Problem with that situation is that there are multiple possible outcomes from black choices. Most outcomes lead to a white victory, but there are different ways that can happen (black resigns, black loses in <549 moves, black loses in 549 moves etc). Not the same victory, so not just a single possible outcome. It's also possible the clock runs out and black gets a win. Or white gets bored and forfeits. Whatever, there are multiple possible outcomes.
The opinion is well supported by the relevant posts in this thread. They are the evidence. Paradoxically, as noted previously, you have to use your own beliefs in order to interpret that evidence correctly. It is telling that you choose not to. I don't know if that is intent, incompetence or ignorance, but you ought to revisit your motives in order to introduce integrity to your arguments.
Why would we be concerned about the opinions of groups that have left God's word and even their own traditional positions? I think the operative word there is apostasy.
The whole bible talks about creation and how God created. Trying to minimize that by calling it interpretation (especially if in some denomination that has abandoned biblical positions) is not an honest strategy.
Not all forms of 'christianity' accept or believe or follow the bible. Some are in direct conflict with His word! The only issue is who you chose to be in conflict with.
God is going to conquer the whole world, of course. It is known that He will use us to rule with Him here forever. If Neb was saved that means Neb will help rule. I could deduce that he may be involved with ruling iw....what part of the world, class?....Ha
Nonsense. It is required to know what God says on the matter and people and spirits are to be weighed according to that standard. When they abandon that standard, they judege themselves.
Do you believe there was a real woman created from the bone of man and that this is how mankind started? Yes or no?
They had traditional teaching on creation. Book numbers do not matter. Even when I was a child the catechism taught about creation.
Yet the way they have interpreted it for centuries was not the same. So now we are supposed to abandon the bible and their traditional views and belief whatever the constantly changing claims of so-called science might say!?
Who cares? The only thing that matters is if they are in conflict with Scripture.
From my vantage point, if I had a nickel for every time I heard someone question Scripture, I would have a lot of nickels.
One simple way is to ask what I think I asked you and never got a reply. Do you believe in a real Eve who was taken one day from a bone of a created man or not?
Not sure what that means. So you believe that God formed a man, brought him to life and later took a bone from him to make a woman? You believe man was on the planet bfore any woman was?
No interpretation needed. You cannot claim God did not form man and created woman from man etc. Period. That would be unbelief, not interpretation.
Oh, that is priceless. I've seen you come up with some really lame excuses before, but that has got to be one of your best efforts.
There is your problem. You are giving substance to "probability" when there is only one door you will choose. 100%. You may come up with the idea that any choice is possible, and yes, from the point of view of the chooser, it will seem so, yet even then, only one door is chosen. It makes no difference.
Nevertheless, the definition of love was not what I was talking about, and is irrelevant to the discussion --science can't deal with it. Their prettiest attempts are in calling it only "chemical activity within the body and brain", as if that explains anything.
To me it only makes sense that if certain events are predestined, all events are predestined.
