Tongues, a Sign to the Unbeliever

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,404.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
"'And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues;" Mark 16:17

"Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe." I Cor 14:22
True. In the context of public fellowship meetings. We must be clear about that to prevent misunderstanding of the different types of tongues as per the list in 1 Corinthians 12.
 
Upvote 0

Alarmist

Member
Feb 17, 2020
10
6
49
Henderson
✟15,499.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
The private and personal use of tongues was not a sign at all.
The tongues spoken of in Corinthians were a gift..(which were for the edification of the body. The proper use of gifts was the subject of Pauls's writing (1Corinthians 12-14) ...the way you can tell is, When he said in 1Corinthians12:1," Now concerning spiritual gifts". He made his subject very clear. The point of speaking without an interpreter was a small side detail. When there is no interpretation, the tongue is unknown/not understood and should be done in private. Seek rather that ye may edify others. Therefore an interpretation is the desired result, so that others may benefit.

How could that be a sign for anyone seeing that the person is praying in tongues in his private prayer room with God being the only listener?
You are separating "Tongues" into categories. There is only 1 category, which is "The gifts of the Spirit".

It was more the fellowship use of tongues along with interpretation that was the sign. Paul links it to Isaiah who said that the presence of the Assyrian language in the nation of Israel was a sign to show God's judgment upon the nation in that He was allowing it to be invaded by a foreign power, because of their idolatry.
The prophecy of Isaiah, pointed to a day where God would reach for the rebellious house of Israel(after the covenant of the law was past, which renders Jews outside of Gods saving Grace Plan) in his mercy. A people speaking the language (not having formerly known the language) of the Jews, was to be an undeniable sign that a new rest had come, and that the Jews should give credence to the message(concerning the messiah) of the apostles,

Paul's statement about tongues being a "sign" would make more sense to Jewish believers, because the pagan Corinthians would not be able to make that link. The Jewish believers would have know exactly what Paul meant; and any Jew coming into a Christian fellowship meeting and hearing tongues and interpretation would know the sign because they would be able to make the link to Isaiah's prophecy. But Gentiles coming into the meeting, not being able to make that link, would not see the use of tongues as a sign at all.
The house of Cornelius, being Gentiles, would have understood the link.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,404.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
The tongues spoken of in Corinthians were a gift..(which were for the edification of the body. The proper use of gifts was the subject of Pauls's writing (1Corinthians 12-14) ...the way you can tell is, When he said in 1Corinthians12:1," Now concerning spiritual gifts". He made his subject very clear. The point of speaking without an interpreter was a small side detail. When there is no interpretation, the tongue is unknown/not understood and should be done in private. Seek rather that ye may edify others. Therefore an interpretation is the desired result, so that others may benefit.


You are separating "Tongues" into categories. There is only 1 category, which is "The gifts of the Spirit".

The prophecy of Isaiah, pointed to a day where God would reach for the rebellious house of Israel(after the covenant of the law was past, which renders Jews outside of Gods saving Grace Plan) in his mercy. A people speaking the language (not having formerly known the language) of the Jews, was to be an undeniable sign that a new rest had come, and that the Jews should give credence to the message(concerning the messiah) of the apostles,

The house of Cornelius, being Gentiles, would have understood the link.
I agree. 1 Corinthians 12 speaks of "various types of tongues" which means that there were different variations of the gift for different purposes (I just wanted to make that clear, for information and not contention).

I agree that the house of Cornelius would have understood the link because they were "God-fearers", having been initiated into Judaism without being fully converted to it. So they would have been familiar with the Old Testament Scriptures.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AbbaLove
Upvote 0

topher694

Go Turtle!
Jan 29, 2019
3,828
3,038
St. Cloud, MN
✟186,960.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You are separating "Tongues" into categories. There is only 1 category, which is "The gifts of the Spirit".
What is your personal experience with tongues and the rest of the gifts of the Spirit?
 
Upvote 0

tturt

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2006
15,773
7,240
✟795,760.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Are the "those who believe not" referring to the unsaved or followers of Jesus who dont believe in speaking in tongues? I Cor 14:22

Also, all tongues can be interpreted according to I Cor 14:13.

Because of their purposes , I dont see it as a small detail. I's not just for a select few but for any believer. Tongues are a sign to unbelievers by believers.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Eha

Active Member
Jan 6, 2020
130
41
51
Tallinn
✟30,373.00
Country
Estonia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
What is your personal experience with tongues and the rest of the gifts of the Spirit?
yeah real experience make everything clear.
people often think, that healing, prophecy and so on, are special gifts given to someone for this lifetime. but in reality - those gifts are given at that moment, they are needed .
tongues, as tool for Holy Spirit to build up yourself, pray for you and as a sign for unbelievers, are given for lifetime, while baptized with Holy Spirit and fire and this is only gift given, while baptized with Holy Spirit and fire.
i prophecy, healed BEFORE was baptized with Holy Spirit and fire.
apostles heal people and made other things, BEFORE they were baptized Holy Spirit and fire.
Paul is talking about correct order in the meeting, while at that meeting some heal, some prophecy and so on - i have been at those meetings.

so reality indeed are final point, to understand, what is written, IF Father do not decide other way.

and sorry - prophecy is only gift, you can use, when you like it.
i know that, because i used it, when lost keys, finding out, what for was help requested and so on.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Eha

Active Member
Jan 6, 2020
130
41
51
Tallinn
✟30,373.00
Country
Estonia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
i am tired of reading peoples wildest guessings, while there is not secret, that to understand scripture and be sure, you are correct - you HAVE TO DO, WHAT JESUS TEACH. Then comes understanding and experience.
even then, sometimes, Father have to show me and explain me, WHAT I JUST DID GO THROUGH.
Understand even NT WITHOUT Holy Spirit is not always easy. Even though we speak about Paul, who was " hard to understand and easy to misunderstand".
 
  • Like
Reactions: anx66
Upvote 0

anx66

Active Member
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2016
193
79
57
Haverhill
✟53,564.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
1 Corinthians 14:22 "Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers"

What do you believe this means?

I didn't know what this verse meant for 30 years. I just put it on the shelf in hopes that someday it would make sense to me. Now I know. (If you've read my book, please don't respond with what I wrote as I just want to know what other Charismatics believe.)

It could be that the disciples who used tongues, where talking in the languages of those around them in there own tongue. Therefore, it was a sign to them. After all, they were Galileans speaking in umpteen different languages that it was unlikely they had learned.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

CharismaticLady

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 14, 2019
2,596
654
76
Tennessee
✟140,294.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
It could be that the disciples who used tongues, where talking in the languages of those around them in there own tongue. Therefore, it was a sign to them. After all, they were Galileans speaking in umpteen different languages that it was unlikely they had learned.

No that contradicts God written word - the rules on tongues in 1 Corinthians 14. Acts 2 is an account of when it first manifested. But it cannot contradict the rule. God is not the author of confusion. The ONLY way to understand tongues is through the supernatural gift of interpretation of the gift of tongues, not natural languages in general as some unfortunately twist. Friend, just stay to the rule and let the story/account line up with it. Don't try to change the rule. It is written in stone. In the case of Acts 2, the emphasis was on the hearing. Each man heard all of the disciples like a choir speaking his own language. Read it again noting that emphasis.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,404.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Hello. Curious. What do you think of Kenneth Copeland and Rodney Howard Browne having a conversation in tongues?

It's a blatant misuse of the gift, and right against Paul's clear teaching on it.

But in saying that, my old pastor suffered a stroke in the late 1970s and couldn't speak in English, but he could speak in tongues, and so he and his son in law would converse in tongues. I think Paul would understand that in view of the circumstances - but it wasn't done as a public display as these two "honourable gentlemen" were doing. (I could have called them something else, but I have been instructed to be friendly! :) )
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟831,404.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
It could be that the disciples who used tongues, where talking in the languages of those around them in there own tongue. Therefore, it was a sign to them. After all, they were Galileans speaking in umpteen different languages that it was unlikely they had learned.
This has happened on occasion in modern times. It happened twice as far as I know in my own church, where someone prayed in tongues and the person sitting beside them heard the praises of God in their on native dialect. This is how it can serve as a sign, especially if the person hearing the praises of God is an unbeliever - such as the Chinese girl sitting in an gospel meeting, and the man behind her, praying in tongues, spoke clear Cantonese, saying, "You need to go forward and receive Christ". That was a sign to that unsaved girl and she did go forward and was saved.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: AbbaLove
Upvote 0

Bob Carabbio

Old guy -
Dec 22, 2010
2,271
568
81
Glenn Hts. TX
✟35,309.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
1 Corinthians 14:22 "Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers"

What do you believe this means?

When a non-believer is addressed in HIS OWN MOTHER TONGUE (often in even the correct regional accent), and told things that the one addressing him couldn't know, and on top of it when the speaker doesn't even KNOW the language he's speaking - that can be rather "Arresting".
 
  • Like
Reactions: lismore
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SPF

Well-Known Member
Feb 7, 2017
3,594
1,984
ATL
✟142,081.00
Country
United States
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
When a non-believer is addressed in HIS OWN MOTHER TONGUE (often in even the correct regional accent), and told things that the one addressing him couldn't know, and on top of it when the speaker doesn't even KNOW the language he's speaking - that can be rather "Arresting".
The day of Pentecost in Acts is a testimony to this truth. Someone who doesn't speak your native language, naturally, suddenly doing so, declaring the marvelous wonders of God is indeed a sign unto them, the unbeliever.

For those of us who already believe, it's not a sign - we already believe, we don't need it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lismore
Upvote 0

tturt

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2006
15,773
7,240
✟795,760.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There are numerous purposes for tongues including "... he that speaketh in an unknown tongue edifieth himself..." I Cor 14:4 + " ...they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God..." Acts 10:46 Also, the church can be edfied with a message of tongues with interpretation..I Cor 14:5.

Seems like this forum is only for posters who believe in the gifts.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AbbaLove

Circumcism Of The Heart
May 16, 2015
2,491
761
✟120,206.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
previous reply deleted as i'm not a charismatic. That said I do believe the nine Supernatural Gifts are just as much in operation today (if not more so) as during the 1st century AD/CE among true Believers/Followers of Messiah Yeshua / Christ Jesus.​
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AbbaLove

Circumcism Of The Heart
May 16, 2015
2,491
761
✟120,206.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
1 Corinthians 14:22 "Therefore tongues are for a sign,
not to those who believe but to unbelievers".

What do you believe this means?

I just want to know what other Charismatics believe.
Apologize for not seeing that this discussion is just for "Charismatic" Believers.
So, deleted my previous posts.​
 
Upvote 0