Lets vote for the Bible to be our form of government- #vote for God

Status
Not open for further replies.

GreekOrthodox

Psalti Chrysostom
Oct 25, 2010
4,121
4,191
Yorktown VA
✟176,342.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I teach a course at the local community college so i can speak as a teacher. I would not compromise the truth or my integrity and teach junk science. you say i wouldn't have a choice...Will you place one of your faithful in the classroom with a gun pointed at me? Will you threaten the lives of my children if i don't comply?

why repost? you don't answer questions

do i have a choice or must i comply with your dictates?

You have a choice to win the victory over yourself.

"He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."
 
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,474
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,492.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I am willing to address any proof you have of this statement. I already made my supporting statements regarding it, and I have lots more to say. But those have to be refuted first.
I already said, Malachi 3:6
Dispensationalism assumes that God changes.
 
Upvote 0

Robin Mauro

Well-Known Member
Sep 11, 2018
702
400
64
North San Juan
✟27,401.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am of the opinion that all problems in society came from the fall yes, but secondly they came from involving the first hebrew nation in the old testament to have a kingship. Some say that theocracies never work, yet we have never had a government simply legislate the Bible alone. The Jews never followed the strict tanach. They would go thousands of years not even reading the torah, and then King Josiah finds the scrolls one day all bundled up in the temple. So no we have never had a theocracy, accept before King saul. But no theocracy in the last four thousand years for sure. NOT A STRICT THEOCRACY.

The first amendment protects freedom of religion in some ways. And for that I am grateful, however I believe it also make it illegal to legislate religion as well.

What does the new testament teach about Government?
My theory is to follow this scripture:
"All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17

if political work is a good work, then the Bible it says "equips for every good work."

then that including politics, and that means that it is good to be used for political purposes.
Can you follow the logic? Now there are many misconceptions of what it would mean to legislate scripture as law legally speaking and I wish to take previous comments from other threads (now closed to start of this conversation if that is ok).

The first comment was from @Greengardener and she said this:


There are some questions as to what laws should be made into civil law. For example the law "you shall worship no other God." Does that mean it's illegal to be atheist or muslim? Well I would if I were to be in the place of trump running for 2020 as a person who would legislate the Bible. Upon getting elected I would have the top seminaries send the best of the best leaders and christian thinkers (which I would vet and interview with a panel) and declare what orthodox christianity is, and what doctrines incorporate that. The Trinity, soteriology, and covenants or dispensations, and any other doctrine.

On first hand I would outlaw non essential businesses from operating on the Sabbath. Gas stations, emergency rooms, police, hospitals, firefighters, etc are considered emergency services, they could all work but most commerce 99% of it would cease. But I am not sure about the gas station thing yet, I don't know if they are emergency. One could always have a spare can of gas. As far as American Holidays, there needs to be some explanation as to what is pagan and what is not. I believe Constantine blended roman holidays, pagan holidays with a christian twist when he converted to christianity. So they had pagan holidays, He gets saved, and now these same pagan holidays, now have a christian name. So we would do something a little different. We would take the christian part of the holiday, and remove the pagan aspects of them. This to me is only something that makes sense in a theocracy. Doing so now is merely personal basis. So for example on Christmas we would celebrate christs birth, but we would not have a tree, which was the pagan addition, but we would have something equally as fun, we would not take something away that we didn't substitute for something better. On easter we would have the resurrection celebrated but we would substitute out the easter bunny and the eggs which was the pagan addition. But we would still celebrate easter sunday, good friday....everyone would have good friday off as a paid holiday universally.

Again just because someone who had religious principles in government failed to follow the religion, does not mean that will be the case this time. That is called the fallacy of poisoning the well. Just because something is hard does not mean we don't do everything in our power to do what is right. I have a hard time believing that.


again Christ showed how religiousness without relationship was worthless, and condemned moralism and religiosity, without faith in Christ as the motivator. Christ sets us free from the law of sin and death, never the less. The law is not bad it is a school teacher to bring us to faith in Christ. While we will be legally required to follow the ten commandments you can follow them and still not be saved. It's not by our works we are saved. So this would just be civil law.


yes under normal circumstances I would agree that this task would be an impossibility. But our God is a God of the impossible and the Bible actually asks us to do impossible things in the name of Christ..."be perfect as I am perfect" for example. But to say it will happen like this this time, is impossible to know if we don't try.

Yes I would fast and pray for each member and ask for prayer and have prayer meetings to cover all of our own board meetings. If God is a God of prayer, He would meet us in our prayer and bless our nation. But ultimately if I was running for president I would have a choice over who was in the cabinet. Who was over everything. And I ultimately would pray to God to see what He wants me to do, not what I would want to do.



Power I am afraid is the one thing that would destroy the christian rule. Due to pride. But the fact that christianity is so peculiar to our culture: (homosexuality is wrong, a woman should submit, no women pastors, one woman one man marriage) that these things are meant to be rejected by the masses and people would in fact hate God's rule. So I don't think this will happen, but it's only because we don't truly believe in God's word, nor in the power of God to do something like this. But the Bible explicitly says if we had the faith of a mustard seed, He could move a mountain into the ocean.

I have been talking about this in other threads. All freedoms that one man gains, is at the cost of another mans freedom. The right to bear arms is at the cost of another mans freedom not to want people around him to be armed. The freedom to have homosexuals marry is at the cost of the freedom of a christian pastors rights NOT to marry them, or bake a cake for them, or take pictures of their event, etc. So you see, freedom is not free. Most if not all freedoms cost something. Freedom comes from God but it's not free. It is very costly. So again in Jesus condemning homosexuality He literally took their freedom away to become christian and obtain eternal life. He did so with the adulterer, and the thief and the lyer as well in dozens of verses. So yes Christianity does take away freedoms, it's probably one of the most limiting religion in the world as far as "worldly freedoms." But one of the most joyful for sure, due to serving others in Christ's love.


The early colonizers had in some limited aspects the same view I do, "let God rule the nation." It's not my own theory it's been practiced in some forms in some limited circles every since america was founded. In fact in a supreme court ruling a supreme court justice ruled "america is a christian nation." This ruling was overturned by the bill of rights and the constitution itself. But we should still strive for God to rule, again if scripture is "given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and if political work is good work, then the Bible it says that itself alone "equips for every good work." so that including politics, and that means it can and should be legislated. Now that does not mean we should not each have our own walk with God and our own prayer life. But my cabinet by law will be required to read scripture, memorize scripture, to pray over decisions in various ways that will be part of their job. And if I don't think their walk with the Lord is right, or if they are getting too proud, I can fire them for no reason at all. Like any president can.
As Paul said to those trying to be saved by the law, " Have you read the law?!"
That's why some countries are still stone people caught in adultery (usually women)...the Taliban for instance.
But ultimately, our laws are based, for the most part, on the Bible...don't steal, don't murder, etc., even though many people do not realize that. But to go back to all the old laws, we would all be dead.
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
4,384
5,079
New Jersey
✟335,136.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I teach a course at the local community college so i can speak as a teacher. I would not compromise the truth or my integrity and teach junk science. you say i wouldn't have a choice...Will you place one of your faithful in the classroom with a gun pointed at me? Will you threaten the lives of my children if i don't comply?

I believe the normal approach, when a school is being taken over by a conservative religious group, is to fire all the faculty who won't comply. So you and I and most state university faculty members across the country would find ourselves out of a job. I've seen this happen with church-affiliated colleges when there was a theological shift within the denomination that sponsored the school.

@createdtoworship , am I right? Given that many public university faculty are not Christians, and given that most Christian faculty members are not young earth creationists and are not Fundamentalists, would your government fire most current public university faculty members across the country and replace them with Fundamentalists? Would you do the same with the private universities as well?
 
Upvote 0

Quartermaine

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2019
2,794
1,615
49
Alma
✟80,772.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You have a choice to win the victory over yourself.

"He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother."
^_^
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
that would be something we would consider. No government can legislate beliefs, so that is not what we would do. But certain world views would be barred from being taught in schools that had federal funding or federal accreditation. For example if a school removed the ten commandment for example from their statement of beliefs, they would also lose federal grant money, research grants, and accreditation.
Which Ten Commandments? Remember that Christians do not agree on the exact wording of the Ten Commandments.
 
Upvote 0

Thomas White

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2020
1,196
708
37
Stockbridge
✟79,254.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Catholics notoriously don't have the idols/graven images commandment..

I'm sorry, but that simply is not true. From the Catechism:

ARTICLE 1
THE FIRST COMMANDMENT

I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.3
It is written: "You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve."4
 
  • Agree
Reactions: panman
Upvote 0

Thomas White

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2020
1,196
708
37
Stockbridge
✟79,254.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
now having quoted justice brewer, I am not agreeing 100% with his views, I am just saying that legally speaking the united states was ruled a "christian nation." And the Justice does modify that He was not talking about a christian government later, but I would disagree with that part. I believe we should in fact legislate the scripture. That is what I mean when I say that no theocracy of the whole Bible as law, has ever happened, but we would go back to earlier laws that did support more of the christian government. I wouldn't have the same doubts about legislating christianity, christianity is nothing to be ashamed of, I for one am not ashamed of my savior and His words should be law.

The basis of your three post response is Justice Brewer's ruling and clarification - a clarification that clearly states that the U.S. is not legally a Christian nation. You then respond that you don't agree with that part, only the second part. You are literally pulling sections of documents out of the context in which they were written. You're revising history to fit your needs. That's what gives rise to revisionist history.

You still haven't replied to my original point. How will you prevent persecution, or will you allow it?

Finally, I must ask, why are you ignoring the examples of the many theocracies throughout history?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: panman
Upvote 0

Jamdoc

Watching and Praying Always
Oct 22, 2019
7,474
2,327
43
Helena
✟206,492.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
I'm sorry, but that simply is not true. From the Catechism:

ARTICLE 1
THE FIRST COMMANDMENT

I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself a graven image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them or serve them.3
It is written: "You shall worship the Lord your God and him only shall you serve."4
The Catholic 10 commandments I've always seen have no idolatry ban and have 2 commandments on coveting instead.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The Catholic 10 commandments I've always seen have no idolatry ban and have 2 commandments on coveting instead.
My understanding is that Roman Catholics have such a ban. Catholics and Lutherans share the same commandments with other Christians. The difference is largely in the wording and the numbering.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I teach a course at the local community college so i can speak as a teacher. I would not compromise the truth or my integrity and teach junk science. you say i wouldn't have a choice...Will you place one of your faithful in the classroom with a gun pointed at me? Will you threaten the lives of my children if i don't comply?

why repost? you don't answer questions

do i have a choice or must i comply with your dictates?
I am just asking for posters to be polite and not to use insults and other forms of logical fallacy for arguments. So if you have more questions, just ask. If you don't wish to ask, then thank you for the debate. And for the record I said people will have the right to bear arms, I never said I would shoot people I disagree with or that that would even be legal to do. As far as replacing teachers who teach evolution, that will not be a big problem. They will be forced to teach real science. Not pseudo science. So that should be an upgrade to most, but if they decide not to teach what the educational division decides is proper curriculum, just as it is today with creationism, the same thing would happen with evolutionists, they would lose their job in the same way creationists can lose their job today.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As Paul said to those trying to be saved by the law, " Have you read the law?!"
That's why some countries are still stone people caught in adultery (usually women)...the Taliban for instance.
But ultimately, our laws are based, for the most part, on the Bible...don't steal, don't murder, etc., even though many people do not realize that. But to go back to all the old laws, we would all be dead.
yes I am aware of the capital crimes of moses law and the levitical law. The commands that are repeated in the new testament would carry forward, such as the ten commandments, the others such as stoning people would not carry forward. Jesus instead of stoning the woman instead chose to say it was hypocritical to judge her. So grace is a new testament thing, and people would have grace incorporated into the laws as well. Not sure if it's a three strikes your out type of thing or how it would work. But if you mess up one time, most likely you are not going to be punished or fined.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I believe the normal approach, when a school is being taken over by a conservative religious group, is to fire all the faculty who won't comply. So you and I and most state university faculty members across the country would find ourselves out of a job. I've seen this happen with church-affiliated colleges when there was a theological shift within the denomination that sponsored the school.

@createdtoworship , am I right? Given that many public university faculty are not Christians, and given that most Christian faculty members are not young earth creationists and are not Fundamentalists, would your government fire most current public university faculty members across the country and replace them with Fundamentalists? Would you do the same with the private universities as well?
no, no, no. Just as I said. you can teach the scriptures even though you don't agree with them. Teachers who are creationists are forced by law to teach evolution all the time. They do so to retain their jobs, so the same thing would happen. You simply teach what the education directors say is the proper curriculum at any given time, you don't get a choice over what topics to teach, you merely get find alternative ways to teach what they want you to teach. It's not different than today.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Which Ten Commandments? Remember that Christians do not agree on the exact wording of the Ten Commandments.
Well I don't think most evangelicals disagree with what the ten commandments are. Maybe other christian groups maybe. But ultimately that would fall in line with the 12 directors that came from top seminaries, they would decide what is normative orthodoxy, and what is explicit orthodoxy.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,425
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟571,140.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Well I don't think most evangelicals disagree with what the ten commandments are. Maybe other christian groups maybe. But ultimately that would fall in line with the 12 directors that came from top seminaries, they would decide what is normative orthodoxy, and what is explicit orthodoxy.
So now this isn’t just going to be a Christian nation, but it will specifically Be an Evangelical Christian nation. So those running it will all be very conservative? The title of your thread says this is being done by vote. Are you limiting the voters to Evangelical Christians?

Bad idea to begin with, even a worse idea now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Thomas White
Upvote 0

Quartermaine

Well-Known Member
Sep 16, 2019
2,794
1,615
49
Alma
✟80,772.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I am just asking for posters to be polite and not to use insults and other forms of logical fallacy for arguments. So if you have more questions, just ask. If you don't wish to ask, then thank you for the debate. And for the record I said people will have the right to bear arms, I never said I would shoot people I disagree with or that that would even be legal to do.
SO what happens to the millions upon millions people who refuse to live under your benevolent rule? Death Camps? Secret police? Torture? Mutilation? Mass graves?
that would be something we would consider.

As far as replacing teachers who teach evolution, that will not be a big problem. They will be forced to teach real science. Not pseudo science. So that should be an upgrade to most, but if they decide not to teach what the educational division decides is proper curriculum, just as it is today with creationism, the same thing would happen with evolutionists, they would lose their job in the same way creationists can lose their job today.


In a conversation with a friend on your plans for government dictation of academic policies he told me of encountering this very situation when he was a high school biology teacher. He taught at a private charter school which while not Christian may of well have been. The board decided that his biology classes woudl teach intelligent design and "real science" He told the board that they wouldn't like the results. The board demanded approval of his lesson plans and he happily complied. The start of the school year would begin with instruction of facts, theories and hypothesizes and how to differentiated them and move to evaluation of evidence and research presented in the "approved" science textbooks. The kids woudl study and research ID for themselves. At the start of the year he surveyed all his students and found that 90% rejected evolution and completely accepted creationism/intelligent design. At the end of the year 98% of the students had rejected ID/creationism and viewed evolution as based in evidence and truth. the three or four students not fully on board with evolution indicated they believed evolution to be completely correct but it was just guided by the hand of God

So good luck with trying to force kids to accept your fake science.[/QUOTE]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archivist
Upvote 0

Thomas White

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2020
1,196
708
37
Stockbridge
✟79,254.00
Country
United States
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The Catholic 10 commandments I've always seen have no idolatry ban and have 2 commandments on coveting instead.

What I posted was from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the official dogma of the Church. It clearly state the commandment against idols.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: panman
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sparagmos

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
8,632
7,319
52
Portland, Oregon
✟278,062.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I am of the opinion that all problems in society came from the fall yes, but secondly they came from involving the first hebrew nation in the old testament to have a kingship. Some say that theocracies never work, yet we have never had a government simply legislate the Bible alone. The Jews never followed the strict tanach. They would go thousands of years not even reading the torah, and then King Josiah finds the scrolls one day all bundled up in the temple. So no we have never had a theocracy, accept before King saul. But no theocracy in the last four thousand years for sure. NOT A STRICT THEOCRACY.

The first amendment protects freedom of religion in some ways. And for that I am grateful, however I believe it also make it illegal to legislate religion as well.

What does the new testament teach about Government?
My theory is to follow this scripture:
"All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17

if political work is a good work, then the Bible it says "equips for every good work."

then that including politics, and that means that it is good to be used for political purposes.
Can you follow the logic? Now there are many misconceptions of what it would mean to legislate scripture as law legally speaking and I wish to take previous comments from other threads (now closed to start of this conversation if that is ok).

The first comment was from @Greengardener and she said this:


There are some questions as to what laws should be made into civil law. For example the law "you shall worship no other God." Does that mean it's illegal to be atheist or muslim? Well I would if I were to be in the place of trump running for 2020 as a person who would legislate the Bible. Upon getting elected I would have the top seminaries send the best of the best leaders and christian thinkers (which I would vet and interview with a panel) and declare what orthodox christianity is, and what doctrines incorporate that. The Trinity, soteriology, and covenants or dispensations, and any other doctrine.

On first hand I would outlaw non essential businesses from operating on the Sabbath. Gas stations, emergency rooms, police, hospitals, firefighters, etc are considered emergency services, they could all work but most commerce 99% of it would cease. But I am not sure about the gas station thing yet, I don't know if they are emergency. One could always have a spare can of gas. As far as American Holidays, there needs to be some explanation as to what is pagan and what is not. I believe Constantine blended roman holidays, pagan holidays with a christian twist when he converted to christianity. So they had pagan holidays, He gets saved, and now these same pagan holidays, now have a christian name. So we would do something a little different. We would take the christian part of the holiday, and remove the pagan aspects of them. This to me is only something that makes sense in a theocracy. Doing so now is merely personal basis. So for example on Christmas we would celebrate christs birth, but we would not have a tree, which was the pagan addition, but we would have something equally as fun, we would not take something away that we didn't substitute for something better. On easter we would have the resurrection celebrated but we would substitute out the easter bunny and the eggs which was the pagan addition. But we would still celebrate easter sunday, good friday....everyone would have good friday off as a paid holiday universally.

Again just because someone who had religious principles in government failed to follow the religion, does not mean that will be the case this time. That is called the fallacy of poisoning the well. Just because something is hard does not mean we don't do everything in our power to do what is right. I have a hard time believing that.


again Christ showed how religiousness without relationship was worthless, and condemned moralism and religiosity, without faith in Christ as the motivator. Christ sets us free from the law of sin and death, never the less. The law is not bad it is a school teacher to bring us to faith in Christ. While we will be legally required to follow the ten commandments you can follow them and still not be saved. It's not by our works we are saved. So this would just be civil law.


yes under normal circumstances I would agree that this task would be an impossibility. But our God is a God of the impossible and the Bible actually asks us to do impossible things in the name of Christ..."be perfect as I am perfect" for example. But to say it will happen like this this time, is impossible to know if we don't try.

Yes I would fast and pray for each member and ask for prayer and have prayer meetings to cover all of our own board meetings. If God is a God of prayer, He would meet us in our prayer and bless our nation. But ultimately if I was running for president I would have a choice over who was in the cabinet. Who was over everything. And I ultimately would pray to God to see what He wants me to do, not what I would want to do.



Power I am afraid is the one thing that would destroy the christian rule. Due to pride. But the fact that christianity is so peculiar to our culture: (homosexuality is wrong, a woman should submit, no women pastors, one woman one man marriage) that these things are meant to be rejected by the masses and people would in fact hate God's rule. So I don't think this will happen, but it's only because we don't truly believe in God's word, nor in the power of God to do something like this. But the Bible explicitly says if we had the faith of a mustard seed, He could move a mountain into the ocean.

I have been talking about this in other threads. All freedoms that one man gains, is at the cost of another mans freedom. The right to bear arms is at the cost of another mans freedom not to want people around him to be armed. The freedom to have homosexuals marry is at the cost of the freedom of a christian pastors rights NOT to marry them, or bake a cake for them, or take pictures of their event, etc. So you see, freedom is not free. Most if not all freedoms cost something. Freedom comes from God but it's not free. It is very costly. So again in Jesus condemning homosexuality He literally took their freedom away to become christian and obtain eternal life. He did so with the adulterer, and the thief and the lyer as well in dozens of verses. So yes Christianity does take away freedoms, it's probably one of the most limiting religion in the world as far as "worldly freedoms." But one of the most joyful for sure, due to serving others in Christ's love.


The early colonizers had in some limited aspects the same view I do, "let God rule the nation." It's not my own theory it's been practiced in some forms in some limited circles every since america was founded. In fact in a supreme court ruling a supreme court justice ruled "america is a christian nation." This ruling was overturned by the bill of rights and the constitution itself. But we should still strive for God to rule, again if scripture is "given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17 and if political work is good work, then the Bible it says that itself alone "equips for every good work." so that including politics, and that means it can and should be legislated. Now that does not mean we should not each have our own walk with God and our own prayer life. But my cabinet by law will be required to read scripture, memorize scripture, to pray over decisions in various ways that will be part of their job. And if I don't think their walk with the Lord is right, or if they are getting too proud, I can fire them for no reason at all. Like any president can.
Are you proposing that a group of Christians take over the government, undemocratically and unconstitutionally, and force a theocracy on the people of this country? I mean, we’d all like the laws to be changed to fit our own personal belief systems, but unless a majority of people share your views you won’t accomplish that in a democracy.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.