Why Christians should reject Partial Preterism

Status
Not open for further replies.

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My Bible says we will be caught up together with them IN THE CLOUDS. Are clouds not in the air?

1 thessalonians 4:17 Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we will always be with the Lord.


It would seem pretty silly to me that they stay in the clouds hidden forever. And unless one wants to agree with Pretribbers, that their destination is heaven at that point, the only other option is, they all descend to the earth eventually, thus no longer hidden in the clouds.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But as to the cloud in Acts 1, how high up would you speculate it was?

No idea, as scripture doesn't say.

Because until the cloud received Him out of their sight, He was obviously still in their sight as He was ascending in the air, which then means this has to be part of the returning in like manner, that at some point after meeting in the clouds He would have to be descending, no longer hidden in the clouds, thus visible to those on earth,

How was Jesus specifically taken INTO heaven?

Acts 1:9 he was lifted up, and a cloud took him out of their sight.

Acts 1:11 This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.”

Where are we caught up to Jesus when he descends from heaven?

1 thessalonians 4:17 After that, we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will always be with the Lord.

thus visible to those on earth, eventually touching down on earth like Zechariah 14:4 shows, which appears to basically be the same place He ascended from.

This assumes your literal interpretation of zechariah 14:4 is correct. However, as we know, God spoke to the prophets of Israel in riddles, parables, dreams, visions (numbers 12:6-8, hosea 12:10).

I believe this vision/parable/dream points to the work of Christ, through his death, resurrection, ascension from the mount of olives, and sending of the spirit.

Zechariah 14:4 On that day His feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem, and the Mount of Olives will be split in two from east to west, forming a great valley, with half the mountain moving to the north and half to the south.

zechariah 14:4 And on that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem,

John 7:38-39 Whoever believes in Me, as the Scripture has said: ‘Streams of living water will flow from within him.’” He was speaking about the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were later to receive. For the Spirit had not yet been given,e because Jesus had not yet been glorified.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I'm sure you know, Its a proverbial phrase that indicates the same situation could be viewed as is either pessimistic or optimistic, depending on the viewer. Those who are pessimistic will view the situation as half empty, while those who are optimistic will view the same situation as optimistic. So it is with eschatology and the partial pret/fut discussion.

Many futurists that I run into on these forums are very much doom and gloom: future antichrist person, tribulation, animal sacrifices returning in a 3rd temple, satan and sin getting worse, kingdom is not yet present, there are 2 peoples of God, Christ doesn't always appear to be the fulfillment of all the promises of God....

Many preterists that I run into on these forums are much more positive: kingdom is present, the gospel is all over the world, no 3rd physical temple, Christ if fulfillment of all the promises of God, there is one peoples of God regarless of race......

the focus more so on futurism tends to be the end times associated with the nation of Israel, while preterism sees Christ and his work on the cross as the eschatological fulfillment of the promises of God

I agree re Futurists. But Amils and Postmils are more positive, not merely Preterists. Where Preterists go off-base is in their fixation with the coming of Titus in AD70, instead of the coming of Christ. Read their posts. Read your own posts. It is grievous! Give me a Christ-centered Premil before that any day!
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe Jesus when He said 'This' generation, not a 'future' generation.

I believe Jesus when He said 'must soon take place', not 'whats going to take place in the future'.

I believe Jesus when He said 'for the time is near', not 'for the time is near in 2,000 years time'

The word genea means:

1) fathered, birth, nativity
2) that which has been begotten, men of the same stock, a family
2a) the several ranks of natural descent, the successive members of a genealogy
2b) metaphorically a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits, character
2b1) especially in a bad sense, a perverse nation
3) the whole multitude of men living at the same time
4) an age (i.e. the time ordinarily occupied be each successive generation), a space of 30 - 33 years

Different translations and Bible scholars interpret it in different ways. Many good Bible students see it my way, many your way. I do not limit its meaning to a 40 year generation as Preterism must to sustain its school of thought. It can equally and fairly broadly describe a time-periods (a literal generation or age) or natural descendants (a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits or men of the same stock).

The root word for genea is genos (Strong’s 1085), which means race, kindred, offspring, family, stock, tribe, nation, i.e. nationality or descent from a particular people.

Acts 13:26 talks about children of the stock [Gr. genos] of Abraham” and Philippians 3:5 those “of the stock [Gr. genos] of Israel.” The Bible is here speaking in a natural sense.
The root word of genos is ginomai (Strong’s 1096), which literally means to gen-erate.

Matthew 24:34 is telling us that the Jewish race would not pass away until all things are fulfilled. Israel is an ongoing generation.
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It would seem pretty silly to me that they stay in the clouds hidden forever. And unless one wants to agree with Pretribbers, that their destination is heaven at that point, the only other option is, they all descend to the earth eventually, thus no longer hidden in the clouds.

To remain in the clouds forever would seem silly to me too. But the throne of God (heaven) seems to be the destination and not the clouds.

John 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way to where I am going

2 corinthians 5:1 Now we know that if the earthly tent we live in is dismantled, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands

philippians 3:20 But our citizenship is in heaven, and we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ,

Hebrews 6:19-20 We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Your subjective argument is pointless. I can say the exact same thing. In previous posts you were responding to specific points, but then just switched to generic subjective responses like post #465 and #460, which is really telling.

In Preterist thinking, every promise the New Testament Church owns, every spiritual requirement it is meant to keep and every future hope it is meant to hold during the intra-Advent, ends with the coming of Titus in AD70. Titus takes the place of Christ in Preterist theology. They are obsessed with him and AD70.

For example:

· The necessity of the church to fellowship much more ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Hebrews 10:25).
· The waiting and watching of God’s people ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Matthew 24:42-51, 25:10, 25:13, Mark 13:35-37, Luke 12:37-40, 21:36, Revelation 3:3, 19:7-10).
· The security that God’s people have by being sealed with the Holy Ghost ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Ephesians 1:13-14 and Ephesians 4:30).
· Our redemption does not arrive until the coming of Titus in AD70 (Luke 21:28).
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
To remain in the clouds forever would seem silly to me too. But the throne of God (heaven) seems to be the destination and not the clouds.

John 14:3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and will take you to myself, that where I am you may be also. And you know the way to where I am going

2 corinthians 5:1 Now we know that if the earthly tent we live in is dismantled, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands

philippians 3:20 But our citizenship is in heaven, and we eagerly await a Savior from there, the Lord Jesus Christ,

Hebrews 6:19-20 We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner place behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.

You do believe that the new Jerusalem is descending from heaven when Christ comes to introduce a new perfect state on this earth, and that this is when we get our new eternal bodies?
 
Upvote 0

Lost4words

Jesus I Trust In You
Site Supporter
May 19, 2018
10,992
11,741
Neath, Wales, UK
✟1,010,141.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Maybe you are just looking at it all wrong. He could have meant that these things would soon begin to take place starting way back then, which can also include events far into the future. It would basically mean one thing keeps leading to another until all things are ultimately finished. Which then might comprise of 2000 years or more from start to finish.

No, i dont see it that way my friend sorry
 
Upvote 0

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You do believe that the new Jerusalem is descending from heaven when Christ comes to introduce a new perfect state on this earth, and that this is when we get our new eternal bodies?


As to that, as an Amil what moment in time do you envision that happening? Because according to your position, that follows the time of the great white throne judgment. Obviously when Christ initially returns, not everyone back on earth are even phyically dead yet, in regards to the lost. Obviously the great white throne judgment can't precede Revelation 19:21. Yet at that point the 2nd coming, and the rapture of the church, would now be in the past.

Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

According to this though, even before the time of Revelation 19:21, this indicates the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready. How can that not be part of the same event we see in the following in Revelation 21?

Revelation 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Wouldn't that place the timing of Revelation 21:2, not after the great white throne judgment, but prior to it instead, if this is connected with Revelation 19:7-9, and that those events precede the events in Revelation 19:21, where, until Revelation 19:21 is fulfilled first, there cannot yet be the time of the great white throne judgment?

Do me a favor if you could, assuming you address any of this. Don't give me a lame answer as other Amils have done in the past, such as all of these events happen in a twinkling of an eye, thus no actual chronology of events involved.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DavidPT

Well-Known Member
Sep 26, 2016
8,602
2,107
Texas
✟196,523.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No, i dont see it that way my friend sorry

As being somewhat of a futurist on my part, I'm still at least willing to compromise about this. So why aren't you willing to? Why would John spend an entire 22 chapters focusing on just a small section of time in the first century?

Here's a question for you since I'm assuming you think all of the plagues mentioned in this book are fulfilled and in the past.

Revelation 22:18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:


What does the text plainly say? If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

So, in your opinion no one in this present time can add unto these things? But if you instead think they can, which BTW, I wouldn't disagree with you, how then can God add any of the plagues that are written in this book, to the one adding unto it if all of the plague events are already fulfilled and in the past according to your view?
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The word genea means:

1) fathered, birth, nativity
2) that which has been begotten, men of the same stock, a family
2a) the several ranks of natural descent, the successive members of a genealogy
2b) metaphorically a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits, character
2b1) especially in a bad sense, a perverse nation
3) the whole multitude of men living at the same time
4) an age (i.e. the time ordinarily occupied be each successive generation), a space of 30 - 33 years

Different translations and Bible scholars interpret it in different ways. Many good Bible students see it my way, many your way. I do not limit its meaning to a 40 year generation as Preterism must to sustain its school of thought. It can equally and fairly broadly describe a time-periods (a literal generation or age) or natural descendants (a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits or men of the same stock).

The root word for genea is genos (Strong’s 1085), which means race, kindred, offspring, family, stock, tribe, nation, i.e. nationality or descent from a particular people.
Since you keep repeating this very exact same post - I will also keep posting the lexicon that applies to Matthew 23:36. Strong's #1074 is what's used there:

Matthew 23:36 Lexicon: "Truly I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation.

And Strong's attributes this specific definition for Matthew 23:36 ~

the whole multitude of men living at the same time: Matthew 24:34; Mark 13:30; Luke 1:48 (πᾶσαι αἱ γενεαί); ; Philippians 2:15; used especially of the Jewish race living at one and the same period: Matthew 11:16; Matthew 12:39, 41f, 45; Matthew 16:4; Matthew 23:36; Mark 8:12, 38; Luke 11:29f, 32, 50; Luke 17:25; Acts 13:36; Hebrews 3:10; ἄνθρωποι τῆς γενεάς ταύτης, Luke 7:31; ἄνδρες τῆς γενεάς ταύτης, Luke 11:31; τήν δέ γενεάν αὐτοῦ τίς διηγήσεται, who can describe the wickedness of the present generation, Acts 8:33 (from Isaiah 53:8 the Sept.) (but cf. Meyer, at the passage).Strong's Greek: 1074. γενεά (genea) -- race, family, generation
 
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I agree re Futurists. But Amils and Postmils are more positive, not merely Preterists

I agree

Where Preterists go off-base is in their fixation with the coming of Titus in AD70, instead of the coming of Christ.

Do believe the vineyard owner came to destroy the wicked tenants in 66-70ad or do you believe the parable of the wicked tenants is not yet fulfilled? because even the 1st century pharisees realized that parable was about them.

Read your own posts. It is grievous! Give me a Christ-centered Premil before that any day!

And I could argue your posts are grievous as well, but that's a subjective argument get's the discussion no where.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As to that, as an Amil what moment in time do you envision that happening? Because according to your position, that follows the time of the great white throne judgment. Obviously when Christ initially returns, not everyone back on earth are even phyically dead yet, in regards to the lost. Obviously the great white throne judgment can't precede Revelation 19:21. Yet at that point the 2nd coming, and the rapture of the church, would now be in the past.

Revelation 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
8 And to her was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of saints.

According to this though, even before the time of Revelation 19:21, this indicates the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready. How can that not be part of the same event we see in the following in Revelation 21?

Revelation 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Wouldn't that place the timing of Revelation 21:2, not after the great white throne judgment, but prior to it instead, if this is connected with Revelation 19:7-9, and that those events precede the events in Revelation 19:21, where, until Revelation 19:21 is fulfilled first, there cannot yet be the time of the great white throne judgment?

Do me a favor if you could, assuming you address any of this. Don't give me a lame answer as other Amils have done in the past, such as all of these events happen in a twinkling of an eye, thus no actual chronology of events involved.

I appreciate your thoughts!

Revelation 19

Scripture has a habit of concentrating on different aspects of the Lord’s coming. Sometimes the focus is Christ. Sometimes the focus is man. Sometimes the focus is the fate of the universe. Sometimes the focus is the wicked. Sometimes the focus is a righteous. Sometimes the subject is humans. Sometimes it is angels. Sometimes it is the visible realm and sometimes it is the invisible realm. Sometimes the subject is the living, sometimes the subject is the dead. Sometimes the subject is heaven. Sometimes the subject is earth. Sometimes the subject is hell. Sometimes it is the beast. Sometimes it is Satan. This does not negate the fact that many simultaneous things can be happening at the one time. Remember, Scripture can only talk about one subject at a time.

Revelation is full of 7 recaps. In my opinion, Revelation 17-19 is the 6th of 7 parallels. It is a record of God's dealing with Babylon. It culminates with the climatic coming of Christ. The wicked are all destroyed in that recapitulation, this agrees with every other Second Coming passage. It is the end.

Revelation 19:11-16 mirrors this passage, “And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he himself. And he was clothed with a vesture dipped in blood: and his name is called The Word of God. And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean. And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall shepherd them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.”

A plain reading of the passage before us reveals that Christ is coming back with wrath to execute judgment and destroy all those left behind. He is not going to reward men for their rebellion by leading them unto the glorified new earth. Neither is Christ coming to engage in some ill-fated war against evil for a thousand years – that is not remotely in the text. The King of kings and Lord of lords will not have to fight for victory. He already won that decisively at the cross.

Christ is seen pouring out His wrath without mixture upon the nations as He smites them in His fury with “a sharp sword” that comes “out of his mouth.” What is the result of this act? It shall “smite the nations” that have missed the catching away. This is what awaits the nations. They are going to be smitten. The word for “smite” in this text is the Greek word patasso, which means to strike with a weapon or to smite fatally. It means to smite down, cut down, to kill, slay.

Let us be clear: He is Coming to smite down the nations, not corral them into some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted millennial age. It says that “he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” This is not a pretty sight. This is not loose talk by God. This is not something that the nations should look forward to. What awaits the nations that have rejected Christ is utter destruction and devastation. The nations left behind are totally destroyed. Christ destroys them by the very utterance of His mouth.

The two words interpreted “fierceness” and “wrath” here are thumos and orge which are regularly employed in the New Testament to mean ‘fierceness, indignation, wrath and vengeance’. The word orge carries the additional meaning of ‘violent passion’. Clearly the Lord is not happy with those left behind. Like those left behind in Noah’s day and Sodom they face an awful end, as they receive the reward of their rejection of Christ.

Verses 17-18 says, “I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. The loipoy (or remaining ones) those left behind were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.”

This is complete wholesale total destruction - for those left behind. There are no survivors!

The feasting part of the marriage supper of the Lamb is a symbolism depicted the destruction of the wicked. Why can this not be a symbolic depiction of the return of Christ and the events that accompany it (including the destruction of the wicked)?

The first part of the narrative outlines a detailed account of the assignment given to “the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven” by the heavenly messenger. The “fowls” are instructed to “come and gather” themselves “together unto the supper of the great God” in order that they would “eat”:

1. The flesh of kings,
2. The flesh of captains,
3. The flesh of mighty men,
4. The flesh of horses, them that sit on them,
5. The flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great.

Revelation 20

Revelation 20 goes right back to Christ glorious (first) resurrection. It is a record of God's dealing with the devil. It is a different subject matter. It culminates with the climatic coming of Christ. The wicked are all destroyed in that recapitulation, this agrees with every other Second Coming passage. It is the end.

Revelation 20:11-15 – 21:1-5: “And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire. And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away (or departed); and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away (or departed). And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.”

Here is Christ returning enthroned, whereupon the general judgment occurs. This lines up with multiple Scripture of a general judgment at the second coming.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Do believe the vineyard owner came to destroy the wicked tenants in 66-70ad or do you believe the parable of the wicked tenants is not yet fulfilled? because even the 1st century pharisees realized that parable was about them.

What has this to do with what I wrote?

This whole parable is focused in on Israel’s inheritance. It shows that through their wanton and continuous rebellion they forfeited their original heritage. The kingdom of God is shown here to have been taken off Israel and given unto “other husbandmen.” In His summing up of His message, Christ predicts, in this vivid parable, the Jews rejection of Himself and His ultimate crucifixion. The new inheritors would be a fruit-bearing people possessing the necessary spiritual credentials. They would do what Israel refused to do, which was “reverence” God’s Son. This company would never be based upon or restricted to one nationality, color or geographical location – it would be international and trans-national, incorporating all the peoples of the world. There is no hint or inclination in this parable that the vineyard would then be given back to these Christ-rejecting husbandmen (representing the old physical economy that was restricted to natural Israel), but that it would be given to the whosoever believeth of all nations, including repentant Jews.

And I could argue your posts are grievous as well, but that's a subjective argument get's the discussion no where.


Not so!

Why possibly would we would the largely Gentile New Testament Church (whom most of the NT letters were written to) be obsessed (like you) with the coming of Titus in AD70? It doesn't make sense! It is insane! It is wrong! The sacred text is rather obsessed with Jesus Christ. Preterists do not get that! Their posts are littered with AD70 quotes, depictions and rhetoric. It is another gospel. It is the gospel of the coming of Titus in AD7. It is a dangerous aberration from the Gospel of Christ.

Every promise the New Testament Church owns, every spiritual requirement it is meant to keep and every future hope it is meant to hold during the intra-Advent, is diverted away from Christ to Titus and his appearing in AD70. That is why every genuine Christian should run from this error.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The word genea means:

1) fathered, birth, nativity
2) that which has been begotten, men of the same stock, a family
2a) the several ranks of natural descent, the successive members of a genealogy
2b) metaphorically a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits, character
2b1) especially in a bad sense, a perverse nation
3) the whole multitude of men living at the same time
4) an age (i.e. the time ordinarily occupied be each successive generation), a space of 30 - 33 years

then how come genea, in any scripture or body of work, is never translated as race without association with peoples living at the same time then?

Strongs has it associated with men living at the same time:

"3. the whole multitude of men living at the same time: Matthew 24:34; Mark 13:30; Luke 1:48 (πᾶσαι αἱ γενεαί); ; Philippians 2:15; used especially of the Jewish race living at one and the same period: Matthew 11:16; Matthew 12:39, 41f, 45; Matthew 16:4; Matthew 23:36; Mark 8:12, 38; Luke 11:29f, 32, 50; Luke 17:25; Acts 13:36; Hebrews 3:10; ἄνθρωποι τῆς γενεάς ταύτης, Luke 7:31; ἄνδρες τῆς γενεάς ταύτης, Luke 11:31; τήν δέ γενεάν αὐτοῦ τίς διηγήσεται, who can describe the wickedness of the present generation, Acts 8:33 (from Isaiah 53:8 the Sept.) (but cf. Meyer, at the passage)."

Different translations and Bible scholars interpret it in different ways. Many good Bible students see it my way, many your way. I do not limit its meaning to a 40 year generation as Preterism must to sustain its school of thought. It can equally and fairly broadly describe a time-periods (a literal generation or age) or natural descendants (a group of men very like each other in endowments, pursuits or men of the same stock).

Name one Bible translation that translates genea as race.

The root word for genea is genos (Strong’s 1085), which means race, kindred, offspring, family, stock, tribe, nation, i.e. nationality or descent from a particular people.

Acts 13:26 talks about children of the stock [Gr. genos] of Abraham” and Philippians 3:5 those “of the stock [Gr. genos] of Israel.” The Bible is here speaking in a natural sense.
The root word of genos is ginomai (Strong’s 1096), which literally means to gen-erate.

then why wasn't genos used instead of genea in matthew 24:34?

Matthew 24:34 is telling us that the Jewish race would not pass away until all things are fulfilled. Israel is an ongoing generation.

I disagree. If you can actually show any translated bible or book that translates genea as race, then you may have an argument.
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
In Preterist thinking, every promise the New Testament Church owns, every spiritual requirement it is meant to keep and every future hope it is meant to hold during the intra-Advent, ends with the coming of Titus in AD70. Titus takes the place of Christ in Preterist theology. They are obsessed with him and AD70.
No, you have this seriously wrong.

The destruction of the Temple and the whole ancient Judaic system in 70 AD was proving further that Jesus IS God (along with His resurrection). It goes back to many of the OT passages about God's judgement. Isaiah 19 is a good example of this. The phrase "riding on a swift cloud" carried a lot of meaning to the ancient Hebrew minds - that represented the power of "the LORD of Heaven's Armies"....and tied Jesus to that very God of judgement (as the same God) as He predicted the coming destruction. That's part of the importance of Him saying to the religious leaders, "From now on, you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven' (the sign of vindication that He is Messiah):

Isaiah 19:1-4 ~
This message came to me concerning Egypt:



Look! The LORD is advancing against Egypt,

riding on a swift cloud.


The idols of Egypt tremble.

The hearts of the Egyptians melt with fear.



2
I will make Egyptian fight against Egyptian—

brother against brother,

neighbor against neighbor,

city against city,

province against province.


3The Egyptians will lose heart,

and I will confuse their plans.

They will plead with their idols for wisdom

and call on spirits, mediums, and those who consult the spirits of the dead.

4I will hand Egypt over

to a hard, cruel master.

A fierce king will rule them,”


says the Lord, the LORD of Heaven’s Armies.​
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In Preterist thinking, every promise the New Testament Church owns, every spiritual requirement it is meant to keep and every future hope it is meant to hold during the intra-Advent, ends with the coming of Titus in AD70. Titus takes the place of Christ in Preterist theology. They are obsessed with him and AD70.

For example:

· The necessity of the church to fellowship much more ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Hebrews 10:25).
· The waiting and watching of God’s people ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Matthew 24:42-51, 25:10, 25:13, Mark 13:35-37, Luke 12:37-40, 21:36, Revelation 3:3, 19:7-10).
· The security that God’s people have by being sealed with the Holy Ghost ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Ephesians 1:13-14 and Ephesians 4:30).
· Our redemption does not arrive until the coming of Titus in AD70 (Luke 21:28).

Where did you learn this from? This is not what the partial preterist believes. It seems to me that you actually may not fully know what partial preterists believe
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0

claninja

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2017
5,647
2,189
indiana
✟298,336.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You do believe that the new Jerusalem is descending from heaven when Christ comes to introduce a new perfect state on this earth, and that this is when we get our new eternal bodies?

I thought your were and idealist?

"In the context of Christian eschatology, idealism (also called the spiritual approach, the allegorical approach, the nonliteral approach, and many other names) involves an interpretation of the Book of Revelation that sees all of the imagery of the book as symbolic."

I hold the new jerusalem = body of Christ under the new covenant. And that this was inaugurated at Christ's 1st coming and is consummated at his return.

Galatians 4:24-26 These things serve as illustrations, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children into slavery: This is Hagar. Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present-day Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother.

Hebrews 12:22 Instead, you have come to Mount Zion, to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem. You have come to myriads of angels

1.) Both the New Jerusalem and the Body of Christ are the Bride of the lamb

Revelation 20:9-10 Then came one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls full of the seven last plagues and spoke to me, saying, “Come, I will show you the Bride, the wife of the Lamb.” And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great, high mountain, and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God,

Ephesians 5:31-32 Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.

2.)Both the New Jerusalem and the Body of Christ are built on the foundations of the prophets
Revelation 21:14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and on them were the twelve names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Ephesians 2:20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone

3.) Both the New Jerusalem and the Body of Christ are where God dwells with his people.
Revelation 21:3 Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God

Ephesians 2:21 In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit.

Thus, by using scripture to interpret scripture, the new Jerusalem = the body of Christ under the new covenant.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,339
7,349
California
✟551,233.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
For example:

· The necessity of the church to fellowship much more ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Hebrews 10:25).
Absolutely not so. I have no idea where you got that idea from.
· The waiting and watching of God’s people ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Matthew 24:42-51, 25:10, 25:13, Mark 13:35-37, Luke 12:37-40, 21:36, Revelation 3:3, 19:7-10).
"The Coming of the Son of Man" is how Jesus referred to it. ISTM that you'd rather use YOUR term instead.
The security that God’s people have by being sealed with the Holy Ghost ends with the coming of Titus in AD70 (Ephesians 1:13-14 and Ephesians 4:30).
Not "ends" - our security, our inheritance became complete (they only had a "deposit" ) at the "Coming of the Son of Man". He vindicated His servants......released them from oppression. He completed the process of atonement.
Our redemption does not arrive until the coming of Titus in AD70 (Luke 21:28).
Salvation (atonement) arrived in fullness at the "Coming of the Son of Man" in 70 AD. That's why we see so many mentions of "our salvation is near" and "fulfillment of the ages" (Romans 13:11; 1 Corinthians 10:11; 1 Peter 4:7 and, thank you, Luke 21:28). Going back in Luke a few verses, Jesus said:

v. 20 ~
The Destruction of Jerusalem
(Matthew 24:15-25; Mark 13:14-23)

20But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, you will know that her desolation is near.

v. 25 ~ There will be signs.......

v. 28 ~ When these things begin to happen [the signs], stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: claninja
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.