Hi there,
So there is a something massive I didn't count on when setting out to work out the relationship between Creation and Evolution: First Impressions. First impressions are simply the instinct first presented to a potential mate, that help define the relationship in a way that develops a stronger union between the two. Without first impressions, it would never be possible to tell whether a mate was a suitable candidate or not. Put simply: first impressions have to make a good first impression or mating is almost completely without a chance of successfully creating offspring.
So what does this prove about Creation? Well, Creation establishes that there is a design behind the first impressions being made: in other words, Creation has the advertizing material, to prove that there is more of a reason to mate, than less. And this relates to Evolution, how? That's the problem: Evolution has no foundation on which to base a relationship. You would have to argue that Evolution learns to make a good first impression, after it is too late to make a good first impression. In other words, Evolution's chance of finding a mate is continually diminishing, down to the point that it concedes there is a design on which to base it.
So I say "call Evolution's bluff"! At the point that Evolution makes any impression at all, it will have had no other choice, but to copy from all the other potential mates it is competing with, down to the last point, where it finally admits there is a design. You just can't get around it; it is Evolutionarily sound logic, that Evolution defeats itself as a competitor,, beginning as it does with so few rules, that it doesn't know when to start. How do you come at it any other way? What first impression does Evolution make, that somehow puts it ahead of the first impression that Creation keeps making?
I am happy to hear your comments, on first impressions.
Thanks.
So there is a something massive I didn't count on when setting out to work out the relationship between Creation and Evolution: First Impressions. First impressions are simply the instinct first presented to a potential mate, that help define the relationship in a way that develops a stronger union between the two. Without first impressions, it would never be possible to tell whether a mate was a suitable candidate or not. Put simply: first impressions have to make a good first impression or mating is almost completely without a chance of successfully creating offspring.
So what does this prove about Creation? Well, Creation establishes that there is a design behind the first impressions being made: in other words, Creation has the advertizing material, to prove that there is more of a reason to mate, than less. And this relates to Evolution, how? That's the problem: Evolution has no foundation on which to base a relationship. You would have to argue that Evolution learns to make a good first impression, after it is too late to make a good first impression. In other words, Evolution's chance of finding a mate is continually diminishing, down to the point that it concedes there is a design on which to base it.
So I say "call Evolution's bluff"! At the point that Evolution makes any impression at all, it will have had no other choice, but to copy from all the other potential mates it is competing with, down to the last point, where it finally admits there is a design. You just can't get around it; it is Evolutionarily sound logic, that Evolution defeats itself as a competitor,, beginning as it does with so few rules, that it doesn't know when to start. How do you come at it any other way? What first impression does Evolution make, that somehow puts it ahead of the first impression that Creation keeps making?
I am happy to hear your comments, on first impressions.
Thanks.