the consensus of which is that the story of Noah's Ark doesn't represent history
I guess majority rules then?
How many Believed Noah?
"I tell you that he will avenge them speedily.
Nevertheless when the Son of man cometh,
shall he find faith on the earth?"
"But as the days of Noah were, so shall
also the coming of the Son of man be.
It's a fantastical story similar to what is found in other ancient near-eastern cultures.
I find the Bible no more credible as an historical source than the Epic of Gilgamesh would be to you.
I guess that is what "Other Religion" is for.
Various descriptions of a great, cataclysmic
ancient flood are common around the world.
These common ideas point to a common root
event. The account of the Flood is not just
found among the Israelites.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is probably the most
famous extra-biblical Flood account.
Why Does Nearly Every Culture Have a Tradition of a Global Flood?
How did all of these completely different peoples, all over the globe, get the same general—and sometimes very specific—ideas?
There have been no historically documented wooden ships as big as the Ark that were seaworthy.
That does not prove anything except that
Gods design was far better then modern mans.
We only have the size not the exact design.
Not to mention God keeping them safe.
-
Archaeology also keeps Proving
lots of Bible History Accurate.
