Does Spirit baptism still happen today by the laying on of hands?

Does Spirit baptism still happen today by the laying on of hands?


  • Total voters
    39

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
How would you define “abiding in sin”?

The context of the kind of sin I mention is not any kind of sin, but sins like hating, lying, and lusting (of which are the kinds of sins that the Bible clearly condemns). I know. You see all sin as being the same and that all sin condemns with fire and condemnation, but the Bible does not teach that (See: 1 John 5:16-17). You believe that way because you want a more comforting belief that Jesus paid for all your future sin, so now you don't have to worry about sin destroying your soul or your salvation (Even though Jesus warned us that committing certain sins can destroy our souls - See: Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 12:32, Matthew 25:31-46, Luke 9:62, etc.). I call any sin that the Bible clearly mentions as leading to spiritual death as "grievous sin." (Which is a term used in the Bible).
If a person abides in a grievous sin and they do not confess it or forsake it, they abide in spiritual death (Whether they are a believer or not). God is not a respecter of persons.

You said:
Because all men sin daily, “anyone who says he is without sin is a liar and the truth is not in him” are you referring to unrepentant sin as abiding? Cuz I can get behind that as a soft definition I think

As for 1 John 1:8:

What is helpful in understanding 1 John 1:8 is looking at its immediate context. 1 John 1:10 says if we say we have not sinned. 1 John 1:10 switches gears from 1 John 1:8 in regards to time; John talks about the declaration on committing sin in verse 8 (which is present tense) to a declaration on committing sin being a past declaration (with verse 10). Verse 10 is saying there are people who said they have not sinned (past tense). This is clearly a gnostic belief. Why? Well, most believers today hold to the idea that they have sinned as a part of their old life before coming to Christ (Regardless of whether they are “OSAS,” a “Sin and still be saved” type believer, or a “Conditional Salvationist”). So this clearly is a “gnostic belief” that John was warning the brethren about (See 1 John 2:26). 1 John 1:8 is a present declaration of sin. It is saying if we say we have no sin when we do sin (present tense). This has to be the interpretative understanding of this verse because 1 John 2:4 says if we say we know Him and do not keep His commandments we are a liar and the truth is not in us. The OSAS's interpretation on 1 John 1:8 does not work because it conflicts with a normal reading on 1 John 2:3-4. You cannot always be in sin (breaking God's commands) as a part of 1 John 1:8 and yet also fulfill 1 John 2:3 that says we can have an assurance of knowing Him if we keep His commandments. Especially when 1 John 2:4 says we are a liar and the truth is not in us if we break his commandments. In other words, if the OSAS interpretation on 1 John 1:8 was true, then I would be damned if I do by obeying God's commands (1 John 1:8) and yet I would be damned if I don't by not obeying God's commands (1 John 2:4).

In fact, the New English Translation says this for 1 John 1:8,

"If we say we do not bear the guilt of sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8 NET).​

In other words, this verse is saying that if a person sins and says they do not bear the guilt of sin (in the sense that they will not have to face any wrath or Judgment from God over their sin) then they would be deceiving themselves and the truth would not be in them. This is exactly what the Eternal Security proposes. They are saying that they do not bear the guilt of any sin (destruction of their soul and body in hell fire) if they do sin because they believe their future sins are paid for by Jesus. They are saying, they do not bear the guilt or the punishment of sin at the final Judgment because of their belief on Jesus. In short, 1 John 1:8 is a denial of the existence of sin on some level. “If we say we have no sin (in the sense that it does not exist) we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8). Christian Scientists think sin is an illusion and does not exist at all. So this verse would apply to them. Eternal Security Proponents and those who deny that “Sin Can Separate a Believer from God” deny the existence of sin partially. They believe sin exists physically but they do not believe sin exists for them on a spiritual level because Jesus has forgiven them of all their sin by their belief on Jesus. In fact, to see just how silly your argument actually is for 1 John 1:8, you would have to believe that you are sinning right now at this very moment in order for such a verse to be true because 1 John 1:8 is speaking in the present tense.

John prescribes that we do not think that sin is an illusion, and we are automatically saved, but John is telling us to "sin not" and go to our advocate Jesus Christ (1 John 2:1), and confess our sins so as to be forgiven of sin and to be cleansed of all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9). How can you confess and be forgiven of sin if all your future sin is paid for? It makes no sense.

You can say that John is talking about a break of fellowship by one's sins and not a loss of salvation, but that would not be consistent with Scripture. 1 John 5:12 says he that has the Son has life, and he that does not have the Son does not have life.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The general church belief is that the "gifts of the Holy Spirit" are 'our gifts'. They are NOT!
I agree.
And it drives me nuts when I see classes, or books, about how to "find" (discover) YOUR gifts. Typically a survey of your NATURAL abilities. Nothing to do with supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I feel like you and me chat a lot on these threads :)
You may have me confused with someone else. It likes you are new and I don't recall speaking to you before. Sorry if I have forgotten. If you recall which thread, I'll look it up. Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Bro I’m totally cool with this reference to the day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit came down for the first time. It was epic! Thankfully, where Paul baptized with water, christ’s death gave us a real baptism with the Holy Spirit at the point of salvation. We still do water baptisms too as a symbol of our inward change but I’m so glad we get the real one when the Holy Spirit comes at salvation. I feel like you and me chat a lot on these threads :)
In the book of Acts the Baptism with the Holy Spirit continued to be a subsequent experience beyond salvation. And it continues today. The Baptism with the Holy Spirit wasn't only about Pentecost.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I go by Scripture in regards to how the Spirit operates, and the Scriptures were written by men of God under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
In that case, shop me the scripture that says we can put the Holy Spirit in a box.

Saint Steven said:
One of the most important things I have learned about the Holy Spirit is that we can't put him in a box.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There are numerous problems with Bill Bright that you can research for yourself on the internet.
That has nothing to do with my testimony. I'm sorry that you cannot fathom what I am saying. But I don't know how I could be any clearer.
 
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But His Word does need to be harmonized, and our souls do need to be taken under consideration when we look at the Bible and what other men teach these days.
There is precious little teaching in the Bible about the gifts of the Spirit. If the Corinthians had not been swinging from the chandeliers we wouldn't have 95 percent of what we do have in just two chapters. (I Cor.12+14)
 
Upvote 0

GaveMeJoy

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2019
993
672
38
San diego
✟41,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
I agree.
And it drives me nuts when I see classes, or books, about how to "find" (discover) YOUR gifts. Typically a survey of your NATURAL abilities. Nothing to do with supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit.
Yep
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

GaveMeJoy

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2019
993
672
38
San diego
✟41,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
The context of the kind of sin I mention is not any kind of sin, but sins like hating, lying, and lusting (of which are the kinds of sins that the Bible clearly condemns). I know. You see all sin as being the same and that all sin condemns with fire and condemnation, but the Bible does not teach that (See: 1 John 5:16-17). You believe that way because you want a more comforting belief that Jesus paid for all your future sin, so now you don't have to worry about sin destroying your soul or your salvation (Even though Jesus warned us that committing certain sins can destroy our souls - See: Matthew 5:28-30, Matthew 6:15, Matthew 12:32, Matthew 25:31-46, Luke 9:62, etc.). I call any sin that the Bible clearly mentions as leading to spiritual death as "grievous sin." (Which is a term used in the Bible).
If a person abides in a grievous sin and they do not confess it or forsake it, they abide in spiritual death (Whether they are a believer or not). God is not a respecter of persons.



As for 1 John 1:8:

What is helpful in understanding 1 John 1:8 is looking at its immediate context. 1 John 1:10 says if we say we have not sinned. 1 John 1:10 switches gears from 1 John 1:8 in regards to time; John talks about the declaration on committing sin in verse 8 (which is present tense) to a declaration on committing sin being a past declaration (with verse 10). Verse 10 is saying there are people who said they have not sinned (past tense). This is clearly a gnostic belief. Why? Well, most believers today hold to the idea that they have sinned as a part of their old life before coming to Christ (Regardless of whether they are “OSAS,” a “Sin and still be saved” type believer, or a “Conditional Salvationist”). So this clearly is a “gnostic belief” that John was warning the brethren about (See 1 John 2:26). 1 John 1:8 is a present declaration of sin. It is saying if we say we have no sin when we do sin (present tense). This has to be the interpretative understanding of this verse because 1 John 2:4 says if we say we know Him and do not keep His commandments we are a liar and the truth is not in us. The OSAS's interpretation on 1 John 1:8 does not work because it conflicts with a normal reading on 1 John 2:3-4. You cannot always be in sin (breaking God's commands) as a part of 1 John 1:8 and yet also fulfill 1 John 2:3 that says we can have an assurance of knowing Him if we keep His commandments. Especially when 1 John 2:4 says we are a liar and the truth is not in us if we break his commandments. In other words, if the OSAS interpretation on 1 John 1:8 was true, then I would be damned if I do by obeying God's commands (1 John 1:8) and yet I would be damned if I don't by not obeying God's commands (1 John 2:4).

In fact, the New English Translation says this for 1 John 1:8,

"If we say we do not bear the guilt of sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8 NET).​

In other words, this verse is saying that if a person sins and says they do not bear the guilt of sin (in the sense that they will not have to face any wrath or Judgment from God over their sin) then they would be deceiving themselves and the truth would not be in them. This is exactly what the Eternal Security proposes. They are saying that they do not bear the guilt of any sin (destruction of their soul and body in hell fire) if they do sin because they believe their future sins are paid for by Jesus. They are saying, they do not bear the guilt or the punishment of sin at the final Judgment because of their belief on Jesus. In short, 1 John 1:8 is a denial of the existence of sin on some level. “If we say we have no sin (in the sense that it does not exist) we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us.” (1 John 1:8). Christian Scientists think sin is an illusion and does not exist at all. So this verse would apply to them. Eternal Security Proponents and those who deny that “Sin Can Separate a Believer from God” deny the existence of sin partially. They believe sin exists physically but they do not believe sin exists for them on a spiritual level because Jesus has forgiven them of all their sin by their belief on Jesus. In fact, to see just how silly your argument actually is for 1 John 1:8, you would have to believe that you are sinning right now at this very moment in order for such a verse to be true because 1 John 1:8 is speaking in the present tense.

John prescribes that we do not think that sin is an illusion, and we are automatically saved, but John is telling us to "sin not" and go to our advocate Jesus Christ (1 John 2:1), and confess our sins so as to be forgiven of sin and to be cleansed of all unrighteousness (1 John 1:9). How can you confess and be forgiven of sin if all your future sin is paid for? It makes no sense.

You can say that John is talking about a break of fellowship by one's sins and not a loss of salvation, but that would not be consistent with Scripture. 1 John 5:12 says he that has the Son has life, and he that does not have the Son does not have life.
I mean, there are all sorts of ways to attempt to delineate between types of sins but grace is sufficient for it all, and when we do sin, which is daily and will always be so until regeneration, we have an advocate in christ, according to the scriptures. If a man says they don’t sin on a Regular basis there is no point in further discussion because they are not in touch with the truth
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pioneer3mm
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I do not want to give you the impression that I am overly adversarial and or overly condemning. While I may respect the efforts of some street preach these days, I believe that they could do a lot more in love. My words sometimes may not convey the inflections of my speech, tone, and nor can they always reflect how I feel towards all. I believe we must pray, love, and go good towards our enemies. This includes even those in whom Christians label as false teachers these days. We must love all people, which can only come by the power of the LORD.

When do you see the core disciples after Christ's resurrection (the 11 / later 12 with Matthias added) receiving the Holy Spirit for the first time?

In John 20:22?
Or in Acts of the Apostles 2?
For me: The answer lies in knowing when Christ was glorified.

For John 7:39 says

"(But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.)"​

Was Christ glorified when He ascended to the Father when He told Mary not to touch Him? Or was Christ glorified in His ascension before His 120 followers?

The most likely answer in light of the whole counsel of God's Word to this is that Christ was glorified when He ascended to the Father in Acts of the Apostles 1, which means that the Holy Spirit was given to His followers in Acts of the Apostles 2.
I think we're in agreement, for whatever that's worth....to those who would disagree with us both. :cool:

I don't believe John 20 was giving them the baptism of holy spirit power (the gift) from the Holy Spirit (the giver). I believe it was Jesus speaking prophetically as to how to receive and what to listen for when He came at Pentecost. The blowing of the air from Jesus was prophetic concerning them hearing the "rushing mighty wind" prior to receiving. And when Jesus told them in John to "receive spirit holy" (the literal Greek rendering), man added the definite article (the) and capitalized Spirit Holy then reordered the words from 'spirit holy' to 'Holy Spirit'. The word "receive" used here is very unique in that it is "lambano" and it speaks of an 'active taking' of something like a receiver on the football team. He doesn't have the ball placed in his hand, he has to run to where the ball is an actively take it by action. The other word for receive in the Greek is decomai. This word denotes a 'passive reception' of something, like someone putting change in your hand. I would agree that the apostles/disciples were all born again with the assumption of Jesus and His giving of the great commission...after His death and resurrection. But that only gives you the holy spirit of Christ being 'born anew' or 'born from above'. You receive that salvation with a different Greek word and that is decomai.

The best scriptural example of both of these two different Greek words in context,, is at Samaria.

ACT 8:14 Now when the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received/decomai the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John, 15 who came down and prayed for them that they might receive/lambano (the) Holy Spirit; 16 for it had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17 Then they laid their hands on them and they received/lambano (the) Holy Spirit.

I believe that the 'active taking' of lambano is demonstrated in supernatural speaking. IOW manifesting something supernatural that people "see and hear".

I believe the tongues spoken at Pentecost were real foreign languages and they were not some kind of unknown mystery language.
And I believe TWO sources of tongues were represented that day. One from our spirit and one from the Holy Spirit. Both of which are heard through our body, but not coming from our soul/mind.

But you are entitled to your "belief". Personally I believe I proved otherwise with the word phone being used 2 verses before they spoke the languages of men. So IF I'm wrong, I believe I"m standing on scripture and not just my opinionated 'belief'. Not trying to sound rude....just challenging you to hopefully seek for more as I did along with so many others.


While I could be wrong, I believe most likely that 1 Corinthians 14:2 is not referring to the gibberish version of tongues that we see and hear today in many churches. This again was the speaking of a real foreign languages.
A foreign language would not live up to the clearly written verse IMO.

1CO 14:2* For one who speaks in a tongue speaks not to men but to God; for no one understands him, but he utters mysteries in the Spirit.

I don't know how you can justify your personal take because this clearly does not meet any "real foreign language" guidelines IMO.


Some believe that 1 Corinthians 14:2 is in reference to speaking an angelic language in private prayer.

However, I believe this verse is talking about the misuse of tongues or publically speaking a real foreign language (i.e. tongues) towards God (without an interpreter), and it is not a private prayer in tongues behind closed doors. How so? Well, the passage says that no man understands him.

"Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy. For he that speaketh in an unknown tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth him; "
(1 Corinthians 14:1-2).​
I believe the church of Corinth understood all the 3 different tongues there were, and therefore Paul never wrote specifically to that which 'they' already knew experientially. But were guilty of an immature mis application of them...just like so many today do. So that's when it behooves us to "rightly divide" the larger category of "tongues" to apply a correct understanding that we're talking about ONE of THREE. Below is my breakdown and scripturally based opinion.

There are TWO SOURCES of tongues.
1. MY SPIRIT (1Co 14:14)
2. THE HOLY SPIRIT (1Co 12:11)

There are THREE PURPOSES of tongues.

1. Self edification. (1Cor 14:4)

2. Church edification. (1Cor 14:4, 5)

3. World edification. (Acts 2:8)

There are three categories of tongues with three purposes.

1. Prayer tongues, FROM. MY SPIRIT (1Cor 14:14) PRAYING to God, as I will, for SELF- EDIFICATION (1Cor 14:4) (angelic/spiritual/heavenly language).

2. Tongues WITH interpretation FROM...THE Holy Spirit and manifested individually, as HE wills, for CHURCH EDIFICATION (unknown language to giver AND interpreter, but MAY be a known tongue of man). Tongues with interpretation is 2 gifts equal to prophecy (1Cor 14:5). (Spiritual/heavenly but also tongues of man/earthly)

3. Tongues WITHOUT interpretation for ministry of the gospel for WORLD EDIFICATION. Known languages of man, unknown to giver, known to receiver (Acts 2:8).
Not sure what you are trying to say here. Were they actually speaking real foreign languages or was it some kind of unknown tongue that no outside observer could listen in and truly know?
Hopefully I have answered this above.

No worries. It's all good.
:oldthumbsup:


I see it as not something in Philip's control, but it had more to do with an unusual situation where the Spirit could not operate because Simon the sorcerer's heart was not right with God. This event needed be taken care of before the witnesses of other members of the church and not just one guy in the church. This was a serious matter that needed to be resolved before other members of the body.
Your 'correct correction' of me earlier has me re thinking this whole senario anew concerning why Phillip couldn't minster the Holy Spirit or the deliverance of Simon from his 'spiritual bondage to a root of bitterness'.

ACT 8:21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter/LOGOS: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. 23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity.

I believe that an "iniquity" comes with an inherited 'evil spirit' from a second or third prior generation. Simon was in BONDage to that spirit. Deliverance was needed and Peter discerned (gift of discernment?) that Simon had the authority to pray this one 'off or out' himself, it appears. But that's just opinion.

Blessings to you in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ today.
And may 'good be on you' for His names sake bro. Gnite.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That has nothing to do with my testimony. I'm sorry that you cannot fathom what I am saying. But I don't know how I could be any clearer.

Sorry, I am not interested in your testimony, friend. I am interested in what God's Word says. The focus of the New Covenant is not the uplifting of gifts (like the miracle bread that the crowd followed after Jesus for), but it is about Jesus Christ, forgiveness in His grace, and this grace spurs us in loving God, and loving our neighbor. God's grace gives us the passion to want to obey and follow Jesus. To keep His commands. To work by the power of His grace and the working of all three persons of the Trinity. While I am generally not against testimonies, the Word of God comes first. It is how we get our faith in the first place. For faith comes by hearing and hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17), and it is not in an experience alone that does not involve His Word.
 
Upvote 0

GaveMeJoy

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2019
993
672
38
San diego
✟41,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
I go by Scripture in regards to how the Spirit operates, and the Scriptures were written by men of God under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.



I don't disagree with the above verses you mentioned. I also do not strive to fit God into a box, either. But His Word does need to be harmonized, and our souls do need to be taken under consideration when we look at the Bible and what other men teach these days. Jesus said narrow is the way and FEW be there that find it. So salvation in my opinion is not in the big mega churches. Not everyone teaches in line with what the Bible says; And many take a liberal approach with the Scriptures (Especially overly larged sized churches - IMO). While I am not seeking to condemn all large churches, it is just that in my experience this appears to be the case that they are not in line exactly with all of what Scripture says always. Nobody today even knows what "repentance" even means. Some think it means to believe in Jesus, and others think it means to exclusively forsake sin alone. Many are looking for an experience, but they are not seeking to truly align with all of what God's Word says.



There are numerous problems with Bill Bright that you can research for yourself on the internet. Bill Bright endorses Jay Gary's new age book.
To learn more about Jay Gary: See this article here:

Part 3: The call to global oneness
(Note: I merely agree with what the author wrote against Jay Gary, and this does not mean I endorse the author's other views or beliefs).

the entire Bible holds merely a shadow or fraction of the power, glory, and mystery of the Holy Spirit. God will never contradict the word but the word cannot even begins to contain Or get a handle on Him
 
Upvote 0

GaveMeJoy

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2019
993
672
38
San diego
✟41,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
There is precious little teaching in the Bible about the gifts of the Spirit. If the Corinthians had not been swinging from the chandeliers we wouldn't have 95 percent of what we do have in just two chapters. (I Cor.12+14)
Yet even though there is really minimal guidance on the gifts in the Bible, so many Christians argue so passionately that they know the real truth the arrogance we have is profound
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I mean, there are all sorts of ways to attempt to delineate between types of sins but grace is sufficient for it all, and when we do sin, which is daily and will always be so until regeneration, we have an advocate in christ, according to the scriptures. If a man says they don’t sin on a Regular basis there is no point in further discussion because they are not in touch with the truth

To help you to see where I am coming from, here is a clip from a scene from a Christian movie called "Time Changer":


If you are interested in checking out the whole film, you can rent or buy this Christian film at the following link via Amazon Prime Video (if you are interested):

Watch Time Changer | Prime Video

Blessings to you in the Lord.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Were you frustrated by reading one of these books, or taking a class? Did you, like many of us, end up having to find your own way to understand the gifts?

Saint Steven said:
I agree.
And it drives me nuts when I see classes, or books, about how to "find" (discover) YOUR gifts. Typically a survey of your NATURAL abilities. Nothing to do with supernatural manifestations of the Holy Spirit.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Sorry, I am not interested in your testimony, friend. I am interested in what God's Word says.
Well that speaks volumes.
You have made a book on your shelf more important than the actual work of God in my life. (my testimony) And then call me friend to take the edge off. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hillsage
Upvote 0

Saint Steven

You can call me Steve
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2018
18,580
11,386
Minneapolis, MN
✟930,146.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yet even though there is really minimal guidance on the gifts in the Bible, so many Christians argue so passionately that they know the real truth the arrogance we have is profound
Yes. Much of it is learned experientially (to which the Bible-thumpers object) and through discipleship of other believers that are farther down the road than we are. This is still a pioneering work. Much has been lost. And the atmosphere of unbelief in the USA is quenching the Spirit. Even Jesus had the same problem in his own home town. Typically when they have a healing meeting in a third world country, everyone gets healed. Yet in the same meeting here in the US hardly anyone gets healed. The Cessationists use this as "proof" that the gifts are "not genuine".

Saint Steven said:
There is precious little teaching in the Bible about the gifts of the Spirit. If the Corinthians had not been swinging from the chandeliers we wouldn't have 95 percent of what we do have in just two chapters. (I Cor.12+14)
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well that speaks volumes. You have made a book on your shelf more important than the actual work of God in my life. (my testimony) And then call me friend to take the edge off. Thanks.

Again, faith comes by hearing and hearing the Word of God (See: Romans 10:17). If our life does not align with what the Bible says, then we are making our life more important than what His Word says. Our experience should align with the Bible. You recommend a man who is a part of the Interfaith movement (i.e. They joining of with other religions like Judaism, Muslims, etc.). So I will not regard your experience that was a result of his teachings. We are born again by the Spirit and by water (i.e. the "water" is the communicated Word of God - or Scripture, see: Ephesians 5:25-27, John 15:3.).

As for saying "friend":
"Let your speech be alway with grace, seasoned with salt,..." (Colossians 4:6).
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,508
7,861
...
✟1,194,503.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Where did you get the idea that my experience did not involve "His Word"?

I am not going to judge your heart and eternal state with God, dear sir. That is not my place. Who is to say how God can operate in a person's life (Despite the imperfections of other men). What troubles me is your statement that appears to suggest that we are not to put a book (the Bible) above a person's life. But what you fail to understand is that it is by this very book that we get our faith, and we have access to God, the Spirit, etc.; We would not know about loving God, and love our neighbor if it was not for the Bible. Morality would be subject to the individual if everyone just want off how they feel or by what some outside experience is telling them (Rather than the Bible).

My Bible tells me that I have to be faithful unto death.
So I am putting a book before my own life.
Jesus tells me to pick up my cross, deny myself, and to follow Him.
The Bible tells me that if I love my father, mother, brother more than Him (Jesus), I am not worthy of Him. This is not to say that we are not to honor our father and mother, and we are not to love them. We are commanded to love even our enemies, and to pray for them, and to do good unto them. But we are to live our life in sacrifice to the Lord Jesus Christ. Jesus comes first; He is our #1, our Captain. But this obedience can only come by truly submitting to His grace and mercy and forgiveness. Believers have to have a godly sorrow, and be broken up about their own wrong ways. They need to seek the Lord and seek His path and will according to His Word, and not their own experiences or ways, or thoughts.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0