sovereigngrace
Well-Known Member
- Dec 9, 2019
- 9,042
- 3,450
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
You just did
Can you add it to the Op?
Upvote
0
You just did
The post that you quoted of mine (#5) with the linked article gives a pretty comprehensive explanation of my views.Are you going to answer these all briefly on one post? That's what I asked for:
"So, can you answer these brief questions for me? I don't need long answers or even scriptural support at this juncture. I am trying ascertain what you believe!"
Jesus abolished the Old Covenant and instituted the New Covenant on the cross. The old covenant ended when the last generation of genuinely circumcised Jews died off. That is, those who were circumcised before Calvary.This topic comes up often - and there seems to be a lot of controversy (and even lack of teaching in the churches I've attended over the span of many decades) over the question.
In another thread - these specific questions were asked:
When did the old covenant end?
When did the new covenant begin?
When did "the last days" begin?
When will "the last days" finish?
When is the "end of the age"?
When is the day of redemption?
When did "this age" arrive?
When does "this age" end?
When do the new heavens and new earth right?
When did the kingdom of God begin?
When does "the age to come" arrive?
Hebrews states:
Hebrews 8:13 ~ By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.Has the Old Covenant disappeared? If so......when?
Can you add two more questions to this post:
When is "the last day" of "the last days"?
What occurs on "the last day" of "the last days"?
I just did, but to be honest about my opinion, I don't believe that having others answer a list of questions results in a group "discussion" - it's more of an inquisition (directed individually). I prefer discussion to, instead, come out of a few questions to prompt discussion. But.....the questions are there. I'm not going to hold posters to answer them like a pop quiz, though.Can you add it to the Op?
The main point was that there are those who are not full preterist that believe in the present reality of the new heavens and new earth. This is similar to the common amil teaching of the "already but not yet".
I find it disturbing that you keep avoiding to address Luke 23's quotation of hosea in regards to 1st century Jerusalem, which corroborates revelation 6's quotation of hosea in fulfillment of the 6th seal.
I find it disturbing that as a self proclaimed Amil, you agree with the teachings of scofield that "genea" refers to stock or race.
I find it disturbing that although you say you use scripture to interpret scripture, the evidence of your posts suggests that is not always true.
Its ending began at the cross
Hebrews 10:9 Then He adds, “Here I am, I have come to do Your will.” He is taking away (present tense verb) the first to establish the second
At the cross, in Christ
Mark 14:24 he said to them, “This is my blood, which confirms the covenant between God and his people. It is poured out as a sacrifice for many
When Christ came in the flesh
hebrews 9:26 If that had been necessary, Christ would have had to die again and again, ever since the world began. But now, once for all time, he has appeared at the end of the age to remove sin by his own death as a sacrifice.
Depends on what is meant by "the last days". I hold it to the mean the last days of the old covenant age. For the old obsolete covenant was soon to vanish away in the 1st century
Hebrews 8:13 When God speaks of a “new” covenant, it means he has made the first one obsolete. It is now out of date and will soon disappear.
1st coming of Jesus leading up to the destruction of the temple.
Matthew 24:3 As he sat on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately, saying, “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age
1 Corinthians 10:11 Now these things happened to them as an example, but they were written down for our instruction, on whom the end of the ages has come
The resurrection of the just and unjust
Either at creation or after the flood.
the coming of Christ in judgment upon Israel, at the destruction of the temple
passing away of the old heavens and old earth
At Jesus' ministry, death, resurrection, ascension, and sending of the Spirit.
the coming of Christ in judgment upon Israel, at the destruction of the temple
I just did, but to be honest about my opinion, I don't believe that having others answer a list of questions results in a "discussion" - it's more of an inquisition. I prefer discussion to, instead, come out of a few questions to prompt discussion. But.....the questions are there. I'm not going to hold posters to answer them like a pop quiz, though.
Laws/commands expire naturally for reasons described in post 13. They only expire in a superficial sense because at core all the laws command the same thing - love. This kind of thing has been happening since the beginning of time and thus does not indicate any CORE differences between OT and NT saints.In spite of the fact that Paul wrote it did?
This topic comes up often - and there seems to be a lot of controversy (and even lack of teaching in the churches I've attended over the span of many decades) over the question.
In another thread - these specific questions were asked:
When did the old covenant end?
When did the new covenant begin?
When did "the last days" begin?
When will "the last days" finish?
When is the "end of the age"?
When is the day of redemption?
When did "this age" arrive?
When does "this age" end?
When do the new heavens and new earth right?
When did the kingdom of God begin?
When does "the age to come" arrive?
When is "the last day" of "the last days"?
What occurs on "the last day" of "the last days"?
Hebrews states:
Hebrews 8:13 ~ By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.Has the Old Covenant disappeared? If so......when?
Laws/commands expire naturally for reasons described in post 13. They only expire in a superficial sense because at core all the laws command the same thing - love. This kind of thing has been happening since the beginning of time and thus does not indicate any CORE differences between OT and NT saints.
Can you establish any meaningful differences between OT and NT saints? I'm not aware of any.
This topic comes up often - and there seems to be a lot of controversy (and even lack of teaching in the churches I've attended over the span of many decades) over the question.
In another thread - these specific questions were asked:
When did the old covenant end?
When did the new covenant begin?
When did "the last days" begin?
When will "the last days" finish?
When is the "end of the age"?
When is the day of redemption?
When did "this age" arrive?
When does "this age" end?
When do the new heavens and new earth right?
When did the kingdom of God begin?
When does "the age to come" arrive?
When is "the last day" of "the last days"?
What occurs on "the last day" of "the last days"?
Hebrews states:
Hebrews 8:13 ~ By speaking of a new covenant, He has made the first one obsolete; and what is obsolete and aging will soon disappear.Has the Old Covenant disappeared? If so......when?
Ok to paraphrase, the answer to my qustion is, "No, I don't see any meaningful distinctions between OT and NT saints". Thanks for confirming. So while you guys carry on in a debate that has no meaningful import, splitting theological hairs, I'll go find something more important to do. Thanks again and - cheers !Not really the point. Paul wrote that the old covenant had been abolished in several of his letters. Coming up with some nifty anecdote which argues with the scripture is a useless endeavor in my opinion. Better to accept what is written, as written, then to argue with it and read it in some other esoteric manner. Totally bad practice not accepting the scriptures as written, especially in the places where there really is no controversy.
Ok to paraphrase, the answer to my qustion is, "No, I don't see any meaningful distinctions between OT and NT saints". Thanks for confirming. So while you guys carry on in a debate that has no meaningful import, splitting theological hairs, I'll go find something more important to do. Thanks again and - cheers !
Funny you said earlier I was missing the point. Actually you're missing the point. You're reading superficially. Once you understand the REAL REASON that law-covenants expire (changes in circumstances) - once you see that it really has nothing to do with the concept of covenant itself - you're less likely to repeat the historically frequent mistake of persisting outmoded ceremonies. Two thousand years after the apostles, the church is still performing water-baptism! And she has no clue that it's a stench and an offense in God's nostrils! She doesn't know the real reason it was instituted, nor why it would expire due to changing circumstances. But hey, like you said, I'm the one missing the point. Fine.If accepting the scriptures as written is not meaningful or important then of course find something more important.
When did the old covenant end?
When did the kingdom of God begin?
When did the old covenant end?
When did the new covenant begin?
When did "the last days" begin?
When will "the last days" finish?
When is the "end of the age"?
When is the day of redemption?
When did "this age" arrive?
When does "this age" end?
When do the new heavens and new earth right?
When did the kingdom of God begin?
When does "the age to come" arrive?
When is "the last day" of "the last days"?
What occurs on "the last day" of "the last days"?
Two thousand years after the apostles, the church is still performing water-baptism! And she has no clue that it's a stench and an offense in God's nostrils!
LOL. You're referring to the same Jesus who gave Abraham a covenant of circumcision - now expired, right? The same Jesus who instituted a plethora of ceremonies via Moses - clearly expired now, right? The same Jesus who told Namaan to baptize himself in water 7 times - right? Do you still practice that ceremony today? The same Jesus who later directed John to perform water baptism - 2000 years ago !!!!! Is that the Jesus you are referring to? Just want to make sure we're referring to the same person.At what point did what Jesus and the apostles preached become a stench?
LOL. You're referring to the same Jesus who gave Abraham a covenant of circumcision - now expired, right? The same Jesus who instituted a plethora of ceremonies via Moses - clearly expired now, right? The same Jesus who told Namaan to baptize himself in water 7 times - right? Do you still practice that ceremony today? The same Jesus who later directed John to perform water baptism - 2000 years ago !!!!! Is that the Jesus you are referring to? Just want to make sure we're referring to the same person.