I wasn't talking about you, MartyMonster.
It's just one of those "fingernails on the chalkboard" things to me, like people saying Revelations instead of Revelation referring to the book of Revelation.
OK, cool.
Upvote
0
I wasn't talking about you, MartyMonster.
It's just one of those "fingernails on the chalkboard" things to me, like people saying Revelations instead of Revelation referring to the book of Revelation.
Would the free willies and the anti free willies please give us a brief statement on what they mean by the term free will?
Thanks.
For what it's worth - when I use the term free will I mean it in the general sense - the way most people in this world mean it.
I.e. - people can do as they wish within their own nature to do those things. No one is coercing or forcing them to make any certain decision. It is their decision to make and do as they are able to decide and carry through with that decision.
Pertaining to our discussion here is the idea that God does not negate or do violence to our God given freedoms and therefore we are responsible for our choices.
That is what I mean by free will and in that sense I believe in and teach free will.
Many think grace is conditional as with any law. That is, grace provides a new lesser law based on believing.
Free will trust in your willingness to believe thinking it triggers God to save you.
Are you saying that you receive the Holy Spirit before you hear the gospel?
Often at the same time. But believing Jews since Abel were all born again apart from the Christian gospel.
Would the free willies and the anti free willies please give us a brief statement on what they mean by the term free will?
"Controls" is not the right word, "determined", or already pre-determined long, long ago, before anything was ever made or given "life" is...Not having free will, to me means, God controls absolutely everything down to the smallest detail, and it is all predetermined.
Free will shares God's glory. No way around it.Some say that Scripture says this. Grace reveals Scripture to be saying otherwise. The rational deductions of any man are not the standard by which the Word of God is to be understood. Grace alone is the standard by which the Word of God is known.
God shapes us through his admonitions. We learn through what we experience.There wouldn't really be much point in exhorting anyone to believe, or remain faithful, if it's all done for them. In fact, why not just get it over with and stock heaven with the elect from the beginning if the will is not involved. God could've at least saved humanity from a tremendous amount of pain and suffering and evil that way.
We are both claiming the same thing, the other reads their ideas into the text. So this means nobody knows the truth. But I've shown "whoever chooses to believe" is foreign to the text. Where I let the text say what it says; "whoever believes". Which means belief is a trait of those whom God saves. This leads to two different gospels. Possibly two different Christ's if denial of grace persists.The free will person see the passage as it is. The Calvinist reads something into the passage that is not there. The Calvinist only sees it differently because of the presupposition he brings to the text, that being that God chooses who gets saved. However, that is an unwarranted presupposition and is without Scriptural support
Also, that passage from Romans 11 is out of context. When Paul is speaking of Law and grace, he is speaking of the Mosaic Law. Free will people today are not under the Law and they cannot re-institute the Law. The Law/grace argument was an issue in Paul's day, not ours.
Grace is not grace if your will determines if you are saved or not.Sorry, I disagree with that. Grace is not opposite of the law and free will can exist with the grace. I think grace means mercy and it means, sins have been forgiven. Forgiveness doesn’t mean law is not correct, it means, if person would deserve judgment, God is merciful and removes the judgment. If the law would not be valid, there would be no need for grace.
Person is under the law, if he obeys it to gain eternal life. If person obeys the law because he loves God and wants to do what is right, he is not under the law. By obeying the law, it is not possible to earn eternal life. But if one is righteous, he wants to do what is right, freely, not because he must. And those people who are righteous, will get eternal life.
These will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
Mat. 25:46
For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
Romans 6:23
For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. His commandments are not grievous.
1 John 5:3
People are free to receive or reject God.
Faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit one must have before they can believe and respond.No they were not.
The great mystery to Abel, Abraham, and everyone else was Jesus Christ. Everyone before the gospel of Jesus Christ was preached were dead in their sin. Abraham was declared righteous because he believed God, not because Abraham knew the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Romans 16:25
Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the mystery which has been kept secret for long ages past...
Abel and Abraham were never born again.
Abel and Abraham were not Christians.
Abel and Abraham did not receive the gifts of the Holy Spirit.
The church did not exist and the church is defined as those that believe in the resurrected Christ.
You still have the cart in front of the horse.
There s no set pattern in scripture. Faith is a fruit of the Holy Spirit. All believers in the OT were saved having never heard the NT gospel.Your replies do not make any sense, in fact, your statements represent a contradiction.
Your claiming that a person is saved before they hear the gospel.
Your also claiming that a person receives the Holy Spirit at the same time as the person hears the gospel.
These two statements of yours are in a direct contradiction of one another.
A person cannot be saved before logically, they believe in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
A person cannot receive the Holy Spirit (faith)
until they hear the gospel of Jesus Christ and believe. Which you stated.
So you have created a contradiction; because you say that a person is saved before they hear the gospel. While at the same time claiming a person has the Spirit (faith) only on hearing the gospel.
How so?I think John 3:16 by itself refutes most of them.
He makes from the same lump of wasted humanity, some appointed to mercy, the rest appointed to wrath.To me that's an ambiguous wording. Why? Because we ourselves are His work, what He made, and He said what He made was "very good" generally. So, technically, there is good stuff about us, and what is good about us is His work, His creation. (that doesn't mean we are 'good' on our own in the ultimate or true moral sense of course!; that's a whole different question entirely) What would not be ambiguous to me is to say simply something like 'all good things come from God'.
“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,” Galatians 5:22 (KJV 1900)Da
Davie, old boy, it don't mean nothing if you just tell me. If you believe that is the case, show me where the scripture says it.
How so?
This assumes people are not incapable of believing in the true Christ. Which scripture proves they are.Whoever believes will be saved. Indicating that all can be saved. That means the sacrifice of Christ for everyone, refuting limited atonement. That also means that unconditional election must be wrong, since the possibilty for anyone's salvation is there. Ok, refuting only the "U" and the "L".
No, it implies that anyone who chooses to believe can be sa--This assumes people are not incapable of believing in the true Christ. Which scripture proves they are.
Unless born again, people will only choose a false Christ.No, it implies that anyone who chooses to believe can be sa--
Oh right, you don't believe in free will.
Also, if people are incapable of believing in Christ...does that not defeat the point of 'irresistable grace'?
Unless born again, people will only choose a false Christ.
“But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” 1 Corinthians 2:14 (KJV 1900)
How about the blind and deaf in Jesus' day? They could not hear the gospel.@Dave L @martymonster
This argument is ridiculous.
Let me ask this; do we really have nothing better to do with our lives than argue over abstract concepts that really have no bearing on current situations? It is not going to change any of our lives if free will is or is not real. Should you not be evangelizing and praising God? I'm sure he'd be more pleased if you spent your time doing work for the kingdom instead of arguing over(pardon me)useless concepts!
We are already divided to the point where we are the laughing stock of both Satan and the nonbelievers.
For the record, though, I do believe in free will. If God is controlling every move we make, not only is God the author of all of our sins, but nothing that has happened up until this point has meant anything because it was all predetermined; all we would be to God is some pitiful soap opera made for a being who only desires mindless worship. To even insinuate such a thing, to me, is the worst kind of blasphemy imaginable.
Just because God knows what we are going to do does not mean he forced us to choose. He exists outside of our concept of time and space--so yes, obviously he's going to know what we will do with the will given to us. God does not control us; but he does punish us for when we do wrong. Do you really think God is so sadistic, he would purposefully force us to commit sins only to punish us? Free-will is the most necessary component, in my opinion, to us being human.
Joshua 24:15
15 But if serving the LORD seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.”
John 7:17
17 Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own.
Galatians 5:13
13 You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh ; rather, serve one another humbly in love.
These are just three verses that imply free will. That is unless you think "choose who you serve" is actually code word for "God already chose for you"; or that "Do not use your freedom to indulge the flesh" is a meaningless warning.
2 Peter 3:9
9 The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.
If the Lord does not want anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance--please explain to me then, Calvinists, why God would purposefully choose to not save us. No matter what excuse you give, it would create a contradiction with scripture. The only answer could be that it is we who choose to separate ourselves from the Lord.
The idea that from the beginning, God has been choosing for us to sin and purposefully 'picks and chooses' who is saved, is sickening.
Lastly, you cannot be saved before hearing the gospel. There is no other way to salvation other than Jesus Christ. If you believe that it's 'the holy spirit' that saves you, you're teetering on the same lines as universalists. You cannot know the Holy Spirit unless you read His word.