grasping the after wind
That's grasping after the wind
- Jan 18, 2010
- 19,458
- 6,354
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
I dont want cars....anywhere.
And no one is forcing you to have one. I approve of that.
Upvote
0
I dont want cars....anywhere.
Actually, as a taxpayer, I am forced to participate in the whole car-frastructure.And no one is forcing you to have one. I approve of that.
Actually, as a taxpayer, I am forced to participate in the whole car-frastructure.
I see. You resent forced participation when its on you. But you mock others so long as your agenda being enforced.I weep for you. I deeply sympathize.
I see. You resent forced participation when its on you. But you mock others so long as your agenda being enforced.
Oh. Sorry about that. I just assumed mockery because 99.8% of similar responses would not be in earnest.I wasn't mocking I seriously sympathize. I do not think you should d be made to drive a car or to pay for other people to do so. All government services should be voluntarily funded.
I remember Soviets had to wait in line for bread because the atheist communists mismanaged everything. Religious people were sent to prison labor camps where many died.Yeah, sorry to break it to everyone, but there were things about the Soviet Union that were good. And you can ask any immigrant (or any person who still lives there), and they can praise those things without expressing support horrific crimes, Stalin's countless murders, etc.
What were some of those good things?
You could get real time off work and go away with your family to a nice, low-key "resort" kind of place. Normal people could do this. Education was free and was at a pretty high level. Public transit in the cities worked and was cheap. It STILL WORKS. The Moscow subway is still so much better than the New York subway, it's insane. Is this some kind of authoritarian dream, that if you miss a subway train in the evening, another will be by in 2 minutes, not in 35 minutes?
OK.Then you're missing some context.
The OP said:
Human rights abuses have nothing to do with socialism. Economic collapse can be a result of the most extreme and inept forms of socialism, but they're not the result of the sort of European-style democratic socialism that Bernie espouses.
It's supremely dishonest and just pretty stupid to take Bernie's very narrow praise of certain aspects of these societies and try to extrapolate it to him being okay with all of the bad things that they did. It would be like saying that because I think Trump is pretty good at marketing and self-branding that I'm also okay with his race-baiting and his narcissism. Not only is it wildly incorrect, it's just dumb.
Of Cuba Sanders says:
"For better or for worse, the Cuban revolution is a very profound and very deep revolution. Much deeper than I had understood," Sanders wrote. "More interesting than their providing their people with free health care, free education, free housing ... is that they are in fact creating a very different value system than the one we are familiar with."
Of Moscow Sanders said:
"There are some things that [the Soviet Union does] better than we do and which were, in fact, quite impressive. Subway systems in in Moscow costs 5 kopecs — or 7 cents. Faster, cleaner, more attractive and more efficient than any in the U.S. — and cheap," an official statement from the Burlington's office reads. "The train trip that we took from Leningrad to Moscow — for Soviet citizens — was very cheap." Sanders then went on to praise "programs for youth and workers" that he saw during the trip.
Just not so sure that Bernie supporters have any idea about the horrible nature of these socialist regimes that Bernie praised. Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia are all top on human rights abuse, malnutrition, economic collapse. Bernie needs to walk back his 35-year history of praising these regimes.
For more see:Bernie Sanders praised communist Cuba and the Soviet Union in the 1980s
SOCIALISM!.....and?
You don’t see the nuance in this at all?Of Cuba Sanders says:
"For better or for worse, the Cuban revolution is a very profound and very deep revolution. Much deeper than I had understood," Sanders wrote. "More interesting than their providing their people with free health care, free education, free housing ... is that they are in fact creating a very different value system than the one we are familiar with."
Of Moscow Sanders said:
"There are some things that [the Soviet Union does] better than we do and which were, in fact, quite impressive. Subway systems in in Moscow costs 5 kopecs — or 7 cents. Faster, cleaner, more attractive and more efficient than any in the U.S. — and cheap," an official statement from the Burlington's office reads. "The train trip that we took from Leningrad to Moscow — for Soviet citizens — was very cheap." Sanders then went on to praise "programs for youth and workers" that he saw during the trip.
Just not so sure that Bernie supporters have any idea about the horrible nature of these socialist regimes that Bernie praised. Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia are all top on human rights abuse, malnutrition, economic collapse. Bernie needs to walk back his 35-year history of praising these regimes.
For more see:Bernie Sanders praised communist Cuba and the Soviet Union in the 1980s
Remember how in the 1980s the USA not only praised the Afghan mujahideen as "freedom fighters" during the Afghan-Soviet war, but also gave them money via other Muslim nations? Remember who was president at the time, and which party he was from? (The NY Times remembers, if no one here does.)
“The United States continued to move backward on human rights at home and abroad in the second year of President Donald Trump’s administration. With Trump’s Republican party controlling the legislative branch in 2018, his administration and Congress were able to pass laws, implement regulations, and carry out policies that violate or undermine human rights.”Nicaragua, Cuba, Venezuela, Russia are all top on human rights abuse, malnutrition, economic collapse. Bernie needs to walk back his 35-year history of praising these regimes.
I don't know - we heard all sorts of things about how he would adopt a different personality once elected. That hasn't exactly worked out. I'm not convinced he's capable of it.That is true. But if he had run as a Democrat, he would have adopted a different personality.
That's the fun of itCan you show when and where Bernie has done precisely that?
Of Cuba Sanders says:
"For better or for worse, the Cuban revolution is a very profound and very deep revolution. Much deeper than I had understood," Sanders wrote. "More interesting than their providing their people with free health care, free education, free housing ... is that they are in fact creating a very different value system than the one we are familiar with."
Yes. You seem to be dodging the fact that calling Cuban socialism in the 1980s, " than their providing their people with free health care, free education, free housing ... is that they are in fact creating a very different value system than the one we are familiar with," is praise. Where did they get all the money to "Provide free health care and free education, and housing," from?To the op: Is appreciating a revolution the same as praise?
Do you appreciate what led to the Cuban revolution?
That’s the thing though. If Trump were a Democrat, we wouldn’t have elected him president.