sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
sovereigngrace,

1. Why are you so afraid to answer simple questions?
Why do you want to control the conversation?
Why are you evading and avoiding?
I’ll be nice and say your silence is more than deafening, it is abnormally noisy.
Try again. Jerry Kelso

I'm not struggling to get my head round why you are constantly avoiding the salient questions, points and Scripture. For you to address them would absolutely nullify Pretrib. I understand that! If I was a Pretribber I would do the same.
 
Upvote 0

jerry kelso

Food For Thought
Mar 13, 2013
4,845
238
✟104,142.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I'm not struggling to get my head round why you are constantly avoiding the salient questions, points and Scripture. For you to address them would absolutely nullify Pretrib. I understand that! If I was a Pretribber I would do the same.

sovereigngrace,

1. Have you ever stopped to think the reason you struggle to get your head round why I’m constantly avoiding the salient questions, points, and scripture is because I am not really and constantly avoiding the salient questions, points, and scripture?
Try again. Jerry Kelso
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,176
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟663,976.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Peter offered the physical return of Jesus if only the nation will accept Jesus as their Messiah in Acts 3:19-20 so its not just a heavenly throne.

19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord.

20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:

OT prophecy is clear that Jesus will reign over Jerusalem from the throne of David, so it was a legitimate offer.





Guojing: "Peter offered the physical return of Jesus if only the nation will accept Jesus as their Messiah in Acts 3:19-20 so its not just a heavenly throne. "



Jesus will return in God's timing. This is not something negotiated by Peter.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,176
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟663,976.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Gospel means good news.

Paul was writing to the Galatians, who are Gentiles, that there is only one gospel FOR THEM, which is his gospel.

You are again doing an interpretation of all these scripture to make your doctrine that "Peter MUST be preaching the same gospel" in early Acts to the JEWS.

Why are there people who insist that their interpretation MUST be the correct one? I am aware I am also interpreting scripture, so I can agree to disagree with your interpretation.



Guojing: "Paul was writing to the Galatians, who are Gentiles ..."


You are assuming that the Galatians were all Gentiles, or Greeks. There were Jews all over the Roman empire. The Judaizers that Paul was in conflict with were probably of Jewish origin. Most likely all the New Testament churches were a mixture of Gentiles and Jews.




Although many people skip over it, this is a crucial decision made at the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. All followers of Jesus Christ are Christians. There aren't two groups, former Jews and former pagans, but one group, Christians.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,176
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟663,976.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
That's right. One thing I noticed in the 4 Gospels account was that Jesus only spoke in parables about the KOH in the 2nd half. Initially he spoke plainly about the KOH. This change midway also puzzled the disciples Matthew 13:10

By the midway point of Matthew for example, the Jewish nation had been given enough opportunities to accept him as their King and it was clear that they are rejecting him.

By speaking in parables, Jesus was able to put the entire nation under ignorance (Numbers 15:22-31), and hence was able to ask God to forgive them for crucifying him, for "they know not what they do"

The offer of the physical kingdom will thus be postponed until after he died and resurrected, which Peter and the others were trying to do in early Acts.

Jesus was coming to the Jews to be their King, that is the entire basis of the Gospel of the Kingdom.

He was 100% Man and 100% God.



Guojing: "When Christ talked to Pilate and said his kingdom was not of this world the Jewish nation had already rejected him and it was time for him to be crucified."

Guojing: "By the midway point of Matthew for example, the Jewish nation had been given enough opportunities to accept him as their King ..."

Guojing: "Jesus was coming to the Jews to be their King, that is the entire basis of the Gospel of the Kingdom."



The Gospel is about offering salvation, the Good News, to individuals. Whole nations have the opportunity to repent, but that is secondary. Those individuals who accept God's offer of salvation are the citizens of God's Kingdom.


That's a funny thing about Dispensationalists. They talk constantly about the Kingdom, and they still don't know what it means. Chafer uses the word "Kingdom" over 500 times in the books I have by him, yet he still misunderstands it.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,176
1,226
71
Sebring, FL
✟663,976.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
dale,

1. I’ve always believed in proper exegesis and looking at both sides .
I was majoring on the point of those who don’t believe in dispensationalism who believe parenthesis as an afterthought.

2. It was a fair question to ask why Schafer used the word parentheses though parenthetical might be a better word as in a break from the context before or for an age etc.
Revelation has parenthetical passages or break from the main context such as the passages between the 6th and 7 the seals, trumpets, and Vials etc.

3. I agree why Schafer used the word parentheses was for the right reasons that are scriptural and have scriptural logic.
I really wasn’t trying to major on what he said for I haven’t studied him out.

4. I believe in dispensations and I believe in patterns of dispensationalism and even covenant theologians believe in the distinction of the way God dealt with people in the covenants and their stewardship’s.
A stewardship is a dispensation.
Every age is supposed to be a good steward.

5. You may be able to argue the point of scriptural basis such as covenants but it doesn’t mean it is not based on scriptures.
There is probably no systematic theology that is perfect including covenant theology.
Biblically, there are covenants but I wouldn’t agree that Calvin wasn’t perfect on everything he said.

6. Dispensationalism is a very great outline of how to understand the patterns of how God dealt with men in different ways and understanding gradual revelation of how the redemption
plan of God unfolds from creation to the cross where Christ was the focus and answer to salvation which was prophesied at the beginning Genesis 3:15.
Creation is still groaning Romans 8:22 and must be restored and will in the millennial kingdom and the New Heaven and the New Earth.

7. With most people on this website on the opposite side seem to want to send dispensationalists and dispensationalism to and from Hell.
Some believe there is no scriptural truth at all to back up what is said.
Everybody has some truth but the scriptures have to be reconciled together properly.
Just because I don’t believe in Calvinism on many points doesn’t mean they are not a Christian or don’t have any truth at all. Jerry Kelso



Jerry Kelso: "Just because I don’t believe in Calvinism on many points doesn’t mean they are not a Christian or don’t have any truth at all. "


I don't know where you got the idea that I am a Calvinist. I don't believe in predestination, or in John Calvin. I even did a thread: John Calvin, Murderer.

As I said earlier, Dispensationalism is based in the Parenthesis, the claim that somehow, some part of God's plan is on hold. I reject Dispensationalism because no one can show me any basis for a Parenthesis, among other reasons.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Guojing: "Peter offered the physical return of Jesus if only the nation will accept Jesus as their Messiah in Acts 3:19-20 so its not just a heavenly throne. "



Jesus will return in God's timing. This is not something negotiated by Peter.

Peter spoke in Acts, in the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

Of course its easy for us now to say that he was not aware of God's hidden plan to save the Gentiles, thru the Jews rejection of their Messiah. But during Acts 3, the Jews had a legitimate free choice to accept or reject.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Guojing: "Paul was writing to the Galatians, who are Gentiles ..."


You are assuming that the Galatians were all Gentiles, or Greeks. There were Jews all over the Roman empire. The Judaizers that Paul was in conflict with were probably of Jewish origin. Most likely all the New Testament churches were a mixture of Gentiles and Jews.




Although many people skip over it, this is a crucial decision made at the Council of Jerusalem in Acts 15. All followers of Jesus Christ are Christians. There aren't two groups, former Jews and former pagans, but one group, Christians.

James decided that the Gentiles are exempted from the Law of Moses, while Jews who believed still have to be zealous for the Law (Acts 21:20-25).

So yes, there were still 2 groups in Acts 15 and after.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Guojing: "When Christ talked to Pilate and said his kingdom was not of this world the Jewish nation had already rejected him and it was time for him to be crucified."

Guojing: "By the midway point of Matthew for example, the Jewish nation had been given enough opportunities to accept him as their King ..."

Guojing: "Jesus was coming to the Jews to be their King, that is the entire basis of the Gospel of the Kingdom."



The Gospel is about offering salvation, the Good News, to individuals. Whole nations have the opportunity to repent, but that is secondary. Those individuals who accept God's offer of salvation are the citizens of God's Kingdom.


That's a funny thing about Dispensationalists. They talk constantly about the Kingdom, and they still don't know what it means. Chafer uses the word "Kingdom" over 500 times in the books I have by him, yet he still misunderstands it.

Under the Gospel of the Kingdom, one who believes in Jesus still had to follow the Law of Moses (Matthew 5)
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
James decided that the Gentiles are exempted from the Law of Moses, while Jews who believed still have to be zealous for the Law (Acts 21:20-25).

So yes, there were still 2 groups in Acts 15 and after.

Paul proceeds to tear apart the religious arrogance of the Christ-rejecting Jews and their double-sided faulty security by showing them the folly of their confidence. He does so in Romans 2:17-24 with laser precision, with legal aptitude and in the most candid manner. He lets loose with both barrels firing: “Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.”

The unbelieving Jews foolishly thought they could be justified by keeping the law. But the Bible repeatedly makes clear that no man can keep the law. The fact is, the demand of the law was perfect obedience. No man could meet that requirement. In fact, James 2:10 makes clear: “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” Who but Christ could achieve this?

Remember, the moral law was a revelation of God’s holy character and His divine mind in regard to righteousness and just standards.

Paul says in Romans 3:20, “for by the law is the knowledge of sin.” The law of God was there to show man the holiness of God and the sinfulness of his own nature. It could not save anyone. It could only condemn. Hebrews 7:19 declares: “For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.”

That is why Galatians 2:16 affirms: “a man is not justified by the works of the law … by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” The apostle says in Romans 3:20: “by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight.” Paul goes further in Galatians 3:8-11 says, “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God.”

The law of God couldn’t remove one single sin, the only thing it could do was show man his wretched state. Its prime purpose for the believer is that it points them to Jesus Christ.

Galatians 3:21-29 attests: “Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.”

He concludes his point in verse 24, saying, “the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you.” This is a damning delineation by the apostle.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Under the Gospel of the Kingdom, one who believes in Jesus still had to follow the Law of Moses (Matthew 5)

It is time for you to step out of the old covenant. It is long gone! Scripture describes the old covenant sacrificial system as “that which is done away” (2 Corinthians 3:11) and “that which is abolished” (2 Corinthians 3:13). It makes clear: “the old testament … vail is done away in Christ” (2 Corinthians 3:14). Hebrews 10:9 confirms: “He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.”

The main difference between the Old Testament period and the New Testament period is their perspective of Jesus Christ! The Old Testament was looking forward to the coming Messiah. The New Testament reveals His arrival and precious work on man’s behalf. As we dig deeper and compare both, we notice that there are notable differences between the two arrangements. We see a significant move:

· From the shadow and type to the substance and reality
· From the imperfect to the perfect
· From the inadequate to the all-sufficient.
· From the physical to the spiritual
· From the external to the internal
· From the natural to the supernatural
· From the temporary to the eternal
· From the earthly to the heavenly
· From the national to the international
· From the conditional to the unconditional

These two economies couldn’t be more diverse. The improvement is obvious, substantial and indisputable. The repercussions are even greater for mankind. What was long-anticipated by the old covenant prophets has now wonderfully arrived. The appearance of Israel’s Messiah was the pivotal moment in history and the catalyst for a colossal transformative change.

The book of Hebrews shows the abolition of the old covenant arrangement and its replacement by the new superior covenant. It is absorbed with the superiority of Christ. Hebrews 8:6 declares: “now hath he [Christ] obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.”

The only provision for our sins, is the sacrifice of Calvary. The sad thing is: many Christians today speak on this subject as if the cross never happened. They talk as if the old covenant is still germane today or will be in the future. They fail to see that it has been eternally removed because the new covenant has wholly replaced it. This is why they get messed up when they get to this overall subject.

They want to go back to the old imperfect system. They yearn for the restoration of an old-covenant-type physical kingdom that is focused on the natural, temporal and earthly. They want Israel to return to her former prominent state above all other nations. They want to elevate Israel to a place that they no longer own in the New Testament. Many want to render circumcision (the sign of the old covenant) meritorious or advantageous when the New Testament says it avails nothing. They promote the return of the Levitical priesthood, even though Christ is man’s heavenly high priest. They promote the rebuilding of a Jewish temple in Jerusalem and desire the complete restoration of the Levitical ceremonial system despite the fact that Christ and His body are shown to be that today.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe in predestination

How can a Christian even come out with such a statement? It is written in the Word, therefore it is biblical! Ephesians 1:3-6, says, “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved.”

Ephesians 1:11-14 declares, “In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will: That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ. In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise, Which is the earnest (or our pledge in advance) of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory.”

Acts 13:48 says, “As many as were ordained to eternal life believed.”

Election and predestination are biblical doctrines. Sorry you dislike them.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is time for you to step out of the old covenant. It is long gone! Scripture describes the old covenant sacrificial system as “that which is done away” (2 Corinthians 3:11) and “that which is abolished” (2 Corinthians 3:13). It makes clear: “the old testament … vail is done away in Christ” (2 Corinthians 3:14). Hebrews 10:9 confirms: “He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second.”

The main difference between the Old Testament period and the New Testament period is their perspective of Jesus Christ! The Old Testament was looking forward to the coming Messiah. The New Testament reveals His arrival and precious work on man’s behalf. As we dig deeper and compare both, we notice that there are notable differences between the two arrangements. We see a significant move:

· From the shadow and type to the substance and reality
· From the imperfect to the perfect
· From the inadequate to the all-sufficient.
· From the physical to the spiritual
· From the external to the internal
· From the natural to the supernatural
· From the temporary to the eternal
· From the earthly to the heavenly
· From the national to the international
· From the conditional to the unconditional

These two economies couldn’t be more diverse. The improvement is obvious, substantial and indisputable. The repercussions are even greater for mankind. What was long-anticipated by the old covenant prophets has now wonderfully arrived. The appearance of Israel’s Messiah was the pivotal moment in history and the catalyst for a colossal transformative change.

The book of Hebrews shows the abolition of the old covenant arrangement and its replacement by the new superior covenant. It is absorbed with the superiority of Christ. Hebrews 8:6 declares: “now hath he [Christ] obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.”

The only provision for our sins, is the sacrifice of Calvary. The sad thing is: many Christians today speak on this subject as if the cross never happened. They talk as if the old covenant is still germane today or will be in the future. They fail to see that it has been eternally removed because the new covenant has wholly replaced it. This is why they get messed up when they get to this overall subject.

They want to go back to the old imperfect system. They yearn for the restoration of an old-covenant-type physical kingdom that is focused on the natural, temporal and earthly. They want Israel to return to her former prominent state above all other nations. They want to elevate Israel to a place that they no longer own in the New Testament. Many want to render circumcision (the sign of the old covenant) meritorious or advantageous when the New Testament says it avails nothing. They promote the return of the Levitical priesthood, even though Christ is man’s heavenly high priest. They promote the rebuilding of a Jewish temple in Jerusalem and desire the complete restoration of the Levitical ceremonial system despite the fact that Christ and His body are shown to be that today.

Yes, the GOK is no longer valid for today.

But it was valid during the time of the 4 gospels, just like circumcision was valid in ages past too.
 
Upvote 0

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Paul proceeds to tear apart the religious arrogance of the Christ-rejecting Jews and their double-sided faulty security by showing them the folly of their confidence. He does so in Romans 2:17-24 with laser precision, with legal aptitude and in the most candid manner. He lets loose with both barrels firing: “Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, An instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law. Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal? Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege? Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God? For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it is written.”

The unbelieving Jews foolishly thought they could be justified by keeping the law. But the Bible repeatedly makes clear that no man can keep the law. The fact is, the demand of the law was perfect obedience. No man could meet that requirement. In fact, James 2:10 makes clear: “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” Who but Christ could achieve this?

Remember, the moral law was a revelation of God’s holy character and His divine mind in regard to righteousness and just standards.

Paul says in Romans 3:20, “for by the law is the knowledge of sin.” The law of God was there to show man the holiness of God and the sinfulness of his own nature. It could not save anyone. It could only condemn. Hebrews 7:19 declares: “For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.”

That is why Galatians 2:16 affirms: “a man is not justified by the works of the law … by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.” The apostle says in Romans 3:20: “by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight.” Paul goes further in Galatians 3:8-11 says, “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them. But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God.”

The law of God couldn’t remove one single sin, the only thing it could do was show man his wretched state. Its prime purpose for the believer is that it points them to Jesus Christ.

Galatians 3:21-29 attests: “Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe. But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed. Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster. For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.”

He concludes his point in verse 24, saying, “the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you.” This is a damning delineation by the apostle.

Yes, but Paul had no authority over the circumcised, he only had on those Gentiles who believed. (Galatians 2:9)
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, but Paul had no authority over the circumcised, he only had on those Gentiles who believed. (Galatians 2:9)

But this is Thee Word of God for man! The fact is: the basis of salvation is the same in both the Old and the New Testaments. The old covenant saints looked forward by faith to Israel’s coming Redeemer and experienced forgiveness. Only those Israelis who accept the Gospel constituted God’s people. Dispensationalists should know: salvation has always been by grace, through faith, in Christ (the Messiah). Men of faith are found throughout the Old Testament. Hebrews 11 attests to this in a very powerful and detailed way. If men are born in sin, and if faith is the product of the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit, then the Old Testament saints must assuredly have supernaturally been birthed of the Spirit. Faith is the spiritual fruit of the renewing work of the Spirit of God within a human. Of course, the old covenant saints looked forward “by faith” to their promised coming Messiah who would redeem His people (Hebrews 11:13). But it seems evident that the Spirit performs the same transformative function in Old Testament times as He does in the New Testament economy.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, the GOK is no longer valid for today.

But it was valid during the time of the 4 gospels, just like circumcision was valid in ages past too.

Once the new covenant was ushered in the old was abolished forever. Colossians 2:14 plainly declares, speaking of these Old Testament ordinances and what happened at Calvary: “Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross.”

The Greek word for “blotting out” here is exaleiphō meaning: ‘to wipe off, wipe away, to obliterate, erase, wipe out, blot out’

Q. When did/will the “blotting out the handwriting of ordinances” occur?
A. Christ “took it out of the way” by “nailing it to his cross.”

These ordinances embraced the old covenant civil, ceremonial and ecclesiastical law. They were finished at the cross. When Christ made that final sacrifice for sin, He satisfied all God’s holy demands for sin and uncleanness and thus He became the final propitiation and substitution for the sinner.

Colossians 2:16-17 continues, keeping on the same theme: “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”

The Greek word translated “holyday” here is heorte meaning a festival or feast. The KJV should probably have used “feast” or “festival” here rather than holyday because out of 27 mentions of this word in the New Testament it is interpreted “feast” in all of them apart from here.

New American Standard puts it like this: “Therefore let no one act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day -- things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.”

The Living Bible says, “So don't let anyone criticize you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating Jewish holidays and feasts or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. For these were only temporary rules that ended when Christ came. They were only shadows of the real thing-of Christ himself.”

Paul is saying here that the old covenant feasts and festivals simply served as types and shadows of things that were to come. They looked forward to the new covenant arrangement and the reality and substance in Christ. The old covenant Jews didn’t have a full revelation of this new system. Premillennialism should take note of the forward-looking nature of the old covenant sacrifices. This disallows a revival of this abolished system in some supposed future millennium after the second coming.

Paul ties up his reasoning in Colossians 2:20-22, summing up the new covenant freedom: “Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why … are ye subject to ordinances, (Touch not; taste not; handle not; Which all are to perish with the using) after the commandments and doctrines of men?”

The phrase “are ye subject to ordinances” is interpreted from the lone Greek word dogmatizo, which literally means to submit to ceremonial rule. Christianity took us completely away from the bondage of the old Mosaic ceremonial law. These festivals were filled with numerous ordinances and blood sacrifices that had to be stringently observed. Speaking of these impotent religious ordinances, Scriptures counsels: “Touch not; taste not; handle not.”
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,042
3,450
USA
Visit site
✟202,084.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, but Paul had no authority over the circumcised, he only had on those Gentiles who believed. (Galatians 2:9)

There is nothing more unbiblical in this new covenant period than trying to divide up the people of God on the grounds of ethnicity. That is spiritual apartheid. It runs completely to the New Testament plan of God to bring Jew and Gentile together equally in Christ. The whole mission of Jesus Christ in introducing the new covenant was to unite Jew and Gentile in salvation. Nothing could be clearer in the New Testament!

The New Testament makes clear; there is only one elect people. There is only one good olive tree, not two; one body, not two; one bride, not two; one spiritual temple, not two; one people of God, not two; one household of faith, not two; one fold, not two; one man, not “twain,” and one elect of God throughout time.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Guojing

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2019
11,836
1,311
sg
✟216,933.00
Country
Singapore
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is nothing more unbiblical in this new covenant period than trying to divide up the people of God on the grounds of ethnicity. That is spiritual apartheid. It runs completely to the New Testament plan of God to bring Jew and Gentile together equally in Christ. The whole mission of Jesus Christ in introducing the new covenant was to unite Jew and Gentile in salvation. Nothing could be clearer in the New Testament!

The New Testament makes clear; there is only one elect people. There is only one good olive tree, not two; one body, not two; one bride, not two; one spiritual temple, not two; one people of God, not two; one household of faith, not two; one fold, not two; one man, not “twain,” and one elect of God throughout time.

acts was a transitional period of time
 
Upvote 0