Why don’t you post the alleged prophesy. Your source of the prophesy. Is the source you heard the person alleging prophesy? Is it a writing by such a person? Or are you having to rely upon what someone else remembers the person saying?
I’ve seen
no evidence @Yarddog inaccururately represented what’s alleged to be a prophesy.
Neither are you!
Yet the alleged prophesy as represented by Yarddog can’t be a reference to Trump. You’ve provided no evidence Yarddog has inaccurately expressed the prophesy.
Which means your ability to find the original alleged prophesy itself is impeded. Such an impediment renders it extremely difficult to test the veracity and credibility of what is alleged to have been said. In other words, your being deferential to rumors, what is rumored to have been said, delivered to you by unknown degrees of hearsay.
That’s what you want to pawn off as prophesy? Sounds familiar, yes, this is similar to the church in the Middle Ages taking advantage of the largely illiterate Christian populace in which the illiterate had to trust what the church leaders said was Biblical was in fact Biblical. Once the blinders came off through the lens of literacy, they were no longer stumbling around in Plato’s Cave, saw the light, and began to realize some doctrine wasn’t Biblical.
Today there seems to be a repeat of the Middle Ages with some Christians adhering to what is told to them to be a modern day prophesy, with no way to reliably verify the prophesy, but to trust the source. No thanks. That type of unmitigated deference and blind belief is too exposed to believing false prophesies. If it can’t be reliably verified, then the propehey isn’t worth believing.
Anconsiderable percentage of your post is based on an alleged prophesy by Rockefeller that you can’t reliably verify. That’s problematic.
