Hi SG
Romans 11:28 teaches otherwise. Note this verse is about those outside the kingdom. Within the kingdom your 1000 verses saying "there is no Gentile nor Jew" are right.
Again, you don't address my points or exegete the passage. It is frustrating discussing with someone who just wants to justify a doctrine. There is no reasoning. I will repeat (because it has not been addressed):
No one could argue that all natural Israelis are “enemies” as “concerning the gospel.” After all, many have gladly embraced Christ over this past 2,000 years, because of this they are intimately loved of the Father. They are not enemies of God, but rather friends. This fits Paul’s ongoing comparison between those who are loved by God amongst his kinsmen, and those who are enemies. These two distinct groups operate under two antithetical banners: “enemies” and “the election.” The enemies are the general Christ-rejecting populace of natural Israel. The election are the believers.
as I've told you, this is solely your interpretation of Ephesians 2:29. However, Israel isn't mentioned there. So we disagree here. Gentile believers are integrated into the olive. Olive doesn't mean Israel in the New Covenant. It's not all the same. If God's imagery always meant the same... why would God use different metaphors then. One metaphor would be enough, I suppose.
I don't fight with the sacred text, as you suggest.
I am not careful to ignore text after text, as you suggest.
I don't choose "classic sweeping Dispy soundbites", as you suggest.
I don't teach apartheid. Every Jew can become a Christian. I don't segregate them.
The context of the passage in view is basically comparing the dark hopeless condition the Gentiles were in before the cross to the liberated enlightened position those who embraced Christ were after the cross. It is only upon conversion that our sins are washed away and the blood of Jesus becomes effectual. Through Calvary, the believing Gentile has been brought into a new dominion and therefore enjoys a new citizenship, with its consequential new benefits. The believing Gentile has been given favor with God and has now fully entered into:
· Christ
· The citizenship of Israel
· The covenants of promise
· Spiritual hope
· Union with God in this present world
This passage is speaking of five distinct, yet inextricably linked, states of alienation that the Gentile believer once suffered before they received the glorious Gospel of Christ. Paul the Apostle makes it clear that all five have been graciously opened up to the Gentiles since Christ’s first advent. The Gentile believer can now experience God in the same way the Jew could prior to the cross through their surrender to Christ and their trust in “the blood of Christ.” Please see: these 5 blessings are what elect OT Israel enjoyed before the cross. We see the incorporation of the once darkened Gentiles into true Israel. They now share with Israel and its Messiah, citizenship, covenants, promises, hope and God.”
You even go on to say:
that's replacement theology at its best (worst).
The Christian church didn't exist before Jesus's death + resurrection. I'm not interested in other churches.
Paul states in Romans 2:25-29: “For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law: but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made uncircumcision. Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision? And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit (
pneuma).”
Paul basically spiritualizes the terms circumcision and Jew to mean believer, and uncircumcision or Gentile to mean unbeliever. He teaches, if a man accepts Christ (regardless of his ethnicity) he is a spiritual Jew (or true circumcision); if a man rejects Christ (regardless of his ethnicity) he is a spiritual heathen (or true uncircumcision). Essentially: Gentiles become true Jews through faith in Jesus, and Jews forfeit their right to be considered true Jews if they reject Jesus.
Philippians 3:3, speaking of the Church generally, says, “For we are the circumcision, which worship God
in the Spirit [Gr.
pneuma], and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh
.”
The title “the circumcision” wasn’t just a natural description of what the Jew had undergone physically, it was an actual designation for the Jews. The phrase “the circumcision” meant and was equivalent to the term “the Jews.” They were synonymous. It is the same with spiritual usage of the term in the New Testament “the circumcision” when referring to all God’s people. It doesn’t just refer to the spiritual act of circumcising the heart, then term became a description of the New Testament Church.
The interesting thing about Philippians 3:3 is that the Holy Spirit takes a common natural term pertaining exclusively to the Jews and applies it to the redeemed Church of Jesus Christ – all those that have been born again of the Spirit of God (whether Jew or Gentile). Hence, a people that are by nature uncircumcised are here strangely described as “the circumcision.”
Bible says all Israel is. Romans 11:28.
Exactly, after defining who true Israel is in Rom 9:6-7 and after showing that we Gentiles have been integrated into the Israeli tree (faithful believing Israel).