- Mar 17, 2015
- 17,184
- 9,196
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
And that's the rub I'd see, it shouldn't be a byproduct, it should be something that plays into edification as a whole rather than resulting contingently from being in some special status.
Here an assumption is being used, but it's an incorrect assumption. What you'd ideally like to do: try to find your own incorrect assumptions you are using (often accidentally), so that you can get free of those, for your own gain.
Trying to put it to words that can communicate it could be hard to do(!), so it wouldn't normally be possible in an antagonistic debate. Instead, you'd have to have a true desire to examine it neutrally, and be eager to find new aspects or pieces, instead of defending a position, see. That's what I was trying to convey above.
If I merely correct the mistaken assumption or bring the needed idea to bear, it won't be hearable if you feel this is a contest I think. It's like....how to understand a physics idea like special relativity for instance, it's not useful to insist it's wrong about time dilation for instance: that 2 twins separated where one travels near the speed of light in a ship for a while can't age a different rates, etc. If one is merely debating, that handicaps their ability to learn. Ideally, one wants to really learn the theory, and then test it.
Upvote
0