Justice Dept. Report Debunks Pres. Trump’s Claim Of A Witch Hunt Against Him

Of course. On the one hand we have a comprehensive report based on a two year investigation.

On the other we have baseless claims made for personal political gain.

How can there be any doubt that the report is true?

Which justice dept report? The IG report specially on the FISA applications? It read exactly like the Comey memo on Hillary’s illegal server. It laid out people did things wrong, abused the process but were somehow not “guilty” of any crime. That is why Durham made the statement he did saying he did not agree with some of the more serious findings.

The Barbarian said:

It confirmed that there was no political purpose, that the investigation was entirely justified, and that Trump just made up the story that his campaign was being spied on.

Click to expand...

The opinion of Horowitz is there was no political motivation but he obtained that information from the testimony of persons accused of such partisanship. The Durham investigation has a wider net on this matter.

And if you read the report it refutes many of the lies of Adam Schiff over the past three years.

The Barbarian said:

No. There is at least one person who could be in big trouble. It just didn't involve political intent or Trump's false claims of being spied on.

Click to expand...

Words mean different things in the Beltway Humpty Dumpty world. The sitting government of the US and its intelligence agencies conducted surveillance using counter intelligence means on a political campaign. For those of us who have been involved with counter intelligence surveillance, that is a sophisticated way of saying “spying.”

Consider the outrage if the Bush administration conducted a counter intelligence campaign (spying) on the Obama campaign. Would we not want then candidate Obama to know if there were questionable personnel in his campaign? Was it not the right measure for the FBI to inform Senator Feinstein of the Chinese spy under her employment for 20 years?

But because it’s Trump it’s ok to conduct surveillance of the entire lot of the campaign. Using an uncorroborated dossier. And withholding exculpatory evidence with regards to Carter Paige.

The Barbarian said:

Durham was appointed for political purposes by Trump's AG, so that's to be expected. The AG is purposely removed from that kind of pressure, and so he was able to give an accurate report.

Click to expand...

No Durham who is a career civil servant serving outside the political Beltway of DC was given the charter to investigate the abuse of government, specifically the pre-FISA surveillance of the Trump campaign and the means used against a political campaign.

...anyone else getting a "BENGHAZI!!" deja vu feeling? You know, "We're going to keep investigating this exact same thing until we find out the exact same things we learned the last 7 times we investigated this exact same thing!"
tulc(is just curious)

No, Barr will just keep spouting lies from his bully pulpit as if they are the truth.