That's because the answer to mans' infirmities is not in science. It's in Christ. This is the same reason Christ did not overthrow the Romans and free Israel from their opression.Well, it is true, science does have assumptions about the past (and distant... and future).
The Big Bang thoery actually is going from a singularity to the current universe... it doesn't give the source of the singularity. There are other theories which don't seem to require a singularity. Besides the fact that it was a catholic priest who invented the term Big Bang.
Additionally, the Bible is not a scientific work. It has been a big failure everytime it has been applied as a scientific work. Since the Bible isn't concerned with the science, then it isn't going to talk about things from a scientific perspective.
Obviously, if it did, we would have the science 2000+ years ago, and not have been discovering it in the last 200 years.
JM
Though the Bible isn't a Physics textbook, it does tell how God works. If God says He created the earth, then He created it. That's not scientific, its supernatural, extra-scientific.
And question, where has the Bible failed scientifically?
Upvote
0