I will but in.briefly to state that the dead Sea scrolls also contained a full copy of Isaiah the matched the.majority text almost perfectly. 95% accurate.
Show scripture support for any translation. In the early 1600's when there were many English dissenters in Nederland, their Meetings began at about 8.00 am and lasted until they finished, usually after midday. No translations were allowed, only Greek and Hebrew. (C B Jewson, History of Bapists in Noffolk)
me and another poster are verifying the evidence I gave about the KJV and God's hand upon that translation: I will let you know what we come up with. Reminder this only works with the KJV. Yes I know verses were added later, but this study is to see if perhaps God preserved at least one moderately accurate Bible in the english language. The errors documented with the KJV have mainly been corrected in the NKJV. Other majority text translations are in the work but nothing of the caliber as the original KJV.
Once upon a long time ago one of my New Testament professors, Dr. Dale Moody, taught directly from the Greek NT translating and exegeting as he went along.
Shrewd Manager interesting that you should choose to use Heinrich Schliemanns possible discovery of Troy as a comparison for Constantin Von Tischendorfs discovery of the Codex Sinaiticus at St Catherines. But unlike Troy the word of God was already a accepted established reality from centuries prior. Though there is much to appreciate and learn from the legacy of Troy and it’s demise . And that is that you should never allow a Trojan Horse inside.
Unless the manuscrips behind the new translations were forged. Why else would God allow parallel bible translations one with roughly 20 to 30 more verses than the other?
The one that is typically used is not, in fact, the 1611. It's most frequently the 1769 Blaney revision.
I have a Hendrickson repro copy of the original AV 1611. It's an accurate dupe in every way, except for physical size & the font being Roman insteada Gothic. naturally it has the translators' preface, To The Reader, & all the other extratextual material found in the original, including the Apocrypha, as well as all the marginal notes. (I've examined an ORIGINAL AV 1611, so I know what's supposed to be in it.)
For the same reasons He caused the FOUR "Gospels", which are basically the accounts of the same events from 4 different authors, to become Scripture.
The comparison was made solely on the basis of untrustworthy names, miraculous finds and authentication issues. Timeo danaos et dona ferentes.
I believe it's still there, my original post I think it's #2 or #4 at the beginning of the thread, feel free to read it and reply. It has an image on it.
You think God wanted the Vatican's paws in the transmission of our sacred scriptures?
