredly, the wicked will not in anyway survive the climactic Coming of Christ, this being expressly “the great day of his wrath.” In short, none of those left behind “shall be able to stand.” This is not simply a temporary condition involving partial destruction in order to facilitate the setting up of a sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted millennium, no; it is the final conflagration that destroys this current scene of time “for ever and ever.”
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, but Revelation 19 shows us the marriage and supper in heaven BEFORE Christ and the armies of heaven descend.

The marriage is for the Bride. Have you not seen how the rapture follows the typical Jewish wedding?

Thanks again for totally avoiding the text and commentary and just advancing your opinions.

What "typical Jewish wedding" are you talking about?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
MYTH! God originated pretrib, passed it to Paul via revelation, and Paul wrote it. Too bad you don't understand it.

look: if you wish to be left behind to tribulate, that is between you and God. Please don't try and convince others to stay behind and face God's wrath. He has given us a way of escape. Why argue? Why not just take what God has offered: a way to escape what is coming?

Not so! It is a Jesuit invention.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If you wish to be left behind, that is between you and God. There WILL BE a pretrib rapture, but it will not be for those with NO FAITH in it. God gives nothing from heaven without faith.
Think about it! Do you have any faith in being caught up as Paul has written - just before wrath begins?

The Church is caught up and immediately the wrath of God is poured out on the wicked, and none shall escape. It would actually help if you read the text under discussion, instead of repeating what your teachers have taught you.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,384.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
1 & 2. Daniel did not call it "tribulation or a "7 year tribulation." Try verse 27.
3. How funny! The rapture is for the Gentile church! The 7 years is for Daniel's people.
4. Daniel 9 only covered the 70th week, not what would come later - as in His 3rd coming.
5. As I have written over and over, Daniel Himself inserted a gap. Notice that the events of 70 AD come BEFORE the mention of the final week.
6. Daniel never used the term "Antichrist." Christ had not yet come.
7. Tell us by proper English what the antecedent is to the "HE." (Verse 27)
8. See answer for 6.
9. Notice that Daniel tells us the entire 70 weeks (including the 70th) is for HIS PEOPLE.
10. Why do you insist all these things must be found in Daniel 9? We have MANY end times scriptures.

This is your only supposed proof-text and you admit it supports absolutely none of the Pretrib theories they force into this historic text. Your failure to answer any of my questions proves my claim that this is an extra-biblical Jesuit invention.
 
Upvote 0