Can't help but notice there's no mention over it being immoral and potentially illegal here, just that it hurts the chances of Republicans to get elected / reelected. Not really surprised, but still disappointed.The chairman of the Connecticut Republican Party has called for Hyde to drop out of the race for the northwestern Connecticut House seat.
"It's not helpful to the President. It's not helpful to other Republican candidates. And it provides an opportunity for Democrats to raise money. It allows the opposition to label all Republicans with these comments," J.R. Romano told CNN on Wednesday.
It's about which narrative about the events surrounding the actions involving POTUS is the correct one. There are two narratives when condensed down, one speaks about coercion as you point out and the other speaks towards a legitimate investigation.
The topic of this thread is about "US Ambassador stalked and surveilled by Guiliani associate and Republican Congressional candidate". Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani and Lev Parnas are persons who are being discussed. Is there coercion or is there a legitimate investigation going on?
I paraphrased a statement Glenn Beck made about a conversation he had with Rudy Giuliani about this topic. The video where everybody can hear the exact statement coming out of Glenn's mouth was included for clarification.
Given the politics in the Province of Ontario Canada, it looks like Joe Biden is guilty of giving an influential job to someone who lacks partiality, his son. The Premier of that province was viewed as lacking impartiality in selecting key positions of power and he had to have those people resign. I could imagine the stink that would occur if our PM had a family relative put in an executive role within a large company that does business here. These actions just north of the border from where I'm from conclude that Joe Biden should be the one that needs investigation.Given the posts above, there sure looks to be a legitimate federal investigation into the actions of Donald's personal attorney and his associates.
That's great, but compared to the mountains of evidence the claims of someone as lacking in credibility as Beck is kind of irrelevant.
Given the politics in the Province of Ontario Canada, it looks like Joe Biden is guilty of giving an influential job to someone who lacks partiality, his son.
I'd like to think that you're right. But a substantial fraction of the American public is following. So is the Senate, and the courts are being stuffed with people with a similar orientation. It may not be a majority of Americans, but it's enough to be worrisome.
Do you think if Democrats manage to get the White House and Senate, suddenly we're going to return to normal standards (which themselves are too low, in my opinion)?
Given the politics in the Province of Ontario Canada, it looks like Joe Biden is guilty of giving an influential job to someone who lacks partiality, his son.
I'd like to think that you're right. But a substantial fraction of the American public is following. So is the Senate, and the courts are being stuffed with people with a similar orientation. It may not be a majority of Americans, but it's enough to be worrisome.
Do you think if Democrats manage to get the White House and Senate, suddenly we're going to return to normal standards (which themselves are too low, in my opinion)?
Perhaps ironically, Ukraine has opened a criminal investigation into this. This is what happens when there is evidence of a potential crime.
Ukrainian officials announced on Thursday that a criminal investigation would be launched into the alleged threats against former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch.
I appreciate that. For me, I don't really like him... he's arrogant, he says stupid things usually to get a reaction (it's a New Yorker thing), but when I look at the condition of this country, low unemployment especially among minorities, better deals with China and Canada/Mexico, conservative judge appointments, and a Reagan-esq strength in terms of standing up to tyrants... then I WAY prefer him over ANYTHING proposed by the left. But that's me... everyone is entitled to their own views.I'm not a democrat. For me, it was simply Trump's own words, accurately heard, in full context, that makes him unacceptable as a president, to me. The statement he could shoot someone though hyperbole....is nevertheless completely unacceptable to me as a person. I would feel the exact same way about a democrat or a libertarian who said that wording. If you yourself said it, I would tell you you had done wrong to say it, and the same with my family and friends, here.
I appreciate that. For me, I don't really like him... he's arrogant, he says stupid things usually to get a reaction (it's a New Yorker thing), but when I look at the condition of this country, low unemployment especially among minorities, better deals with China and Canada/Mexico, conservative judge appointments, and a Reagan-esq strength in terms of standing up to tyrants... then I WAY prefer him over ANYTHING proposed by the left. But that's me... everyone is entitled to their own views.
Be blessed.
Ken
Yep. You won't see N Korea do anything on his watch, you won't see Iran actually openly kill Americans...and you won't see him try to appease terrorists with billions in cash payoffs.Standing up to tyrants? Are you being serious?
Yep. You won't see N Korea do anything on his watch, you won't see Iran actually openly kill Americans...and you won't see him try to appease terrorists with billions in cash payoffs.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc. Don't ever make an assumption and then write the first chapter of a book trying to correct somebody else. I do appreciate your time though.You really need to start actually looking for real news, rather than listening to those who keep repeating the same partisan talking points that aren't grounded in reality.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc. Don't ever make an assumption and then write the first chapter of a book trying to correct somebody else. I do appreciate your time though.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc. Don't ever make an assumption and then write the first chapter of a book trying to correct somebody else. I do appreciate your time though.
You know exactly zero about me other than what little I have shared. You don't need what I read, what my background is, who I am close to, etc. Don't ever make an assumption and then write the first chapter of a book trying to correct somebody else. I do appreciate your time though.
but when I look at the condition of this country, low unemployment especially among minorities