- Sep 6, 2016
- 15,961
- 10,817
- 73
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
He is a very gentle man of God.
M-Bob
Upvote
0
John Piper explains the subject rather well.
He is a very gentle man of God.
M-Bob
No the verse in it's context wouldn't be. But you didn't quote it in it's context. You just put it out there as an accusation. How did you think it would be understood?A verse is an accusation? You said that God's will cannot be resisted. This verse says otherwise.
Since you seem to only want to fight I am done with you. My efforts to get you to actually make an argument continues to fall on deaf ears. You are wasting my time.I didn't bring it up. However, as I said, a question is not a fallacy. It's a request for information, not an argument.
It's not poising the well, it's a question. A fallacy is an error in reasoning.No a question is not a fallacy unless it is intended to poison the well. Then it is fallacious.
I am working on the answers to your questions. You are correct that I had read the post and obviously didn't answer it. I an not sure why, other than I was busy and forgot it. Sorry. I will try to post my answers tomorrow.Are you telling me truthfully you did not read the post where I asked you to answer all the questions, and that I even put them in bold so there is no confusion? If you did see it as I suspect, and because this happens so often, do you think it's fair I find it for you?
Anyway, it's this post Struggles with Calvinism
Since you seem to only want to fight I am done with you. My efforts to get you to actually make an argument continues to fall on deaf ears. You are wasting my time.
An error in logical argument is a fallacy as well. Red herrings and poisoning the well are both fallacies in logical argument. Look them up. Now I will not answer any more of your nonsense. Bye.It's not poising the well, it's a question. A fallacy is an error in reasoning.
He starts by saying he has mysteries in his theology and there are things he can't give a rational account of. Why would I learn theology from someone who says this? The mysteries he speaks of likely the contradictions in his theology.
No the verse in it's context wouldn't be. But you didn't quote it in it's context. You just put it out there as an accusation. How did you think it would be understood?
This needs answering so I will this one more time.Seriously that made me laugh. I've given you plenty of arguments. You've danced and dodged. I'm still waiting for you to put the Romans 11 verse in context.
An error in logical argument is a fallacy as well. Red herrings and poisoning the well are both fallacies in logical argument. Look them up. Now I will not answer any more of your nonsense. Bye.
I didn't misunderstand. It was obvious the reason he quoted the verse out of it's context. Resisting the Spirit is what all men do by default. Rom. 1 makes it clear that all men have a knowledge of God in them but they hate Him so they change the glory of God into the likeness of man. They resist the truth of the Scriptures that were inspired by the Spirit and will not believe that they might have life.How can you misunderstand " resist the Holy Spirit?" It's not as if it's an isolated concept in scripture. Much of the book is about God's people resisting him, starting in Eden.
Reformed Theology = Deformed Theology
I've listened to R.C. He had the same problems.
RC Sproul explaining reformed theology.
M-Bob
I didn't misunderstand. It was obvious the reason he quoted the verse out of it's context. Resisting the Spirit is what all men do by default. Rom. 1 makes it clear that all men have a knowledge of God in them but they hate Him so they change the glory of God into the likeness of man. They resist the truth of the Scriptures that were inspired by the Spirit and will not believe that they might have life.