Romans 9 Is Not About Predestination!

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Uh...nowhere does it say we wait can't obey God of our own will. In fact we have not a single example in the bible of God telling anyone that they had no free will to obey him.

I posted several verses that shows an unsaved man or a christian living in the flesh can please God! The flesh or human nature can do nothing to please God!

Romans 7:18
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

Isaiah 64:6
But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Those in their human nature (the unsaved and the backslidden Christian) can do nothing to please God! These verses should settle the matter.

Because God has foreknowledge. But you're ignoring what Peter said. Judas had obtained a part in their ministry. You are the person ignoring the words of God. You're not arguing with me, you're arguing with God. (And I am not saying I myself am God in case you try that tactic.)

I do not add to Gods Word. I accept it as written.

YOu do not even know what foreknowledge is and means. it is pro- ginosko which means to plan in advance!

Judas was a devil from the beginning! It was Gods foreknowledge for God planned it!

Romans 9:18-21 King James Version (KJV)
18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

God has the absolute right to do what He wants with any of His creatures!

You cannot find a single scripture that puts it that way.

No there is no verse that is worded that way.

But the fact we are not saved by works is clear and that we work as a result of our salvation is clear in Ephesians 2:10

Ephesians 2:8-10 King James Version (KJV)
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Isaiah was talking about the failed righteousness of Israel, not a permanent state of man. But the words that God prepared for us to walk in do in fact result in God's accounting of righteousness to us and God himself calls many people in the Old and New Testaments, 'righteous.'

Wrong again. Being defclared "righteous" by God has always been on the basis of faith! Romans 4 makes that clear and th ebook of galatians as well!

Works do not save nor do they make us more acceptable to God. They only make us obedient to God in His plan for our life!
 
Upvote 0

Al Touthentop

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2019
2,940
888
61
VENETA
Visit site
✟34,926.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Libertarian
I posted several verses that shows an unsaved man or a christian living in the flesh can please God! The flesh or human nature can do nothing to please God!

Which has absolutely nothing to do with inability to obey or a lack of free will.

Romans 7:18
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

The desires of the flesh produce nothing good. Even if we were wanting to do good, we couldn't invent any works that would save us.

Isaiah 64:6
But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.

This was talking about Israel, as I stated before, and it has to do with their disobedience, it isn't a general statement about all mankind in general.

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Which means that those who succumb to their own fleshly desires are by definition disobedient. They are not tainted by some sin infection. Sin is disobedience, it isn't a disease.

Those in their human nature (the unsaved and the backslidden Christian) can do nothing to please God! These verses should settle the matter.

Right. But they are doing this of their own free will.

I do not add to Gods Word. I accept it as written.

Saying that we don't have free will is not accepting God's word as written. Read Ezekiel 18.

YOu do not even know what foreknowledge is and means. it is pro- ginosko which means to plan in advance!

No, it means "before knowledge" - or previous knowledge. It can be used in the context of making plans but it means to know in advance of something. That word is a compound word. Gnostos means "I know."
It doesn't mean "I plan."

Judas was a devil from the beginning! It was Gods foreknowledge for God planned it!

Nowhere are we told that Judas was made to disobey.

18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?

This means that God makes the rules. It may seem like Paul is saying that he makes people hard in their hearts but that's not the way the people of that time would have understood it. Today, we would say that God's word offends some people. God only made them offended by speaking the truth. He didn't go into their hearts and minds to make them offended and prevent them from obeying. It is blasphemy toward God to assert that he makes people disobey and then punishes them for the disobedience he caused.

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

Right. God did not make us sinners and it is the height of folly to blame God for the things we do of our own free will. We sinned, he didn't make us sin.

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

The Greek words show us that none of the vessels were created for anything but honor. They were refitted or adjusted for destruction after they left the shop.

God has the absolute right to do what He wants with any of His creatures!

But he isn't unjust. So he doesn't premake anyone for destruction. Any other assertion is blasphemy toward him.


No there is no verse that is worded that way.

That's correct. The claim is pretext. It isn't found in the text stating it that way because it isn't a teaching of scripture.

But the fact we are not saved by works is clear and that we work as a result of our salvation is clear in Ephesians 2:10

You are ignoring the context. Works "of yourselves," not just any works. The works of God, which we obey are what saves us.
 
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Which has absolutely nothing to do with inability to obey or a lack of free will.

WOW ! you have really drunk deep the kool-aid!

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

What part of cannot do you not understand? Anyone who is unsaved can not do 1 thing that pleases God! It does not say not want, or don't feel like obeying, it says they CANNOT!

That means they are incapapble of pleasing God! Th elost have no free will. They are spiritually dead,and slaves to sin.

The desires of the flesh produce nothing good. Even if we were wanting to do good, we couldn't invent any works that would save us.

Correct and those in the flesh are inescapable (cannot) please God. They have no choice. Works do not save anyway! or keep us saved, if one believes Gods' Word.

No, it means "before knowledge" - or previous knowledge. It can be used in the context of making plans but it means to know in advance of something. That word is a compound word. Gnostos means "I know."
It doesn't mean "I plan."

And it is foreknowledge through pre-arrangement . Not God knowing in advance whether someone will accept or reject Christ.

But let me ask you a question. If those in the human nature cannot please god- how can they choose of their own "free will" to accept Christ as Savior? That is something that pleases God. And God says those in the flesh cannot please Him!

Right. But they are doing this of their own free will.

But they can't please god! So how can they choose Jesus which pleases God when they are incapable of pleasing Him? Did God lie to us when He said the lost cannot please Him? or is accepting Christ something that doesn't please God?

This was talking about Israel, as I stated before, and it has to do with their disobedience, it isn't a general statement about all mankind in general.

6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Ephesians 2 King James Version (KJV)
2 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

Its just as true in the new as well! Humans cannot please God by any work while they are unsaved.

This means that God makes the rules. It may seem like Paul is saying that he makes people hard in their hearts but that's not the way the people of that time would have understood it. Today, we would say that God's word offends some people. God only made them offended by speaking the truth. He didn't go into their hearts and minds to make them offended and prevent them from obeying. It is blasphemy toward God to assert that he makes people disobey and then punishes them for the disobedience he caused.

That is no twhat the Scriptures say and you know that! Or are you totally uneducated in basic grammar and word understanding!

14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.

17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.

18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

God hardens and God forms a lump to dishonor! Not God making a decision based onthe decision of the lump!

Stop butchering grammar to try to defend a false idea handed down to you.

You should take God at His word instead of retranslating it. You cannot even show me one verse where it says the lost have free will to choose to obey God, while I have shown you God saying the lost cannot please (obey) Him.
 
Upvote 0

Al Touthentop

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2019
2,940
888
61
VENETA
Visit site
✟34,926.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Libertarian
WOW ! you have really drunk deep the kool-aid!

Is an insult really necessary or effective do you think?
Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Those who are obeying their fleshly desires rather than God's commands, cannot please God. This says nothing at all against free will. In fact it implies free will. It doesn't say here that nobody can please God. Paul specifies a certain class of people, "they that are in the flesh."

That's a limiting statement and you are totally ignoring that grammatical limitation. It doesn't mean "all men" and it isn't talking about just people who have flesh. Were this the case, then Jesus couldn't have pleased God because he was also made of flesh. That isn't what he means there. He means people who are submitting to their own fleshly desires.
What part of cannot do you not understand? Anyone who is unsaved can not do 1 thing that pleases God! It does not say not want, or don't feel like obeying, it says they CANNOT!

That's not what it says. It doesn't say that they have no ability in and of themselves to obey. It says that when they're performing to their own standard of flesh, that they cannot please God.
That means they are incapapble of pleasing God! Th elost have no free will. They are spiritually dead,and slaves to sin.

They are sinning. Disobedient to God. They, of their own free will are being disobedient.


Correct and those in the flesh are inescapable (cannot) please God. They have no choice. Works do not save anyway! or keep us saved, if one believes Gods' Word.

Works do save as Jesus himself said.

28 Then they inquired, “What must we do to perform the works of God?” 29 Jesus replied, “The work of God is this: to believe in the One He has sent.”

So, Jesus tells them in response to the question "What must we do," that they must believe. Belief itself is a work. If we're not saved by work, then Jesus was either lying or it is impossible to be saved.

And it is foreknowledge through pre-arrangement . Not God knowing in advance whether someone will accept or reject Christ.

Foreknowledge is knowing in advance, it is not arranging in advance. You are re-defining words.

But let me ask you a question. If those in the human nature cannot please god- how can they choose of their own "free will" to accept Christ as Savior? That is something that pleases God. And God says those in the flesh cannot please Him!

Because they were in their "human nature" - obedience to their own desires, not obeying God. They chose to obey the flesh rather than God. That's what Paul is saying.


But they can't please god! So how can they choose Jesus which pleases God when they are incapable of pleasing Him? Did God lie to us when He said the lost cannot please Him? or is accepting Christ something that doesn't please God?

They are not restrained from pleasing God by God, but by their choice to please themselves.


6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

The very proof that they have made a choice. "Carnally minded." So what you set your mind on is what determines whether or not you will please God or yourself.

7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

To choose your own pleasure is to reject God.

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

Those who refuse God's commands cannot please God. There's a grammatical limitation placed there which you totally ignore.

2 And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

He's referring to baptism here, a work which they did, the result of which caused them to be born again and put in Christ. (See Romans 6 where he used the very same language to explain baptism)

2 Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

We were once disobedient to God.

Its just as true in the new as well! Humans cannot please God by any work while they are unsaved.

You have modified the text here and inserted the word "any" where it isn't used. Paul was making a comparison here between works "of yourselves," works of merit that are assumed to be pleasing to God as opposed to the commands he gave which result in salvation.
That is no twhat the Scriptures say and you know that! Or are you totally uneducated in basic grammar and word understanding!

Again with the insults as if this is a productive method of convincing somebody of something.

14 What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? God forbid.

15 For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.

So God makes the rules. And if he has mercy on the vessels that have been adjusted for destruction, then that is proof of his righteousness. It isn't proof that he causes people to disobey and then punishes them. Your reading of this is so blasphemous to God, I'm surprised you can have a good conscience after concluding that God is so unjust as to make arbitrary rules and then mock people for thinking he is unjust for doing so.
16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.

We don't make the rules, God does. That's what he's saying. This is not saying that God made people sinners or faithful. He demanded faith and even after people disobeyed he showed them mercy by sending his son. Paul is comparing Jews to Gentiles here and it is the Jews which were "adjusted for destruction."
17 For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.

So even Pharaoh was created for honor, not destruction.

18 Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth.

God offended Pharaoh with his words. Pharaoh chose to be offended. Had Pharaoh obeyed God, God's glory would still have been magnified, Pharaoh would have been honorable, and the Israelites would still have been made free.

19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault? For who hath resisted his will?

Pharaoh resisted God's will. Paul's question there is rhetorical. The answer to it is: "everyone." Yet in spite of people resisting his will, what God planned to accomplish was accomplished.

20 Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?

So does a man tell God that God made him disobedient? "Preposterous," Paul says. You choose of your own free will to disobey and placing the blame on God is ridiculous.

21 Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

He just told us that God created Pharaoh for honor and Pharaoh disobeyed God. So the lump is made for honor but it decides of its own free will to obey or disobey. A disobedient lump can never please God. God didn't make him disobey and then punish him for the disobedience that he caused. That would be unjust by any standard.

God hardens and God forms a lump to dishonor! Not God making a decision based onthe decision of the lump!

God offends with his words. He doesn't make people disobey.
Stop butchering grammar to try to defend a false idea handed down to you.

You are twisting God's words and in your twisting are claiming that God is an arbitrary unjust God who blames people for disobedience that he caused. That's blasphemy and you don't seem to see it. God claims to be just and righteous and he teaches us in the Old Testament that false allegations are anathema to justice.

If God made people to disobey him, and then charged them with "sin," he's an unjust God. They're were not being disobedient at all. They are actually obeying him. And you're saying that they're bad people, when in fact, by doing "his will," they were "good." Talk about twisting of scripture!

You should take God at His word instead of retranslating it. You cannot even show me one verse where it says the lost have free will to choose to obey God, while I have shown you God saying the lost cannot please (obey) Him.

You might try some common sense and reconciling what Paul said there with other scriptures.

15 Consider also that our Lord’s patience brings salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom God gave him. 16 He writes this way in all his letters, speaking in them about such matters. Some parts of his letters are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.

You've bought into the distorted view of people who preach that God is a tyrant, not a merciful God.
 
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Those who are obeying their fleshly desires rather than God's commands, cannot please God. This says nothing at all against free will. In fact it implies free will. It doesn't say here that nobody can please God. Paul specifies a certain class of people, "they that are in the flesh."

That's a limiting statement and you are totally ignoring that grammatical limitation. It doesn't mean "all men" and it isn't talking about just people who have flesh. Were this the case, then Jesus couldn't have pleased God because he was also made of flesh. That isn't what he means there. He means people who are submitting to their own fleshly desires.

No it implies a lack of free will for the unsaved!

If one is unsaved- they are living in the fleash/carnal/natural man/human nature-and they cannot please God! There is no choice when the word is cannot! They can't please god- they are incapapble.


15 Consider also that our Lord’s patience brings salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom God gave him. 16 He writes this way in all his letters, speaking in them about such matters. Some parts of his letters are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction.

You've bought into the distorted view of people who preach that God is a tyrant, not a merciful God.

You mean as opposed to your concept of God who sits on the throne and waits for people to make up their mind? Or wait until they do enough good works to get saved. Or once saved if they don't do enough good worksd-God yanks their salvation card?

Sorry but I prefer the God of the Bible as it is written.

Ephesians 2:8-9 King James Version (KJV)
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

If you wish to know what is th eonly work that can save a man, it is this:

John 6:28-29 King James Version (KJV)
28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

The Word of God teaches us we do not work to get or maintain our salvation. But we work because we are saved and the work is simply an outpouring of the life of Christ in us!

The woord of men tell people they must work to earn Gods favor!
 
Upvote 0

Al Touthentop

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2019
2,940
888
61
VENETA
Visit site
✟34,926.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Libertarian
No it implies a lack of free will for the unsaved!

Not at all. Those who are "in the flesh" are disobedient by choice.

If one is unsaved- they are living in the fleash/carnal/natural man/human nature-and they cannot please God! There is no choice when the word is cannot! They can't please god- they are incapapble.

They cannot please God by being disobedient to God. It does not say they are incapable of changing their behavior. You are in error.



You mean as opposed to your concept of God who sits on the throne and waits for people to make up their mind?

If your concept of God is correct, then we don't have free will at all even after being saved. If God forces people to obey, then they don't have any free will at any point.

Or wait until they do enough good works to get saved. Or once saved if they don't do enough good worksd-God yanks their salvation card?

For a person to become saved, he has to obey the gospel. That's just a fact. Paul writes that his whole purpose was to bring about obedience of "the faith." That being the system of faith or the gospel.

Sorry but I prefer the God of the Bible as it is written.

No you want to inject your own pretext in there and say it means something other than what is written.


Ephesians 2:8-9 King James Version (KJV)
8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

9 Not of works (of yourselves), lest any man should boast.

And you leave off verse ten because it doesn't work with your narrative.

If you wish to know what is th eonly work that can save a man, it is this:

So now you finally admit that we're saved by work(s).

John 6:28-29 King James Version (KJV)
28 Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?

29 Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.

The Word of God teaches us we do not work to get or maintain our salvation. But we work because we are saved and the work is simply an outpouring of the life of Christ in us!

Show me where it says anywhere that we're saved first and I'll accept your theology.

The woord of men tell people they must work to earn Gods favor!

No, that's not the case. As Jesus points out, doing God's commands is not earning anything (Luke 17:10).

Anyone who teaches that obeying God is to earn salvation is preaching false doctrine. The commands of God are themselves grace. When we obey them, we are not earning anything.
 
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
They cannot please God by being disobedient to God. It does not say they are incapable of changing their behavior. You are in error.

We need to end this. You are more interested in your opinion than what the Word says.

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

If you accept words at their face value- then anyone on the human nature cannot please God and that also means they cannot change their behavior in a way that will please God.

To be directr with you, if you think this verse means different, yo uhave a problem with language that needs to be resolved.

You may have the last word.
 
Upvote 0

Al Touthentop

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2019
2,940
888
61
VENETA
Visit site
✟34,926.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Libertarian
We need to end this. You are more interested in your opinion than what the Word says.

The text says that only a certain type of people are in the category you point to. Not every man, "they that are in the flesh." And he explains what that means. But you do not want to accept that because you have the pre-existing belief that man is incapable, because of Adam, of resisting sin of their own free will.

That belief is false and is not taught in scripture. In fact, the opposite is taught in God's own words.

6 So the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.

If he commanded Cain to rule over sin, are you suggesting that he was just tricking Cain when he said that he could do that? He was really lying because he created him incapable of ruling over sin, because he had no free will to obey God? Seriously? What sort of God is it that you worship?

Romans 8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

If you accept words at their face value- then anyone on the human nature cannot please God and that also means they cannot change their behavior in a way that will please God.

Only if I ignore the rest of the Bible's teachings. This phrase "in the flesh" does not mean being human. Every human was born in the flesh. Jesus came "in the flesh."

Please do not insult your own intelligence by equating this to every person on earth because Paul isn't doing that. He explains that those who are "in the flesh" are those who obey the will of their flesh rather than God's. A disobedient person. And a disobedient person cannot please God.

To be directr with you, if you think this verse means different, yo uhave a problem with language that needs to be resolved.

You may have the last word.

The language of that verse is fine. You just refuse to acknowledge that it doesn't mean every human being.
 
Upvote 0

nolidad

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 2, 2006
6,762
1,269
69
onj this planet
✟221,310.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The language of that verse is fine. You just refuse to acknowledge that it doesn't mean every human being.

Well I will still let you have the last word- but I must address your false witness of me!

I never said it meant every human being! Just the unsaved who are in the flesh (or human nature) No one who is unsaved can please God.

Romans 3 proves this beyind any honest reader of scripture-
There is no one righteous
Therer are none that seek God
There are none that understand.

1 Cor. Also proves it beyond doubt.

The natural man cannot understand the things of God They are foolishness unto Him

18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

romans 8 also proves it:

5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

The unsaved man is not subject to the law of God nor can it be subjected to the law of God!
 
Upvote 0