jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Jerry Kelso: "Revelation 5:9-10; 11:18; 19:7-10 shows the church is in Heaven through the whole tribulation ..."


We know that there are many Christians in heaven. That doesn't prove there are no Christians on earth, or no church on earth, or any discontinuity in the presence of the church on earth.



Jerry Kelso: "Revelation 4:1; John is taken up into Heaven through an actual portal in Heaven when the church age is through."



I notice that this point has been discussed in a number of posts. You have exchanged views with Sovereign Grace on this subject. You should listen to what he is saying.

I don't know if John went to heaven or is he simply saw a vision, or a series of visions, that showed him what God wanted him to know. If John went to heaven, he went as a spirit.

One man going to heaven as a spirit, temporarily, is completely different from millions of Christians being bodily lifted into heaven as permanent residents. In fact, I'm having trouble seeing the connection. John isn't surrounded by members of the church when he sees this vision and no one visits heaven with him, when he goes as a spirit.

Part of the problem is that you believe that the Scripture has described Rapture in other places. Since you believe that Rapture is in the NT, then you have little trouble thinking that this passage somehow refers to it. The truth is that there is no Rapture (separate from the Second Coming) in the Bible.

dale,

1. The 24 elders represent both old and New Testament Christians Revelation 4&5 in the beginning.
The first saved saints are souls under the altar and they are not till the 5th seal and they are martyrs.
2 Thessalonians 2 God sends a strong delusion to many so they won’t be believing.

2. Old Testament saints are already in Heaven in the beginning and middle.
The church also has to be in the middle to the end to be given rewards in Heaven for their works Revelation 11:18 and the marriage of the Lamb Revelation 19:7-10.

3. Revelation 4:1; John was given the vision on Patmos and was in the spirit on the Lord’s day.
This doesn’t mean he became spirit when he went through the door in Heaven. Why? Because he was still in his earthly flesh and Revelation 10 said he would prophesy again to people on earth. He did eventually die physically.

4. As far as sovereigngrace in my opinion and his perception to many on this post is that he has an agenda and not interested in true apologetics.

5. Yes, I do believe in s pre- Trib rapture but not just from Revelation 4:1.
The fact is that you can’t prove a post trib rapture at the second coming.
It is only a resurrection of the dead Jewish martyrs of the tribulation Revelation 15:1-2;20:4-6.
You have to insert 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 to make a post- trib rapture work.
Revelation 19:11-20 has all the saints from Adam’s day to the tribulation saints Revelation 20:4-6.
You may think post is a sure thing but I believe I have shown more evidence for pre-trib that makes it more possible and viable than the post-trib position. Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
There is no distinction. That is a Pretrib fable. There is only one kingdom. The kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom and incorporates the whole domain over-which the Lord Jesus Christ exercises His Divine kingship, dominion and intimate rule. It includes heaven (and all those who are in heaven) – the place where with the kingdom is centered and administrated.

The kingdom of God exists wherever the king – the Lord Jesus Christ – exercises His spiritual jurisdiction. His kingdom embodies all those who possess the indwelling Holy Spirit – those who are born-again of the Spirit of God. Christ’s kingdom is therefore found wherever there are citizens of that Kingdom.

In John 3:3 Jesus declared: Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

And in John 3:5 He says, “Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.”

The penitent sinner spiritually enters into a spiritual kingdom upon conversion. Entering in to that spiritual kingdom in this life brings an immediate realization in the ‘here and now’ and on this earth of true “righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost” (Romans 14:17) and is decisively personal to the recipient. That means if you have given Christ kingship of your life then you are in the kingdom of God and the kingdom of God is in you! The King in God’s kingdom is none other than the Lord Jesus Christ. And since we got saved we are His subjects. The laws that govern Christ’s spiritual kingdom are found in this precious Book.

That means if you have given Christ kingship of your life then you are in the kingdom of God and the kingdom of God is in you!

Romans 14:17 sums it up like this: “For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink (or, the kingdom of God is not material things); but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

The kingdom is summed up in 3 words:

· righteousness
· peace
· joy

When you truly enter the kingdom of God on this earth you inherit: “righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

Here in this passage again we see that the kingdom of God is not a physical temporal kingdom that can be naturally observed or enjoyed but rather a spiritual kingdom, which is spiritually entered. The peace spoken of here is the peace that pertains to those saved by God’s Sovereign grace, and who belong to the spiritual kingdom of God. Not only would Messiah’s kingdom be characterized by peace, but He also would be “the prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:6). It was also not of this world – it was a heavenly kingdom.

Jesus declared in Matthew 6:31-34, “take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.”

Premils often make the same mistake as the Pharisees did in their interpretation of the Old Testament prophecies. They interpret the Old Testament references to the kingdom in a literal, physical, visible, earthly temporal sense, when Christ demonstrated their fulfilment in a literal, spiritual, invisible, heavenly eternal sense. Many Christians today, like many Jews before them, are mistakenly looking forward to a physical reign of Christ on this sin-cursed earth. Such people, who call themselves Premillennialists, believe that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom, which will be concentrated on the actual city of Jerusalem. They believe that it is only at this stage that He will finally reign over His enemies and rule over the nations. However, Christ is not coming to reign over His enemies; He is coming to destroy them.

sovereigngrace,

1. Romans 14:17 was recorded after the cross.
Israel was under the Mosaic law and not the New Covenant.
Their KoG was spiritual according to recognizing the Messiah and belief he had the power to forgive sins.
Our KoG is spiritual according to the message of the death, burial and resurrection.

2. John 3:3,5.
The Jewish basis of being born of water and spirit was 2 things.
a). Born of water was the Red Sea deliverance the first time.
Baptized under the cloud and sea 1 Corinthians 10:1-4.
b). Born of the spirit was the Jews being given a new spirit and a new heart etc. Ezekiel 36:25-27.
Everything pointed to the cross from Genesis 3:15. But gradual revelation must be understood by gradual revelation.
The death, burial and resurrection didn’t come until Christ said it was finished.

3. The KoG in its physical state is the whole universe Read Psalms.
The KoH in its physical state is this earthly sphere that is the kingdom under the whole heaven Daniel 7:27.
In its spiritual state the KoG within you deals with salvation Matthew 6:33;Luke 17:20-21.
The Jews were never told to seek the KoH and never was said to come without observation.

4. The physical land for Israel through Abraham is found in Genesis 12-15 and the reason Jesus said Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth Matthew 5:5.
The physical reign of David is unconditional conditioned by obedience which will happen in the end of the tribulation.
2 Samuel 7:13-16; 1Chronicles 28:1-7; Ezekiel 37:13-16; Romans 11-25-27.
You have to allegorize or spiritual scripture to get past these scriptures. Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
dale,

1. The 24 elders represent both old and New Testament Christians Revelation 4&5 in the beginning.
The first saved saints are souls under the altar and they are not till the 5th seal and they are martyrs.
2 Thessalonians 2 God sends a strong delusion to many so they won’t be believing.

2. Old Testament saints are already in Heaven in the beginning and middle.
The church also has to be in the middle to the end to be given rewards in Heaven for their works Revelation 11:18 and the marriage of the Lamb Revelation 19:7-10.

3. Revelation 4:1; John was given the vision on Patmos and was in the spirit on the Lord’s day.
This doesn’t mean he became spirit when he went through the door in Heaven. Why? Because he was still in his earthly flesh and Revelation 10 said he would prophesy again to people on earth. He did eventually die physically.

4. As far as sovereigngrace in my opinion and his perception to many on this post is that he has an agenda and not interested in true apologetics.

5. Yes, I do believe in s pre- Trib rapture but not just from Revelation 4:1.
The fact is that you can’t prove a post trib rapture at the second coming.
It is only a resurrection of the dead Jewish martyrs of the tribulation Revelation 15:1-2;20:4-6.
You have to insert 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 to make a post- trib rapture work.
Revelation 19:11-20 has all the saints from Adam’s day to the tribulation saints Revelation 20:4-6.
You may think post is a sure thing but I believe I have shown more evidence for pre-trib that makes it more possible and viable than the post-trib position. Jerry Kelso

sovereigngrace,

1. Romans 14:17 was recorded after the cross.
Israel was under the Mosaic law and not the New Covenant.
Their KoG was spiritual according to recognizing the Messiah and belief he had the power to forgive sins.
Our KoG is spiritual according to the message of the death, burial and resurrection.

2. John 3:3,5.
The Jewish basis of being born of water and spirit was 2 things.
a). Born of water was the Red Sea deliverance the first time.
Baptized under the cloud and sea 1 Corinthians 10:1-4.
b). Born of the spirit was the Jews being given a new spirit and a new heart etc. Ezekiel 36:25-27.
Everything pointed to the cross from Genesis 3:15. But gradual revelation must be understood by gradual revelation.
The death, burial and resurrection didn’t come until Christ said it was finished.

3. The KoG in its physical state is the whole universe Read Psalms.
The KoH in its physical state is this earthly sphere that is the kingdom under the whole heaven Daniel 7:27.
In its spiritual state the KoG within you deals with salvation Matthew 6:33;Luke 17:20-21.
The Jews were never told to seek the KoH and never was said to come without observation.

4. The physical land for Israel through Abraham is found in Genesis 12-15 and the reason Jesus said Blessed are the meek for they shall inherit the earth Matthew 5:5.
The physical reign of David is unconditional conditioned by obedience which will happen in the end of the tribulation.
2 Samuel 7:13-16; 1Chronicles 28:1-7; Ezekiel 37:13-16; Romans 11-25-27.
You have to allegorize or spiritual scripture to get past these scriptures. Jerry Kelso

There is no difference. Your teachers have taught you wrong. Unfortunately, they make the exact same mistake as the Pharisees did, who expected a visible, physical, temporal, earthly kingdom, when, in fact, Christ brought a spiritual, heavenly, eternal kingdom that could not be viewed with the naked eye.

Premils often make the same mistake as the Pharisees did in their interpretation of the Old Testament prophecies. They interpret the Old Testament references to the kingdom in a literal, physical, visible, earthly temporal sense, when Christ demonstrated their fulfilment in a literal, spiritual, invisible, heavenly eternal sense. Many Christians today, like many Jews before them, are mistakenly looking forward to a physical reign of Christ on this sin-cursed earth. Such people, who call themselves Premillennialists, believe that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom, which will be concentrated on the actual city of Jerusalem. They believe that it is only at this stage that He will finally reign over His enemies and rule over the nations. However, Christ is not coming to reign over His enemies; He is coming to destroy them.

Jesus said in John 18:36, “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.”

Christ couldn't have made it clearer. This expectation – of a literal visible territorial political kingdom – was wrong. It exposed the ignorance which controlled the Jews. They had a defective perception of the nature of God’s kingdom and the manner in which it would appear.

Messiah would come and reveal true righteousness and divine authority, although it would be in a completely different way to what Israel expected. The kingdom of God, which Christ continually spoke of, did not relate to a physical Jewish kingdom that could be viewed with human sight. It did not relate to individual Gentile nations. Luke 17:20-21 records an interesting discourse between Christ and the Pharisees on the subject of the kingdom of God, saying, He was “demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come.”

Christ replied, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within (entos) you.”

The Lord revealed in this passage that the kingdom of God – His kingdom – was not a literal earthly domain neither could it be viewed like other kingdoms with their outward splendour, impressive power and magnitude. It was, rather, a spiritual kingdom, which could only be spiritually entered. Messiah had finally come to His people.

John Gill says of this passage, “it [the kingdom of God] reigns, through righteousness, unto eternal life; and by it, Christ, as king of saints, dwells and reigns in his people. Now this is not to be understood of the Scribes and Pharisees, as if they had any such internal principle in them, who were as painted sepulchres, and had nothing but rottenness and corruption in them.”

When Christ appeared at His first advent, many religious Jews imagined He would reinstate the then defunct earthly throne of Israel and reign victorious over the physical nation of Israel. They believed that the appearance of Messiah would usher in a period of physical and spiritual bliss for Israel in which their enemies would be totally destroyed. The Jewish expectation was a literal visible territorial kingdom of which the Messiah – the King – would rule over. They believed He would immediately destroy every enemy that withstood the house of Israel. Their wrong thinking was guided by a hyper-literalist interpretation of OT Messianic prophecies. These Christ confronted and exposed in His teaching.

Premillennialists are constantly exalting the power and influence of Satan and diluting the sovereign power and influence of Christ. That is nowhere more evident than in their constant rubbishing of Christ’s current kingship over His enemies at the right hand of majesty on high. Whether they mean to or not, Premils are always highlighting what Satan is doing in our day instead of what Christ is doing. Premil portrays a BIG devil and a small god; Scripture presents a small devil and a BIG God. In Premil, Satan seems sovereign in this age and God is curtailed. Premils are always lauding the ability of Satan since the cross. In Scripture, Christ is sovereign and Satan is curtailed. Scripture is always lauding the ability of Christ since the cross. As a consequence, Premil portrays an impotent beat-down New Testament Church, whereas Scripture sees a victorious potent New Testament Church invading the nations with the good news of Christ and subjugating the powers of darkness as they do so. In Scripture Christ reigns over all creation as God and His new creation as Savior.

It is hard to watch Christians undermine the omnipotence of Christ. They deny Christ is reigning today as King of kings and Lord of lords. They deny Christ is reigning over all creation. They deny Christ is reigning over His enemies as conquering king. They have Christ operating in a vacuum as some impotent want-to-be ruler. They deny that He is sitting upon David’s throne as Israel’s Messiah. They depict Him as some kind of Prince-in-waiting desperately hoping to rule. As we have seen, that is not what Scripture depicts.

Premillennialists, believe that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom, which will be concentrated on the actual city of Jerusalem. They believe that it is only at this stage that He will finally reign over His enemies and rule over the nations. However, Christ is not coming to reign over His enemies; He is coming to destroy them.

Jesus said in the corresponding passage in Luke 11:20-22, if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you. When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.”

What Jesus was saying here is that his ministry was proof that the kingdom of God had arrived.

Here, Christ highlights the Sovereign power of the kingdom of God and reveals how the “strong man” – Satan – and his kingdom of devils can only be defeated by One that is stronger than them, namely Himself – the Son of God. As we examine the gospels we discover, Satan was stripped everywhere that Christ confronted him. The Lord entered the devil’s house and took authority over him and spoilt His goods. Previously, Satan's grip on the nations was so strong and so embedded that the truth of God's Word could not penetrate through. The devil overwhelmingly controlled the Gentile nations.

1 Corinthians 4:20 says, the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power (or) dunámei.”

The question is: who can stand against God?

Well if we align with Him then who can stand against us?

When we pray “Thy kingdom come” we are praying for heaven to come down in supernatural power in our midst – just like at Pentecost. This is a petition for the glory of God to be seen in Nebraska.

Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

John testified in Revelation 1:9: “I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom.”

If Christ's kingdom is not yet come, then what kingdom was it that John resided in?

Hebrews 12:28: “Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear.”

The error in Premil theology is in their understanding of the actual nature of the kingdom. It has no reference to physical worldly governments but rather God's spiritual government over His people throughout all nations. Kingdom life pertains to the elect alone.

The kingdom of God in the New Testament does not refer to a political or earthly kingdom. The word kingdom simply means ‘king [with a] domain’. Its meaning includes the territory and the people over whom the King rules and exercises sovereign authority. The term also includes the legislation and laws that administrate that kingdom. The word employed in the New Testament for ‘kingdom’ is the Greek word ‘Basileia’ denoting ‘sovereignty, royal power, kingship and dominion’. A kingdom must therefore have (1) a king – a head, (2) a domain to rule over – subjects and territory, (3) a structure of administration – ethics, rules and laws which govern it.

The kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom and incorporates the whole domain over-which the Lord Jesus Christ exercises His Divine kingship, dominion and intimate rule. It includes heaven (and all those who are in heaven) – the place where with the kingdom is centered and administrated.

Romans 14:17 sums it up like this: “For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink (or, the kingdom of God is not material things); but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

The kingdom is summed up in 3 words:

· righteousness
· peace
· joy

When you truly enter the kingdom of God on this earth you inherit: “righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

Here in this passage again we see that the kingdom of God is not a physical temporal kingdom that can be naturally observed or enjoyed but rather a spiritual kingdom, which is spiritually entered. The peace spoken of here is the peace that pertains to those saved by God’s Sovereign grace, and who belong to the spiritual kingdom of God. Not only would Messiah’s kingdom be characterized by peace, but He also would be “the prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:6). It was also not of this world – it was a heavenly kingdom.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
5. Yes, I do believe in s pre- Trib rapture but not just from Revelation 4:1.
The fact is that you can’t prove a post trib rapture at the second coming.
It is only a resurrection of the dead Jewish martyrs of the tribulation Revelation 15:1-2;20:4-6.
You have to insert 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 to make a post- trib rapture work.
Revelation 19:11-20 has all the saints from Adam’s day to the tribulation saints Revelation 20:4-6.
You may think post is a sure thing but I believe I have shown more evidence for pre-trib that makes it more possible and viable than the post-trib position. Jerry Kelso

Jesus says of His Coming in Matthew 24:29-31, Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming (erchomai) in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and ‘they shall gather together[or episunago] his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.”

This is referring to the exact same event as is described in 1 Thessalonians 4. It is the Coming of the Lord that is signalled by the sound of the last trump and the uniting of the elect both on earth and in heaven. Christ tells us that the angels “shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.” This agrees with Paul’s assertion in 1 Thessalonians 4 that Christ will come with and for His saints at His Coming. Those saints that the angels gather in heaven are the "dead in Christ," those that are gathered from the four winds of the earth are 'the live in Christ'. This is describing the same event. Moreover, this passage locates the catching away at the end of the tribulation, not seven years before it. There is no 7-year tribulation period mentioned in Matthew 24:29-30, or anywhere else for that matter.

I have repeatedly showed you that 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17 and Revelation 19 are climactic, but you duck around them and fail to acknowledge the sacred text that forbids Pretrib. 1 Thessalonians 4:15-5:3 confirms: “we which are alive and remain unto the Coming (parousia) of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord. Wherefore comfort one another with these words. But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night. For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

This is a record of Christ’s one and only future Coming. This reading describes how Christ comes “with” and “for” His saints the next time. Verse 14 of our reading explicitly states, “them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.” Those living believers will be “caught up” to meet Jesus when He appears. This is the final uniting of the elect on earth (the live in Christ) and those in heaven (the dead in Christ). It is accompanied by the great sound of the trump ushering in the end. The word rendered “remain” in our King James Version (which relates to those that are alive at Christ’s Coming) is the Greek word perileipo, which means “to survive.” Thus, we can take from this reading that the Lord is returning for those who remain by surviving. These are tribulation saints.

This Coming is not only sudden but noisy. Christ is not coming secretly with an apologetic whisper but publicly with a triumphant shout. He appears with “with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God.” This trumpet will sound and bring forth the elect from all nations. I Thessalonians 5:2-7 confirms that it isn’t just Christ’s Coming that is sudden but also the destruction that accompanies. Likening Christ’s return to “a thief in the night” capably serves to impress the surprising nature of this Coming for the lost. It shows that the wicked are caught abruptly in their folly at the apocalypse. The “sudden destruction” is so impactful that none escape. That is explicit in the narrative. The wicked are totally and completely destroyed, allowing no room for the Pretrib theory of a subsequent 7yrs trib.

Pretribbers have to divorce 1 Thessalonians 4:14-5:4 from other similar passages that refer to the coming of Christ with the trumpet of God. For them to do otherwise would totally demolish their doctrine.

This is the end! Jesus comes on the “day of the Lord” as a “thief in the night.” He rescues His people, but equally His appearing sees the “sudden” and total “destruction” of the wicked: “they shall not escape.”

I mean, the Holy Spirit could not have made it clearer: "they shall not escape." This totally negates the whole Premil paradigm of countless wicked mortals saturating the new earth.

2 Thessalonians 1:7-10 declares: “the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day.”

Here Christ glorifies His saints and He destroys the wicked from His presence. What unsaved individuals do you consider are excluded from those "that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ"?

The day of the Lord is near, it is approaching, it is at hand.

Once again “the coming of our Lord” and “the day of the Lord” are shown to refer to the same concluding day of time. Paul is encouraging the Church here to remain strong and steadfast as they await the coming of the day of the Lord. This day, that comes unexpectedly as a thief in the night, will catch the wicked unprepared. He tells the Thessalonians not to be “soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us.” This would suggest that there would be times of trial and tribulation to endure before this great climactic event. What is more, it is an approaching event that the Church was to prepare for, because: “the day of the Lord is at hand (or enistemi meaning impending).”

We should carefully note that this is the time when the Church is gathered unto the Lord. The coming (parousia) of the Lord witnesses the gathering of the saints – dead and alive. The dead in Christ are resurrected; the alive in Christ are caught up. The phrase “gathering together” is taken from the Greek word episunagoge proving that the Church isn't raptured until the one final coming of Christ at the day of the Lord.

This is sudden, climactic and totally destructive. It sees God rescuing His elect and destroying the wicked.

Jesus said in Luke 17:26-30, “as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all. Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.”

The plain focus of this teaching in Luke 17 (reference Noah and Lot’s day) is the nature and degree of the judgment that befell the wicked in these two familiar Old Testament stories and especially the extent of that particular wrath. The key element and major emphasis of this discourse is the fact (speaking of the ungodly) that God “destroyed them all.” The comprehensive destruction of the wicked in both of these examples is the important lesson of the narrative; both the whole world of Noah’s day and the whole individual city of Sodom in Lot’s day saw the immediate and complete rescue of the entire righteous coupled together with the immediate and complete destruction of the entire wicked.

The solemn side of the parable about the 10 virgins is the awful plight of the five foolish virgins who had no oil in their lamps. Like the wicked that were left in Noah’s day, the religious will cry when it is too late: “Lord, Lord, open to us.” The only problem is: it is too late. The solemn cry will come from the Master, “Verily I say unto you, I know you not” (vv 11-12). This is exactly what Jesus says to the wicked at the final judgment. He isn't saying: 'welcome to a 7 yr trib' or 'welcome to the Premil millennium for another chance'. Sadly, they are damned and doomed for all eternity. That is what happens when Jesus comes: the elect are rescued, those left behind are destroyed.

Scripture makes it abundantly clear that salvation will not always be available. There is a termination point to God’s gracious offer of salvation. That conclusion comes when Jesus comes at the end (or telos).

There are no mortals left to populate the half-delivered and half-bound, semi-glorious and semi-corrupt undesirable Premil mongrel earth filled equally with righteousness and unrighteousness, sin and sinlessness, glorified saints and mortal rebels, immortality and mortality, peace and harmony and war and terror. This concept is totally unknown to Scripture. There is no sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted millennial age in the future. Scripture forbids it.

I believe Revelation 19 completes the 6th of 7 parallels in Revelation that describe the intra-Advent and conclude with the climactic return of Christ. After the marriage of the Lamb (Revelation 19:7), which is the glorification of the saints of all time (including the dead in Christ and the live in Christ), the saints return as an army (following Christ) to destroy the wicked. John sees heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True … And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and clean” (11-14).

Jesus is returning for a prepared people. He is relentlessly exhorting His listeners to “watch” and be “ready” for His return because it is then that He will pour out His wrath upon all mankind who are not prepared, ready and rescued.

John says, heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crownsout of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, King of kings, and Lord of lords (Revelation 19:11-16).

Verses 17-18, saying, “I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the supper of the great God; That ye may eat the flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and the flesh of horses, and of them that sit on them, and the flesh of all men, both free and bond, both small and great. And I saw the beast, and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse, and against his army. And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone. The (loipoy or remaining ones or those left behind) were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh.

The beast's army is totally destroyed in Revelation 19. There are no wicked to inherit the millennium, as Premil contends. They are wiped. Everyone left behind will be completely consumed; the birds of heaven filling themselves with “the flesh of all men.” Significantly, the suffix “both free and bond, both small and great” is added in order to fully impress the enormity and all-inclusive nature of this feast.

Christ is seen pouring out His wrath without mixture upon the nations as He smites them in His fury with a sharp sword that comes out of his mouth.” He destroys them by the very utterance of His mouth. He then treadeth (or tramples) the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.”

The two words interpreted “fierceness” and “wrath” here are thumos and orge which are regularly employed in the New Testament to mean ‘fierceness, indignation, wrath, indignation and vengeance’. The word orge carries the additional meaning of ‘violent passion’. Clearly the Lord is not happy with those left behind. Like those left behind in Noah’s day and Sodom they face an awful end, as they receive the reward of their rejection of Christ.

The picture being portrayed here is that of the grapes being crushed by the vineyard worker making wine. The reference to “the winepress” is symbolic language denoting the fate of the wicked when Christ appears – that is why it is called “the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” The Christ-rejecter misses the catching away, and is consequently trampled underfoot like grapes being crushed in a winepress. The grapes are the disobedient of all nations.

How can these rebels possibly escape such a furious end? True judgment and righteousness has now arrived in the form of Christ and the glorified saints. Like every other Second Coming passage, this is climactic language describing the final end of rebellious man
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
There is no difference. Your teachers have taught you wrong. Unfortunately, they make the exact same mistake as the Pharisees did, who expected a visible, physical, temporal, earthly kingdom, when, in fact, Christ brought a spiritual, heavenly, eternal kingdom that could not be viewed with the naked eye.

Premils often make the same mistake as the Pharisees did in their interpretation of the Old Testament prophecies. They interpret the Old Testament references to the kingdom in a literal, physical, visible, earthly temporal sense, when Christ demonstrated their fulfilment in a literal, spiritual, invisible, heavenly eternal sense. Many Christians today, like many Jews before them, are mistakenly looking forward to a physical reign of Christ on this sin-cursed earth. Such people, who call themselves Premillennialists, believe that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom, which will be concentrated on the actual city of Jerusalem. They believe that it is only at this stage that He will finally reign over His enemies and rule over the nations. However, Christ is not coming to reign over His enemies; He is coming to destroy them.

Jesus said in John 18:36, “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.”

Christ couldn't have made it clearer. This expectation – of a literal visible territorial political kingdom – was wrong. It exposed the ignorance which controlled the Jews. They had a defective perception of the nature of God’s kingdom and the manner in which it would appear.

Messiah would come and reveal true righteousness and divine authority, although it would be in a completely different way to what Israel expected. The kingdom of God, which Christ continually spoke of, did not relate to a physical Jewish kingdom that could be viewed with human sight. It did not relate to individual Gentile nations. Luke 17:20-21 records an interesting discourse between Christ and the Pharisees on the subject of the kingdom of God, saying, He was “demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come.”

Christ replied, “The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within (entos) you.”

The Lord revealed in this passage that the kingdom of God – His kingdom – was not a literal earthly domain neither could it be viewed like other kingdoms with their outward splendour, impressive power and magnitude. It was, rather, a spiritual kingdom, which could only be spiritually entered. Messiah had finally come to His people.

John Gill says of this passage, “it [the kingdom of God] reigns, through righteousness, unto eternal life; and by it, Christ, as king of saints, dwells and reigns in his people. Now this is not to be understood of the Scribes and Pharisees, as if they had any such internal principle in them, who were as painted sepulchres, and had nothing but rottenness and corruption in them.”

When Christ appeared at His first advent, many religious Jews imagined He would reinstate the then defunct earthly throne of Israel and reign victorious over the physical nation of Israel. They believed that the appearance of Messiah would usher in a period of physical and spiritual bliss for Israel in which their enemies would be totally destroyed. The Jewish expectation was a literal visible territorial kingdom of which the Messiah – the King – would rule over. They believed He would immediately destroy every enemy that withstood the house of Israel. Their wrong thinking was guided by a hyper-literalist interpretation of OT Messianic prophecies. These Christ confronted and exposed in His teaching.

Premillennialists are constantly exalting the power and influence of Satan and diluting the sovereign power and influence of Christ. That is nowhere more evident than in their constant rubbishing of Christ’s current kingship over His enemies at the right hand of majesty on high. Whether they mean to or not, Premils are always highlighting what Satan is doing in our day instead of what Christ is doing. Premil portrays a BIG devil and a small god; Scripture presents a small devil and a BIG God. In Premil, Satan seems sovereign in this age and God is curtailed. Premils are always lauding the ability of Satan since the cross. In Scripture, Christ is sovereign and Satan is curtailed. Scripture is always lauding the ability of Christ since the cross. As a consequence, Premil portrays an impotent beat-down New Testament Church, whereas Scripture sees a victorious potent New Testament Church invading the nations with the good news of Christ and subjugating the powers of darkness as they do so. In Scripture Christ reigns over all creation as God and His new creation as Savior.

It is hard to watch Christians undermine the omnipotence of Christ. They deny Christ is reigning today as King of kings and Lord of lords. They deny Christ is reigning over all creation. They deny Christ is reigning over His enemies as conquering king. They have Christ operating in a vacuum as some impotent want-to-be ruler. They deny that He is sitting upon David’s throne as Israel’s Messiah. They depict Him as some kind of Prince-in-waiting desperately hoping to rule. As we have seen, that is not what Scripture depicts.

Premillennialists, believe that Christ will set up an earthly kingdom, which will be concentrated on the actual city of Jerusalem. They believe that it is only at this stage that He will finally reign over His enemies and rule over the nations. However, Christ is not coming to reign over His enemies; He is coming to destroy them.

Jesus said in the corresponding passage in Luke 11:20-22, if I with the finger of God cast out devils, no doubt the kingdom of God is come upon you. When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: But when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils.”

What Jesus was saying here is that his ministry was proof that the kingdom of God had arrived.

Here, Christ highlights the Sovereign power of the kingdom of God and reveals how the “strong man” – Satan – and his kingdom of devils can only be defeated by One that is stronger than them, namely Himself – the Son of God. As we examine the gospels we discover, Satan was stripped everywhere that Christ confronted him. The Lord entered the devil’s house and took authority over him and spoilt His goods. Previously, Satan's grip on the nations was so strong and so embedded that the truth of God's Word could not penetrate through. The devil overwhelmingly controlled the Gentile nations.

1 Corinthians 4:20 says, the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power (or) dunámei.”

The question is: who can stand against God?

Well if we align with Him then who can stand against us?

When we pray “Thy kingdom come” we are praying for heaven to come down in supernatural power in our midst – just like at Pentecost. This is a petition for the glory of God to be seen in Nebraska.

Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

John testified in Revelation 1:9: “I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom.”

If Christ's kingdom is not yet come, then what kingdom was it that John resided in?

Hebrews 12:28: “Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear.”

The error in Premil theology is in their understanding of the actual nature of the kingdom. It has no reference to physical worldly governments but rather God's spiritual government over His people throughout all nations. Kingdom life pertains to the elect alone.

The kingdom of God in the New Testament does not refer to a political or earthly kingdom. The word kingdom simply means ‘king [with a] domain’. Its meaning includes the territory and the people over whom the King rules and exercises sovereign authority. The term also includes the legislation and laws that administrate that kingdom. The word employed in the New Testament for ‘kingdom’ is the Greek word ‘Basileia’ denoting ‘sovereignty, royal power, kingship and dominion’. A kingdom must therefore have (1) a king – a head, (2) a domain to rule over – subjects and territory, (3) a structure of administration – ethics, rules and laws which govern it.

The kingdom of God is a spiritual kingdom and incorporates the whole domain over-which the Lord Jesus Christ exercises His Divine kingship, dominion and intimate rule. It includes heaven (and all those who are in heaven) – the place where with the kingdom is centered and administrated.

Romans 14:17 sums it up like this: “For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink (or, the kingdom of God is not material things); but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

The kingdom is summed up in 3 words:

· righteousness
· peace
· joy

When you truly enter the kingdom of God on this earth you inherit: “righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.”

Here in this passage again we see that the kingdom of God is not a physical temporal kingdom that can be naturally observed or enjoyed but rather a spiritual kingdom, which is spiritually entered. The peace spoken of here is the peace that pertains to those saved by God’s Sovereign grace, and who belong to the spiritual kingdom of God. Not only would Messiah’s kingdom be characterized by peace, but He also would be “the prince of peace” (Isaiah 9:6). It was also not of this world – it was a heavenly kingdom.

sovereigngrace,

1. The Greek word for basileia means a realm or a region governed by a king.
There can be no kingdom without a king.
It is mentioned 33 times only in Matthew because it is Jehovah’s King.
The word Heaven is plural in these passages.
The phrase KoH literally means the kingdom from the heavens. It’s a dispensation always term that refers to the Messiah’s kingdom on earth.
The sovereignty comes from Heaven because that is where the King is from.
John 18:36.
To this end he was born and this is the first subject of his ministry Matthew 3:2;4:17.

2. The proclamation of the kingdom has 306 verses.
The proclamation of the King has 964 verses.
The rejection of the King has 901 verses.
The rejection of the King has 782 verses.
You have no scriptural right to deny a physical kingdom on earth.

3. KoG physical is mentioned 72 times. It’s term means sovereignty of God over the whole universe.
It existed before the creation of earth.
It is moral and universal and will know no end.
The angels and and other spirit beings were in this kingdom before earth’s creation. Read Job 38:4-7.
The KoH could not have existed then, for there wasn’t no earth for the kingdom from the Heavens to rule.
To deny the KoG is just spiritual is to deny the scriptures.

4. The KoH reign is political in its sphere (Isaiah 9:7; Daniel 7:13-14,18).
John 18:36 Jesus spoke when he was fixing to go back to Heaven.
It wasn’t time for the KoH reign on earth that was promised to the Jews eternally and conditioned by obedience, because of Israel’s rejection.
Acts 1:6-7 shows that it wasn’t time after the cross or in the early church. It will happen in the future Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:7 ;66:7-10; Ezekiel 37:16-28; Zechariah 14; Romans 11:25-29.
Are you going to deny these truths in the scriptures?

5. Your assessment about premills doesn’t speak for all even though many have a defeated attitude because of a misunderstanding of the KoH and the KoG and Jesus message under the Mosaic law and end up bringing the spirit of the law upon them.

6. The Jews understood their covenants of the Kingdom on earth were real and eternal. 2 Samuel 7:13-16; 1 Chronicles 28:1-7.
This is why Jesus offered the physical KoH Matthew 4:17; Repent for the KoH is at hand.
Luke 1:33; And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
Verse 32 Christ is to be given the throne of David.
All these prophecies from the beginning were to be physical and spiritual for Israel, not the church.
Israel today is hated by many nations in the world.
Your group just like the Catholics spiritualized this verse and others and misapply it to the church and take it out of context.
There is a grace component in the Davidic covenant Romans 4:6.
Jesus said he was given all authority in Heaven and Earth Matthew 28:19.
Now I understand Acts 2:25-35 and the spiritual aspect of Christ sitting on the right hand etc.
However, you have to recognize there are scriptures of a literal kingdom as well, not just spiritual aspects. You want to make all of them spiritual. This is why I say you throw the baby out with the bath water.

7. Premills don’t undermine the omnipotence of God except in your false context of denying the literal Davidic KoH in the future.
We don’t deny Christ reigning as King of Kings and Lord of Lords of our hearts.
In Revelation 4-5 the Lamb is in Heaven, in Revelation 19 the saints are at the marriage of the Lamb.
When he goes to war in vs 11-16 where he is has on his venture and on his thigh a name written King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
We don’t deny Christ is reigning over creation. Christ has all authority and power in Heaven and Earth.
He is not reigning physically over the physical KoH right now.
We don’t deny Christ reigning over his enemies because he defeated Satan at Calvary and has the keys to hell and death Revelation 1:18. He uses spiritual warfare through the church to defeat the enemies onslaught Ephesians 6:10-17.
However, he still allows the enemies that make up the world system to rule and reign within that context.
It will be different in the millennial kingdom and the final perfect state 1 Corinthians 15:24-28.
We believe spiritually he reigns as the physical ruler from the right hand of God upon David’s throne Acts 2:25-35.
But he is not reigning on earth physically and spiritually in the KoH reign today.
Why? Because he hasn’t taken over the kingdoms of the world because they are not his. If this was just spiritual Revelation 11:15 wouldn’t state that The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign forever. This is all future from now and since Calvary.
I’m sure you’ll pass it off on the last perfect state because you don’t believe in the future millennial kingdom of 1000 years.

8. You like to give the scriptures for the spiritual KoG and ignore the scriptures about the physical KoH reign on earth called the millennium of a literal 1000 years Revelation 20.

9. I don’t really understand why you want to give one side of the issue and not the other. Do you realize how deceptive that is?
You make false claims about premills because you are trying to put our beliefs in your context and it doesn’t work.

10. The physical kingdom basiliea is a fact of scripture but you just want to deny it.
It is separate from the spiritual aspect of the KoG.

11. The KoH and KoG started in the Garden of Eden and when they sinned it needed restoration.
This was to happen in Jesus day but there was no prophecy that said Israel would accept Christ.
It was prophesied that the church was predestined Ephesians 1:3 and God would die for the whole world John 3:16
and that because of Israel’s stumbling and falling Salvation came to the gentiles Romans 11:11 and Matthew 21:43.
The KoH physical and the KoG spiritual is tied into Israel’s restoration and creation’s restoration and putting down all sin and rebellion and destroying all enemies of Christ and Satan thrown into the lake of fire Joel 2;Ezekiel 37:16-28; Isaiah 11:6-9; Romans 8:22; 1 Corinthians 15:24-28; Revelation 20:10.

12. The KoH is the son’s who will give it back to the Father so God can be all in all. This is when the KoG physical will be in complete harmony with this earthly sphere of the KoH.
So yes there is a distinction between the KoH physical and the KoG spiritual.
The spiritual kingdom has to received in order to inherit the physical KoH reign. Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. The Greek word for basileia means a realm or a region governed by a king.
There can be no kingdom without a king.
It is mentioned 33 times only in Matthew because it is Jehovah’s King.
The word Heaven is plural in these passages.
The phrase KoH literally means the kingdom from the heavens. It’s a dispensation always term that refers to the Messiah’s kingdom on earth.
The sovereignty comes from Heaven because that is where the King is from.
John 18:36.
To this end he was born and this is the first subject of his ministry Matthew 3:2;4:17.

2. The proclamation of the kingdom has 306 verses.
The proclamation of the King has 964 verses.
The rejection of the King has 901 verses.
The rejection of the King has 782 verses.
You have no scriptural right to deny a physical kingdom on earth.

3. KoG physical is mentioned 72 times. It’s term means sovereignty of God over the whole universe.
It existed before the creation of earth.
It is moral and universal and will know no end.
The angels and and other spirit beings were in this kingdom before earth’s creation. Read Job 38:4-7.
The KoH could not have existed then, for there wasn’t no earth for the kingdom from the Heavens to rule.
To deny the KoG is just spiritual is to deny the scriptures.

4. The KoH reign is political in its sphere (Isaiah 9:7; Daniel 7:13-14,18).
John 18:36 Jesus spoke when he was fixing to go back to Heaven.
It wasn’t time for the KoH reign on earth that was promised to the Jews eternally and conditioned by obedience, because of Israel’s rejection.
Acts 1:6-7 shows that it wasn’t time after the cross or in the early church. It will happen in the future Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:7 ;66:7-10; Ezekiel 37:16-28; Zechariah 14; Romans 11:25-29.
Are you going to deny these truths in the scriptures?

5. Your assessment about premills doesn’t speak for all even though many have a defeated attitude because of a misunderstanding of the KoH and the KoG and Jesus message under the Mosaic law and end up bringing the spirit of the law upon them.

6. The Jews understood their covenants of the Kingdom on earth were real and eternal. 2 Samuel 7:13-16; 1 Chronicles 28:1-7.
This is why Jesus offered the physical KoH Matthew 4:17; Repent for the KoH is at hand.
Luke 1:33; And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
Verse 32 Christ is to be given the throne of David.
All these prophecies from the beginning were to be physical and spiritual for Israel, not the church.
Israel today is hated by many nations in the world.
Your group just like the Catholics spiritualized this verse and others and misapply it to the church and take it out of context.
There is a grace component in the Davidic covenant Romans 4:6.
Jesus said he was given all authority in Heaven and Earth Matthew 28:19.
Now I understand Acts 2:25-35 and the spiritual aspect of Christ sitting on the right hand etc.
However, you have to recognize there are scriptures of a literal kingdom as well, not just spiritual aspects. You want to make all of them spiritual. This is why I say you throw the baby out with the bath water.

7. Premills don’t undermine the omnipotence of God except in your false context of denying the literal Davidic KoH in the future.
We don’t deny Christ reigning as King of Kings and Lord of Lords of our hearts.
In Revelation 4-5 the Lamb is in Heaven, in Revelation 19 the saints are at the marriage of the Lamb.
When he goes to war in vs 11-16 where he is has on his venture and on his thigh a name written King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
We don’t deny Christ is reigning over creation. Christ has all authority and power in Heaven and Earth.
He is not reigning physically over the physical KoH right now.
We don’t deny Christ reigning over his enemies because he defeated Satan at Calvary and has the keys to hell and death Revelation 1:18. He uses spiritual warfare through the church to defeat the enemies onslaught Ephesians 6:10-17.
However, he still allows the enemies that make up the world system to rule and reign within that context.
It will be different in the millennial kingdom and the final perfect state 1 Corinthians 15:24-28.
We believe spiritually he reigns as the physical ruler from the right hand of God upon David’s throne Acts 2:25-35.
But he is not reigning on earth physically and spiritually in the KoH reign today.
Why? Because he hasn’t taken over the kingdoms of the world because they are not his. If this was just spiritual Revelation 11:15 wouldn’t state that The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign forever. This is all future from now and since Calvary.
I’m sure you’ll pass it off on the last perfect state because you don’t believe in the future millennial kingdom of 1000 years.

8. You like to give the scriptures for the spiritual KoG and ignore the scriptures about the physical KoH reign on earth called the millennium of a literal 1000 years Revelation 20.

9. I don’t really understand why you want to give one side of the issue and not the other. Do you realize how deceptive that is?
You make false claims about premills because you are trying to put our beliefs in your context and it doesn’t work.

10. The physical kingdom basiliea is a fact of scripture but you just want to deny it.
It is separate from the spiritual aspect of the KoG.

11. The KoH and KoG started in the Garden of Eden and when they sinned it needed restoration.
This was to happen in Jesus day but there was no prophecy that said Israel would accept Christ.
It was prophesied that the church was predestined Ephesians 1:3 and God would die for the whole world John 3:16
and that because of Israel’s stumbling and falling Salvation came to the gentiles Romans 11:11 and Matthew 21:43.
The KoH physical and the KoG spiritual is tied into Israel’s restoration and creation’s restoration and putting down all sin and rebellion and destroying all enemies of Christ and Satan thrown into the lake of fire Joel 2;Ezekiel 37:16-28; Isaiah 11:6-9; Romans 8:22; 1 Corinthians 15:24-28; Revelation 20:10.

12. The KoH is the son’s who will give it back to the Father so God can be all in all. This is when the KoG physical will be in complete harmony with this earthly sphere of the KoH.
So yes there is a distinction between the KoH physical and the KoG spiritual.
The spiritual kingdom has to received in order to inherit the physical KoH reign. Jerry Kelso

As is your MO, you totally avoided every single Scripture and point that I made in my last posts and began to make an another evasive Dispy speech - with NO QUOTES. This is classic Jack Van Imp style confounding theology.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. The Greek word for basileia means a realm or a region governed by a king.
There can be no kingdom without a king.
It is mentioned 33 times only in Matthew because it is Jehovah’s King.
The word Heaven is plural in these passages.
The phrase KoH literally means the kingdom from the heavens. It’s a dispensation always term that refers to the Messiah’s kingdom on earth.
The sovereignty comes from Heaven because that is where the King is from.
John 18:36.
To this end he was born and this is the first subject of his ministry Matthew 3:2;4:17.

2. The proclamation of the kingdom has 306 verses.
The proclamation of the King has 964 verses.
The rejection of the King has 901 verses.
The rejection of the King has 782 verses.
You have no scriptural right to deny a physical kingdom on earth.

3. KoG physical is mentioned 72 times. It’s term means sovereignty of God over the whole universe.
It existed before the creation of earth.
It is moral and universal and will know no end.
The angels and and other spirit beings were in this kingdom before earth’s creation. Read Job 38:4-7.
The KoH could not have existed then, for there wasn’t no earth for the kingdom from the Heavens to rule.
To deny the KoG is just spiritual is to deny the scriptures.

4. The KoH reign is political in its sphere (Isaiah 9:7; Daniel 7:13-14,18).
John 18:36 Jesus spoke when he was fixing to go back to Heaven.
It wasn’t time for the KoH reign on earth that was promised to the Jews eternally and conditioned by obedience, because of Israel’s rejection.
Acts 1:6-7 shows that it wasn’t time after the cross or in the early church. It will happen in the future Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:7 ;66:7-10; Ezekiel 37:16-28; Zechariah 14; Romans 11:25-29.
Are you going to deny these truths in the scriptures?

5. Your assessment about premills doesn’t speak for all even though many have a defeated attitude because of a misunderstanding of the KoH and the KoG and Jesus message under the Mosaic law and end up bringing the spirit of the law upon them.

6. The Jews understood their covenants of the Kingdom on earth were real and eternal. 2 Samuel 7:13-16; 1 Chronicles 28:1-7.
This is why Jesus offered the physical KoH Matthew 4:17; Repent for the KoH is at hand.
Luke 1:33; And he shall reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.
Verse 32 Christ is to be given the throne of David.
All these prophecies from the beginning were to be physical and spiritual for Israel, not the church.
Israel today is hated by many nations in the world.
Your group just like the Catholics spiritualized this verse and others and misapply it to the church and take it out of context.
There is a grace component in the Davidic covenant Romans 4:6.
Jesus said he was given all authority in Heaven and Earth Matthew 28:19.
Now I understand Acts 2:25-35 and the spiritual aspect of Christ sitting on the right hand etc.
However, you have to recognize there are scriptures of a literal kingdom as well, not just spiritual aspects. You want to make all of them spiritual. This is why I say you throw the baby out with the bath water.

7. Premills don’t undermine the omnipotence of God except in your false context of denying the literal Davidic KoH in the future.
We don’t deny Christ reigning as King of Kings and Lord of Lords of our hearts.
In Revelation 4-5 the Lamb is in Heaven, in Revelation 19 the saints are at the marriage of the Lamb.
When he goes to war in vs 11-16 where he is has on his venture and on his thigh a name written King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
We don’t deny Christ is reigning over creation. Christ has all authority and power in Heaven and Earth.
He is not reigning physically over the physical KoH right now.
We don’t deny Christ reigning over his enemies because he defeated Satan at Calvary and has the keys to hell and death Revelation 1:18. He uses spiritual warfare through the church to defeat the enemies onslaught Ephesians 6:10-17.
However, he still allows the enemies that make up the world system to rule and reign within that context.
It will be different in the millennial kingdom and the final perfect state 1 Corinthians 15:24-28.
We believe spiritually he reigns as the physical ruler from the right hand of God upon David’s throne Acts 2:25-35.
But he is not reigning on earth physically and spiritually in the KoH reign today.
Why? Because he hasn’t taken over the kingdoms of the world because they are not his. If this was just spiritual Revelation 11:15 wouldn’t state that The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ and he shall reign forever. This is all future from now and since Calvary.
I’m sure you’ll pass it off on the last perfect state because you don’t believe in the future millennial kingdom of 1000 years.

8. You like to give the scriptures for the spiritual KoG and ignore the scriptures about the physical KoH reign on earth called the millennium of a literal 1000 years Revelation 20.

9. I don’t really understand why you want to give one side of the issue and not the other. Do you realize how deceptive that is?
You make false claims about premills because you are trying to put our beliefs in your context and it doesn’t work.

10. The physical kingdom basiliea is a fact of scripture but you just want to deny it.
It is separate from the spiritual aspect of the KoG.

11. The KoH and KoG started in the Garden of Eden and when they sinned it needed restoration.
This was to happen in Jesus day but there was no prophecy that said Israel would accept Christ.
It was prophesied that the church was predestined Ephesians 1:3 and God would die for the whole world John 3:16
and that because of Israel’s stumbling and falling Salvation came to the gentiles Romans 11:11 and Matthew 21:43.
The KoH physical and the KoG spiritual is tied into Israel’s restoration and creation’s restoration and putting down all sin and rebellion and destroying all enemies of Christ and Satan thrown into the lake of fire Joel 2;Ezekiel 37:16-28; Isaiah 11:6-9; Romans 8:22; 1 Corinthians 15:24-28; Revelation 20:10.

12. The KoH is the son’s who will give it back to the Father so God can be all in all. This is when the KoG physical will be in complete harmony with this earthly sphere of the KoH.
So yes there is a distinction between the KoH physical and the KoG spiritual.
The spiritual kingdom has to received in order to inherit the physical KoH reign. Jerry Kelso

What would have happened if Israel as a nation had repented and accepted Jesus as Lord and king? Would an earthly Messianic kingdom have been set up? Obviously, the cross would not have happened as Jesus would have been reigning in power and glory in Jerusalem. If Israel had excepted Jesus and an earthly kingdom had been set up I would man’s sin have been atoned for?

If Israel had accepted Jesus and an earthly kingdom had been set up then would the Church ever have existed? How therefore could Jesus have made a bona fide offer of an earthly kingdom to Israel?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. The Greek word for basileia means a realm or a region governed by a king.
There can be no kingdom without a king.
It is mentioned 33 times only in Matthew because it is Jehovah’s King.
The word Heaven is plural in these passages.

The phrase KoH literally means the kingdom from the heavens. It’s a dispensation always term that refers to the Messiah’s kingdom on earth...

4. The KoH reign is political in its sphere (Isaiah 9:7; Daniel 7:13-14,18).

To effectively prove a case, you must advance truth, facts and evidence, not speculations, inferences and elaborate non-scriptural man-made theological schemes.

Because "the kingdom of God" passages disallow your carnal Dispy paradigm, you have to invent another alternative kingdom that allows for your Zionist beliefs and the return of an old covenant style system, that Christ abolished. This comes from the fact that Dispys are in love with the old covenant arrangement, its rules, its racial superiority, it temple, its priesthood and blood sacrifices.

To secure this they try to distinguish between the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God, when there is no difference. Basically, they try to divide the indivisible. The ironic part of Dispy thinking is that they make "the kingdom of heaven" a political kingdom of earth. And make it a carnal earthly innovation, one scripture knows nothing of it

Zechariah 9:9 predicted his entry into Jerusalem: “Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.”

Christ came as king, although many deny this truth with their end-time theology. However, that is what the Scripture says. The fact is, this wasn’t what unbelieving Israel was expecting – a servant king, a humble Messiah. This didn’t fit in with their carnal elitist perception of an earthly political kingdom. This is where they missed it. Unfortunately, Premils make the same mistake of also anticipating an earthly political kingdom. They miss the fact that the King came and assumed David’s throne by being raised from the dead 2,000 years ago. They too look for an earthly temporal domain that is unknown to the pages of the New Testament.

The Pharisaic expectation was completely different from God’s plan. Christ brought a spiritual heavenly kingdom to this earth not a physical natural kingdom as some imagined from their understanding of Old Testament readings.

In fulfilment of Zechariah 9:9, and as the Lord’s ministry came to an end on earth, we see Him entering into Jerusalem triumphant on a donkey. There, He received the adoration of believing Israel. They were notably crying: Hosanna: Blessed is the King of Israel that cometh in the name of the Lord. And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written, Fear not, daughter of Sion: behold, thy King cometh, sitting on an ass's colt” (John 12:13-15).

Mark 11:10 parallels saying: “Hosanna; Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord: Blessed be the kingdom of our father David, that cometh in the name of the Lord: Hosanna in the highest.”

Even though the religious Jews and pagan Romans were largely ignorant to who Christ was, the crowd acknowledged the presence of Messiah’s kingdom manifested through Jesus Christ. Christ was indeed the fulfilment of every Davidic prophecy. He was David’s greater son. In Jesus Christ, we see the introduction of the eternal Davidic hope and the plan of God for mankind. The kingdom and the king are inseparable in both the spiritual and the natural realm. A king without a kingdom is not a king. This triumphant parade of Christ signaled the fulfilment of many of the Old Testament prophecies relating the coming of the Davidic kingdom.

As we compare the different narratives of this triumphant event we see the fact that the King and the kingdom are the one and same thing.

In Matthew 21:1-5, 8-9 the multitudes are seen venerating Christ: “And when they drew nigh unto Jerusalem, and were come to Bethphage, unto the mount of Olives, then sent Jesus two disciples, Saying unto them, Go into the village over against you, and straightway ye shall find an ass tied, and a colt with her: loose them, and bring them unto me. And if any man say ought unto you, ye shall say, The Lord hath need of them; and straightway he will send them. All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, Tell ye the daughter of Sion, Behold, thy King cometh unto thee, meek, and sitting upon an ass, and a colt the foal of an ass … And a very great multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut down branches from the trees, and strawed them in the way. And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.”

The parallel records here and the titles given by Christ’s followers in recognition of His lofty position as Messiah prove the correlation of phrase/titles. Remember, we are looking at the same event. This proves that titles like “Son of David” and “King of Israel” and “the kingdom of our father David” are all tied together and are interchangeable.

Jesus said shortly before His death, “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence. Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice” (John 18:36-37).

Here, Christ simply, clearly and unambiguous testifies He is king. He says, “Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end was I born.” What is more, He explains that He has a kingdom. That is why He personally calls it “My kingdom.” Of course, the origin determines the nature of the kingdom. Significantly, this kingdom originates from heaven, not this world. The testimony of Christ can always be trusted.

But this kingdom was not the type of earthly kingdom they imagined. It was a spiritual one.

We should carefully note: the king and the kingdom are indivisible. Again, where the king reigns you find the kingdom. Just like Christ was the Son of God and the Son of man did not indicate that there were 2 separate persons here, just 2 aspects of the one Christ. It is the same with His kingship. There are not 2 kingdoms here, no more than there are 2 Christs, but just 2 aspects of the one kingship.

It wasn’t time for the KoH reign on earth that was promised to the Jews eternally and conditioned by obedience, because of Israel’s rejection.

When did Jesus ever make the offer of a political kingdom to the Jews during his earthly ministry?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acts 1:6-7 shows that it wasn’t time after the cross or in the early church. It will happen in the future Isaiah 2:1-4; 9:7 ;66:7-10; Ezekiel 37:16-28; Zechariah 14; Romans 11:25-29.
Are you going to deny these truths in the scriptures?

Acts 1:1-9: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.”

Many Premillennialists advance the disciples question to Christ in Acts 1:6 relating to the restoration of the kingdom to Israel, as evidence that Christ is going to set up a future physical temporal kingdom on this earth for 1000 years after His Second Coming. I believe such an interpretation emanates more from a partial preconceived idea of the word “kingdom” rather than any direct or indirect allusion to, or a clear description of, a post-Second Coming earthly physical millennial kingdom in this passage.

Such an interpretation is definitely not in keeping with the context of the narrative or the actual subject matter under discussion relating to the spiritual empowerment of the Church at Pentecost in order to effectively take the Gospel to the nations. Neither is it consistent with our Lord’s clear and continuous teaching on the kingdom as a spiritual entity, which was ushered in with the commencement of His earthly ministry.

The writer of the book of Acts, in Acts 1:3, highlights the context of our Lord’s teaching (post-Calvary) on the spiritual kingdom of God, saying, “he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.”

Whilst there is no definite amplification of this brief reference to the kingdom of God, there is no exegetical or theological warrant to believe that the message of the kingdom of God, which was evidently widely preached throughout these forty days, related to anything other than the same spiritual message of the kingdom of God that He so extensively and thoroughly preached prior to the cross.

The kingdom of God that Christ introduced was of a spiritual nature. This absolutely confounded the Pharisees and their misguided earthly carnal concept of the Messianic kingdom.

The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving a spiritual response to their question.

Before the question came Christ was exhorting the disciples on the need for patience as they awaited the empowerment of the Holy Ghost to take the Gospel out to “the whosoever.” Everything about the context is spiritual. The Lord was stating “that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence (Acts 1:4-5).

Surely an unbiased look at these introductory comments would give us insight into what the Lord was teaching and what actually provoked the question that followed it. Undoubtedly the Lord was giving spiritual instruction about a spiritual kingdom that would shortly come with great power and fire? This is not territorial language.

What is “the Promise of the Father” here? Is it a material physical kingdom or is it a spiritual heavenly kingdom? Is it a millennial kingdom similar to this evil age, filled with death and rebellion, or was He speaking of the power of the Holy Ghost that would fall upon the disciples to empower them to bring the good news of Christ to all nations – starting in Jerusalem?

Evidently, Christ was referring to the day of Pentecost where the Church received its Holy Ghost baptism of fire. The whole discourse here is spiritual and revolved around the development of this spiritual kingdom subsequent to Christ’s ascension. Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

The disciples then interjected with a question: Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?”

Premillennialists attribute much extravagant, extensive and grandiose detail to this simple question. They build a whole school of thought pertaining to a supposed period after the second coming out of this basic inquiry. They call it a millennial age and make it a Jewish-orientated kingdom. Nevertheless, and significantly, New Testament Scripture knows nothing of such an old-covenant-type Jewish age. That has been reduced to the history books.

What Premillennialists fail to see is: there is no mention of a future period after the second coming in the question, neither is there any intimation of that. There is not even any mention of the second coming, never mind a belief in a thousand-year reign of Christ on a still corrupt earth! No one could derive such a doctrine from this straightforward question. It would have to be taught elsewhere for it to enjoy veracity.

The most that we could take from this is that they may indeed have anticipated the introduction of a parochial, territorial and old-covenant-type physical kingdom. But that is far from a foregone conclusion. We can only, at best, speculate on that. Even if that was their assumption, that in no way proves that it was a legitimate hope. The disciples were often misguided in their expectations and narrow-minded in their tribal aspirations. They frequently saw no further than the borders of Israel. We see that played in the book of Acts, with their reluctance to advance the Gospel to the Gentiles.

It is hard to read the motives and intention of the question. Many times, the disciples were not getting the full meaning of Christ's teaching. He sent His whole ministry correcting and re-directing them. So it could have been a patriotic desire. But Christ's response nails it. That is what is key, not the disciples question. Premils tend to ignore the context and response and just talk about one verse in this narrative. That is because it suits their theology.

Regardless, it doesn’t really matter what the disciples thought, we need to rather ascertain what Christ thought and taught. We should remember: that this question came in the midst of a spiritual discourse about the kingdom of God arriving in power at Pentecost. Christ's reply is key. It is powerful. It is direct. It nails the literalist’s interpretation of this in a carnal earthly sense.

Bible students can speculate all they want as to what was going on in the disciples’ heads. They could debate over whether they were grasping the spiritual thrust of Christ’s teaching about them being part of a spiritual renewal in Israel and further afield, or whether they anticipated the Pharisaical hope of the Messiah overthrowing the Romans and reigning on a physical throne in Jerusalem. Notwithstanding, the most important aspect of this text is not the disciples question, it is Christ’s response.

Whilst it is difficult to understand the thinking of the disciples here, what is clear is what Christ was saying before the question and what Christ said after the question. That is more important than the disciples question. This gives us context to the question. This gives us perspective on what the kingdom really looked like.

Jesus reply to the disciples is telling. He responded: “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power (or dunamis), after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:7-8)

If the disciples did have some glorious future natural earthly hope of a Jewish kingdom containing all the old covenant structures, rights and customs then Jesus totally rebuked such a concept by His spiritual response. If their hope was spiritual then He ably explained the development of that spiritual kingdom – from the small nation of Israel to the Gentile nations. He was outlining the great commission and showing them their evangelistic mission field.

Regardless of their thinking, one thing is certain, Christ definitely (and unambiguously) outlines a spiritual response. Christ’s measured response to the disciples’ query supports the notion of a spiritual kingdom in this age; proving it to be in perfect accord with, and a continuation of, His teaching in relation to the kingdom of God (the subject He was undoubtedly advancing prior to the disciples’ enquiry). The nature of Christ’s reply shows us the spiritual nature of the kingdom of God in our current age.

Christ did in no way here ignore or dismiss the disciples’ query about natural Israel, as some would have us believe, rather the contrary, He directly addressed it in His response. In doing so, He reiterated His earlier teaching on the impending spiritual empowerment that would come upon the kingdom, just prior to the disciples’ interjection; only now He geographically confirmed that the spread of that message would embrace the actual nation of Israel (the locations of “Jerusalem,” “Judaea” and “Samaria” being identified). Nonetheless, in His response, He went further, widening out the disciples limited vision, which was still very localised, to encompass “the uttermost part of the earth.”

Christ’s response was that His kingdom was spiritual and not territorial. The focus was not going to be limited to Israel, but would expand to all nations. The disciples would thus, after a short season of tarrying in Jerusalem and an indispensable empowerment from on high, be living “witnesses” of the kingdom of God not only in their own natural land as they had wondered but throughout all the world. This is indeed what happened! This indeed is what is happening right now. This is definitely not talking about some imaginary age sandwiched in-between the second coming of Christ and the new heavens and new earth.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acts 1:1-9: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.”

Many Premillennialists advance the disciples question to Christ in Acts 1:6 relating to the restoration of the kingdom to Israel, as evidence that Christ is going to set up a future physical temporal kingdom on this earth for 1000 years after His Second Coming. I believe such an interpretation emanates more from a partial preconceived idea of the word “kingdom” rather than any direct or indirect allusion to, or a clear description of, a post-Second Coming earthly physical millennial kingdom in this passage.

Such an interpretation is definitely not in keeping with the context of the narrative or the actual subject matter under discussion relating to the spiritual empowerment of the Church at Pentecost in order to effectively take the Gospel to the nations. Neither is it consistent with our Lord’s clear and continuous teaching on the kingdom as a spiritual entity, which was ushered in with the commencement of His earthly ministry.

The writer of the book of Acts, in Acts 1:3, highlights the context of our Lord’s teaching (post-Calvary) on the spiritual kingdom of God, saying, “he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.”

Whilst there is no definite amplification of this brief reference to the kingdom of God, there is no exegetical or theological warrant to believe that the message of the kingdom of God, which was evidently widely preached throughout these forty days, related to anything other than the same spiritual message of the kingdom of God that He so extensively and thoroughly preached prior to the cross.

The kingdom of God that Christ introduced was of a spiritual nature. This absolutely confounded the Pharisees and their misguided earthly carnal concept of the Messianic kingdom.

The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving a spiritual response to their question.

Before the question came Christ was exhorting the disciples on the need for patience as they awaited the empowerment of the Holy Ghost to take the Gospel out to “the whosoever.” Everything about the context is spiritual. The Lord was stating “that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence (Acts 1:4-5).

Surely an unbiased look at these introductory comments would give us insight into what the Lord was teaching and what actually provoked the question that followed it. Undoubtedly the Lord was giving spiritual instruction about a spiritual kingdom that would shortly come with great power and fire? This is not territorial language.

What is “the Promise of the Father” here? Is it a material physical kingdom or is it a spiritual heavenly kingdom? Is it a millennial kingdom similar to this evil age, filled with death and rebellion, or was He speaking of the power of the Holy Ghost that would fall upon the disciples to empower them to bring the good news of Christ to all nations – starting in Jerusalem?

Evidently, Christ was referring to the day of Pentecost where the Church received its Holy Ghost baptism of fire. The whole discourse here is spiritual and revolved around the development of this spiritual kingdom subsequent to Christ’s ascension. Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

The disciples then interjected with a question: Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?”

Premillennialists attribute much extravagant, extensive and grandiose detail to this simple question. They build a whole school of thought pertaining to a supposed period after the second coming out of this basic inquiry. They call it a millennial age and make it a Jewish-orientated kingdom. Nevertheless, and significantly, New Testament Scripture knows nothing of such an old-covenant-type Jewish age. That has been reduced to the history books.

What Premillennialists fail to see is: there is no mention of a future period after the second coming in the question, neither is there any intimation of that. There is not even any mention of the second coming, never mind a belief in a thousand-year reign of Christ on a still corrupt earth! No one could derive such a doctrine from this straightforward question. It would have to be taught elsewhere for it to enjoy veracity.

The most that we could take from this is that they may indeed have anticipated the introduction of a parochial, territorial and old-covenant-type physical kingdom. But that is far from a foregone conclusion. We can only, at best, speculate on that. Even if that was their assumption, that in no way proves that it was a legitimate hope. The disciples were often misguided in their expectations and narrow-minded in their tribal aspirations. They frequently saw no further than the borders of Israel. We see that played in the book of Acts, with their reluctance to advance the Gospel to the Gentiles.

It is hard to read the motives and intention of the question. Many times, the disciples were not getting the full meaning of Christ's teaching. He sent His whole ministry correcting and re-directing them. So it could have been a patriotic desire. But Christ's response nails it. That is what is key, not the disciples question. Premils tend to ignore the context and response and just talk about one verse in this narrative. That is because it suits their theology.

Regardless, it doesn’t really matter what the disciples thought, we need to rather ascertain what Christ thought and taught. We should remember: that this question came in the midst of a spiritual discourse about the kingdom of God arriving in power at Pentecost. Christ's reply is key. It is powerful. It is direct. It nails the literalist’s interpretation of this in a carnal earthly sense.

Bible students can speculate all they want as to what was going on in the disciples’ heads. They could debate over whether they were grasping the spiritual thrust of Christ’s teaching about them being part of a spiritual renewal in Israel and further afield, or whether they anticipated the Pharisaical hope of the Messiah overthrowing the Romans and reigning on a physical throne in Jerusalem. Notwithstanding, the most important aspect of this text is not the disciples question, it is Christ’s response.

Whilst it is difficult to understand the thinking of the disciples here, what is clear is what Christ was saying before the question and what Christ said after the question. That is more important than the disciples question. This gives us context to the question. This gives us perspective on what the kingdom really looked like.

Jesus reply to the disciples is telling. He responded: “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power (or dunamis), after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:7-8)

If the disciples did have some glorious future natural earthly hope of a Jewish kingdom containing all the old covenant structures, rights and customs then Jesus totally rebuked such a concept by His spiritual response. If their hope was spiritual then He ably explained the development of that spiritual kingdom – from the small nation of Israel to the Gentile nations. He was outlining the great commission and showing them their evangelistic mission field.

Regardless of their thinking, one thing is certain, Christ definitely (and unambiguously) outlines a spiritual response. Christ’s measured response to the disciples’ query supports the notion of a spiritual kingdom in this age; proving it to be in perfect accord with, and a continuation of, His teaching in relation to the kingdom of God (the subject He was undoubtedly advancing prior to the disciples’ enquiry). The nature of Christ’s reply shows us the spiritual nature of the kingdom of God in our current age.

Christ did in no way here ignore or dismiss the disciples’ query about natural Israel, as some would have us believe, rather the contrary, He directly addressed it in His response. In doing so, He reiterated His earlier teaching on the impending spiritual empowerment that would come upon the kingdom, just prior to the disciples’ interjection; only now He geographically confirmed that the spread of that message would embrace the actual nation of Israel (the locations of “Jerusalem,” “Judaea” and “Samaria” being identified). Nonetheless, in His response, He went further, widening out the disciples limited vision, which was still very localised, to encompass “the uttermost part of the earth.”

Christ’s response was that His kingdom was spiritual and not territorial. The focus was not going to be limited to Israel, but would expand to all nations. The disciples would thus, after a short season of tarrying in Jerusalem and an indispensable empowerment from on high, be living “witnesses” of the kingdom of God not only in their own natural land as they had wondered but throughout all the world. This is indeed what happened! This indeed is what is happening right now. This is definitely not talking about some imaginary age sandwiched in-between the second coming of Christ and the new heavens and new earth.

You are the one who is reading into the Bible when you kept insisting that it is a spiritual kingdom.

If Jesus indeed agreed with your interpretation, he would not have said "And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. "

He would have replied, "It is only a spiritual kingdom, my dear, haven't I explained to you so many times already? And its already here, can't you see with your spiritual eyes, a wolf lying down peacefully with a lamb now?" ^_^
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
As is your MO, you totally avoided every single Scripture and point that I made in my last posts and began to make an another evasive Dispy speech - with NO QUOTES. This is classic Jack Van Imp style confounding theology.

sovereigngrace,

You know it is not right to tell a story. That seems to be your MO.
You literally didn’t answer to anything I said or asked.
I must have hit a nerve. Do you always avoid and accuse falsely when you can’t answer to the complete scriptural context on a subject.
This is classic falsehoods to the extreme.
You need to quit saying I avoided your every point and scripture.
I addressed them all at once because they were all about the spiritual aspect of the KoG and not about the KoH physical aspect.
You accuse me of what you are doing.
Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are the one who is reading into the Bible when you kept insisting that it is a spiritual kingdom.

If Jesus indeed agreed with your interpretation, he would not have said "And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. "

He would have replied, "It is only a spiritual kingdom, my dear, haven't I explained to you so many times already? And its already here, can't you see with your spiritual eyes, a wolf lying down peacefully with a lamb now?" ^_^

Christ’s reply in this passage did not deny that the kingdom of God would be again manifested among natural Israelites, or that significant numbers of Israelites would at some late period in human history be reached, but that from henceforth all the nations of the world (not just Israel) would be the focus of God’s redeeming grace. The reason the disciples would have to wait was in order that they would receive power (or dunamis). This word dunamis is where we get our English word dynamite. The disciples needed to receive that power of the Holy Ghost which would embolden them to preach the Gospel and show them the global extent of the kingdom’s relevance.

Pentecost was the time when the kingdom of God was empowered to take the Gospel to Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and the uttermost parts of the earth. The Gentiles were drawn into this great spiritual kingdom by this humble band of disciples faithfully and boldly preaching the Word (empowered by the Spirit). This couldn't have been talking about some future millennial kingdom or the disciples would all still be alive.

This was spiritual counsel of the spiritual advance of the kingdom both in Israel and then the nations.

Israel did indeed experience the power of the kingdom with the bold preaching of the Word of God, resulting in thousands of Israelis entering into the kingdom of God. This even happened before the great Gospel advance among the Gentiles.

If they were getting the spiritual aspect re the kingdom (and why wouldn't they after 40 days of teaching on it after the resurrection?), why could this not have been a spiritual desire to see spiritual revival in Israel? I think that there is too much foisted upon a very simple question. Surely a few days later the fire fell and many experience salvation in that city?

Acts 2:41 records: “there were added unto them about three thousand souls.”

Acts 4:4 records: “believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand.”

Acts 5:16 records: “There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem.”

Acts 14:1 records: “a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.”

Acts 21:20 records: “Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe.”

As we have clearly seen, there is absolutely no evidence of, or allusion to, in either the disciples question or our Lord’s opening words or His direct reply, to a physical earthly temporal earthly Pharisaical Jewish kingdom in this reading. Such an interpretation of this passage emanates from a preconceived mistaken misunderstanding of the word “kingdom” rather than any specific direct allusion to a temporal earthly Jewish kingdom in the reading. There is also not the slightest reference to a 1,000-year reign of Christ at some later stage in physical Jerusalem.

No sensible theologian could therefore honestly use this spiritual passage as a conclusive proof that the disciples believed in, or that the New Testament teaches, a future earthly millennial kingdom. Even if the disciples had mistakenly believed such a thing, and that is debatable, Christ’s unambiguous response to their question dismantles such a misguided notion.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

You know it is not right to tell a story. That seems to be your MO.
You literally didn’t answer to anything I said or asked.
I must have hit a nerve. Do you always avoid and accuse falsely when you can’t answer to the complete scriptural context on a subject.
This is classic falsehoods to the extreme.
You need to quit saying I avoided your every point and scripture.
I addressed them all at once because they were all about the spiritual aspect of the KoG and not about the KoH physical aspect.
You accuse me of what you are doing.
Jerry Kelso

I refer you back to my detailed biblical rebuttal.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
What would have happened if Israel as a nation had repented and accepted Jesus as Lord and king? Would an earthly Messianic kingdom have been set up? Obviously, the cross would not have happened as Jesus would have been reigning in power and glory in Jerusalem. If Israel had excepted Jesus and an earthly kingdom had been set up I would man’s sin have been atoned for?

If Israel had accepted Jesus and an earthly kingdom had been set up then would the Church ever have existed? How therefore could Jesus have made a bona fide offer of an earthly kingdom to Israel?

sovereigngrace,

1. You are using a hypothetical and so your what if’s are irrelevant because they don’t harmonize with the scripture.

2. Scripture proves that he did offer the physical kingdom but you don’t want to believe it.
You think because Jesus knew they would reject him that it wasn’t a bonafide offer which is contrary to the word and because of the covenants.
Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. You are using a hypothetical and so your what if’s are irrelevant because they don’t harmonize with the scripture.

2. Scripture proves that he did offer the physical kingdom but you don’t want to believe it.
You think because Jesus knew they would reject him that it wasn’t a bonafide offer which is contrary to the word and because of the covenants.
Jerry Kelso

Where and when did He offer a geo-political kingdom to Israel? Please quote!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Acts 1:1-9: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.”

Many Premillennialists advance the disciples question to Christ in Acts 1:6 relating to the restoration of the kingdom to Israel, as evidence that Christ is going to set up a future physical temporal kingdom on this earth for 1000 years after His Second Coming. I believe such an interpretation emanates more from a partial preconceived idea of the word “kingdom” rather than any direct or indirect allusion to, or a clear description of, a post-Second Coming earthly physical millennial kingdom in this passage.

Such an interpretation is definitely not in keeping with the context of the narrative or the actual subject matter under discussion relating to the spiritual empowerment of the Church at Pentecost in order to effectively take the Gospel to the nations. Neither is it consistent with our Lord’s clear and continuous teaching on the kingdom as a spiritual entity, which was ushered in with the commencement of His earthly ministry.

The writer of the book of Acts, in Acts 1:3, highlights the context of our Lord’s teaching (post-Calvary) on the spiritual kingdom of God, saying, “he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God.”

Whilst there is no definite amplification of this brief reference to the kingdom of God, there is no exegetical or theological warrant to believe that the message of the kingdom of God, which was evidently widely preached throughout these forty days, related to anything other than the same spiritual message of the kingdom of God that He so extensively and thoroughly preached prior to the cross.

The kingdom of God that Christ introduced was of a spiritual nature. This absolutely confounded the Pharisees and their misguided earthly carnal concept of the Messianic kingdom.

The two verses that go before Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) support the idea of a spiritual kingdom. The two verses that follow Acts 1:6 (relating to the disciples’ question) show the Lord giving a spiritual response to their question.

Before the question came Christ was exhorting the disciples on the need for patience as they awaited the empowerment of the Holy Ghost to take the Gospel out to “the whosoever.” Everything about the context is spiritual. The Lord was stating “that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence (Acts 1:4-5).

Surely an unbiased look at these introductory comments would give us insight into what the Lord was teaching and what actually provoked the question that followed it. Undoubtedly the Lord was giving spiritual instruction about a spiritual kingdom that would shortly come with great power and fire? This is not territorial language.

What is “the Promise of the Father” here? Is it a material physical kingdom or is it a spiritual heavenly kingdom? Is it a millennial kingdom similar to this evil age, filled with death and rebellion, or was He speaking of the power of the Holy Ghost that would fall upon the disciples to empower them to bring the good news of Christ to all nations – starting in Jerusalem?

Evidently, Christ was referring to the day of Pentecost where the Church received its Holy Ghost baptism of fire. The whole discourse here is spiritual and revolved around the development of this spiritual kingdom subsequent to Christ’s ascension. Jesus confirms this again in Luke 24:46-49: “Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things. And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power (or dunamis) from on high.”

The promise of the Father was the baptism of the Holy Ghost, which was a power from on high that endued them for service.

Jesus had previously said to the disciples in Mark 9:1: “Verily I say unto you, That there be some of them that stand here, which shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom of God come with power (or dunamis).

Christ was speaking of Pentecost. He said the disciples would not die until they had “seen the kingdom come with power” – referring here the Church's baptism of fire to win a lost world. It didn't mean they would die when that happened.

The disciples then interjected with a question: Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?”

Premillennialists attribute much extravagant, extensive and grandiose detail to this simple question. They build a whole school of thought pertaining to a supposed period after the second coming out of this basic inquiry. They call it a millennial age and make it a Jewish-orientated kingdom. Nevertheless, and significantly, New Testament Scripture knows nothing of such an old-covenant-type Jewish age. That has been reduced to the history books.

What Premillennialists fail to see is: there is no mention of a future period after the second coming in the question, neither is there any intimation of that. There is not even any mention of the second coming, never mind a belief in a thousand-year reign of Christ on a still corrupt earth! No one could derive such a doctrine from this straightforward question. It would have to be taught elsewhere for it to enjoy veracity.

The most that we could take from this is that they may indeed have anticipated the introduction of a parochial, territorial and old-covenant-type physical kingdom. But that is far from a foregone conclusion. We can only, at best, speculate on that. Even if that was their assumption, that in no way proves that it was a legitimate hope. The disciples were often misguided in their expectations and narrow-minded in their tribal aspirations. They frequently saw no further than the borders of Israel. We see that played in the book of Acts, with their reluctance to advance the Gospel to the Gentiles.

It is hard to read the motives and intention of the question. Many times, the disciples were not getting the full meaning of Christ's teaching. He sent His whole ministry correcting and re-directing them. So it could have been a patriotic desire. But Christ's response nails it. That is what is key, not the disciples question. Premils tend to ignore the context and response and just talk about one verse in this narrative. That is because it suits their theology.

Regardless, it doesn’t really matter what the disciples thought, we need to rather ascertain what Christ thought and taught. We should remember: that this question came in the midst of a spiritual discourse about the kingdom of God arriving in power at Pentecost. Christ's reply is key. It is powerful. It is direct. It nails the literalist’s interpretation of this in a carnal earthly sense.

Bible students can speculate all they want as to what was going on in the disciples’ heads. They could debate over whether they were grasping the spiritual thrust of Christ’s teaching about them being part of a spiritual renewal in Israel and further afield, or whether they anticipated the Pharisaical hope of the Messiah overthrowing the Romans and reigning on a physical throne in Jerusalem. Notwithstanding, the most important aspect of this text is not the disciples question, it is Christ’s response.

Whilst it is difficult to understand the thinking of the disciples here, what is clear is what Christ was saying before the question and what Christ said after the question. That is more important than the disciples question. This gives us context to the question. This gives us perspective on what the kingdom really looked like.

Jesus reply to the disciples is telling. He responded: “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power (or dunamis), after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth (Acts 1:7-8)

If the disciples did have some glorious future natural earthly hope of a Jewish kingdom containing all the old covenant structures, rights and customs then Jesus totally rebuked such a concept by His spiritual response. If their hope was spiritual then He ably explained the development of that spiritual kingdom – from the small nation of Israel to the Gentile nations. He was outlining the great commission and showing them their evangelistic mission field.

Regardless of their thinking, one thing is certain, Christ definitely (and unambiguously) outlines a spiritual response. Christ’s measured response to the disciples’ query supports the notion of a spiritual kingdom in this age; proving it to be in perfect accord with, and a continuation of, His teaching in relation to the kingdom of God (the subject He was undoubtedly advancing prior to the disciples’ enquiry). The nature of Christ’s reply shows us the spiritual nature of the kingdom of God in our current age.

Christ did in no way here ignore or dismiss the disciples’ query about natural Israel, as some would have us believe, rather the contrary, He directly addressed it in His response. In doing so, He reiterated His earlier teaching on the impending spiritual empowerment that would come upon the kingdom, just prior to the disciples’ interjection; only now He geographically confirmed that the spread of that message would embrace the actual nation of Israel (the locations of “Jerusalem,” “Judaea” and “Samaria” being identified). Nonetheless, in His response, He went further, widening out the disciples limited vision, which was still very localised, to encompass “the uttermost part of the earth.”

Christ’s response was that His kingdom was spiritual and not territorial. The focus was not going to be limited to Israel, but would expand to all nations. The disciples would thus, after a short season of tarrying in Jerusalem and an indispensable empowerment from on high, be living “witnesses” of the kingdom of God not only in their own natural land as they had wondered but throughout all the world. This is indeed what happened! This indeed is what is happening right now. This is definitely not talking about some imaginary age sandwiched in-between the second coming of Christ and the new heavens and new earth.

sovereigngrace,

1. You really don’t believe in proper context, you just believe in your own context.
Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. You really don’t believe in proper context, you just believe in your own context.
Jerry Kelso

1. Your detail is out of context and without a doubt is no proper rebuttal.

Really? Let's look at context. What was Christ teaching on before the disciples interjected with their question? Was it some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted future Premil millennium where Israel would rule over the Gentiles and there would be the full restoration of the old covenant arrangement? Or was He speaking about the spiritual empowerment of the kingdom of God at Pentecost to spread the Gospel throughout Israel and the nations?

What was He speaking about after the question? Was it some sin-cursed, goat-infested, death-blighted future Premil millennium where Israel would rule over the Gentiles and there would be the full restoration of the old covenant arrangement? Or was He speaking about the spiritual empowerment of the kingdom of God at Pentecost to spread the Gospel throughout Israel and the nations?

In both, His subject was Pentecost. Please read it without your Dispy glasses on.

Acts 1:1-9: “The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of all that Jesus began both to do and teach, Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto the apostles whom he had chosen: To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God: And, being assembled together with them, commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me. For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel? And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power. But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight.”
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Where and when did He offer a geo-political kingdom to Israel? Please quote!

sovereigngrace,

1. I already gave you scriptures and you avoid them like the plague.
I gave you scriptures even for sinners being in the KoH and how it will be possible and why.
It is your fault that you don’t read it and don’t address it.
Why should I repeat myself when you don’t pay attention or that you think you know everything a premill believes cause you used to be one.
I answered and rebutted on what you think premills believe and you didn’t answer me back on that.
Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0